EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Zelaya Speaks
In a significant development in hemispheric relations, the Obama
admininstration yesterday condemned the June 28 Honduras
coup d'état more strongly than ever, announced the cutoff of
additional millions in economic aid and declared it would not accept
the legitimacy of elections under the auspices of the coup government.
In an interview shortly after his meeting with Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton, Honduran president Manuel Zelaya pronounced the US
decisions "a great step forward" for the Honduran popular resistance to
the coup and a "positive message in favor of democracy."
Following the State Department meeting, a US spokesperson announced the termination of "a broad range of assistance" to Honduras as a spur to encourage the return of President Zelaya and democratic processes to the country, which has been under repression for two months.
Zelaya told The Nation that the US would terminate multi-year Millennium Challenge grants in the range of $200 million, involving funds for roads, ports and infrastructure. Clinton chairs the Millennium Challenge corporation, which meets next week.
Asked if Clinton intended a message to the coup regime in Honduras, Zelaya responded forcefully that it was a "direct blow in the face of [Roberto] Micheletti" because "the golpistas' [coup organizers] plan was to negotiate with the candidates for an exit strategy so that they don't have to pay for their crimes, and get away with their crimes after an election. When you don't recognize the legitimacy of the elections, you are breaking up the plan of the golpistas."
With these decisions, the Obama administration has made clear that it embraces the Latin American consensus that the coup was an illegitimate transfer of power. "Mexico, Central and Latin America already had taken a position on the elections. We were only missing the United States. Now in light of these statements, the entire continent is condemning these elections under the de facto regime," Zelaya said.
When probed on the conditions when the sanctions might be lifted, Zelaya said only "when democracy is restored and President Zelaya returns." He said he is "prepared to return independently of any US plans" in order to "protect the population."
There will be "a permanent convulsion" and a "permanently ungovernable country" if he cannot return, and "that's what everybody wants to avoid." The social movements in Honduras "are not willing to go back to the way things were before," he noted.
What the June 28 coup was able to prevent, for now, was an advisory referendum planned for three days later on whether there should be a constituent assembly to rewrite the Honduras constitution, promoting greater participatory democracy. But the same coup also provoked the rise of a new social movement with its own dedicated members, martyrs and new memories.
"The grassroots movement," Zelaya said, has only one purpose, the transformation of Honduras, including deep structural changes. "This movement is now very strong. It can never be destroyed," he said. Zelaya believes that the reforms of his administration, including an increased minimum wage, subsidies to small farmers, cuts in bank interest rates and reductions in poverty levels "are the causes which irritated the ruling elite of Honduras."
Zelaya said he hopes that Clinton understands that "the same opponents of Obama in the US are mine in Honduras. The transnational trade, oil and banking systems. Those who do not want health insurance here are the same as those who do not want to pay a living wage in Honduras."
For example, he pointed out, "during Bush there was no coup. The coup in Honduras during the first six months of the Obama presidency was a litmus test. The right-wing groups in America who are supporting the coup are betting that Obama will not solve the problem. I trust that that he will."
Warming to the point, Zelaya went on to argue that the coup plotters in Honduras "have copied some reactionary sectors in Washington," who publicly say that Obama "has no power, that he is weak, weaker than Jimmy Carter, that we should not pay any attention to the Obama administration, and they refer to him as the black boy who doesn't know where Tegucigalpa is."
But the right-wing groups from Latin America to the Beltway have employed a Democrat and ardent Clinton supporter, Lanny Davis, to lobby for their interests in the capital, or what Zelaya calls "the empire of capital." Democratic consultants also are sprinkled in the coup delegations to the Costa Rican talks.
Perhaps no lobbyist is closer to the Clintons than Lanny Davis. When his name was raised critically by Zelaya during the meeting, the secretary of state did not acknowledge that Davis was her longtime family ally but instead took notes on Zelaya's claim of Davis's false charges and promised to investigate them. "She didn't tell me what she would investigate," he added, with a good-natured chuckle.
For Clinton's State Department, the tone of the meeting marked a shift from frosty previous statements on the coup. After Obama's initial observation that an undemocratic coup had taken place, State Department spokesman Philip Crowley said that a coup had not taken place, in legal terms, and ridiculed Zelaya for being allied with Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez. "If that is the lesson that President Zelaya has learned from this episode," he remarked amidst laughter in a July State Department briefing, "that would be a good lesson." On August 4, a State Department letter to Senator Richard Lugar said Zelaya's "insistence on taking provocative actions...led to a confrontation that unleashed the events that led to his removal." The term coup d'état was not used in the letter.
Asked yesterday by The Nation whether the State Department certified what happened as a coup d'état or was calling it a coup, Zelaya responded, "I do not know the details of US law, but in the communiqué issued today the United States on behalf of the State Department said that in relation to the coup in Honduras various parts of the Honduran government are involved: the legislative, judicial and military. The State Department directly implicates the Congress, the army and the Court of Honduras in the coup."
Whatever Lanny Davis's spin may be, yesterday's developments represent a sharp rejection by the Obama administration of going it alone in Latin America.
The State Department's Crowley was not present at the meeting yesterday, which included longtime Latin American diplomat Tom Shannon, National Security Council representative Dan Restrepo, US ambassador to Honduras Hugo Llorens, and a different public relations spokesman, Ian Kelly.
The present tension may be winding down, but it is not over. Micheletti, abandoned by the Americans in his quest to legitimize the coup, is under enormous pressure to accept the recommendation of Costa Rican President Oscar Arias that he step down, which would be a huge victory for Latin America. On the other hand, any return to Honduras by Zelaya could be volatile, with the right-wing wanting his arrest or even his death. He cannot run for re-election under the present constitution. There is no visible candidate to replace him, and the constituent assembly proposal is off the agenda for now (or "por ahora", as a young Hugo Chávez once said upon release from prison).
The future may lie with the social movements that have risen against the military coup, with Zelaya serving as a transitional hero to the mobilized and awakened people on the streets of Honduras who are trying to take an unpredictable future into their own hands.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


17 Comments so far
Show AllThere seems to be some confusion about how much money is involved. The State Department press release issued yesterday says, "In addition to the $18 million that has been terminated by Clinton, another $11 million in funding from the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation is subject to being terminated, Crowley said, when the MCC board meets next week."
That $11 million, even added to the $18 million, is but a small part of the $215 million in total MCC money already allocated to Honduras. And that's not to mention the $150 million that the U.S.-controlled International Monetary Fund just days ago announced it was sending to Honduras.
According to accounts in the Honduran press, the de facto government finance minister says the government will lose a total of $28 million, which had been intended for a highway construction project. That's not even close to being a fatal blow to the coup government.
I think we're being taken in by the State Department. What's new?
Supposedly 30 million was cancelled.
70 million in "humanitarian aid" (read severance pay for Michelletti when he signs Plan Arias) is still in place.
Mark Weisbrot's observation (CD article today) on IMF funding for Honduras going forward and a CEPR report to the same effect on yesterday's Progressive Newswire should be read along with Hayden's piece.
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/09/03-17
This "full interview" promised by Nation is actually a number of one liner quotes from Zelaya strung together in a narrative in which Hayden displays a great many "he said/she said" interpretations of exactly what was said and promised between State and Zelaya with the latter perhaps doing the understandable Neville Chamberlain thing of clutching a piece of paper after meeting Hitler and saying "this is peace in our time" immediately before Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia. It seems from Hayden's narrative that some of the Zelaya detractors at State were excluded from this meeting, including the fact that State had a new PR man present, Ian Kelly (and if you saw Kelly's pitiful press conference in which he tried to defend State's contracting the grossly misbehaving Wackenhut affiliate which carried out the "initiation games" at the Kabul embassy, you can only imagine how the bumbling Mr. Kelly would handle still another press conference on the Honoduras coup issue.) Well, Mr. Hayden filed his story to make H. Clinton and B. Obama look a shade better about their shameful dithering on the whole matter, and this is what it is his job to do at the Obama-defending Nation. Helluva job, Tom!
So what exactly is the plan? Zelaya returning until his term ends in November? Zelaya getting to serve 6 mo in office whenever he returns?
guess who: Zelaya and Clinton don't have a plan, they have an agreement. You must have learned from the health care reform debacle that having a "plan" would actually subvert the chance to get an agreement. Like I said, Chamberlain had an "agreement" with Hitler, but of course there was no plan on which they agreed. You'll have to wait and see with the rest of us just when and how and if Zelaya returns. When it happens, we'll have the plan.
A good move by the Obama administration; they are rare these days...
Obama and Hillary finally did the right thing. A Bush-Cheney administration would have supported the coup yet brag about democracy.
I wouldn't hand out kudos just yet.... we need to see the Zelaya back in office and free to run the gov until the election. Honduras also needs a new constitution to rein in the basically 10 families that own and control about 95% of Honduras. Wealth that is not rightfully or lawfully theirs.
Paying 'lip service 'to something, won't make it true. It appears the situation is being finessed where Obama and Clinton can appease criticism, all the while buying time to continue a pro-active, explicitly fascist policy in Honduras. That is fundamentally the classic programmatic modus operandi of all American foreign policy in Latin America.That is the historical tradition and has the weight of inertial ponderousness; it simply cannot change with verbal threats. Putting strictures on aid–even the elimination of all aid entirely– is an operation in pure cynicism if the 'aid' is not explicitly military or effecting right wing millitias or the police. Clearly it is entirely bogus in nature, amounting to little more than an obfuscatory deceit, while maintaining the staus quo. Allowing for so called democratic "elections" is another travesty, much like the elections in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Pittances of 'adjustments' here or there, if they even can be verified and not continued surreptitiously, through privatized, corporate channels of which Hillary Clinton is all too familiar with, do essentially nothing. Not until the de-stabilizing anachronism of the American military base is removed in its entirety, can America's true motives be viewed as anything but abjectly cynical. Despite the removal of $30, even $50 million in aid, America will continue to use Honduras as a base of pro-fascist staging grounds in the region. Why anyone would continue to see this differently is another lesson in liberal's acting like hopelessly naïve Pollyanna's. When the U.S. Marines land to depose fascism, perhaps only at that time will cynicism be allayed.– (Jill Bains)
Looks like theatre to me considering US moves in Colombia and the direction of Imperial policy generally. However, Honduras is really small potatoes in the overall Imperial Plan, so it might be allowed to go free in order to deflect charges of Imperialism and Obama=Bush.
Some of Tom Hayden's numbers regarding aid cutoffs to Honduras' golpistas need severe qualification. "Zelaya told The Nation that the US would terminate multi-year Millennium Challenge grants in the range of $200 million, involving funds for roads, ports and infrastructure." Sorry, Tom, but despite all the audacious hope for justice in Central America, the facts are otherwise: "State Department spokesman Fred Lash told CEPR that total U.S. assistance to Honduras was $100 million and today's decision affected $30 million: this included $8.96 million from the State Department, $9.4 million from USAID, and $11 million from the Millenium Challenge Corporation (MCC) (which will not be officially cancelled until its Board meets next week)." - Eva Gollinger, Post Cards from the Revolution, Sept. 4, 2009. So the inconvenient truth is that the reduction in aid from the Millennium Challenge corporation chaired by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, will only be $11 million, not the $200 million stated (perhaps in "hope") by Zelaya.
More significantly, these aid reductions must be viewed in the perspective of a huge aid infusion which Tom failed to mention. Again, a quote from Eva Gollinger, one of the most respected Latin American observers of the coup, "Weisbrot also noted that the International Monetary Fund decided just a few days ago to give Honduras more than $160 million. Since the United States has a veto over IMF decisions, this will be seen by the coup regime as a decision of the U.S. government. The IMF money, which is a huge amount of money for Honduras, will more than compensate for any cuts in U.S. official aid."
Once again, the Obama administration polishes its moral credentials while making payoffs to the class they represent, in this case, the coup leaders who will quickly reverse those nasty rises in the minimum wage for one of the poorest countries in this hemisphere. But all will be forgiven them once they deliver on the profit-potential of the Honduran working poor.
Zelaya's acting naive about 0's relationship with the banqueros and petroleros -
Understandably.
Watch what 0 does under the table, though. I'd look for a big IMF or WB loan to cover the loss of aid.
It would be slick for US elites: The $$ becomes a loan made under duress. Whatever government survives in Honduras then supposedly owes the IMF, and under circumstances that the US press can spin creatively.
Further US pressure on Honduras becomes defensible at home in all cases: either they're lousy golpistas, or the ingrate Zelaya isn't responding after we had his back and so forth.
Someone with connections should look into where the aid to Honduras that has been cut was going, and where the loan-aid that will be delivered will go.
Here's betting that if those protesting the coup were benifitting in any way from US aid, they will not from the IMF loan.
And of course if that comes out, press will spin that as an independent IMF move.
We may not have gotten to disturbingly clear, but it's at least clearly disturbing.
Hayden calls Zelaya's removal a coup but does not describe the way in which it took place or Zelaya's actions that precipitated his removal. The Honduran supreme court and the legislature approved of his removal, including a number of judges from his own party, because, evidently, he tried to hold an illegal and unconstitutional referendum to allow himself another term in office. This seems no more a coup than was the imminent removal (made moot by his resignation) of Richard Nixon in 1974. Just because Zelaya is a leftist does not make him the good guy in this controversy.
Wait a minute. If you think it is, for any reason, acceptable to remove a democratic leader via military force, I worry about you.
Secondly, Zelaya did not seek to extend his term, but rather amend a Constitution that would favor democracy and the interests of the masses over the elite.
"Just because Zelaya is a leftist does not make him the good guy in this controversy". At risk of simplifying, I think the fact that he is a leftist, the fact that he is for the people and against the elites does make him the good guy. Zelaya encountered this resistance from the elite who would lose political power if Zelaya got the reforms he wanted. This is all about class interest and it frightens me that self-avowed leftists are worried about fidelity to the Honduran constitution and the interests it protects.
Article 239 of the Honduran Constitution reads: "No citizen that has already served as head of the Executive Branch can be President or Vice-President. Whoever violates this law or proposes its reform, as well as those that support such violation directly or indirectly, will immediately cease in their functions and will be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years."
It may not specify that the courts or the legislature, or the army, have the power to remove the president who violates this provision, but if anyone does, they do, and if no one does, then why have a constitution?
Zelaya wanted to amend the constitution to favor Zelaya. It is the way with 3rd world strongmen that they see themselves to be indispensable. That's how such countries end up with presidents for life. Is there no other leader in Honduras who could lead the leftist cause? With leftists like Zelaya, who needs right wing oppressors?