Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Aquino’s Ripple Effect
Today the formal mourning ends for Corazon Aquino, the former president of the Philippines who died at the beginning of this month, but her significance as a figure of hope will live on. Robert Kennedy once spoke of each act of courage as a ripple sent forth to cross with other ripples, ultimately "to build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance." That defines the exact legacy of this woman whom The New York Times described as "a soft-spoken homemaker who became a global icon of democracy."
When hundreds of thousands of people filled the streets at Aquino's funeral last week, it was impossible not to think of the millions who rallied to her during the "People Power Revolution'' of 1986. The tyrant Ferdinand Marcos had ruled the Philippines under martial law since 1972, and when he tried to steal the election Aquino had clearly won, the people poured into Manila's largest square, sporting yellow. Aquino's husband had been murdered by Marcos supporters, but she bravely faced down the dictator - even rejecting a US attempt to prop up Marcos with a "power-sharing'' deal. The massive resistance went on for three days, with Aquino insisting on its nonviolence. When Marcos sent tanks into the square, unarmed civilians stood before them without moving. Soldiers refused to fire on the protesters. Finally, Marcos fled. The Philippines was transformed - including the end of its century-old role as an American military outpost.
But the ripples had only begun to move. Those three days of "people power'' in February of 1986 were a key part of the transforming current that swept the world's imagination. Against the iron assumptions of a realpolitik consensus, resolute nonviolence had trumped armed uprising as a source of social change. A moral revolution had begun.
In South Africa, where Kennedy had spoken 20 years before of the ripples of hope, Nelson Mandela had just refused the Apartheid government's offer to release him from prison on the condition that his movement cease resistance. Mandela had been a leader of armed struggle, but his refusal to be released turned his imprisonment itself into a source of people power, and ushered in the nonviolent denouement of the campaign to transform South Africa. By the time of Mandela's unconditional release in 1990, the once-unthinkable reconciliation was underway.
Only a few months before Aquino's triumph, the governments of Ireland and England had come to the Anglo-Irish Agreement - Dublin affirming rights of the Protestants in Northern Ireland, London affirming Dublin's role. The stage was set for the Irish people themselves to transform the ancient conflict, and, drawing energy from the worldwide current of peace, they did. Soon the nonviolent leader John Hume and Sinn Fein's Gerry Adams began the dialogue that eventually included Protestants David Trimble and Ian Paisley, culminating in the Good Friday Agreement.
Not long after Aquino's election, the so-called Esquipulas Peace Process was launched in Central America by Costa Rica's Oscar Arias, with the region's five presidents agreeing a year later to peaceful resolution of conflicts and new structures of economic cooperation. Arias's role as mediator in the current Honduran crisis shows that he still defines democratic hope.
In the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev had been elected head of the Communist Party in 1985. What he felt flowing toward Moscow from the streets of the Philippines was the current of the grassroots democracy movement that would soon break the surface in the Soviet realm itself. First, the satellite nations ("Solidarity'' in Poland, the "Peaceful Revolution'' in East Germany, the "Candle Holders'' in Czechoslovakia), and then the Soviet republics themselves, even including Russia (the Russian White House coup attempt in 1991), would be disarmed by throngs of nonviolent protesters in streets and squares.
Each of these developments occurred independently of events in the Philippines, and not all ripples of hope swept down injustice: when a million people went to Tiananmen Square in 1989, the soldiers obeyed orders to fire. But the decade following the People Power Revolution in the Philippines showed that nonviolent social change could no longer be dismissed as wishful thinking. A modest woman who overcame her fear to speak truth and uphold justice started something that is not finished.


10 Comments so far
Show AllWhere's an Aquino for the US, eh?
One outcome from the People Power in the Philippines was Tiannamen Square -- the usual outcome for People Power-type actions. The fact that the Philippine soldiers didn't back Dictator Marcos may have given hope to oppressed people everywhere, but it is not something one can count on.
An Aquino for the U.S. would lead to mass slaughter and imprisonment (or "re-education").
I keep hitting the Post Comment button twice!
Aquino is said to have fended of a whole bunch of coup de etat attempts. The reason she was able to do this was she had the support of Ramos, who became her successor, and was able to head off the coup attempts because he was thoroughly a part of the military system that had been Marcos's support staff.
Oddly enough, Ramos was a pretty good president during his term. He characterized himself as a "hands on, problem solving president" and, though he did his duty in keeping the wealthy elites in tact, he did try to do a good job.
hello. i am frankly surprised that *A* writer in america still recalls enough of the events in my home country decades ago - and then traces the events of other countries , at least partly giving some recognition to the way the "pinoys" (that's what we call ourselves, often humorously or self-depreciatingly) may have given a way of reminding countries that this IS possible:
a peaceful protest of national proportions to literally remove a tyrant.
I was no longer in the philippines when it happened but all the family was of course, like others, involved in the revolt. but at least from what I know as a filipino , it is closer to the truth that Ramos - the former general of marcos - "switched" and it was partly his switch that gave added power to the revolt by removing himself from the Military under marcos. he was always quite highly respected even as a general - and it was commonly believed that he was "uncorruptible" . when he was president for one term - he maintained his residence in his old house - just a very modest one - unlike many generals or army folks who, under marcos had enriched themselves , building mansions.
as i recall - as a General in the ARmy - he was highly enough respected that he was not really among the "inner circles" of marcos when marcos instigated or "caused" martial law to be applied. it was more another General - ENRILE - who was a very political person - with whom marcos connived to create the conditions (during campaigns - a "minor" bombing of a marcos campaign to justify martial law - like the 9/11 would justify bush's militarism) -
but they could not really oust Ramos completely.
he might have just bided his time and when the time came that the people revolted - that's when he put his lot in with the people...probably KNOWING that the ARMY had greater respect for HIM than Marcos or Enrile (that much - everyone in the philippines is in agreement about) .
that was another reason he won his election. BUT when HE tried to "suggest" changing the constitution again to allow him another term after saying he would only be for one term. it was quite instantly rejected popularly. and he respected this plebiscite that they offered to ask the people's opinion. so he had his one term.
he retired from the presidency pretty much holding his respectability in the eyes of the people intact.
this is at least what I recall about the events of those years.
Thank you for your perspective...
I would argue another point as to the motivations for Marcos choosing to cut and run...
The CIA/Banksters who put Marcos into power no longer had any use for him...
They had already dug up all the Japanese gold and jewels they had looted from mainland china prior to WWII...
And it was no longer worth it to brutally oppress an archipelago like the phillipines just for labor...
They got what they came for... Over a thousand tons of gold... Which the CIA banksters then used to destabilize the Ruble thru worthless securities on one front... And fund a proxy war in Afghanistan on another... To bring down the russian economy...
Gorbechov was an anomaly... Easily remidied by a bloodless coup... And the election of the corporatist Yeltsin...
Who proceeded to sell off the Russian industrial infrastructure to private interests for pennies on the dollar...
Like the drilling rights to the Caspian sea basin... Which is worth more than the Nazi black eagle trust and Japanese gold combined...
A worthwhile investment for the fascists if there ever was one...
"Robert Kennedy once spoke of each act of courage as a ripple sent forth to cross with other ripples, ultimately "to build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."
The last US President that tried that is pushing up daisies, like his brother Robert and MLK.
People in the United States of America need articles like this one to help us see what we need to do for change. We are sinking and no amount of military weaponry and avarice will raise this ship.
To James Carroll. Being a long time fan of yours, I would love to see you do an article on CD critiquing the Chris Hedges/Ralph Nader article above.
Well, I'd forgotten a lot of this, although I know I was all for Corazon at the time.
it's inspiring to remember what The People can do when they get together in a really big mass movement- and that there can be such a person like Corazon Aquino.
why can't we ever get leaders like her?
It was my recollection that the self sacrifice of Benigno that triggered the revolt, and Corazon rode his coattails. That is not intended as a criticism of Corazon, but a clarification. I brought this up with a Filipino who pays attention to stuff like this, and he remembered it the same way.
I got the same impression about Ramos as teddy et al.
However, Corazon, like Arroya, is from a wealthy family and did more to take care of the wealthy (especially including her family and friends) rather than the vast numbers of poor who really needed help.