EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- Naomi Klein: 'Anti-Shock Doctrines' Show the Way to Resist
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Town Hall Mob
There’s a famous Norman Rockwell painting titled “Freedom of Speech,” depicting an idealized American town meeting. The painting, part of a series illustrating F.D.R.’s “Four Freedoms,” shows an ordinary citizen expressing an unpopular opinion. His neighbors obviously don’t like what he’s saying, but they’re letting him speak his mind.
That’s a far cry from what has been happening at recent town halls, where angry protesters — some of them, with no apparent sense of irony, shouting “This is America!” — have been drowning out, and in some cases threatening, members of Congress trying to talk about health reform.
Some commentators have tried to play down the mob aspect of these scenes, likening the campaign against health reform to the campaign against Social Security privatization back in 2005. But there’s no comparison. I’ve gone through many news reports from 2005, and while anti-privatization activists were sometimes raucous and rude, I can’t find any examples of congressmen shouted down, congressmen hanged in effigy, congressmen surrounded and followed by taunting crowds.
And I can’t find any counterpart to the death threats at least one congressman has received.
So this is something new and ugly. What’s behind it?
Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, has compared the scenes at health care town halls to the “Brooks Brothers riot” in 2000 — the demonstration that disrupted the vote count in Miami and arguably helped send George W. Bush to the White House. Portrayed at the time as local protesters, many of the rioters were actually G.O.P. staffers flown in from Washington.
But Mr. Gibbs is probably only half right. Yes, well-heeled interest groups are helping to organize the town hall mobs. Key organizers include two Astroturf (fake grass-roots) organizations: FreedomWorks, run by the former House majority leader Dick Armey, and a new organization called Conservatives for Patients’ Rights.
The latter group, by the way, is run by Rick Scott, the former head of Columbia/HCA, a for-profit hospital chain. Mr. Scott was forced out of that job amid a fraud investigation; the company eventually pleaded guilty to charges of overbilling state and federal health plans, paying $1.7 billion — yes, that’s “billion” — in fines. You can’t make this stuff up.
But while the organizers are as crass as they come, I haven’t seen any evidence that the people disrupting those town halls are Florida-style rent-a-mobs. For the most part, the protesters appear to be genuinely angry. The question is, what are they angry about?
There was a telling incident at a town hall held by Representative Gene Green, D-Tex. An activist turned to his fellow attendees and asked if they “oppose any form of socialized or government-run health care.” Nearly all did. Then Representative Green asked how many of those present were on Medicare. Almost half raised their hands.
Now, people who don’t know that Medicare is a government program probably aren’t reacting to what President Obama is actually proposing. They may believe some of the disinformation opponents of health care reform are spreading, like the claim that the Obama plan will lead to euthanasia for the elderly. (That particular claim is coming straight from House Republican leaders.) But they’re probably reacting less to what Mr. Obama is doing, or even to what they’ve heard about what he’s doing, than to who he is.
That is, the driving force behind the town hall mobs is probably the same cultural and racial anxiety that’s behind the “birther” movement, which denies Mr. Obama’s citizenship. Senator Dick Durbin has suggested that the birthers and the health care protesters are one and the same; we don’t know how many of the protesters are birthers, but it wouldn’t be surprising if it’s a substantial fraction.
And cynical political operators are exploiting that anxiety to further the economic interests of their backers.
Does this sound familiar? It should: it’s a strategy that has played a central role in American politics ever since Richard Nixon realized that he could advance Republican fortunes by appealing to the racial fears of working-class whites.
Many people hoped that last year’s election would mark the end of the “angry white voter” era in America. Indeed, voters who can be swayed by appeals to cultural and racial fear are a declining share of the electorate.
But right now Mr. Obama’s backers seem to lack all conviction, perhaps because the prosaic reality of his administration isn’t living up to their dreams of transformation. Meanwhile, the angry right is filled with a passionate intensity.
And if Mr. Obama can’t recapture some of the passion of 2008, can’t inspire his supporters to stand up and be heard, health care reform may well fail.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



146 Comments so far
Show AllThey should have been protesting in alarm eight years ago or thirty years ago when the current mess was instigated.
Disupting an AARP information meeting with rants about USA not needing big socialism blah blah blah is too rich a vein of irony.
The military-security-industrial-finance complex loves big socialism when it's for them.
But the stupid slugs of the mass class always get the message too late.
The New York Times did not see fit to use the following comment on Krugman's article, which I stayed up late writing and posted rapidly, in plenty of time to be posted:
"Obama’s health care bill is more than a thousand pages long. People do not understand it, and therefore it is easy to tell lies about it. People in America are frightened today and have good reason to be. They are losing their jobs and their houses. They have deliberately been kept ignorant about health care: where the money comes from, where it goes, and any analysis of real alternatives.
The only reason for a more than thousand page health care bill is to allow for more smoke and mirrors, to conceal the money trail. It isn’t true that Obama’s plan will force sick old people to be euthanized or any of the other outrageous fabrications that have people marching on Congressional offices with pitchforks. But these things are true:
Obama’s plan would not kick in until 2013. It would force people to buy private insurance or be punished. It would not cut health care costs, but only slow the speed of health care increases. Its price tag would be kept at a staggering trillion dollars only by cutting back on vital services. It would not be universal. It would not give Americans the health care they need and they already more than pay for.
Obama knows, and admitted candidly at a press conference last week, that the only way to insure everyone is with a Single Payer system. What he doesn’t know but must learn, if he is to regain the momentum that inspired the army of helpers that brought him into office, is that there is absolutely no way of placating those who profit from our present dysfunctional system. How could there be? The whole industry has been erected over the past fifty years of fake reform upon the a criminal premise: “Your money or your life.”
Obama had the sword of the people in his hands when he came into office but is rapidly losing it. Racism is part of it; racism has been a hidden reef in America for the past recent decades, but it is always present. But if Obama, when he was strongest, had enacted policies that aimed directly at keeping frightened homeowners in their homes instead of entrusting this job to the same 20th century whoopee boys who caused the crisis, he would have administered a powerful inoculation against racism to a whole bunch of people who could go one way or another, but who are falling now, out of fright, towards their worse selves-- towards racism. Give these same people a real, robust , fair and simple to understand (because it is without tricks), health care plan, and their better angels will prevail: they will defend Obama.
Obama is hurrying to cement a bad bill in place that will not begin to be enacted until his second term of office. Even were it to be passed and enacted, it would fail the tests of universality and economy. But, after 50 years of heel dragging and obfuscation, why the rush?
It’s shocking that, 50 years after Harry Truman first proposed a national health plan in this country, Congress has never formally requested or considered a full-scale analysis of the economics of Single Payer. Every American interested in health care reform, Obama included, needs to demand that Congress commission and consider a full scale Congressional Budget Office analysis of Single Payer. Economists who have studied it maintain that for a few years Single Payer would cost more than we presently spend, as people line up to get their longstanding unmet health care needs met. But expenditures would rapidly level off and then decrease dramatically. We not only can afford it, we can’t afford as a nation NOT to have it. When and if Obama grasps this and acts on it, he will get his groove, and his enthusiastic volunteer army, back.
Were Obama to spend the next year working with Single Payer advocates to come up with a decentralized Single Payer plan, and then take the bully pulpit to explain it, he would win over the American people, despite all the lies and the money of the industry, could go down in history as the greatest American President."
By the way, I have noticed that the NYT frequently closes the window of comments on health care articles very, very rapidly. It did so on this article.
You have said everything I want to say!
Me too.
Kudo's! Great comment.
Obama's decent into Racism was unfortunate, but he has repaired it as best he could.
Though I believe its too late for this President and Health Care for people.
By way of contrast the Canada Health Act is 14 pages long and it written, side by side, in both languages!
But right now Mr. Obama’s backers seem to lack all conviction, perhaps because the prosaic reality of his administration isn’t living up to their dreams of transformation. Meanwhile, the angry right is filled with a passionate intensity.
----------------------------
Mr. Obama's backers are big pharma and insurance. They don't suffer from lack of conviction at all Mr. Krugman. They are winning the fight and successfully transforming our healthcare system into a mandate to purchase their overpriced drugs and worthless policies.
Perhaps the angry right (of which Mr. Obama is a part of although I do not know if he's angry) is succeeding because they have ready access to all media whereas progressives have been shut out.
Obama lost me long before he was elected when he lied about his determination to oppose retroactive immunity for the telecoms for spying on the American people. Since then he continues to lie about opposing torture, about governing transparently, about keeping people locked up forever without trial etc. He misrepresented himself to "progressive" people like me whose support he needed to win the Democratic primary. Once that was achieved we became instantly expendable to him.
The plutocrats are delighted. They are now represented by someone who does not look like them, who talks the talk of morality as well as any politician I've ever heard and yet is as certain to protect and enhance their interests as George and Dick were.
So "the prosaic reality of his administration" is the same prosaic reality of almost every administration that preceded it: the rule of the rich by the rich for the rich.
Of course there are people who are "afraid of socialism". But, let's face it. This plan/these plans are a farce.
Also, people are disgusted, in general, with what this gov't has been doing, particularly the bank bailouts. This is an easy anti-gov't target. And the right will play it for all its worth. If there was any integrity in these plans they couldn't succeed.
Finally, anyone who thinks we could get a decent, cost-effective health care plan out of this gov't, I believe, is delusional and living in a fantasy world.
I do not want gov't controlling any aspects of my life, much less health care. The new Director of the CDC thinks gov't needs to be more aggressive about obesity. If anyone of you who wants national health care in this environment is fat, look out. You will no longer own your life. If you have never used illegal drugs, you will find out what it's like when behavior that harms no one but, possibly, yourself is criminalized.
"I do not want gov't controlling any aspects of my life, much less health care". I assume that you will decline your future medicare benefits.
Well put, winning ticket. I bet if the somewhat overweight (?) cassandra lives long enough to have Medicare, she will have a grand epiphany of thought and somehow manage to shoehorn this bit into her overarching philosophy.
cassandra and I had a discussion a while back. She supports single payer health care. What she doesn't trust are the current pols running things and I wouldn't blame her on that. If current pols can't run anything correct and keep remaining corporatist shills, then how can we trust them to keep single payer alive and well? Just look at how both parties in Congress are slowly but steadily sabotaging Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. The result? They're all in red ink when that could have been avoided.
Good luck waiting for those future trustworthy pols. I think we'll wait a LONG time. If that's the first step requirement for change, then forgetaboutit. Social Security is and has been an amazing success story. It's very well run and sometime, many years from now, some tweaking will be necessary. Big deal. Likewise Medicare has been a wonderful program. However, with medical costs severely on the rise, we have issues to work through. You sound so flip with your "could have been avoided" talk.
Excuse me but in case you haven't realized, bad pols do bad things. The worse they are, the worse the damage they'll do. You're not looking at the broad picture. Everything is being pulled out under our noses whether you believe it or not. I found good pols such as Ralph Nader who I proudly voted thrice for even if he didn't win. Good pols are there but most people keep falling for the corporate media trashy soundbites and phony polls and that needs to stop !
What the hell do you mean, "even if he didn't win?" He wasn't even in the picture. I know it's grand to pretend that idyllic leadership is just around the corner, but in the real world it's not going to happen. YOU'RE "not looking at the broad picture."
Greg, you have to pardon my niece. I think she's upset that people like you and I vote on who can win and I think we're both guilty of it and paying the price. Anything can happen in the real world. Third parties can win even if they do face uphill battles and very slim odds of winning. I am reconsidering holding out optimism for Obama though I would never vote for a bloody Republican unlike her parents. I did not vote for Nader but if he was forced off the ballots, off the presidential debates, and given no chance to run his campaigning, then he was unfairly forced out of the picture. My niece showed me where Nader tried to get into the debates but the rules were stacked against him. To force a presidential candidate out of a debate just because he or she doesn't poll well is totally anti-democratic and that policy must be dropped.
I don't feel guilty. I'm disappointed in Obama, but I knew and still know he was the best choice that had any hope of winning. I'll give you the "anything can happen" because my state once elected Jesse Ventura as governor, but a national election is a different ball game. We have to have some kind of limit on presidential candidates in a debate. If there are 10 or 20 or 1,000, then the whole idea of a 'debate' kind of disintegrates.
"We have to have some kind of limit on presidential candidates in a debate. If there are 10 or 20 or 1,000, then the whole idea of a 'debate' kind of disintegrates."
That's a twisted extreme example. Limiting debates to just D vs R is what gave us this mess.
I'm very sorry if I offend you, but anyone who believes in or supports a two party system has their head of their ass. Get set to be disappointed always.
JenniferBedingfield: You are absolutlely correct. I do not believe these creatures can be trusted and the article about the White House caving to Big Pharma reinforces that belief. I also believe they will use a gov't plan of any kind to obliterate nutritional medicine--the very things that have kept me out of the hands of the medical monopoly for over 30 years. FDA, which, of course, is run by Big Pharma and Monsanto will soon have control of our entire food supply (unless the "food safety" bill is stopped in the Senate) and have already demonstrated their will and ability to remove low cost, very effective supplements from the market. Of course, I don't have a crystal ball so I hope I'm wrong, but past and present behavior is a pretty good indicator and the prognosis is not good.
The consequence of this will be the ultimate rationing because the costs will never come down no matter how administratively efficient we become. And Big Pharma will have a lot of control over how that rationing is done. Bleak? Maybe. Realistic? Probably.
Just to make sure, what's the HR number to that "food safety" bill? Is it 875? Sorry, I've forgotten after a while. On Monsanto, yeah it's tough trying to get people organized just to get the mayor to rein that corp in. If that's not enough, the UN is protecting it. I'm afraid we're stuck with a totally cornfed electorate so I'm anticipating the worst slow as it might be.
I have had no health insurance in over 10 years. I will be on Medicare within 5 years. I have been told I can't decline Medicare but I will take it and use it for the possible accident or ER needs. I can't get low cost insurance for that piece because insurance companies are run by greedy pigs.
It would be best to evaluate arguments on their merits, rather than what you stereotypically generalize about the author.
Please take a couple of deep breaths. Oxygen gives us life. You're getting a little paranoid about the government, corporations and food. Sure they're in it to make money, but they don't want to kill their customers. Of course with the health insurance companies they want to keep healthy, wealthy individuals living as long as they stay healthy. Their purpose is to make money. Why wouldn't you use Medicare for a possible non-ER/accident need? It sounds like you have a serious interest in some nutritional supplements. I used to use Vitamin C to eliminate infections. It worked great. Then one day I read that it was of no value. It never worked for me again. The placebo effect is a powerful force. Of course some nutritional supplements are of real value, but it's easy to over-emphasize their role in good health. Anyway, good luck to you.
I'm not paranoid and I'd put money on it. You do not know much about alternative healing. It is not about taking vitamin C to prevent colds, altho someone in Boston has told me that "everyone" she knows uses Emergen-C to stop a cold in its tracks. After looking at the label, I understood how (they use ascorbates rather than ascorbic acid). I don't know, because I haven't been sick in 5 years.
I don't tell you how to manage your health care, and again, you should not assume you know as much as anyone else about this. Have you heard of IV vitamin C treatments for cancer? I just know that for at least 25 years and probably longer, they have suppressed dozens of simple treatments and cures. And I haven't even ordered the TV book about it (Kevin Trudeau's ads). What is true is that you must TREAT CAUSES, NOT SYMPTOMS.
If you want to learn,start with "Why Stomach Acid is Good For You" by JV Wright, MD and L Lenard, PhD. Then start imagining how much money could be saved if physicians used the right test to evaluate their patients' gut pH.
Also, go to www.healthfreedomusa.org and read about Codex. There was an article on CD recently about Canada allowing GMO crops because it's not restricted under Codex.
re: not using Medicare--Each situation would be evaluated separately, and the monopoly is good for diagnostics, but, even with cancer, I'll take my chances with what I know, not what the cut, burn and poison contingent thinks. And I worked in hospitals for several years, including cancer units.
The new Director of the CDC?
How many divisions does he have?
Because he'll have to pry the bacon cheese steak from my cold, dead, pudgy, greasy hands.
· Yr Obd't Servant
How in the world is a government program (but not the one being devised) that assures one's doctor and hospital bills get paid, "controlling any aspect of my life"? I am tiring of this deliberate conflation. Under single payer you can choose any doctor and hospital you like, and no longer worry about paying for it. Better yet, the doctor no longer has to worry, and deal with endless insurance paperwork, in order to get paid, so they can concentrate on practicing medicine. Right now, big insurance companies are controlling your life, big time, whether you realize it or not. Doctors are largely having to make their differential diagnosis based not on science but on insurance payment considerations.
And at any rate, is is not about just "me" it is about a collective solution to a problem that is killing 22,000 people every year.
And the obesity remark is just sheer paranoia. Obesity is not harmless to others, at a minimum, it costs us all in the form of higher insurance premiums.
The same argument applies to those who want he "freedom" to not wear a motorcycle helmet, but that's a different topic.
"I do not want gov't controlling any aspects of my life, much less health care."
Every time you stop at a stoplight, the government is controlling your life.
Every time you don't burn your trash because there's a fire warning, the government is controlling your life.
Whenever you use a public restroom and there's no sign banning you because you're the wrong shade, the government is controlling your life.
Every time you pack your kids off to school, the government is controlling your (and their) lives.
When you put your baby in a crib in which the bars are close together in order to prevent the baby from getting its head caught between them, the government is controlling your (and your baby's) lives.
When your children do not catch and die from small pox because all of the children they're exposed to are vaccinated, the government is controlling your (and their) lives.
Whenever a power grid in some faraway location delivers electricity to your home, the government is controlling your life.
When the contractor you hired follows building codes that ensure his work is done properly and thereby ensures that your house does not burn down or fall down because of his work, the government is controlling your life.
When your doctor's training, work history and record of complaints/violations is made part of a public record by your state's medical board, the government is controlling your (and all of his patient's) lives.
The government controls many aspects of all our lives. Granted, it does this better in some areas than in others. But the fact is, there could never be any form of cohesive human society without some form of government. Fortunately, it is a fluid and ever-evolving process, which means that it can always be improved.
Don't want government "controlling" your life? Get over it. They already do. Don't like it? Move to a mountaintop somewhere and live like a caveman. Or, you could do more than piss and moan, get involved and do everything in your power to ensure that your government does things right.
Excellent response!
The items you cite are external controls which define parameters. They don't tell you which school to send kids, which crib to buy, what clothes or cars to choose, which doctor to see, etc.
When the gov't starts telling you where you must live, what types of medical treatment you can choose, what types of substances you can or can't put in your body, how much exercise you must get daily (and ties your health care benefits to it),it is going way too far. We already have a Drug War and have repressed medical information and availability to many items that could solve an assortment of health problems. We do not need any more of this. The House just passed the "food safety" bill which gives FDA control over almost all farming.
For the past 30 years, some would say 80, some 115yr, this gov't has existed for nothing but funnelling money to the top and erasing all regulatory structure related to the New Deal. It is foolish to think that anything this gov't, as currently constitued, does will be beneficial to anyone but transnational corporations and the occasional accidental beneficiaries among us. (Cash for Clunkers)
"The items you cite are external controls which define parameters."
Well, duh! The "parameters" are rules set up by the government, and the "external controls" are the threat of legal, monetary or other consequences if you fail to conform. I can't think of a better definition of "government control" than that.
"When the gov't starts telling you where you must live, what types of medical treatment you can choose, what types of substances you can or can't put in your body, how much exercise you must get daily (and ties your health care benefits to it),it is going way too far."
1. The government has never told anyone where they must live, nor am I aware of any provisions in the healthcare bill that require you to live in any specific place.
2. The types of medical treatment you can currently choose are based upon your income, your current healthcare insurance (if you have it) and its coverage limitations, and the availability of a specific treatment (or your ability to get yourself to wherever it is available). Whether you are on a government program or a private insurance plan, you are free to get any medical treatment your little heart desires. This does not mean, however, that your insurance plan will pay for it. That decision is made by someone other than you. Medical treatment is available to anyone and everyone. Health insurance is only about how your treatment is paid for, not whether you'll be able to get it or not. Why do you think that folks with wonderful health insurance end up holding fund-raisers and putting donation cans around town in order to pay for their child's liver transplant? Because their Blue Cross guy said, "Of course Sally can have a liver transplant operation! However, we'll only cover half of the $45,000 bill."
3. The government already tells you what you can and cannot put into your body. That's why kids aren't allowed to purchase alcohol, and why contaminated foods are pulled from the shelves before you give yourself food poisoning, and why they can't put cocaine into Coca-Cola anymore, and why food products and prescription drugs have expiration dates. Hell, that's why some drugs require prescriptions!
4. There's nothing in any of the healthcare proposals that refers to exercise or limiting benefits based on exercise. In fact, I know of no reliable way to determine who exercises and how much they exercise. Insurance companies, however, will deny you coverage for being overweight, or for having high blood pressure or high cholesterol (I know...I used to sell health insurance).
Please, let's keep the raving paranoia to a minimum!
Well said.
Exactly. You may not "want" to have government control, but to even think you can avoid it without a private army of lawyers is wishful thinking.
Cassandra doesn't like being dictated too; tell me who does?
Sure, it's bad in our country. Now imagine how they feel in Honduras, Iraq or Afghanistan.
What we do over there had to eventually get heavier and harder here. As you clearly pointed out, many regulations are for our benefit. Does Cassandra buy tires? Where does she think the rules for tire manufacture come from? The free market? Nope. It's the DOT (dept. of transportation). You don't want morhphine in your child's cough syrup to make an addict out of him? Thank the FDA. Who do you think forces corporations to list the contents of in food products on the label? The free market? Nope. It's the mean old FDA again. Think, Cassandra, THINK.
Instead of imagining how I'd feel in Honduras, Iraq or Afghanistan I'd rather imagine how I'd feel in Sweden, Norway, or Denmark, where the government controls a lot more than it does in the United States. I'd love to feel that.
"you will find out what it's like when behavior that harms no one but, possibly, yourself is criminalized.?"
It appears that you are trying to defend obesity from "big brother", and general political/social pressure from the community against obesity and other outcomes of human weaknesses by implication, pressures that may be imposed by an escalation of "big government".
We've been taught to fear/loath such pressures, with the "freedom" slogan endlessly repeated in the echo chamber of elite media.
This is because human weaknesses are cash cows for US elites, perhaps their greatest exploits, and everyone ought to know by now that US elites value profit above all else. It seems the past eight years reign of the imperial chimp would have awakened USans to the psychopathic wealth/power imperative plaguing the USA.
After we shift all of our exchange/association away from the elite power centers and toward our local communities and we still find ourselves succumbing to human weaknesses, we know there is still work to be done building our local communities, our ultimate safety/security pillars.
Our behaviors most certainly harm not only ourselves, but others too, through influence. But our tasks to build local and individual self-determination and strength should be much easier without the elites' opiate temptations so let's look at the positive side and achieve progress step by step.
The best thing the gov't could do to oppose obesity would be to stop subsidizing corporate farms esp, corn wheat and potatoes. The very foods that enable cheap, low quality food that promotes obesity.
While the insurance industry has publicly supported regulations that would guarantee everyone coverage and outlaw pre-exising condition exclusions, insurance executives from UnitedHealth Group, Assurant, and WellPoint specifically refused to “commit” to ending the controversial practice of rescinding coverage after an applicant files a medical claim.
Watch a compilation of insurers’ refusal to end rescission:
Video from Think Progress:
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/06/ignani-reform/
How do we know that all the lefty messages written here are not "trolls" trying to confuse us that the left is not for any step that involves Obama's plan to provide a public option for health insurance.
I have no allusions that Obama is not for big business but if more people can be covered by this public health care plan then its definitely a start of something good.
Sir,
The "Obama" health plan is ruse. The screaming by the republicans is part of a propaganda effort to position the two main parties so they appear to be in conflict. The purpose of this ruse is to deny us a true health plan worthy of a developed, industrialized country. HR676 is just a few pages long. That's the plan we need. They don't want to talk about that because it works like social security. The profit motive goes out the window and Insurance corporations will be forced to compete in the real world. All the noise is baloney. It's hollywood wrestling at its' best. The socialism bugaboo as applied to health is exactly backwards. The only solution to health care is socialistic health care, period. The profit motive must be eliminated from caring for the sick, period.
I'm for socialized healthcare. So is HR676 the plan that does that? I wish that people would be more specific.
These townhall mafia style protests scare the lights out of me. All this even when the current health care plan is already compromised enough? What would townhall be like if single payer were on the table? I hope Obama and Congress get something done right on this and pass a reform bill that will improve health care for all at all.
Stanley, I'm not opposed to a public option, although it would be much more expensive than single payer. I'm opposed to a public option that the insurers like. That would do more harm than good to single payer. And there is no way we will get anything they don't like.
It's clear to me that things (not just health care) will only get worse until the people rise up. And this downhill slide is turning icy, no brakes.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
BeForKids, I would actually love to see single payer option be put on the table. I recently lost my job as my company was at its last breath before going out of business once and for all and I can't tell you how scared I am to be living without being insured. I already lost my wife to cancer years ago and it wasn't just due to flimsy insurance coverage but also delayed service, poor treatment, and flawed earlier tests not pointing out dangerous signs as they were supposed to. Most of the days I'd work 12-13 hours a day and I'm finding out the steep costs of covering oneself as a result of unemployment. I just don't know if Obama will be able to consider pushing for single payer even if he does support it which I thought he did. I thought Obama was pushing for a public option plan that was heading towards the German model of multiple payer but I was alerted to the differences between both the US and German models. I think that no plan will work until for-profit is reduced or removed altogether.
By the way, my niece, JenniferBedingfield, introduced me to this and a few other progressive sites. She told me all about you and your idea of Main Street Party. Unlike her, I've been slow to learn and still clinging to hope that Obama will get something right somewhere. I thought he sort of did good on the stimulus package though I've heard criticisms usually from the Republicans. After I helped her overcome her trauma, she was disappointed in my lack of knowledge and so here I am.
I usually read the local and national Kansas City newspapers as well as turn to the news and Huffington Post when I'm not as worked up and out on a given day. I have heard everyone on the right talk about things getting worse but I could not understand my niece and similar on the left sounding like the Republicans. I know Obama has been a letdown on some things but I generally don't hear of all this on the news sources that I usually turn to except for maybe Huffington Post. She sounds so different from most people I have a political conversation with but I think I might start to know why if I read these articles and comments. Maybe my unemployment might give me that chance although I still feel desperate to look for a job.
Welcome to CommonDreams, Stanley.
I've used it as my home page since 1999, during and after the riots in Seattle.
Your niece was wise to turn you on to it, and I'm glad you listened to her.
Good luck also in finding a job!
rosie2731
Thank you rosie for the warm welcome. I cannot believe that I have not seen this site before. Maybe my years of working overtime have really taken a toll on my life. Thank you for the well wishing and I look forward to great discussions ahead.
Glad you started listening to your niece. She appears to know how to think. I sent a Liberal Dem relative articles from Common Dreams and she asked me not to send her "libertarian" stuff. She saw any criticism of Dems and Obama as right-wing, just as you did.
Sorry about the unemployment, hope things work out for you.
"She saw any criticism of Dems and Obama as right-wing, just as you did."
Yep, I've had friends like that. I guess they'd here my disgust with bill clinton and assume I was a right winger. People I did not suspect were right wingers would later repeat the limbaugh propaganda to me thinking they had a receptive audience when in reality I was a libertarian in the so called "moral issues" but somewhat socialist on economics. I'd still say I'm libertarian when it comes to the war on drugs, sex, and reproduction but now I'm very socialist on economic matters.
Stanley, if you want some wilder perspectives check out the Center for Research on Globalization http://www.globalresearch.ca/ , The Information Clearinghouse http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/ , and The World Socialist Website http://www.wsws.org/ . They might too radical for you but they have some very good information at times. They are my favorites with Commons Dreams just a little less appealing to me.
'The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.' There's no difference between the 2 political parties. We can stay with the status quo of rising health care costs and complete loss of insurance for the unlucky or we can move towards what I believe is a better system, but again, don't forget, there is no difference between the 2 parties.
There is a difference between the two parties.
It's only a small difference. But sometimes that small difference can be huge. If Mccain was elected, we would not be talking about any changes to health care. And if Gore would've fought to win over Bush younger, then we probably would not have escalated into an occupation of Iraq.
There is a difference.
"But right now Mr. Obama’s backers seem to lack all conviction." You're right Paul - he BETRAYED them all and every "Hope" they had for a better life. BHO did exactly what he set out to do - silence them - while continuing every destructive flat earth policy of the Bush Crime family while he continues committing the same Crimes. Overseer doesn't have a gender or a race, only a job description: Xfer all wealth to the top 1% and keep the plebs in their place. Couldn't be simpler. Welcome to Plan Columbia, American style. Haven't gotten to the death squads yet, but we will. We're Patriots....
This is not the first time America 'turned on itself'.
To varying degrees, Americans have always been a 'potential threat to themselves and others'.
When the Americans DO turn on themselves, they do so with much enthusiasm, and efficiency.
The "Civil War" of the 19th Century is an excellent example.
Many Americans are 'still fighting it' in many ways; but take these few points into consideration.
In four years the Americans killed and maimed more of themselves than all of the other wars they have been involved in ---combined. They introduced no less than 5 new weapons of mass destruction, and re-introduced 'total war', all of this ON THEMSELVES.
They have been directly and indirectly involved in wars and revolutions all over the world which resulted in untold loss of innocent lives and destruction most people would become ill from if the revelations were made public.
And so much more that space here does not allow details.
Yet, the Americans arrogantly hold themselves up to the world as the 'example' and brag that they 'promote freedom and Democracy to the world'----with their 'example'.
So now, they are willing to demonstrate to the world that the wealthiest nation on the planet has hungry and homeless children and elderly, a collapsing economy (as a result of the repetition of the many mistakes of the past), wars in diverse locations on the globe---that they are loosing; and now. The admission that they can 'put human beings into space' but can't take proper care of their medical needs while they are down here on Earth---unless they are wealthy.
Speaking as one who was born 'a prisoner of war in his own country'; I cannot think of a Nation in history that deserves the end that America seems to be headed for.
Total destruction, at their own hands.
America, the world cannot possibly tolerate you much longer.
Good luck America, you really need it.