EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Structural Inequality: News Not Fit to Print?
President Obama's address to the NAACP acknowledged that racial inequality is not an African-American problem, but rather a problem of our entire nation. So why didn't the New York Times?
Last week President Obama spoke boldly about persistent racial discrimination and criticized the "structural inequality" that presents "the steepest barrier" to African-American equality in the 21st century.
Speaking before a crowd at the centennial convention of the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People, he highlighted the
need for government action to help tear down these barriers.
So it was a surprise to see this headline on the New York Times story covering the event: "Obama Tells Fellow Blacks: 'No Excuses' for Failure."
Somehow the Times
saw fit to dismiss Obama's meaningful acknowledgement of continued
discrimination and, instead, portray his speech as a dose of "tough
love" to Black America.
The Times was not alone, though. The Huffington Post, a purportedly more liberal outlet, titled its article "Your destiny is in your hands…'No excuses.'"
It is true that President Obama borrowed a page from the book of Black
leaders as diverse as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., the Rev. Al
Sharpton, and Minister Louis Farrakhan in outlining the need for Black
self-empowerment. But it was a damaging oversight to ignore the
president's recognition of systemic inequality and the policy solutions
he laid out to reform these systems.
By addressing the living
legacy of white supremacy, African-American socioeconomic
disenfranchisement, President Obama advanced the discussion of racial
inequality.
The president pointed out that the
African-American community still suffers from discrimination and is
disproportionately hurt by a recession and the boom/bust economy that
has broadened economic inequality throughout the country. He included
policy proposals ranging from changes to tax policy, health care,
education and housing to improve the condition of African Americans.
One of the most repeated themes in Obama's address was that the
nation's racial inequality is not an African-American problem, but
rather a problem of our entire nation. Yet if you read The New York Times, you'd think the president was simply scolding African Americans for failing to live up to their potential.
I had hoped for more from the leading newspaper in the country. Not only should The Times
have reported on what Obama actually said, but as is done concerning
other important policy matters, it should have also examined whether
Obama's prescriptions were adequate for the ongoing racial economic
divide.
As someone who studies the racial economic divide —
particularly between Blacks and Whites — my strongest criticism of the
address is that Obama's policy solutions are not strong enough to
overcome the structural inequality suffered by African Americans.
African Americans have only 10% of the wealth of White Americans and
they are segregated into the most disenfranchised communities. On top
of that, their job loss rate has been far higher than the rest of
American's during our current economic crisis.
When I first
read President Obama's address to the NAACP, I had a mixed reaction. I
was glad to have a president who saw government responsibility for the
structural inequality developed through decades of discrimination. At
the same time, I found myself disappointed that he did not advocate for
stronger measures, like an equity assessment of all future federal
spending to ensure that government funds do not solidify the racial
economic divide.
Yet after reading news coverage of President Obama's
address, I realized that his discussion of structural inequality is
beyond what most Americans are prepared to deal with, or at least
beyond what The New York Times sees as news that's fit to print.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

29 Comments so far
Show AllIf Obama was serious about reducing structural inequality, supporting single-payer medical insurance is the first step he needs to take.
"As someone who studies the racial economic divide — particularly between Blacks and Whites — my strongest criticism of the address is that Obama's policy solutions are not strong enough to overcome the structural inequality suffered by African Americans."
Just about everything Obama has done is not strong enough to overcome the status quo. He's a centrist and is out to please everybody. This is not leadership..it's appeasement of the power structure that put him in the presidency and it's a weak, cowardly approach; betraying those who gave him their vote. He must think this will get him re-elected in 2012. Big mistake....unless of course, they pull off another 2000 with a slightly different twist.
The other buried story is how the NAACP, which was recieving far more RSVP's to the event than they could fit in a large hotel ballroom, wanted instead to use Yankee stadium for Obama's speech. But Obama, in a political calculation to appease white poeple, didn't want to be "seen" delivering his largest-audience speech since the election to a black audience about racism issues, so he told the NAACP he would give the speech only indoors in the hotel ballroom.
What structural inequality? Now that we have a black president, we blacks should know that the sky's the limit for us in this country. We aren't profiled, beaten, murdered, or otherwise harassed by police anymore, nor do we continue to experience the 'last one hired, first one fired' scenarios from our dark (no pun intended) employment past. There's no more 'redlining' to prevent us from living where we want, we make the same amount of average income as our Caucasian counterparts in the same positions, we're not charged any more higher percentage rates of interest on loans anymore than Caucasians, and thanks to strong affirmative action and more than adequate public assistance to our poor, our families are stronger than ever. Brighter days are here!
We no longer represent 60-70% of the average population of U.S. prisons while being only 12% of the total population. Schools in primarily black areas are funded as well and educators educate as well as schools in primarily Caucasian areas. As a matter of fact, things have gotten so good that there are no primarily Caucasian areas anymore. Now that the U.S. Government has stopped their introduction of drugs into this country and have placed the focus on treatment for drug addicts instead of harsher penalties and longer prison sentences has brought new life back to our once shattered communities.
Personally, I love the fact that these things are no more. Especially because I grew tired of hearing from my Caucasian compatriots that, if I didn't like how things were here in America, that going back to Africa and having it 'really hard' was my alternative. Now I can hold my head up high and be proud to be an American! Oh, wait...these things still go on and are part of the structure of American life for AAs. Shit, I really need to put down my crack pipe, grab the straps on my Nike basketball shoes and pull harder. That's the ticket.
Excellent. Thank you.
Black_Anarch July 23rd, 2009 10:49 am...And to think, Obama accomplished all this in only six, count 'em, six months....Obamassiah...man of miracle whip...er I mean miracles!
You make excellent points. But I'm curious why you make the issue out to be Black versus White? Why not minority versus majority? What about Latinos, Asians, and Europeans (especially late 19th, early 20th century)? They're all minorities in the US, and yet you made no mention of them and the racial issues they face. Seems to me you're not practicing what you preach.
Now here's what I see. I'm a white guy raised by extremely racist parents. I try very hard every day to NOT be racist to ANY minority. I hate racism, and I hate that sometimes I can't help thinking racist thoughts because of my upbringing. BUT when I turn on the TV and see A-A comedians outright trashing white folks, or I turn on a sports event and see whites in the extreme minority, I really wonder. Where's the outcry from African Americans regarding THAT racism? If we're going to stamp out racism, we have to stamp out ALL racism, even if it's against the white majority.
I think Blackanarchist raises some very valid points. Your points are well taken too. In cities like LA, polarization between blacks and latinos have hit a fever pitch in some communities leading to formation of gangs like the Florencia 13 which are committed to pure Mexican neighborhoods by lethally racially cleansing blacks and others who they perceive don't belong in the neighborhood (perjorative words like "mayate" come to mind). There is also a cross section of blacks who feel that people who come from Mexico and other Latin countries have no business in the US due to fierce competition of dwindling resources. When El Salvadorean refugees were fleeing the American fueled conflict in El Salvador, they persecution by not only whites, but by blacks and Mexicans as well; as they compete over meager resources. That helped lead to the formation of the Mara Salvatruchas. Unlike these scrapper gangs in the US, Salvatruchas are well acquainted with the art of war.
One thing that infuriates me is those pseudoleft activists who cry persecution and then they are ready to bash gays at the drop of a hat. They justify gay bashing as an agent of imperialism and oppression.
Both you and Blackanarchist are correct, we need to deal with the elephants in the room.
Regards to you both.
"What about Latinos, Asians, and Europeans (especially late 19th, early 20th century)? They're all minorities in the US, and yet you made no mention of them and the racial issues they face. Seems to me you're not practicing what you preach."
How are Europeans minorities? One hundred years ago, they were indeed viewed as separate, by other whites. Is that still the case? Do Polish, or Irish, or Italians still experience discrimination? Driving while Polish? Driving while Irish?
Also, given that Black Anarch is (probably) black, I don't believe it is unreasonable that s/he does not write about the issues that Chinese Americans, or Latinos face, or other groups face.
"I hate racism, and I hate that sometimes I can't help thinking racist thoughts because of my upbringing. BUT when I turn on the TV and see A-A comedians outright trashing white folks, or I turn on a sports event and see whites in the extreme minority, I really wonder. Where's the outcry from African Americans regarding THAT racism?"
Those A-A comedians also often outright trash black folks. And many white folks, and Asian folks, and Latino folks, including in other countries, find those A-A comedians funny. It isn't just African Americans who find Chris Rock funny. Comedians make fun of society. And in that process of making fun of society, hopefully, the will hold up a mirror, to society.
Sports? Seriously? Almost all the owners of pro sports teams are white.The large majority of sports executives of those pro sports teams are white. The vast majority of paying fans in pro sports venues are white.
Do you seriously think that these white owners, who have fortunes in the hundreds of millions, in the billions, who are nearly all of them only interested in getting even more money, and those white executives would discriminate against white athletes, when most of the (paying) audience for pro sports is white?
It wasn't that long ago when black football players struggled to get selected to play quarterback. By that long ago, I mean that a black quarterback has ceased to be an issue only in the past decade or so. Why? Because they were somehow viewed as lacking the mental ability to handle the position. It wasn't that long ago that black coaches struggled to get head coaching positions in the NFL. They STILL struggle to get head coaching positions in the NCAA, at college level.
Even today, NOW, there is the perception that male African American athletes are more physically gifted than white or asian american athletes. The converse of course, is that they viewed as either mentally deficient, or lazy. Black male athletes even today, are perceived as, viewed as physically talented. Whereas white, or asian american, athletes are nearly always viewed as either smart, or hard working.
Have you even considered that the reason that there are so many African Americans in (certain) pro sports, basketball and football principally, is because there are some African American (males) who see sports as the only way out, the only way to making a living, the only way to get money, via scholarships, for college?
Furthermore, African Americans are hardly prevalent in hockey, or golf. Or soccer. Or tennis. Or volleyball. Or swimming. Or gymnastics. Or skiing. Or crew. Or figure skating. In those sports, there are very very few African American athletes, in some cases, as good as none.
Nor are African Americans anywhere as prevalent in women's basketball, as they are in men's basketball. Notice that the racial demographics in women's sports reflects that of the US population much more so than those of men's sports?
And the number of African Americans in baseball has long been declining, due to various factors.
In other words, your noticing the extreme minority of white athletes in the NFL, or white American athletes in the NBA, there are pretty many white athletes in the NBA, but most of the are European, is a cultural factor. It is due to African American males who choose to focus on basketball and football. It is due to you only paying attention to football and basketball.
"How are Europeans minorities? Do Polish, or Irish, or Italians still experience discrimination? Driving while Polish? Driving while Irish?" Maybe nowadays you are correct, but it wasn't long ago when there were signs posted, "Irish need not apply". The newspapers in the 19th century depicted Irish as simians. Irish men were considered unemployable. As for the Poles, they had to endure "Pollack" jokes even though the Poles I have known are engineers, scientists etc. Italians in America were considered "non-white" in the 19th century.
As I said, today. I know what happened in the 19th 100+ years ago.
When I speak about racism, I speak about not only the preference for one's own ethnic group but also about the ability to harm members of the ethnic group(s) that are discriminated against. Truly, Latinos, First Nations peoples, Asians and other minority groups in this country, and around the world, experience discrimination from other out groups. However, there is still only one group, on this planet, able to not only hate but, use their political, economic, religious, legal and other powers to harm and even attempt to destroy the out groups. That group is whites of European descent.
Whether you agree or not, a very functional definition of racism is as follows:
"Racism (White Supremacy) is the local AND global power system and dynamic, structured and maintained by persons who classify themselves as white, whether consciously or subconsciously determined, which consists of patterns of perception, logic, symbol formation, thought, speech, action and emotional response, as conducted simultaneously in all areas of people activity (economics, education, entertainment, labor, law, politics, religion, sex and war), for the ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet Earth." -- Frances Cress Welsing
The fact is that only the Caucasian people maintain the level of power required for racism to have more than just a local effect. I don't like it nor do I think it's right for anyone to hate anyone. However, if I don't like my neighbor, I don't have the means to utilize the system to keep him from adequate work, good housing, solid education and decent health care. This article discusses systematic racism, not individual racism. Latinos fighting blacks or blacks fighting asians or whatever means very little, in a global sense, and in point of fact, is a distraction from the real danger and power of white supremacy.
So, turn the flame on and shoot down my comment if you wish. It will not change for a single moment the facts of my statement. I am willing to let racism die when those who benefit from the system let the system die. Until then, I will shout from the rooftops about the things I see happening to my people. Other minority groups have their advocates and I support them wholeheartedly. Whites who are working toward the dismantling of this sad and sick system have my support as well. We are all human beings and we can find our way back to harmony with each other if we only but try. Thanks for listening.
I am getting sick and tired of race being brought up. When will society learn to just be colorblind and provide economic equality and opportunities for all regardless of race, gender, religion, or whatever ??
I'm sick and tired of bringing it up. I will refrain from doing so when that economic equality and opportunity that you mention is a reality. We all know that racism was basically instituted by the richfilth capitalists to prevent poor people, of all races, from coming together and destroying the capitalists. However, at this point in our shared history, it has gained a life of its own and needs to be destroyed, in toto, before we can move ahead with visions that benefit our common humanity. Refusing to discuss and highlight obvious inequality will not help to get rid of it. Refusing to even discuss racism only exacerbates the current situation and allows most people to pretend that there is no racism issue.
"I am getting sick and tired of race being brought up. When will society learn to just be colorblind and provide economic equality and opportunities for all regardless of race, gender, religion, or whatever ??"
After Caucasians stop being sick and tired of race being brought up, and start acknowledging and working to dismantle structural inequalities based upon race, starting with the pitifully inadequate public schools in racially segregated communities.
Hi Jennifer. Sadly your post is way ahead of it's time. I don't believe that homosapiens have reached that evolutionary level of maturity yet.
Oh, we seem to hurt your sensibilities by pointing out racism.
I take it you're white?
The Obama admin is an equal opportunity provider...
With the bankster bailouts, all of our grandchildren will be paying for it with taxes for years to come...
With the CIA front banks like Leyman Bros, Bear Stearns & Goldman Sachs intentionally gaming the stock market, they have leveled the playing field between the working poor and the middle class, by stealing all the pensions & 401k's and retirement funds of the more caucasian among us...
And with the continued outsourcing of manufacturing and tech jobs, unemployment is reaching racial parity as well... This is good news...! As army recruitment is picking back up with the market down...
This is the beauty of class war... once the banksters pulled the stopper out of the economy to syphon out all of our liquid assets, the ensuing cyclonic race to the bottom will level all ships...!
This article from WSWS provides a critical socialist perspective absent from "progressive" media.
Obama’s speech to the NAACP
18 July 2009
Tom Eley
"The main thrust of president Barack Obama’s speech before the centenary meeting of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) Thursday was to blame working class African-Americans for the social crisis engulfing them.
Obama alluded to the dimensions of the social misery confronting black workers. African-Americans are “out of work more than just about anybody else” and are “more likely to suffer from a host of diseases but less likely to own health insurance,” the president said. Obama also made reference to the disproportionately large number of African-Americans incarcerated in the nation’s massive prison system and affected by AIDS."
...
"But what is the cause of this misery? And how does Obama propose to alleviate it?
Here Obama adopted all the right-wing nostrums about “personal responsibility” that have been used to justify the gutting of social programs, exacerbating the crisis confronting broad sections of the working class.
“Government programs alone won’t get our children to the Promised Land,” Obama declared. In other words, black workers can expect no significant social assistance from the Obama administration. Instead, Obama claimed that what is needed is “a new mind set, a new set of attitudes.”
...
The president even offered some parenting tips. “To parents ...You can’t just contract out parenting,” he counseled. “That means putting away the Xbox, putting our kids to bed at a reasonable hour.”
Had a white politician made similar statements, there can be little doubt he or she would have been attacked as racist. But because of the color of his skin, Obama’s words are hailed as “tough love.” Obama recently made a very similar speech in Africa, in which he argued that the continent most ravaged by imperialism is at fault for its own plight. (See “Obama’s neocolonial mission in Africa”)
...
(more)
...
Read the full article here:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jul2009/pers-j18.shtml
The World Socialist Web Site: international, daily, socialist perspectives on current affairs: http://www.wsws.org
The WOD and the prison system--job opportunities for poor blacks and whites, courtesy of conservatives everywhere.
I heard that Obama was going to reach across the aisle and help African-Americans.
A very simple test was run by a group of researchers in Canada.
In reply to a number of advertisements looking for workers they sent in the same application using the same words, diction and educational background.
The only thing tey changed was the NAME wherein foreign sounding names (East Indian\African\Chinese etc) were used instead of European sounding names.
Those with European sounding names were three times more likelybe called in for a Job Interview.
This is INGRAINED inside a society and puts those minorities behind the eight ball from the get go.
We can never be truly color blind unless we are in fact blind. After all our sense of vision by design is intended to seperate. But these people calling folk in for Job Interviews did not even have to SEE the person in question. They saw a name and attached a connotation to that name.
We have a long ways to go to get past that.
As far as what Predident Obama said or did not say about the racial divide across the United States, talk is cheap when you don't intend to do anything and this President has shown over the past 6 months that he really does not intend to do much of anything except what is already status-quo.
That is why he is a Beige Bush.
Poet
"I'm sick and tired of bringing it up. I will refrain from doing so when that economic equality and opportunity that you mention is a reality. We all know that racism was basically instituted by the richfilth capitalists to prevent poor people, of all races, from coming together and destroying the capitalists. However, at this point in our shared history, it has gained a life of its own and needs to be destroyed, in toto, before we can move ahead with visions that benefit our common humanity. Refusing to discuss and highlight obvious inequality will not help to get rid of it. Refusing to even discuss racism only exacerbates the current situation and allows most people to pretend that there is no racism issue."
I totally agree Black Anarch. We cannot afford to ignore racism, but we also cannot afford to ignore classism as well. Too many people are guilty of ignoring or both of them as well as sexism, homophobia, religious intolerance, etc.
My problem is that too many people on the left can't discuss certain issues without demonizing and indicting entire groups.
The 99% is vulnerable. But we can't ignore that some of the 99% are more vulnerable than others.
Yeah we have a racial divide, we also have a class divide along with a gender divide.
We're all getting screwed here, and I laugh at those people who would suggest the old white guys who run the show are looking out for me as a young white guy. They'd let me drown also.
When people only focus on race, they assume that whites really aren't being disenfranchised, and that when their quality of life isn't up to par, that it's their fault entirely. That line of thinking also plays into Horatio Alger myths about a meritocracy. It assumes that working hard in America will get you somewhere, but it's just that some people are being held back by their race alone. Most whites aren't supreme and aren't living high on the hog either. Only a handful of them are, and those few really couldn't care less about anyone who isn't in their clique.
When people only focus on class, they ignore discrimination, redlining, the funneling of drugs into black communities, being left out of the New Deal, and the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow among other things. Yes, there is a class war, which I do think overrides everything else, but there has been a race war too. The regressive, repressive policies and schemes of the elites have been specifically trained on non-whites in a number of ways. That's not something that we can just let drop off of our collective radar.
However, we can call attention to it in a way that is inclusive, in a way that doesn't scapegoat, that doesn't inflame entire groups or involve divisive identity politics.
No racial group is made up of bogeymen. The only bogeymen are at the very top, and they would terrorize us all. Very few people in general are safe from their machinations. Know that.
I have said countless times here on CD that I cannot shield my eyes and ears from racism. I deal with racists everyday. They hate me because I'm not racist. That's one reason why it angers me (and I'm not saying everyone here is like this) when certain lefties make white men all out to be ogres. It makes me as angry when people on the right make black people out to be predators that are just dying to fuck someone like me up.
On the other hand, people in general need to stop blaming the black community entirely for its own troubles, hell we need to stop blaming workers and poor people of all races for their own troubles.
Inner city black people aren't poor because of what they wear or what music they listen to.
Rural white folk aren't poor because they like NASCAR.
Red people in the reservations aren't poor because they supposedly drink too much booze.
Poverty's no one's fault but the elites.
And yeah, some black people are in gangs, murder and rape people. I work with at least a dozen white guys that would be holding up convenience stores if they didn't have a job. The lowlifes of all stripes piss me off immensely. White men have no monopoly on regressivism either. If nothing else the rainbow of lowlifes help fracture solidarity and act as fodder for the ruling class.
I'm rambling and losing my way here (long, aggravating, slog of a day, my hands are still dirty), but just keep in mind that we need to zoom out as much as we need to zoom in.
The thing is though it that the people who perpetuate white supremacy are a select few people. The majority of whites don't have the power to keep anyone down. They're being kept down themselves.
"ultimate purpose of white genetic survival and to prevent white genetic annihilation on planet Earth."
But what the powerbrokers are doing is actually quite the opposite. They're condemning the entire human family by their environmental policies alone.
And is "white genetic annihilation" really a threat? Is it really imminent? I would say that the annihilation of the human race in a general is a real threat. It assumes that whites are destined to die without a military/industrial complex to hold everyone down, even though it keeps them down too. It assumes that in an equal, peaceful world where everyone has a decent quality of life, whites wouldn't exist.
"In other words, your noticing the extreme minority of white athletes in the NFL, or white American athletes in the NBA, there are pretty many white athletes in the NBA, but most of the are European, is a cultural factor. It is due to African American males who choose to focus on basketball and football. It is due to you only paying attention to football and basketball."
I thought I read somewhere that many years ago, most pro basketball players were Jewish.
Bottom line, Barack Obama nor the Democrats, let alone Republicans, are addressing what needs to be done to turn this country or the world around. While some groups may be disproportionately affected, millions and millions of people in this country are unemployed and without health insurance, and they come in all colors. Give EVERYONE a job at a decent, liveable wage and free all-inclusive healthcare, and you've already solved a couple of problems. Reparations would fix another. Obama doesn't seem to want to do any of that.
Poverty is a societal ill that really doesn't have a color. Most of us are a paycheck or two away from living at the Salvation Army, and it's not our fault if we end up there.
Thank you for even addressing my comment, let alone in a very positive way.
I do not believe in the possibility of so-called 'white genetic annihilation'. There are differing types of Homo sapiens sapiens because evolution seems to delight in variety and diversity. But, make no mistake. If you read the texts of white supremacists, they state openly that miscegenation is going to destroy them as a 'race'. This POV is systematized in Western Culture to the point that even very veiled comments that point toward this potentiality have been enough to move large groups of whites toward genocide of out groups everywhere, throughout our history.
I actually feel the saddest for my poor white brethren and sisteren. Historians have written about a time in this country when poor whites, blacks and Natives joined together for common struggle against their richfilth oppressors. White indentured servants (little more than slaves) would regularly run off with, make love to, and fight alongside their black and native counterparts. I dream of that time coming around again. The racist system was put in place not just to keep non-whites down but, poorer whites as well. Of course, as soon as you mention this, apologists jump up to quibble about the distinction between 'indentured servitude' and 'slavery' and nothing ever changes.
If you've read my posts here on CD, you should know that I, the Black Anarch, stand for freedom, peace, prosperity and a better world for all people. This is our planet and we have let the scum of human society rise to the top. We have let this scum keep us divided while robbing our home of any and all resources that we need to live. We need to demolish this sick system and make sure that, in the new world to come, things like good work, plentiful food, decent homes, peaceable social interaction, health care and solid education are non-negotiable and are the birth rights of every human being.
Hey Black Anarch, it's all good. You've actually become one of my favorite posters here, and I do in fact read your posts. You are a breath of fresh air here and are a uniter. I am inspired by you.
I am aware of what the white supremacists believe in. MY point is that the elites really don't give a flying fuck about any of us. They're not looking out for the poor duped Klansman and keeping his gene pool "pure" any more than they are for the interests of black, brown, red, or yellow people.
Oh they WANT that Klansman to be so concerned about being bred out that he's unaware of global warming and that his masters are getting richer while he's getting poorer.
Good afternoon,
I think that here you have one of the reasons why a lot of white people that I've talked to get frightened of talk of systemic racism(I say this as a white male in his early-mid 30's who used to bring it up quite often). Most of the talk in regards to what an average person can do to end systemic racism seem end with either making friends with people of color or somehow limiting access to money. Making friends is risky and most of the people who would listen to arguments about systemic racism wouldn't be giving up resources to go from sports car to crappy beater as much as from crappy beater to no car(and therefore most likely no job, which means no money, which means life on the streets).
And this is where race divide dovetails into class divide as most of the people who have all the money are white people.
Thank you for writing, it helped me clarify my thoughts on the matter and that is a goodness.
P.S.- Apologies in advance if I showed my ass.
"I am getting sick and tired of race being brought up. When will society learn to just be colorblind and provide economic equality and opportunities for all regardless of race, gender, religion, or whatever ??"
I agree and disagree. The issue of race gets tiresome to me too because it obscures class issues among other things. And you're right about providing opportunity and security to all people. But we're not going to stop hearing about race until we fix the problem of race first. And there are ways to go about doing that. Affirmative Action and "apologies" for slavery 'aint gonna go far enough either. Restitution needs to be made if for no other reason that it's the moral thing to do.