Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama's Health Care Push Eerily Similar to Bill Clinton’s
In his prime time speech on health care reform President Obama acknowledged public skepticism about his plan:
"I realize that with all the charges and criticisms that are being thrown around in Washington, a lot of Americans may be wondering, "What's in this for me? How does my family stand to benefit from health insurance reform?’ "
Here is how he answered that question:
"If you have health insurance, the reform we're proposing will provide you with more security and more stability. It will keep government out of health care decisions, giving you the option to keep your insurance if you're happy with it. It will prevent insurance companies from dropping your coverage if you get too sick. It will give you the security of knowing that if you lose your job, if you move, or if you change your job, you'll still be able to have coverage. It will limit the amount your insurance company can force you to pay for your medical costs out of your own pocket. And it will cover preventive care like check-ups and mammograms that save lives and money."
All of that sounds pretty good, as does Obama's persistent pledge to pay for the program by taxing the rich--in his speech he defined them as people making more than $1 million a year. But then there is Obama's nods to "a marketplace that provides choice and competition"--buzzwords for the private health insurance system that now leaves 47 million people uninsured.
With Blue Dog Democrats breathing down Obama's neck, and Republicans determined to oppose any plan the White House endorses, it's hard to see how he is getting to comprehensive reform by August.
Obama has been careful not to make the same political mistakes the Clintons made when they attempted to climb the health care hill. Instead of setting up a commission to solve the problem at the White House, he is kicking the whole thing to Congress. It may or may not prove to be a winning strategy for getting something passed.
But there is an eerie similarity between Clinton's health care battle and Obama's.
Here is Bill Clinton on health care reform in 1993:
"Millions of Americans are just a pink slip away from losing their health insurance, and one serious illness away from losing all their savings. Millions more are locked into the jobs they have now just because they or someone in their family has once been sick and they have what is called the preexisting condition. And on any given day, over 37 million Americans -- most of them working people and their little children -- have no health insurance at all. And in spite of all this, our medical bills are growing at over twice the rate of inflation, and the United States spends over a third more of its income on health care than any other nation on Earth."
Now here is Obama:
"We spend much more on health care than any other nation but aren't any healthier for it. . . . This is not just about the 47 million Americans who don't have any health insurance at all. Reform is about every American who has ever feared that they may lose their coverage if they become too sick, or lose their job, or change their job. It's about every small business that has been forced to lay off employees or cut back on their coverage because it became too expensive. And it's about the fact that the biggest driving force behind our federal deficit is the skyrocketing cost of Medicare and Medicaid. . . . If we do not reform health care, your premiums and out-of-pocket costs will continue to skyrocket. If we don't act, 14,000 Americans will continue to lose their health insurance every single day. These are the consequences of inaction. These are the stakes of the debate that we're having right now."
As we know, the Clinton health care initiative collapsed. And much of Clinton's progressive speech-making turned out to be window dressing for micro-initiatives that made little impact on the big problems he spoke about so stirringly.
Clinton himself has said that Obama ought to be able to pass health care reform. He told CNN in February that public pressure for universal health care had grown dramatically since the early 1990s. Plus, he said, "You don't have to have an employer mandate. You don't have to have a tax increase now," he said. "I think the obstacles are less than they were."
Unfortunately, that may also means that a health care plan that passes this year turns out to be less than meets the eye.
- Posted in


17 Comments so far
Show AllWhy rush any of it? I say let's have time to build support for HR676. We need more time to wake up the uninformed and misinformed before we can successfully get Congress to sit down and listen rather than put up with their playing kissyface with Big Insurance and Big Pharma again and again.
i'm not sure we have 100 years. big legislation gets passed early and quickly, and I can't think of many examples that contradict that wisdom. this was a surrender, but for some reason, I don't see the Dems horribly bent out of shape over it. Everyone in the political/corporate class walks away a winner: repos get to say they stopped socialized medicine, Dems get to say we tried but didn't quite have the oomph, but stick with us for (insert high number of election cycles here) and we'll get it done if we can just get rid of the GOP, and the corporate profits are secure. Everyone wins! But us.
They have this theater down cold. And it's hard to believe, that 15 years later, the precise same playbook worked like a charm.
The good news is that I don't think a mandatory coverage bill will pass later. I think it'll get to a vote, and teh Dems will "rally" to stop it, claiming victory for preventing the excessive burden on the poor afte rthe GOP plays its role in making sure there's not enough off a subsidy to make it affordable for pretty much anyone.
And then we'll reconvene after a few hundred thousand more dead and dance this dance again in ten or so years.
The Clinton/Obama comparison is useful. I think the health care reform slogan should be that the time has finally come to put an end to the employment-based private health insurance system as we know it, once and for all.
Bill from Saginaw
The congress is so overwhelmingly corrupt, and so gleefully self-righteous in its corruption, that, in the end, I expect some slobbering, goober-eyed Republican senator to go on camera and flip nearly every citizen in this country the bird after some fake reform bill finally passes in the autumn.
Bubba knows best?
hey,
did clinton know this
one?
that (super rich)companies
who do businesses, or conduct business outside the United States dont pay into the social security funds, the medicare/medicaid funds, or any taxes for police/fire/rescue teachers, state workers? They have what they call,
tax shelters..like in this article right here:
http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/some-companies-getting-bailed-out-hav
bring this all out into the open, introduce it to the government, because they haven't been doing their jobs.
Tax cheats..
gnken
Im a State Worker and currently have health care offered when I retire at the same employee contributions I would pay as a active employee. I have seen our insurance diminish over the years. I m one who wants "Single Payer". Every time they use the "P" (Private) word, or "Choice". It means we are about to get "SCREWED" and here it comes. My insurance diminished after the Clinton team failed, and I m sure we are about to live 93-95 all over again. I will try to say as healthy as I can. That's all we can do.
Who Are Today's Progressives
"Only those of us who are seeking to change the world."
"The reason being?"
"There is no alternative."
"Based on?"
"Perpetual war + global warming + economic collapse = doomsday, as well as the fact that time's running out."
"Anything else?"
"Yes we can."
I absolutely agree with the need for support for HR 676, and a closer look at Bernie Sanders Senate version of Single Payer. There is so much mis-information on the subject, but as is becoming so readily apparent, the longer this goes on, the more the propaganda mills crank out their lies and "confuse" the general public who can't absorb much more than a sound bite at a time.
oh no.... reminds me of the chris rock saying.. nigga nigga nigga - please!
That remark was uncalled for sir.
i'm sorry. your right. I'm not feeling right today - angry thats all. It shant happen again.
I think too many pundits draw parallels between Clinton's health care and Obama's. Obama learned from Clinton's experience and did EVERYTHING differently. Clinton tried to get single payer going because it was cheapest. They tried to form the plan without input from Congress or much from the industry so it wouldn't get watered down, and it went down in flames because everyone opposed the plan and put lots of advertisements out without sufficient response.
Obama let Congress devise the plan so if Health care fails, it will be Congress that gets the blame (and the people that opposed it should get voted out in 2010). Of course Congress tried to put band aids on the existing plan instead of trying real change. Obama tried to be Bipartisan but the Republicants haven't even tried to come up with good ideas, they only obstruct. In 94 AARP, the AMA, the doctors and the Nurses associations opposed the plan, now they favor it. There are many organizations like Move on with millions of members that are pushing for reform and Obama has gotten on the bully pulpet and answered every attack with a quick response. Finally the most important difference is that Dems have the numbers to ram this through and 72% of the American public are behind the plan, because they know that if they don't do something, everyone's insurance will double.
Sure the Insurance industry has bought off all of the Republicants and most of the Dems but this time around Congressmen will hear from their constituents that if they don't pass this thing they will be out of a job.
"Obama learned from Clinton's experience and did EVERYTHING differently."
Then why is his plan no better Clinton's?
It's worth noting that Clinton tried to get his plan through at the height of the Republican Revolution, while Obama is working within an infinitely superior environment.
And yet Obama's plan is worse than Clinton's, has drastically damaged his poll numbers, and will almost certainly be defeated. This is what happens when the nomination is stolen from the more popular, more qualified candidate. :(
I will soon be 82. My primary health insurance is Medicare. My secondary is a private company (name withheld). Recently I have been a few times in hospitals. Every time Medicare has paid the hospitals and doctors what it was obligated within two weeks. The private insurer had this information at the same time yet it usually took several months, haggling, and threats with suits to make them pay their contractual share.
Those who claim that private health insurance is better and more reliable than the government are stupid and dangerous babblers. I know better. On the basis of my experience I will enroll in "single pay" immediately. Why don't you give it to me Mr. Obama?
I don't understand why President Obama does not forcefully and truthfully state that more people will die because they cannot afford health insurance than will die from "terrorist" attacks. In other words: the state of health insurance and delivery is more life-threatening for our people than terrorism. Once this is understood funds must be transferred from the fight against terrorists to the fight against disease and death.
It's time for President Obama to say "public option or veto".
I'm with Crowsnest here.
The insurance companies are bureaucratic terrorists.
As Woodie Guthrie said, some can kill you with a fountain pen.
-30-