Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Eric Cantor's Cant
Virginia congressman Eric Cantor may be a GOP rising star, but he sure is a hypocrite. How else to describe someone who's a leading critic of President Obama's Recovery Act and joins his congressional colleagues to urge Virginia's Department of Transportation to apply for stimulus money for high-speed rail? If that isn't two-faced, what is ?
He's also a demagogue: "Millions of jobs will be crushed by the Administration's policies." Say what? The stimulus may have been too small and overemphasized tax cuts, but it's helped states, including his own, with longer unemployment benefits, expanded food stamps and subsidies for people who've lost jobs to extend their health insurance. It's also kept teachers in the classroom, cops on the street and got workers rehired. Hours after Cantor delivered the GOP's weekly radio address blasting the stimulus, Vice-President Biden announced that $1.5 million of the bill's money would go to the Richmond Police Department to retain officers. And $20 million is going to Chesterfield County, a suburb of Richmond, to help 275 teachers from being fired. Virginia's working men and women should remember that Cantor fought hard to cut a provision in the stimulus bill that was designed to help low-income workers.
As Obama marks his sixth month in office, his Presidency will be judged by its laser-like focus on creating jobs, good jobs, and many of them. Double-digit unemployment is a ticking time bomb and his economic team needs to work quickly to defuse it. But Cantor & crew don't care about creating jobs. They want to spin the debate about the economy so their party, which has absolutely nothing to offer working people, games the 2010 midterm elections.
It may be, as some argue, that the politics of getting a second stimulus through a Congress filled with GOP obstructionists and conservative Democrats is too tough at this time -- especially with the battle for healthcare reform in full gear. If that's the case, what's needed instead is a simple and comprehensive package that focuses on job creation. In their must-read Nation article, "A Jobless Recovery" (July 13), Leo Hindery Jr. and Leo Gerard lay out a set of common-sense proposals for a job-led recovery. "We can either focus our economic recovery efforts on creating full employment for the 150 million workers who are not part of the top 0.2 percent and on rebuilding the country's manufacturing base. Or, as we have been doing for nearly three decades, we can concentrate on policies that mostly just benefit the incomes of the wealthiest 300,000."
The economic spin battle underway -- disconnected from the real economy and working Americans' lives -- is filled with demagogic and alarmist rhetoric about out-of-control government spending and federal debt. But in the absence of consumer spending and with banks failing to lend -- even while they report record profits and hand out huge bonuses -- government is the last resort. It must spend in order to avert a deeper recession.
But Eric Cantor and his crew just don't get it. Instead of laying out job creation policies, they whine. And they whine. The question is, why are we still listening to people who broke the back of the middle class, engineered the largest redistribution of wealth upwards to the very rich, and now dare to attack fairly modest government-led efforts to help working families weather this economic crisis?


6 Comments so far
Show AllJust think how many of the republicans will go home taking credit for healthcare reform.
"As Obama marks his sixth month in office, his Presidency will be judged by its laser-like focus on creating jobs, good jobs, and many of them."
Note to KvH: you know as well as anyone that the President has absolutely no plan whatsoever for creating "many good jobs."
Because it can't be done, especially by a President. According to Krugman, we need 18 million jobs like, yesterday. How is BO gonna accomplish that? Issue an executive order forcing all employers to hire 5 more workers, needed or not?
2nd note to KvH: there's a huge difference between "many good jobs," all of which would be short-term, and careers. Is your beloved BO focused laser-like on creating long-lasting careers, too? Or just ways to get shovels in the hands of those now willing to do anything to put food on their tables?
The only "laser-like focus" I've noticed is in consolidating and extending the power of the Unitary Executive and attempting to outdo the previous criminal maladministration in creating extra-constitutional Undue Processes with maximum opacity to pursue the bogus and self-perpetuating Global War on Terror.
Yeah, I know you're not supposed to call it that any more, but at the moment I disremember the Obama Maladministration euphemism-- there are so MANY to remember!
Oh, and there's certainly been a "laser-like focus" on transferring maximum wealth to the banksters at the expense of the common citizen, especially now that the US Treasury has been outsourced to Goldman-Sachs.
Wait... I guess there ARE a lot of good jobs being created to manage and transport all of the loot being poured down that golden rathole. So I must reluctantly concede that Obama has been maintaining a "laser-like focus" on jobs after all. My bad.
· Yr Obd't Servant
"why are we still listening to people who broke the back of the middle class, engineered the largest redistribution of wealth upwards to the very rich, and now dare to attack fairly modest government-led efforts to help working families weather this economic crisis?"
Because they're the same ones that give us the news.
When is The Nation going to start using the word "hypocrite" for Obama? I know you folks have to start campiagning for his reelection by downplaying the wars and corporate welfare now by telling us how naughty the GOP is, but I thought I'd ask anyway. When will you ever use this plain language about how awful Obama is?
The question is, why are we still listening to people who broke the back of the middle class, engineered the largest redistribution of wealth upwards to the very rich, and now dare to attack fairly modest government-led efforts to help working families weather this economic crisis?
In the United States, this is the political question of our time. I don't know the answer but I'm certain the same fools who gave us Bush/Cheney for eight years will return the Republicans to power to finish the job of kicking the United States down the long flight of stairs to die unceremoniously of a broken neck. It won't cadaverous Cantor, however; a Jew can't be elected president. Don't worry. The Republicans have a boatload of violent, venal, dumb shits to choose from.