A Recipe for America and How You Can Help
With Recipe for America, Sustainable Food Advocate Jill Richardson Invites You to Join the Cause
Americans are more obese than ever, our current agriculture system
is dependent on oil and other limited resources, our waterways and air
are polluted by factory-like farming operations, and still opponents
try to push sustainable agriculture to the margins. But change is
possible, as Jill Richardson writes in her new book, Recipe for America: Why Our Food System is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It, which breaks down many of the issues facing the food system and provides approximately 70 pages of solutions.
The book first sets out to explain the way our agriculture system devolved from sustainable to unsustainable. “In the end, the numerous problems in our food system — pollution, human rights abuses, poor food safety, the breakdown of rural communities, the decline in our health — are hardly random,” she writes. “Instead, they stem from a common thread of industrialization, which occurred primarily over the second half of the twentieth century.”
The logical conclusion for Richardson, then, is that sustainable agriculture is the only way forward. In the next chapter, she details the reasons why sustainable agriculture works — beginning with the inherent consideration it provides to the common good, by maintaining the land, the air, and other species for future generations. She spends time talking about the science of building fertile soil, a necessary part of the practice of sustainable agriculture, as well as the importance of biodiversity, which creates stability in the populations of neighboring plants and organisms. She makes it clear that these considerations are being left out of current conventional agriculture, which purports that we can indefinitely add fertilizer to fields instead of building topsoil (we can’t; a crucial element, phosphorus, which can be maintained in topsoil, is now most often being irrevocably washed away every growing season through bad agricultural practices). Building up soil is scientific, involving laboratory samples and methodology, not some turn back to the past, Richardson asserts. This method also saves the farmer money while promoting the environment; and without doing such, we face a future inability to feed ourselves.
So what then is standing in the way of implementation of sustainable practices? Here, it seems, most often the barriers to building a sustainable food system come down to the political will to change. Richardson goes into detail about the barriers on the micro level, in restaurants and school cafeterias, for example. But most interesting are the barriers on the farm, and how excessive regulation on the macro level (like the pending National Animal Identification System (NAIS)), and incentives that promote industrial agricultural practices over sustainable, affect farmers’ will and ability to change. But the greatest barrier of all, she writes, may be the lack of recognition on the part of the government that sustainable agriculture practices are superior to industrial agriculture, and for that to change, we need public outcry.
Richardson focuses the final third of her book on the feasible, incremental solutions that will begin to stem the tide of industrial agriculture and favor improved, more sustainable practices. She starts with big ideas, like protecting children, food safety, human and animal rights and the value of labeling, then zeros in on the policy initiatives and problems facing improvements in those areas.
Food safety, for example, is the cause that has been getting a lot of focus in Washington. Here Richardson goes into detail about some of the major issues facing food safety, like antibiotic resistance, microbial contamination, and mercury in fish, and gives specific recommendations for change that can be achieved right now. For mercury in fish, for example, she calls on the government to change its lax warnings to reflect more accurate information about what is safe, then to place labels and warnings where consumers are likely to see them, and finally to significantly curb mercury pollution. She links the problems in keeping our food safe nationally primarily to the “piecemeal” way in which our food safety system has been set up. In addition, the USDA’s conflict of interest in simultaneously being charged with promoting and regulating industry (usually more of the former than the latter), and a chronically under-funded FDA (the body charged with making sure our food is safe) leaves Richardson wondering if all those campaign contributions from Big Ag and Big Pharma are keeping regulation in check.
Like a handbook for the sustainable advocate in training, Recipe for America feels like a one-on-one session with a pro in the trenches. It gives the reader the tools they need to be up-to-date on the state of the food movement, the pending legislation and state of the political process as it pertains to food. So pick up a copy, and join the ranks. The good food movement needs YOU!
[Hungry for more? Read Jill Richardson's blog, La Vida Locavore]

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllI think government understands these issues very well. With government's help (tax incentives, etc., etc.), mega-corporations have steadily been pushing farmers out of business. So, on its most basic level, who provides more funding of political campaigns -- rich corporations or low-to-moderate income farmers? It is our own government, our legislators, who have given corporate entities the power/means to take over agriculture. Farm by farm, they have effectively taken over much of our land, using their financial and political power to very wipe out family farms.
As we notice more holes in the dikes, it is every citizen's duty to volunteer his or her finger.
See the Ringing Cedars of Russia site for Anastasia's pristine solution. How but by initially spreading word of these truly amazing books can we implement such a program of planetary transformation?
Hey, who cares as long as I can enjoy eating all I want and watching my favorite television shows? Grow your own foods if you wanna but I'll enjoy my favorite fast foods and TV dinners as I please. I've been enjoying it for years and I'm still flying.
Peak oil, hopefully, will solve our agriculture problems. Without the ability to overproduce as a result of essentially free energy in the form of stored photosynthesis we will have to go back to more sustainable forms agriculture. A side benefit may be that sustainable agriculture will no longer support the overpopulation that resulted from free energy farming and the population of the planet will be correspondingly reduced to a level that is resource sustainable.
Yes, sustainable agriculture is a fantasy if the population continues to grow. Nothing can be sustainable without a "sustainable" population, meaning a population that is able to live without destroying natural systems and that stays the same size. The most reasonable number I have heard is around 500,000,000.
Thank god for peak oil. Hopefully the economy will collapse before we have completely destroyed much more of the ecosystem.
There are multiple reasons for the obesity epidemic in America. I was recently at a birthday party where one of the guests, who was overweight, was expounding on his hunger for the cake. I told him that I tended to get more excited over 'veggies.' Hopefully, one of these decades, we can move more towards farming perennial plants instead of mostly annuals. While I 'no-till' to save soil, farming perennials would save more soil.
The USA is losing topsoil at a rate 10 times faster then it replenished. In China this rate is 40 times.
Industrial scale farms are being pressured to farm corner to corner in order to maximize crop yield. (Thus profits).
The primary cause of this is the raising of CROPS such as Corn which also sucks up tons of water.
Grain based fuels are exactly the wrong way to go. Converting pasture to cropland is the wrong way to go.
Great comment.
The barriers to fixing the problems with American agriculture are political and not scientific. There's nothing in this article that has not been discussed at length on this forum. The problem is getting around Big Ag's stranglehold on politicians at all levels of governement, especially the federal.
Like most of the issues facing the US, this one originates on Wall Street where corporate centralization of the elements of food production are seen as vital to the delivery of predictable profits.
Legal limits on agricultural holdings are the only possible way to stop the destruction of our food supply. We need to do to corporate agriculture what single-payer healthcare reform would do to the health insurance industry.
q
Another great comment.