EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
Popular content
Today's Top News
Give Canadians the Choice of Al Jazeera TV
The most vocal critics of human rights commissions often invoke freedom of speech. Yet they were strangely silent when Ottawa effectively blocked Al Jazeera Arabic TV's entry into Canada in 2004. And they are mostly silent now about Al Jazeera English's application before the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission.
Being treated like that in Canada is a minor irritation for the folks at the Qatar-based Al Jazeera, including the Canadian Tony Burman, managing director, English. They have seen far worse.
A-J Arabic was started in 1996 as a way of putting the gas-rich Persian Gulf emirate on the map.
Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani got it started with $140 million and the freedom to do real journalism. The quid pro quo was that the network wouldn't go after him. As compromising as that sounds, it isn't really. Which Canadian media excoriate their owners?
A-J spread like wildfire. Using its motto, "The opinion and the other opinion," it broke one taboo after another. Are the Saudi royals corrupt? Is Hezbollah a terrorist organization or legitimate resistance?
Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain shut down A-J bureaus. So did the Palestinian Authority (again, yesterday). Algeria shut down its own power grid 10 minutes into an A-J program on extrajudicial killings in that country.
Saudi Arabia once banned its citizens from watching, appearing on or talking to anyone from A-J. It ran an effective campaign to have advertisers pull their business from Al Jazeera.
It pulled its envoy from Doha.
So did Morocco. Tunisia and Libya severed diplomatic relations.
Egypt dubbed A-J a "Zionist channel."
Al-Jazeera was accused of being a lackey of Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and Hamas – as well as Israel and the CIA.
In November 2001, two American 500-pound bombs were dropped on the A-J bureau in Kabul, levelling the building. No one was inside.
During the Iraq war, its office in a Basra hotel was hit by four American missiles. Again, no one was hurt. Its Baghdad bureau was bombed, killing one correspondent. A-J staff was repeatedly harassed, beaten, arrested.
With its many bureaus and enterprise reporting, A-J got scoops galore: the 1998 Anglo-U.S. bombing of Iraq; interviews and tapes of Osama bin Laden; the 2001 invasion of Afghanistan, etc.
It was the first Arabic channel to interview Israelis. It was the first with women sports reporters.
In Canada, the A-J Arabic application was approved in 2004 by the CRTC but under strict conditions. To ostensibly protect viewers from possible anti-Semitic material, the channel's distributors were to be held responsible for its content. They balked.
"The effect of the commission's decision is to turn distributors into censors," said Michael Hennessy, president of the Canadian Cable Association. "This sets a frightening precedent."
Now it is the Al Jazeera English network, started in 2006, that's up for consideration. The CRTC is expected to meet next week.
The English network broadcasts 24 hours a day, seven days a week, from four centres – Doha, Kuala Lumpur, London and Washington.
It has developed a following of 140 million households in 100 countries – a footprint that the BBC and CNN took 10 years and more to develop. But unlike them, "our home team is not London or Atlanta. We have no home team to cheer," says Burman, former head of CBC News.
A-J English reports from under-reported regions of this world. It does so in detail, not two- or three-minute clips. This at a time when other media are retrenching, and Canadians are seeing less and less of news from around the world.
The network has a staff of 1,200 from 50 nationalities, "the most diverse newsroom in the world," says Burman. "Our staff is as multicultural as Canada. A-J should have special resonance in Canada."
Burman also says that "Israeli politicians appear on Al Jazeera more than on any other network outside of Israel. We provide more coverage of Israel than any other international coverage outside of Israeli networks.
"We are seen in Tel Aviv but not Toronto, in Haifa but not Halifax, in Kiryat Shmona but not Calgary."
That makes no sense.
The CRTC has no choice but to give Canadians the freedom to see Al Jazeera English. Otherwise, it would place Canada in the company of those autocrats who have tried to silence Al Jazeera.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




21 Comments so far
Show AllHere is the A.J. English language web page.
http://english.aljazeera.net/
AJE is wonderful, I subscribe to its YouTube news clips and its articles are great, and from what I can tell, completely free of bias. Try looking for that in Western news. And the film Control Room was great.
Its available 24/7 on livestation.
I say nyet to AJE. We wouldn't want our minds polluted by diverse viewpoints. Let sleeping dogs lie...or something like that.
Let lying dogs sleep?
So AJE TV is for practical purposes, banned in Canada, just like the US.
Aside from their health care system, and their use of the world's measurement system, can someone explain how Canada is different from the US in any substantial way?
Michael Moore can go around and open unlocked front doors in Canada :-)
Stephen Harper? Jason Kenney? The one who looks like a yawning hamster when he speaks - what is his name again?
Neither of them are fans of Avi Lewis or his famous wife either.
Looking forward to my Avi fix today - so I guess I better check if youtube has put up the latest episodes of Fault Lines yet.
Yes, we live in igloos and can read. The AJE application is pending, no decision has yet been made.
Yes there are the igloos and our spelling sets us apart from the US. I guess our beer too.
AJ English has many strengths. However, its recent action to pull broadcasting of a nonviolent West Papuan self determination documentary however is shocking. Apparently from pressure from the Indonesian government, AJ English capitulated. It is most unfortunate and tacitly supports a deeply racist ideology operating in Indonesia. See the www.nonviolentaction.net website for details.
Almost by definition, when information the public is entitle to is censored, the ones censoring it are the bad guys.
A corollary is that whatever is being censored, when you find out what it is, the real situation is much worse (they don't wait for the worst stuff to be in danger of being exposed to haul the censors out). The stuff that Al Jazeera reports isn't the half of it.
The likely prohibition of AJE TV in Canada is not at all surprising; it is banned in the USA. The corporate MSM are desperate to extend even tighter control over media news to try to compensate their loss of credibility. They want only the "good news" about the national and global system to be broadcast, but there is so little of this that they more and more resort to straight out lying. This is what the "freedom of the press" is all about -- freedom to broadcast only the official side of what is going on.
No surprises in the court of the emperor, I guess.
The translations on english.aljazeera.net/ are not great at times, but it's a great resource.
I have yet to see a translation error of Aljazeera's engish web site. Many educated Arabs speak English passably and write it quite well.
That are a far cry from the sometimes incomprehensibly bad english in the owners manual of Chinese goods.
Can't say anything about the translations on AJ, but I can attest that translations on CNN have been out in left field at time. As a former Yugoslav linguist, I found their translations pre-Bosnia incorrect to the point of 'propaganda'. I've listened to AJ in the past and have found them informative. My web server now block that site, so haven't listened to them in a year or so....
Harper is opposed to the principle of "giving Canadians choice."
Harper's goal is to smash Canada, then go work as a cube flunkey in his heart's desire USA.
To reinforce TheProf: you can watch al Jazeera live on your computer after downloading Livestation. You can choose from several languages. A broadband connection is necessary.
http://www.livestation.com/
Thanks!
Downloaded it last night, works great, cool people in that chat room too.
We've got Fox. Why not AJ?