Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- In Arkansas, Exxon Is Threatening to Arrest Reporters But Otherwise Telling Nobody Nothing
- It’s Official: A Democratic President Proposes to Cut Social Security
- Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?
- The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize
- Fukushima Meltdown Driving Increased Abnormalities Among US Infants
- The Corporate Betrayal of America
- Fukushima Meltdown Driving Increased Abnormalities Among US Infants
- Exxon's Unfriendly Skies: Why Does Exxon Control the No-Fly Zone Over Arkansas Tar Sands Spill?
- The Growing Campaign to Revoke Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize
- Chemical Disasters, Agent Orange, and GMOs: Monsanto's Legacy Traced in Exposé
Popular content
Today's Top News
Some Choice Words for the 'Select Few'
If you want to know what really matters in Washington, don't go to Capitol Hill for one of those hearings, or pay attention to those staged White House "town meetings." They're just for show. What really happens -- the serious business of Washington -- happens in the shadows, out of sight, off the record. Only occasionally -- and usually only because someone high up stumbles -- do we get a glimpse of just how pervasive the corruption has become.
Case in point: Katharine Weymouth, the publisher of The Washington Post -- one of the most powerful people in DC -- invited top officials from the White House, the Cabinet and Congress to her home for an intimate, off-the-record dinner to discuss health care reform with some of her reporters and editors covering the story.
But CEO's and lobbyists from the health care industry were invited, too, provided they forked over $25,000 a head -- or up to a quarter of a million if they want to sponsor a whole series of these cozy get-togethers. And what is the inducement offered? Nothing less, the invitation read, than "an exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will get it done."
The invitation reminds the CEO's and lobbyists that they will be buying access to "those powerful few in business and policy making who are forwarding, legislating and reporting on the issues...
"Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No." The invitation promises this private, intimate and off-the-record dinner is an extension "of The Washington Post brand of journalistic inquiry into the issues, a unique opportunity for stakeholders to hear and be heard."
Let that sink in. In this case, the "stakeholders" in health care reform do not include the rabble -- the folks across the country who actually need quality health care but can't afford it. If any of them showed up at the kitchen door on the night of this little soiree, the bouncer would drop kick them beyond the Beltway.
No, before you can cross the threshold to reach "the select few who will actually get it done," you must first cross the palm of some outstretched hand. The Washington Post dinner was canceled after a copy of the invite was leaked to the web site Politico.com, by a health care lobbyist, of all people. The paper said it was a misunderstanding -- the document was a draft that had been mailed out prematurely by its marketing department. There's noblesse oblige for you -- blame it on the hired help.
In any case, it was enough to give us a glimpse into how things really work in Washington -- a clear insight into why there is such a great disconnect between democracy and government today, between Washington and the rest of the country.
According to one poll after another, a majority of Americans not only want a public option in health care, they also think that growing inequality is bad for the country, that corporations have too much power over policy, that money in politics is the root of all evil, that working families and poor communities need and deserve public support if the market system fails to generate shared prosperity.
But when the insiders in Washington have finished tearing worthy intentions apart and devouring flesh from bone, none of these reforms happen. "Oh," they say, "it's all about compromise. All in the nature of the give-and-take-negotiating of a representative democracy."
That, people, is bull -- the basic nutrient of Washington's high and mighty.
It's not about compromise. It's not about what the public wants. It's about money -- the golden ticket to "the select few who actually get it done."
When Congress passed the Helping Families Save Their Homes Act, "the select few" made sure it no longer contained the cramdown provision that would have allowed judges to readjust mortgages. The one provision that would have helped homeowners the most was removed in favor of an industry that pours hundreds of millions into political campaigns.
So, too, with a bill designed to protect us from terrorist attacks on chemical plants. With "the select few" dictating marching orders, hundreds of factories are being exempted from measures that would make them spend money to prevent the release of toxic clouds that could kill hundreds of thousands.
Everyone knows the credit ratings agencies were co-conspirators with Wall Street in the shameful wilding that brought on the financial meltdown. But when the Obama administration came up with new reforms to prevent another crisis, the credit ratings agencies were given a pass. They'd been excused by "the select few who actually get it done."
And by the time an energy bill emerged from the House of Representatives the other day, "the select few who actually get it done" had given away billions of dollars worth of emission permits and offsets. As The New York Times reported, while the legislation worked its way to the House floor, "It grew fat with compromises, carve-outs, concessions and out-and-out gifts," expanding from 648 pages to 1400 as it spread its largesse among big oil and gas, utility companies and agribusiness.
This week, the public interest groups Common Cause and the Center for Responsive Politics reported that, "According to lobby disclosure reports, 34 energy companies registered in the first quarter of 2009 to lobby Congress around the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. This group of companies spent a total of $23.7 million -- or $260,000 a day -- lobbying members of Congress in January, February and March.
"Many of these same companies also made large contributions to the members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, which has jurisdiction over the legislation and held a hearing this week on the proposed 'cap and trade' system energy companies are fighting. Data shows oil and gas companies, mining companies and electric utilities combined have given more than $2 million just to the 19 members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee since 2007, the start of the last full election cycle."
It's happening to health care as well. Even the pro-business magazine The Economist says America has the worst system in the developed world, controlled by executives who are not held to account and investors whose primary goal is raising share price and increasing profit -- while wasting $450 billion dollars in redundant administrative costs and leaving nearly 50 million uninsured.
Enter "the select few who actually get it done." Three out of four of the big health care firms lobbying on Capitol Hill have former members of Congress or government staff members on the payroll -- more than 350 of them -- and they're all fighting hard to prevent a public option, at a rate in excess of $1.4 million a day.
Health care policy has become insider heaven. Even Nancy-Ann DeParle, the White House health reform director, served on the boards of several major health care corporations.
President Obama has pushed hard for a public option but many fear he's wavering, and just this week his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel -- the insider di tutti insiders -- indicated that a public plan just might be negotiable, ready for reengineering, no doubt, by "the select few who actually get it done."
That's how it works. And it works that way because we let it. The game goes on and the insiders keep dealing themselves winning hands. Nothing will change -- nothing -- until the money lenders are tossed out of the temple, the ATM's are wrested from the marble halls, and we tear down the sign they've placed on government -- the one that reads, "For Sale."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



151 Comments so far
Show AllShe explained this one yesterday when I asked her about the party's platform. The goal of Main Street Party is to focus on Main Street itself. Social issues have no place here and shall be taken care of when the time is ripe. I would much rather start clean rather than try to say Green Party and get shouted "commie" in my face.
Bennett Miller
Shreveport, LA
Thanks for the synopsis, Benn. I had to work yesterday, so missed Kathy's explanation. I hope she didn't shy away from responding to my question because she's tired of answering the same question. People want to know why they should invest time and energy in a new party, so it bears repeating, even if it's over and over and over. Goes with the territory.
As far as the Green Party goes - I understand your POV. The GP is tainted, mostly wrongly. As a past member, I grew tired of working and defending my position after both internal strife (and some ridiculous demands) and external negative PR was used against it (mostly by Democrats).
I think the sign reads"
"SOLD"
There's a good possibility that I won't get any of my transformative energy inventions prototyped. I'm right, but I'm not a fat cat. I'm an inventor, sitting on exactly what we need. Some of my designs go back 10 years but there wasn't any money then either.
No word yet, which isn't a good sign.
The Arctic sea ice extent has some chance of breaking 2007's record low by September. It will depend on a highly variable July and August. We can be sure that we'll be putting a great deal of methane, a global warming gas, into the atmosphere from the Arctic sea bed and from permafrost on surrounding lands. If you want to book a tourist ship sailing through Canada's Northeast Passage in September on an eco-tourism voyage, go ahead and book it.
Though sell PaulK, when we live in a world of R&D!
That's Rob and Duplicate!
OR
Buy the patent and sit on it.
I like the idea of supporting -for the rest of their lives-, people who invent things that benefit mankind.
While you promote your inventions, to corporate entities, (non disclosure docs and all) they find ways around YOU, and steal your idea anyway!
They have attorneys sitting around just waiting for a fight!
At the end of the essay, they wrote: "That's how it works. And it works that way because we let it."
"We" is national consciousness. National consciousness is not coherent and it is not unified. Polls reveal that people prefer single-payer, that they want the wars finished, and so forth. But most people, I think, spend little time thinking about how it COULD be. They simply want to get through the day and enjoy life a little.
And most people have given up on government, though, unfortunately, they still pay their taxes, which is really criminal, considering the actions of the government.
It's very hard to bring change by fighting the system. This era is not like the '60s. National consciousness—and world consciousness—have changed dramatically. There is a lot of fear and little tolerance for any sort of disorder/disruption of normal business: hence the arrests of the single-payer advocates at the Senate hearings.
But while the face of things shows business as usual, there's no question about changes to come. It's just a matter of how smoothly these transitions occur.
The rich and powerful are accustomed to what they have. It's all they know. Most politicians resemble the people who vote for them: they are self-serving people of limited vision.
Many people have forgotten who they are—if they ever did know who they are. The future will demand that people know the deepest level of their existence. Only in knowing the deepest, purest, most peaceful level of the Self can someone perform action which is right for himself and his surroundings. Nature will demand this from all humanity. And nature always has the upper hand. History is rife with stories of societies which failed to honor nature.
The US may be lucky in many ways but this nation is not out of nature's realm and not beyond nature's reach. The disconnect between man and nature mirrors the disconnect between the people and the government.
That state of affairs cannot last.
"That's how it works. And it works that way because we let it."
As Tonto said to the Lone Ranger, "What do you mean 'we', white man?".
THEY planned this. THEY milked us of profits after convincing us through clever PR that more is better. THEY then took the profits to buy our politicians, change the laws, concentrate their wealth some more and strip us of our dignity, self respect and voice in our government. WE trusted the government. Telling us WE let them do this is like telling a rape victim it was her fault because she has a vagina. What utter crap!
Lets talk about who "THEY" are. The oligarchy with their family dynasties are the best, brightest, most inventive, wholesome, family loving, harmonious, industrial and productive individuals on earth who well deserve their riches...NOT!
This is the myth. If they are so great, why, among families where the ultimate socialst dream exists (no hunger, no physical needs unfullfilled, the best education, exposure to the most beautiful works of art and artists, vacation in the finest resorts, respect from their peers, press adulation, etc. ad nauseum) do these families have violent strife and envy, wars over inheritance, public sniping and feuds, sibling murder or fraticide? Shakespeare covered the "harmony" among the royalty pretty well. The bible shows us how "great" brothers and sisters in the king's family get along. So you see, these people have one and only one outstanding trait; they are willing to sacrifice anything and anybody for power and riches. The rich elite are the worst trash there is in the world. The way hollywood portrays their lives is total bullshit. The PR game has convinced us that this predatory existence they lead is the ideal human condition. Wake the fuck up, people! They are LOSERS and they want us to be losers like them. Eschew their riches and pig behavior.
THEY NEED US. WE DON'T NEED THEM.
Bring them down with a frugal life. If you still envy the rich lifestyle, consider a frugal lifestyle as group therapy and "act it out" for awhile. The addiction to "rich envy" will fade. It takes time and you must avoid consumerist PR.
When you see somebody rich, turn your eyes away and say, "there goes the neighborhood". They are trash.
Thank you for the laugh. Whew. That last line was priceless, I can't wait to use it. I have just the school board meeting to use it. And thanks for the way to talk to the teens that stream through my house about some of their "idols". (G~d, how I hate that word)
BeForKids writes...
"We're not powerless. We can take our country back with the power of our vote."
I agree, but each and every year corporate America decides the only participants in the election. Most Congressmen, who ran in the last election, were sponsored by Big Pharma. It didn't matter whom you voted for, the corporate guy got in.
As for a new party that doesn't tow the corporate line, corporate media would ignore it or patronizingly make occasional reference to the new party only to point out that it's not realistic to vote for a third party. Most Americans would never even get a chance to hear about it. Look at Ralph Nader? The majority of Americans still don't know that he ran for president in the last two elections. Still millions voted for him in 2000 only to be blamed later for getting Adolf Bush elected. I sincerely doubt that Al Gore would have been the panacea that we were hoping for as well. Simply put, you can't participate in the election process (as a candidate) unless corporate America first approves of you regardless of the party affiliation.
"We're not powerless. We can take our country back with the power of our vote."
BULLSHIT.
Only withholding our dollars from the corporation will change the equation so that our vote has some meaning. As long as bribing is called lobbying, we don't have a snowball's chance in hell of influencing government. You must deny the profits to the corporate crooks that buy our politicians.
FRUGALITY IS FREEDOM!
It will hurt. They'll laugh at us. Many of us will die of disease and hunger while the rich hoard their fortunes. The politicians and newspapers will wage wars on our "stinginess" and "laziness" and "anti-american unproductivity". It will all be PR to herd us back the the milking and butchering areas. The quicker alternative is violent revoltion. Violent revolution only changes the names of those in power so that a new set of assholes can milk us. No, this can only be done slowly and painfully. If you love money and are poor or middle class, you've already been defeated.
The vote is but one variable in the equation, just as withholding dollars from the corporations is but one variable.
Frugality as freedom is just a nice daydream. The only way that could possibly work is to utterly and totally remove yourself from modern society, and that certainly doesn't equate to freedom of choice and the right of self-determination for all.
There is the question of money. It is currently a privately owned commodity. That is a key variable in the equation. Surely anyone should be able to comprehend how when your money is owned so are you.
There is the question of law. It is currently legislated and adjudicated by those beholden to financial, corporate and special interests, by which the spirit of personal freedoms have been throughly co-opted.
And there is the question of political persuasion. Whenever partisan rhetoric and partisanship are involved, objectivity and common sense are lost.
And finally there is the question of critical mass. Common ground cannot be found nor can the seeds of common welfare flourish whenever the greater mass of people fail to define and adhere to a common vision.
In concluding that any one man or any one variable can bring about the change we seek, you fail to understand the true nature of what binds us.
Amendment X of the Constitution provides the opportunity for people to lawfully organize and assert power within the framework of "Natural Law" as referenced and set forth by our forefathers in the Declaration of Independence. As if history hasn't already enlightened us, a violent revolution will simply be another case of jumping from the kettle into the fire, and in time we will find ourselves again at the mercy of those who will wield power as might rather than as responsibility..
Agg and Space Cadet, you both miss my point. We can advance by starting local and moving up from there. The more Congressional districts we start with the better, but one is better than none. It will just take longer.
Agg, you sound like a corporatist's wet dream. This isn't about frugality, it's about survival. They would love an uncomplaining slave wage/cannon fodder class consisting of 95% of Americans but I DON'T! I want affordable college, affordable health care, safe and professional childcare, a year of paid maternity leave so babies can be nurtured, 30 hour workweeks and 6 week vacations so families can relax and spend time together. If other countries can do this we can. Americans don't realize they are entitled to this but they are. Like the USSR of the 1950s, we are living behind an iron curtain withholding information about what our lives could be.
We can take back our country with the power of our vote if we refuse to vote for anyone who accepts corporate money. Our representatives should be writing and passing laws for us, not laws written by lobbyists for the corporations. Hell, they don't even read those laws before voting yes.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
BeForKids,
"Agg, you sound like a corporatist's wet dream."
If I'm a corporatist's wet dream, then they must have a strange sex life.
All kidding aside, I hear what you are saying. They will step on me like an ant. I beg to differ. You still labor under the impression that these powerful people buying our politicians owe their power to the government and the military. It's not true. Most people in the government and the military and the police come from people like you and me who are highly pissed. The power of our leaders comes from us. The money of the rich comes from us. They don't get the profits from each other. We deny them the profits and they can't pull the political strings. THEN we institute the reforms because THEN the politicians won't be bought and paid for by the elite. Now if you think wanting to impoverish the rich is a weak kneed idea borne of cowardice, I'll accept that as a possibility. However, I maintain that lack of profits strikes terror into the rich elite's heart like no violent revolution would. Furthermore, as long as most Americans like the idea of being rich, fat, wealthy and just plain pigging out, then the elite bastards can always buy enough of us to DESTROY any reforms for the good of the people like the 30 hour work week and free education. It is KEY to embrace a philosophy of life OPPOSITE to the elite outlook. Perhaps you hunger for your shot at the big time. They'll buy you.
"This isn't about frugality, it's about survival."
THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO GET ACCROSS TO YOU!
I'm not being frugal because it's fun. I do it because it hurts the elite. You say that is bullshit. Okay, 70% of the economy is consumer spending. Someone here said we had to exit the economy totally to do the corporations enough damage. NOT TRUE. All we have to do is cut their profits as a positive act instead of an "oh shit, I'm poor so I'll have to be frugal" thing. Corporations are leveraged to the hilt. It won't take much to bring them down. They were much more fiscally conservative before the Great Depression. Now it's much easier to bring them down because their finances are so fragile. So if we reduce our spending by 50% (NOT exiting the economy totally), we destroy the economy and the profits. Furthermore, if we ALL sell our stocks and put the money in bonds or treasuries or savings accounts in credit unions, it destroys the hedge funds, pension fund managers and wall street brokers that BUY our politicians with OUR money. The whole 401K thing was a massive, fraudulent buck pass to screw the American people and further enrichen the elite. But I'll bet you still have a 401K, right?
I think we're on the same side but you think I'm mealy mouthed. The tough guy American individualist, Horacio Alger thing was ALWAYS a myth. Jimmy Stewart's movie characters NEVER existed. We've been gamed. Wake up. We CANNOT use their methods to bring them down. They are better at them and we'll always lose because half of us will be led by the smell of MONEY.
"We can take back our country with the power of our vote if we refuse to vote for anyone who accepts corporate money."
Yes, but candidates who don't take corporate money don't get to play. So you have a problem here with this analysis. The only time that the accumulation of local offices has worked to build a national electoral movement is the movement on the right recently. and whether or not it's "worked" is arguable, since most of the wishlist of the social right in the US has remained unfulfilled. Further, that was a movement incubated by the infusion of millions of dollars of both corporate and antidemocratic millionaire money. Progressives won't get that kind of seed cash. Ever.
The electoral system as is, is broken. Completely broken. YOu can take over as many school boards as you wish--like the right did--or take as many state legislative seats as you'd like. But nothing changes. And the reason nothing changes is the way our Federalist system is gamed by national power. There are a thousand ways to overrule local and state officers and policies that aren't acceptable to the dominant political and commercial elites.
Think of what you *can't* do right now:
1. You can't run for office without money. Period. Even smaller local offices require an outlay of cash that is beyond the reach of almosst anyone that is not solidily middle class. Further, the time required to work AND run for a campaign is generally not available to ordinary workers (corporatista managers can sometimes pick and choose their time off to do these things. Usually it's self-employed professionals, like lawyers and doctors).
2. You cannot limit the expenditure of cash on campaigns at any level. Thanks to Buckley v Valeo, cash is speech. Even if you managed to get some laws passed, they will be overturned on challenge. Rich people love 527s, since they get to open up the purse strings and go to town against a candidate or party by running "issue" ads.
3. Gerrymandering over the years has resulted in so many "safe"" districts for one of the major parties that it would be virtually impossible for even a nationaly supported third party to gain substantive numbers of seats in any legislative body. They could get massive numbers of total votes, but be left with nothing in the end.
4. You cannot bypass the media filters at any level. All "news" outlets are essentially conservative--if you include corporatist as a form of conservatism, which I do. Advertisers wishes rule, and that is *always* taken into account when determining what to cover and what to ignore. If there was any doubt about this before, there can benone now after the Washington Post "pay to play" scandal.
What we have is a tension between normative civic duty--exercising the right to vote to the point where a right becomes duty--and the conferring of legitimacy on the state. This is, in my view, our single biggest error. We shouldn't be trying to win elections, attractive as the possibility may appear. Ask the right where 35 years of building a massive and well-funded movement got them in the end. Almost nowhere (almost, but they did get a few things).
If we believe that this system is irredeemable, than our first obligation is to begin the long process of stripping legitimacy from this system. We cannot do that when people vote. Each time you vote, you are giving your consent, regardless of who you vote for. An electoral boycott in massive numbers (and they're pretty big now!) would at the very least put power on notice that we're no longer in thrall to the faux democracy we've established. We're beginning, inother words, the long process of getting a national divorce from the state.
I hate to conclude that one of the most important things to do is to make sure you don't vote anymore, but I do conclude that. We have to decide whether or not we're going to be antagonistic to the state and act accordingly, or if we're going to continue in this bizarre holding pattern, constantly waiting for a savior that never comes, and in doing so, continuing to give voice to the fantasy that we still believe America can work as advertised.
I can't give the state anything anymore. And I can't vote, because I don't see myself as a citizen possessed of representation OR rights. So in return, I refuse to give moral cover for this machine. The most power I have right now is to tell them, "I may not be able to stop you, but I sure as hell won't sign my own death warrant".
Just something to think about.
Skip_Townes,
I applaud your efforts and analysis. It is obvious that you are part of the solution.
Thank you
I've been toying with the idea of not voting and I think I might go for it. I just don't see it working, at any level anymore for me. And I've been doing it conscienciously for 30 years. That's a long time to give something a chance and have it disappoint you over and over again.
Me, too. It's understandable that the young hold out hope for this sytem, and one of the weirder things is that we usually associate youth with rebellion; and with some justification. But the flip side of being young is that you don't have the gritty experience of seeing a "system" for what it is. That, sadly, takes time. So when you're finally old enough to realize you've been gamed, you're also old enough to where rocking the boat hasalmost been bred out of your DNA by your experience as a field hand. And when you're young, there's always the "next election".
I wish we didn't even have to have discussions like this. Anyone remember how board discussions were even 8 years ago? Or even prior to 2004? I'm seeing posts and language I'd never thought i'd start seeing from ordinary people like me. But I guess this is where the long march begins. John Adams famously said that the American Revolution began in the heads of the people about ten years prior to the war actually being waged (as a result of the injustices of the French-Indian War). I think we're in the same position.
AS each person concludes that their government is this alien lifeform that rules without regard, the bond becomes ever more fragile between state and citizen. Even peaceful revolutions--and most of them I think are peaceful--require that severance. I think radicals have to focus on that psychological aspect of it. Pushing people, respectfully but firmly, toward the idea that there is probably no way this country can fix itself; for the same reason a broken mower can't do it.
"They" have been putting "their" person in anyway.
Not voting won't change who gets elected!
--------------
BE FOR KIDS - Act LOCAL is the exception!
Lets start getting PEOPLE WE KNOW into local government!
BeForKids,
You and all of us need to organize.
If readers/posters are sincere, we will make plans to get together at public forums. Visit the website for Netroots Nation 2009; this year's convention is in Pittsburgh, August 13-16. I would guess that there will be a CommonDreams booth.
Last November I invited readers to join me at School of Americas vigil in November. I met Marie Dennis who authored the CommonDreams essay, "Shut the Doors on a Disgraced Military School," 11/20/08
If readers are sincere about doing something and taking action, it would help to organize.
wc652,
I agree with your above post. There is very little organization in this nation of ours. As long as liberal/progressive people stay on the computer, lamenting about one thing or another, nothing will change except an increase in power and profit for the ruling elite, the corporate executives, the war-mongers, and the politicians accepting money from these types.
Standing together, in person, and in numbers is crucial for progressive change. Chit chat on the computer only goes so far as we share our thoughts with one another, and the ruling-class could care less about how mad the "keyboarders" are. The political actions legislation in Washington D.C. proves my point. Many writing on this forum have very good ideas, and I like BeForKids idea of a "Main Street Party" for common people. The Democrats, for the most part, lost my respect, but I have supported and voted for progressive ones.
I envisioned a CommonDreams summit last year, but most posters prefer isolationism, and are very fearful of other people in spite of having good intentions. One thing about tyrants...they aren't bashful for coming together in achieving their goals for money and power. Too bad more on the left don't have the courage of their convictions.
Peaceman,
I cannot tell you just how much I agree with you. I surprisingly find myself getting better the more time I spend reading the books than posting. I understand what you mean on isolationism. I've seen a lot of grouping and dividing on this and other sites, even the progressive/liberal sites, on the Internet. Despite the divisions though, I do give it my best to communicate with others with different view points rather than letting myself get too taken into one person alone. The trick is to mingle in with various viewpoints on the left and figure out how best to separate the wheat from the chafe when necessary. As for a CD summit, yeah that's going to be harder to actually envision since our nation believes so much in individualist mentality. By the way, long time no see. Welcome back. :)
Jennifer,
Thanks for your understanding. You are correct about assessing different points of views on the left and one thing for sure about liberals and progressives--we promote our way or method as the best or proper way towards attaining our goals, and therein lies the problem, I think. Too many directions on how to get there and achieve results. It's difficult for many on the left to get on the same page and unite. As for a CD summit, I gave up on that concept and work in the surrounding communities in building consensus for specific issues. I'm more into an active role rather than a passive one posting comments on CD or other websites. But the comments section ARE important, as we learn from each other. I'm promoting Single Payer Health Care, HR 676, and several other things at the moment. If anyone hasn't seen the Bill Moyer's interview Friday night, they need to, and if they're still not convinced about the treacherous agenda of the insurance companies, then our country is doomed. Sometimes I'm off of CD for a few weeks at a time and don't even read the articles because of time limitations. You noticed. Thanks again!
"Sometimes I'm off of CD for a few weeks at a time and don't even read the articles because of time limitations. You noticed. Thanks again!"
I wished I could share that strength but there's so much goodies on this site I just can't resist. :)
PS: I still have your posts and advice in hand and don't hesitate to look back on them.
You're very kind, Jennifer, but there many fine people posting on CD who say so much more than I do.
I know what you mean about the difficulty in staying away. Don't worry, the old Peaceman is very aware of daily events.
The main thing is...you're on the right path. So, my compliments to you!
I have a better idea. Why not plant in some fake Democrats and Republicans who will switch to Main Street Party once elected and follow the MS party platform of course? It's bad enough that the electorate will only choose between Democrat and Republican so why not just sneak them in without waking up the two sleeping giants?
We all know that money influences governance. Election reform can help, but the influence of money then moves 'off the map': it still remains a potent force. Consider the implicit understanding of people like Rubin, Summers, and Geithner that a cushy bankster job awaits them after their government service is done (or not, ya know what I mean?).
But the money can STILL reflect, imperfectly, the WILL of the PEOPLE, if the PEOPLE STILL OWN THE MONEY. The danger to our democracy is wealth concentration: the money that influences policy coming from too few points of view. And no one denies that, since Reagan cut taxes, there has been wealth concentration. In 1980, the wealthiest 1% of the country owned 20% of it. Today, that's 40%. In 1977, the wealthiest 0.1% of income earners earned 20 times the median income of the poorest 90%. Today, that ratio is 80 times! Given this, how can Congress help but reflect the issues important to a smaller and smaller fraction of society?
We need to return progressive taxation to the levels it was at between 1930 and 1980. No, we weren't corruption free. But we were solvent, dynamic, tops in industry, engineering, civilization, infrastructure. Basically, we were everything we today are NOT. And I don't find it inconsequential that, in some states, the wealthy actually pay LOWER tax rates than the poor.
ubrew12,
"The danger to our democracy is wealth concentration"
Surely, you are reffering to our democracy in the past tense.
We don't have a democracy. We exist in a kleptocratic plutocracy or a plutocratic kleptocracy.
ALL the money comes from the poor and middle class. And as you have pointed out, corruption, injustice, the assault on honesty and decency and the destruction of everything worthwhile will continue until we stop letting them milk us. We must learn to love living like paupers. We must learn to be unselfish and share with our neighbors. We will destroy the influence of the rich on our politicians if the rich become poor. The rest is BULLSHIT. Remember, the rich get their money from YOU. Stop being an idiot. Deny them their profits.
"We need to return progressive taxation to the levels it was at between 1930 and 1980."
This MUST BE DONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The bills this nation owes and the commitments it has made require it and history has shown that it makes society stable and improves things for everyone Including the rich.
OMT, Right now we go into debt as a nation to give money to the rich to invest and correct things. People, with progressive taxation with deductions for investment in the economy we did the same thing and didn't go into debt. The rich were forced to invest to get those deductions and things worked. Force the rich through tax policy to do this again otherwise we are just bankrupting the nation. I sure didn't see the rich getting poorer in those days. LOL!!!!
This is corruption, and corruption is the biggest problem in the world today, far greater than "terrorism." It is exacerbated by what I call "willful ignorance" on the part of public officials - complete disinterest in even thinking about what might be good or wise to work toward for the common good.
i do hold out some hope for single-payer healthcare.... or just for the genuine 'care' of some in the health biz to go viral, but am so far just grateful beyond words i haven't NEEDED healthcare like so many mistreated, untreated and undertreated people i've known have.... sometimes desperately. personally i avoid the healthcare industrial complex as much as possible and try to eat consciously of not just my own health, but that of the earth that sustains us all & to exercise sensibly for prevention, and hopefully will face my aging body's inevitable deterioration with the right balance of tenacity and acceptance once my mortality manifests in a big way. to see insurance companies and big pharma evaporate or transform into something resembling actual compassionate CARE for the sick or injured or dying in my lifetime would be a great thing to see, but dedication, kindness and respectful earth stewardship are not a commodities, however much it might look that way, given the access and lack of access to med. care based on economic class. someday maybe we humans will have enough imagination, skill & intelligence to get over our buying and selling mania and learn how to just be kind, living simply 'that others may simply live'.
You may be right that we all have to eat and live responsibly but even then it doesn't guarantee that your healthcare costs will necessarily be low. You cannot expect people to be automatically enlightened. If there are forces out there to brainwash the masses, there needs to be counter-forces to effectively cancel the brainwashing. I don't like blaming people for lack of personal responsibility.
The power of lobbies do not contravene or contradict the power of the vote; they feed from it. That is why lobbies are part of superficially part of democratic systems, not part of straightforwardly totalitarian ones.
In the US, lobbies work and corporations almost completely control government not because Americans' votes are worthless, but because so many of them can be indirectly purchased. The lobbyist purchases media exposure for the politician, who returns policy decisions.
The changing Democratic platform through the 2008 election manifested this as clearly as a textbook. Policies faded and fell to the right as progressive campaigns fell to underfunding and media blackouts and the front-runners found themselves competing in a field with no progressives in the running and none that they had to face in open debate.
The American people could gain control of the electoral process directly should they, by some miracle, manage to become generally informed about politics.
Of course, that will remain hypothetical.
The other possibilities involve systemic reform of the ways media govern elections.
Since Congress is too beholden to lobbyists to vote to limit lobbying, this has to be done by direct ballot proposals.
"Since Congress is too beholden to lobbyists to vote to limit lobbying, this has to be done by direct ballot proposals."
I think CA has already tried direct ballot proposals and like MS, they often don't work out. Somehow, it's too easy to brainwash the voters into getting their votes wrong. We may need varieties of counter lobbyists and think tanks that aren't too monied.
It's all because of 'representation.'
This news is worthy. Pacifica Radio reported it a few days ago. I do take one exception:
"President Obama has pushed hard for a public option but many fear he's wavering,..."
Is this true? Has Obama pushed hard? I don't think so.
Of course not. Obama's PR goons are just trying to keep him positioned as the voice of reason. Watch how he tap dances around the calls for a new stimulus. Anything that goes strait to the people without giving 90% to the elite crooks first will not be approved by this president. He is bought and paid for. His administration HAS JUST ROBBED MILLIONS of retired people and employees by claiming there is no inflation htis year. That will deny COLA money to those who need it most in 2010. But you don't hear a word about the gamed CPI (consumer price index). Help is not on the way. We can only help ourselves.
Sioux Rose
AGG: Right on! Thank you for an incisive analysis. Obama's moves are so predictable they could be made into a new dance. It could be named the "bait, court, and quick switch," requiring numerous 180-degree turns, done adroitly and repeated. I guess it's so spellbinding to dumb-struck audiences that it seems fresh and innovative, every time he assumes his quick steps. (Apologies to our own forum's quickstepper.)
"Obama's moves are so predictable"
Are you so sure about that? I can predict what the Republicans will do from a mile away but the Democrats especially Obama have a knack of sniveling and then stabbing at very close range. I can expect bad stuff from Obama but don't know how bad. Are you referring to the Obama cultists and their violent talks and moves?
Bennett Miller
Shreveport, LA
It's best that you anticipate the worst of Obama. Obama's too unpredictable IMO at least in terms of how bad he can get.
Soux Rose,
Thank you. I hope the dental thing is working out.
"That's how it works. And it works that way because we let it."
As Tonto said to the Lone Ranger, "What do you mean 'we', white man?".
THEY planned this. THEY milked us of profits after convincing us through clever PR that more is better. THEY then took the profits to buy our politicians, change the laws, concentrate their wealth some more and strip us of our dignity, self respect and voice in our government. WE trusted the government. Telling us WE let them do this is like telling a rape victim it was her fault because she has a vagina. What utter crap!
Lets talk about who "THEY" are. The oligarchy with their family dynasties are the best, brightest, most inventive, wholesome, family loving, harmonious, industrial and productive individuals on earth who well deserve their riches...NOT!
This is the myth. If they are so great, why, among families where the ultimate socialst dream exists (no hunger, no physical needs unfullfilled, the best education, exposure to the most beautiful works of art and artists, vacation in the finest resorts, respect from their peers, press adulation, etc. ad nauseum) do these families have violent strife and envy, wars over inheritance, public sniping and feuds, sibling murder or fraticide? Shakespeare covered the "harmony" among the royalty pretty well. The bible shows us how "great" brothers and sisters in the king's family get along. So you see, these people have one and only one outstanding trait; they are willing to sacrifice anything and anybody for power and riches. The rich elite are the worst trash there is in the world. The way hollywood portrays their lives is total bullshit. The PR game has convinced us that this predatory existence they lead is the ideal human condition. Wake the fuck up, people! They are LOSERS and they want us to be losers like them. Eschew their riches and pig behavior.
THEY NEED US. WE DON'T NEED THEM.
Bring them down with a frugal life. If you still envy the rich lifestyle, consider a frugal lifestyle as group therapy and "act it out" for awhile. The addiction to "rich envy" will fade. It takes time and you must avoid consumerist PR.
When you see somebody rich, turn your eyes away and say, "there goes the neighborhood". They are trash.
AGG
"Bring them down with a frugal life."
-I agree, but as long as we have a capitalist system, not consuming means people lose their jobs. It's a catch-22, in order for a capitalist to function the sheeple must consume.
The way the game is rigged the oligarchs can't lose. When times are booming they rake in profits, when times bust, like now, they socialize the losses. The profits remain private, the losses are socialized.
It really is the system that needs to change, because capitalism doesn't work for the majority, it works handsomely for the top. Most of the sheeple being marginalized by the system are also defenders of it. So how do we convince them we need to do away with capitalism when secretly many of them hope to win a lottery a ticket and one day be rich themselves?
That explains why people look at my wife and I when we would say how frugal we were. There too, enough discussion and I'd get shouted "commie" in my face yet again. The poor schmucks have nothing to gain from capitalism and yet they hate the very thing that could save their lives. I am also witnessing more hardline Obama cultists parroting Obama on supporting capitalism.
Bennett Miller
Shreveport, LA
You are right and they are wrong. As Obama's betrayal becomes more evident, his defenders will be silenced and realize you were right. When they "get it", they'll look again at your life style. They'll see how you continue to live in good and bad times. They'll see how you are a reliable, unbuyable individual and seek to emulate you. The current aversion to frugality is a product of a generation of clever, massive and nearly constant advertising through product placement in television and movies. Movie stars act out the "I love money, money, money and it makes me so happy, happy happy" over and over again. So it's little wonder that the victims of this con see you as the one in error; Peer pressure to be a big spender is part of the con. I have several family members who are loyal republican money lovers who think I'm some kind of Vermont hippy that has rejected society. Well, I HAVE rejected their version of it. Hang in there. My wife and I get the same treatment and worse.
Ric Tailcap
"So how do we convince them we need to do away with capitalism when secretly many of them hope to win a lottery a ticket and one day be rich themselves?"
I wish I knew. I was part of the rat race for many years and bought into the "money isn't everything, but it's way ahead of whatever is in second place" meme. What caused me to change? I saw how for every year that I busted my tail working and taking additional college courses to better myself, the elite were "bettering themselves" economically by several multiples of my best efforts. After blaming myself for a while, I finally realized that our system was set up this way. All my efforts were helping lazy rich people much more than they were helping me. I was perpetuating THEIR wealth while inching agonizingly towards mine. I vowed to stop welfare for the rich and frugality is the only way. War and Peace is a good book that shows how a poor guy is subsequently treated as important when he inherits a fortune. It's all fake and he finally realizes it.
I hope that helps.
Mr. Moyers and Mr. Winship,
Thank you.
Absolutely magnificent.
Sincerely,
Deborah
Boston, MA
One more excellent article about how Washington works, how the will of the public is thwarted. One question, is this how all of Washington works, all the time everyday, on every issue?
And I hear people say that we let them do this. I write my representatives... I write letters to the editor... I send money to groups that, I think, support my positions... I vote... and nothing ever much changes. But, I don't know what to do. What else should we do in order to get our government to respond as we want them to?
Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public. (H.L. Mencken)
That, as I see it, is the problem here. I have read some very thought-provoking posts from some very intelligent people here. And forgive me, but I'm just not that smart. However, we live in a nation in which "one in five high school grads cannot read their own diplomas"(http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0201illiterateamerica.htm). A large percentage cannot read a map.
Those people aren't reading this excellent article by Moyers and Winship. They aren't posting their comments here. They are content to watch Wheel of Fortune instead of the news. Inside Edition is the closest many of them come to journalism. The politicians know this, and count on it.
Talking heads on both sides, from Olberman to O'Reilly, do their best to reach this audience because when you are content to let someone else do your thinking for you, your mind is easily swayed.
Here in the midwest, I'm hearing a lot of talk of actual revolt. The Glenn Becks and Ted Nugents and Limbaughs are stoking a fire that will soon burn out of control. Gun sales are up, book sales down. That's never a good combination.
I don't have any answers. But the idea of a right wing resurgence, at best, or insurrection, at worst, scares the hell out of me. If you all want to organize, I'm in. Email me DHSwinehart@gmail.com
I started with a Mencken quote, I'll finish with one:
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.
America cannot change. I used to think that with enough economic hardship affecting a large enough segment of our population, people would shut off their dream machines and become politically involved ... and act in their collective best interests.
Apparently not. Well at least not in the ways we'd hoped. If things got much worse for a lot of people, would it make a difference? The only political action that seems to appeal to anyone is the kind fomented by the Right. (Guns, Militias, etc.) These movements and others like the Tea Parties are just cathartic expressions of rage and frustration. These people argue against the very idea of taxes instead of demanding more tangible and equitable benefits from the taxes that are collected.
Because the Right has done such an effective job of discrediting government of any kind, political energy is directed towards self-defeating ideals like secession, tax abolition, and the most pointless of all, arming ourselves for the "second revolution." As Chris Hedges says in the attached, "The system wants violence." Then they can turn up the heat, take away all our civil rights and establish more restrictive laws to (of course) "protect us from ourselves."
Look at this and bear witness to some of the madness that's sweeping our nation.
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/20090708_time_for_a_second_revolution
The true but unappealing fact is that the only way we can change this government is to act politically: invest our time our actions and our votes. Don't settle for charismatic products like Obama (anyone else convinced yet he was the wrong one?)
It's too hard I'll admit. We're too big. But we have to find a way. We need a revolution alright, but not one waged with traditional weapons of war. We need to take up arms in the information revolution: Push people to become candidates and get them elected. Break down the barriers to participation in government. Get more millionaires out of government and more middle class in.
Nothing would make me happier than some outrageous groundswell of activism that would wipe that irritatingly complacent smile off Obama's face. (It's almost become as irritating as Bush's smirk)
We need politicians that will forgo dinners at Blue Hill while millions live in poverty and hunger. We need a real visionary not a charismatic consumer product that is well-schooled in the finesse of navigating politics (Why do you think Palin is so popular?). We need real change and we won't get it until we change - as a nation.
And we need to make it happen before the frustrations on the right turn into a violence that will change our country for the worst.
The US is as corrupt as any other nation. So stop pretending and finally admit: no better, no worse than any other. And this is the country that the world looks to for leadership? What is the matter with the world? Gone stupid?