Who Sits at the Health-Reform Table?
President Obama held a town hall on
Health Care Reform last week, broadcast nationwide on ABC with Charlie
Gibson and Diane Sawyer. Once again, even though a majority of the
public and now even a majority of doctors in the US favor a
single-payer system, single payer was still off the table.
The president of the AMA, which opposes single payer, nowadays
representing about a 19 percent minority of doctors, was prominently on
display.
Ron Williams, CEO of Aetna, the health insurance company that in the
1850’s provided insurance to slave holders for their slaves, was part
of the discussion too. In 2007, Ron Williams received $19,924,027.00 in
total compensation as CEO of that health insurance company.
But the part of the healthcare problem that caught my eye was a woman
in a bright yellow jacket, seated on the front row in the East Room of
the White House. "Dr. Gail Wilensky, who ran Medicare in the Bush
Administration," gushed ABC's Diane Sawyer by way of introduction.
Wilensky (the Dr. in front of her name is for a PhD in economics, not a
degree in medicine) got to ask the last question in the prime-time
portion of the show, right before the late-night news. She tossed out
some big numbers and asked "What do we do in ways that CBO will count
so that we can actually get everybody covered?"
It is worth noting here that CBO, the Congressional Budget Office, has
'scored' other plans, but not single payer. If the single payer numbers
were run by CBO, she might have the answer to her question.
Wilensky was also present at one of the Senate Finance Committee
hearings in May where the Committee Chairman, Senator Max Baucus, joked
about needing more police as he had single payer advocates arrested for
vocalizing their wish to be included in the debate.
At www.singlepayeraction.org
, I read that "Baucus held three days of health care hearings and heard
from 41 witnesses — not one of which was a single-payer advocate," and
that, "Earlier this month, Baucus said that he will use the power of
his office to seek to have the criminal charges against the Baucus 13
dismissed," and that as of June 25, "Prosecutors said this week they
have not heard from Baucus or his office about the matter."
Doctors, nurses, other advocates are kept away from the table and face criminal charges. Wilensky and Aetna are at the table and get invited to the White House.
A Troubling Past
So who is Wilensky? I'll answer that by pasting in a portion of an
op-ed I wrote in the Kansas City Star in March 2000:
"Under the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, besides cutting Medicare funding, Congress formed the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission with 17 commissioners, a full-time director and a staff of 30 analysts.
"The
commission, charged with advising Congress on how to spend Medicare
money, is headed by Gail Wilensky, former chief of the Health Care
Financing Administration under President George Bush. Sound like a good
idea?
"I first ran across Wilensky's name when I
was researching HCR ManorCare, the national chain that owns an Overland
Park nursing home where my father lived for 13 days in 1998 before I
moved him to another facility. Wilensky serves on ManorCare's board of
directors and its audit committee.
"She also serves on the boards of United Health Group (an HMO and other health companies), Pharmerica Inc. (which provides medications to nursing homes), Advanced Tissue Sciences Inc., Neopath Inc., Quest Diagnostics Inc., St. Jude Medical Inc., Shared Medical Systems Corp. and Syncor International."
One wonders whose interests she considers when making her recommendations to Congress.
On Aug. 19, 2003, I had occasion to speak about Wilensky again when I
was invited by Sen. Kit Bond’s staff to speak at a hearing in the
Federal Courthouse in Kansas City, Missouri, before the Subcommittee on
Aging of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the
United States Senate.
Here is a portion of my statement:
“Immediately
after getting my father out of Manor Care, I began researching that
company and the other big players in long-term care, and what I found
then was Enron and WorldCom and Arthur Andersen. I looked at the SEC
filing for the half dozen giants in the field and found that they all
lavished multimillion dollar compensation packages on their CEOs and
other top executives.
“Integrated Health Services
sought a 50 to 60 million dollar golden parachute for departing CEO,
Dr. Robert Elkins, who had led them to bankruptcy, and a federal
bankruptcy judge approved it. In addition to lavish salary and bonuses,
HCR Manor Care CEO, Paul Ormond, realized a gain of $23.7 million from
stock options exercised in fiscal 2001.
“Seems like all these companies have money to burn, yet they continue
to work together to lobby for more money, with no strings attached,
wrapping themselves in a phony free market flag while typically getting
70 percent or more of their billions of dollars of total revenues from
tax dollars and Medicare and Medicaid.
“In 1999, I found Gail Wilensky, then head of the congressionally
mandated Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, was also serving on the
board -- and I will correct here, it was the audit committee, not the
compensation committee, of HCR Manor Care -- as well as on the boards
of health care related companies. She later resigned from MedPAC due to
the appearance of conflict of interest.
“But today we have former For Profit hospital lobbyist, Tom Scully; he
is the administrator of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It
seems all the corporate interests are always very well represented.”
So it was in 2003. And in the White House and on ABC last Wednesday, it
seems all the corporate interests were still very well represented.
I didn’t see any evidence of single-payer advocates on the show. I
e-mailed Dr. David Himmelstein of Harvard Medical School, co-founder of
Physicians for a National Health Plan just to make sure that I didn't
miss something. He confirmed that they were once again "off the table."

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
15 Comments so far
Show All[1] "Conservative ideology has failed America"
(my take: this is as true as the sky is blue; it's not even debatable)
[2] "It's not conservative ideology that has failed...it's the corruption of our elected officials"
(my take: the last part of this is true chiefly BECAUSE the first part is already demonstrably false
<><><>
Since conservative ideology (which is mostly just vile greed wrapped in faux religious and patriotic claptrap) is now, and effectively has been for the past 60 yrs, the one and only ruling ideology, the only useful question is:
Why do Americans tolerate this ideology -- when 80% of them clearly don't benefit from it, to say nothing of being provably harmed by it?
This question is only answerable by getting into the psychodynamics of healthy self-identity vs mass hypnosis, mass masochism, mass identification with the aggressor, etc. -- areas of inquiry that, unfortunately, even most dedicated progressives tend to pan again and again.
Mr. Klammer:
Please note that the GAO did a study in 1991 of the single payer system in Canada and they found:
"If the universal coverage and single-payer features of the Canadian
system were applied in the United States, the savings in administrative
costs alone would be more than enough to finance insurance coverage
for the millions of Americans who are currently uninsured. There would
be enough left over to permit a reduction, or possibly even the elimina-
tion, of copayments and deductibles, if that were deemed appropriate."
AND
"Canadians have few problems with access to primary care services.
There are more physicians per person in Canada than in the United
States, and Canadians use more physician services per person than do
US. citizens. Yet the cost of physician services per person in Canada
was one-third less than in the United States."
You can find this study by putting this number in Google: HRD-91-90
Any guess as to why do we not hear more about this study?
Let's keep the heat on our representatives and tell them that they must vote for single payer or we will vote them out of office. (You're fired!) It can be as simple as that.
I have an idea as to who should sit at the table. Companies and their employees who have been finding business in the doldrums due to overhead costs. I've worked in temporary jobs in the past and I felt the pain of trying to invest in one of those healthcare insurance companies. The problem most employees have is they're hooked into ignorance. Just this morning when I was talking to someone who was discussing healthcare reform that was being discussed on TV, I asked her about single payer. She said she never heard of it but when I explained it to her she giggled and called it Hillary care. I almost felt like smacking her but tried again. She was still confused and I told her that as long as she's employed that she doesn't have to worry about single payer. Then she suddenly gets worried and even cries and begs me to explain more about it. I finally decide to try again and after explaining in more laymen's terms, she finally understands but gets angry and screams "Why doesn't government defend the people the way they're supposed to? Sign me up for single payer !!" How many more will have to wake up like this again and get past the media junk and bunk? Sigh ....
We all know who was sitting at the table. The same people with an open invitation to the corporate revolving door to the oval office. (Most likely why Obama wants to keep hidden his guest list of corporate paymasters who own him.)
Who was not invited?
Did anyone see any homeless in the audience? Ralph Nader? People advocating single payer?
The deck is stacked.
I urge anyone to read, The Selling of A President. The book documents the presidency of Richard Nixon and the marketing of his presidency which led us into perpetual war preparations and opened the door for the profit health industry.
http://www.amazon.com/Selling-President-Joe-McGinniss/dp/0140112405
The AMA switched sides.
The AMA is a slick devil. If they switched sides, I'd question their motives and see what it is about the bills they really like that made them pretend to switch to begin with.
Like Mississippi, like Washington. So here we have the Democrats supposedly in control and yet they can't or won't do anything differently from the GOP. Like Mississippi, I'm getting the feeling that it's getting even harder to tell apart the Democrats from the Republicans in Washington. Obama is doing one hell of a job copying former governor Ronnie Musgrave who went down in flames when he too was recalled in 2003 but in MS. Failure to repair the healthcare mess in MS turned out to be a major liability for Musgrave and I see a similar fate happening in Obama's case. The media and the elites such as AMA and the fraudulent insurance companies may appear to be saving Obama's bacon but that lad can't hold out for long. The GOP will find someone unexpectedly popular to oust Obama by 2012 if this keeps up.
Sioux Rose
Just more evidence of a craven economics that rewards the newly self-appointed nobles, while placing the cost of their lavish unearned lifestyles onto the increasing body of serfs. Everybody's going serfin, serfin U.S.A.
When he signed the climate change bill last week, Obama told the world that we must not be prisoners to the past (referring to coal burning and gas guzzling vehicles).
When Obama dismisses single-payer he repeatedly tells the world that we must build upon the past (the expensive, limited choice, employer-based private medical insurance system that dominates US "health care").
Obamacare will make us prisoners of the past big time.
"Everybody's going serfin, serfin U.S.A."
LOL ! I love that one. Thanks.
I'm glad someone's happy.
This stuff makes me angry. Are Americans that clueless or is it masterful manipulation.
Conservative ideology has failed America. It need to be rejected, expelled.
phasor sez: "Are Americans that clueless or is it masterful manipulation."
***
Yes.
Masterful manipulation of the clueless.
It's not conservative ideology that has failed America, it is the corruption of our elected officials. These officials have their pockets full of 'donations' from corporate interests and we know these funds are FLAT OUT BRIBES.
It is past time for us to realize this fact and stop voting for the dancing corporate puppets in our government. While they still count some of the ballots, we must not vote for members of the two corporate political parties. Let's stop serfing and stand up as active citizens.
wantrealdemocracy says, "It's not conservative ideology that has failed America, it is the corruption of our elected officials."
Let me get this straight - greed is good, but the fault is that elected official are greedy.
I would not characterize money from corporate sponsors as 'donations' at all; rather they are 'investments' and corporate entities make them in return for favorable legislation which maximizes their profits and diminish life for the rest of us. The political system represents a symbiotic relationship between corporate forces and THEIR representatives. Because Congress is sure as hell not representing us.