Shell Settlement with Ogoni People Stops Short of Full Justice
Payout of $15.5m could backfire now that precedent of a Nigerian community suing a oil company has been set
Shell's decision to settle out of court with a group of Ogoni people rather than take them on in New York means a measure of justice has come to the Niger Delta. The sum of $15.5m (£9.6m) may be peanuts for the company and nothing can compensate the 500,000 Ogoni people for generations of devastating pollution, human rights abuses and persecution. But while Shell insists that the result is no admission of guilt, it nevertheless represents a triumph for an impoverished community over one of the richest companies in the world.
What it suggests is that Shell wants to bury the facts about what was happening on the Niger delta in the 1970s and 1980s when it was extracting tens of millions of barrels of oil a year from Ogoniland while allowing the people to slide into destitution as it was destroying their environment. The settlement stops the world knowing exactly what was the company's relationship with the national government and the military, and the extent of Shell's involvement in the human rights abuses that led to Ken Saro-Wiwa's execution. The Ogoni had assembled a formidable case and were being represented by some of the most best human rights lawyers in the world. It could have been intensely embarrassing for the company if it all had come out.
Shell said it had agreed to settle out of humanitarian interests, but everyone on the delta knows that real justice has not been done, and that the environmental abuses continue. The company continues to needlessly burn off vast amounts of gas. The air is still poisoned, children are still sick, there are few jobs, the creeks are polluted and the poverty is intense.
Moreover, the security situation on the delta is far worse than it was 12 years ago when the Ogoni case began. Then, the delta was politically volatile but the oil companies could work there more or less unimpeded and people felt reasonably safe. Today the whole region is awash with guns and the delta is one of the most dangerous places on earth.
In the last few months the Nigerian military have raided dozens of communities they believe are threatening the state and thousands of people have fled their villages. The kind of peaceful protest that the Ogoni led in the 1990s now seems quaint. Anyone who stands up for environmental justice or who challenges the oil companies, which provide the Nigerian state with 90% of their foreign earnings, is now in mortal danger.
But Shell's decision could backfire. The precedent of a Nigerian community suing a multinational oil company in a western court has been set. There are thousands more Ogoni who will now want to bring their case to the west to see justice done, as well as other Niger Delta tribes like the Ijaw, the Igbo, the Ibibio and the Itsekiri who also want justice. There have been more than 500 pollution cases against Shell in Nigeria, but few reach court and the company has been able to use the appeal system to delay those that do for many years.
Now the lesson is that justice and reparation can be obtained abroad. A Dutch court will soon hear a case brought against Shell by other Niger Delta villagers following a major oil spill years ago. Meanwhile, in Ecuador, Chevron is about to hear its fate in a massive pollution case that has been going on for nearly 10 years. It's quite possible the company will be fined more than $4bn.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
7 Comments so far
Show All$4bn definitely sounds like some compensatory gains are really being made. $15.5mn is [pitiful].
However, what I wonder is why Dutch Royal Shell was able to settle out of court; who approved or rumber-stamped this approval? Was it the victims suing Shell who decided to accept this form of settlement, or is it imposed on them when they'd want to take this as fully to court as possible? If the latter, then either the representative(s) for these victims is a scum rotten piece of sh*t charlatan, etcetera, or the victims are questionable in terms of their motives, of accepting such a lousy settlement; give it was supposed to provide compensation and they received ... [pittance].
This settlement was not meant to compensate the Ogoni tribe, just the parties to the lawsuit, who are the relatives of the nine who were summarily executed by the military junta.
One third of the settlement is to go into trust for the tribe, and there are separate suits being brought on behalf of the Ogoni as a whole.
first the lawyers will take what 35 to 50 %
Nigeria has a population of 150,000,000 - the Ogoni have a population of 500,000 - less than one-third of one percent of Nigeria's population. They have no political power.
Oil represents 95% of foreign exchange earnings and 65% of government revenue. According to the World Bank oil revenue
benefits less than 1% of the population. (Not the Ogoni)
Nigeria was a net exporter of agricultural products. It now is a net importer, as the agricultural infrastructure continues to collapse.
Obasanjo is committed to a program of reform. Abacha, his predecessor was to Nigeria as Bush/Cheney were to the US. It is unlikely that meaningful reform can occur in light of the damage done by Sam Abacha.
With most of the population living on less than $1 per day there is little likelihood that the elite will curtail their lifestyles for meaningful social and economic development.
The Ogoni are not part of big three tribal groups. They are insignificant.
Shell may do a "settlement" with the Ogoni. The Nigerian Government is more likely to "eliminate" the Ogoni rather than come to terms with them.
If we had no influence on the massacre of millions of Tutsi and Hutu in Rwanda, the current massacres occuring in the Congo, and the ongoing Darfur tragedy ... what makes you think we can influence events in Ogoniland.
Maybe the British and the Dutch will ignore Shell Oil and their own economic well-being to "pressure" Nigerians. More likely, they will increase their arms sales to "support' the Nigerian military.
odoco
ducksawce - thank you for the 'facts' that surround this emotional issue. Great information that sheds a deeper light on the problem.
odoco
I have always felt that justice has never been served in cases such as this, even if the plaintiffs win a monetary reward. No company official is ever brought to justice for having personally committed crimes, which would lead to personal accountability and the end of 'corporate leadership immunity' for the actual planners of such crimes.
This case may have set a precedent, but not the one that needs to be set. Until the actual planners and implementers of these crimes are brought before a court of law, nothing will change.
Certainly the least we can do is boycott Shell. Really all of the oil companies should be boycotted. They've got us over a barrel for the time being but it's changing!