Echoes of Solidarity 20 Years after Tiananmen
Twenty years ago today, I was at Camp Thoreau in New York's Catskill Mountains. Though I had already become a full-time academic, I was still involved in the topical folk music circles in which I had hung out for much of the previous decade and had come down from Ithaca to join this annual gathering of politically-conscious folk musicians for a weekend of workshops, jam sessions and performances.
As we were clearing our dishes from dinner, I came upon the kitchen volunteers huddled around the radio listening to incoming reports of the massacre then unfolding in and around Tiananmen Square in Beijing.
Serving as the emcee for the concert that evening, I broke the news to the 300 or so singers, songwriters, and musicians assembled. I looked out upon an audience composed of amazing performing artists - Fred Small, Betsy Rose, Charlie King, Matt Jones, Pat Humphries, and many others - who had spent their lives singing songs about such struggles for freedom and justice. The shock, anger and despair was overwhelming. .
I reminded them that, despite efforts by the corporate media to portray the student movement in China as some kind of campaign against socialism, it was in fact a campaign against the tyranny and injustice of Communist Party rule and for a more just and democratic society, a society where workers and peasants had power in reality, not only in name. Indeed, I informed them, the song most frequently sung by the student protesters during the seven weeks they had occupied the heart of China's capital was none other than "The Internationale."
I then asked Pete Seeger and Sis Cunningham to join me on stage. Unlike these two veteran radicals - who had sung with Woody Guthrie in the Almanac Singers back in the 1940s - few of my generation knew the words to this international socialist anthem, so I had written them up on butcher paper which I held up for the audience to see. With Pete (accompanying himself on his banjo), Sis, and I leading the chorus of mostly professional singers, nearly 300 voices came together in harmony singing
Arise, you prisoners of starvation!
Arise, you wretched of the earth!
For justice thunders condemnation:
A better world's in birth!
No more tradition's chains shall bind us,
Arise you slaves, no more in thrall!
The earth shall rise on new foundations:
We have been nought, we shall be all!
As this diverse group of left-wing musicians sang out together, many of us through our tears, we were making a powerful witness in song, not just in protest of the tragedy then unfolding in Beijing, but at the betrayal of 20th century socialism by all those who, in its name, had become a new class of oppressors and exploiters.
Despite the calamity which took place in China that day, the student martyrs had given the world a glimmer of hope. While the nonviolent movement that had emerged that spring in Beijing and in towns and cities throughout China was brutally crushed, other largely nonviolent movements would emerge elsewhere in the coming years that would bring down scores autocratic regimes, ranging from monarchies to Communist dictatorships to right-wing military juntas. By the end of that year, such unarmed insurrections would usher in democratic governance in Poland, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, Chile, and Kenya. During the 1990s, nonviolent movements brought down dictatorships in Mongolia, Mali, Thailand, Madagascar, Indonesia, Nigeria, and elsewhere. This decade has seen strategic nonviolent action play the pivotal role in overcoming corrupt and autocratic rule in such countries as Serbia, Nepal, Georgia, Ukraine and the Maldives.
Liberal democracy does not automatically bring social justice, but it is a necessary first step. Dictatorial rule, even in the name of "socialism," cannot. The form democracy takes will vary based upon a given society's history, culture and social conditions, but those in leadership must be accountable to their actions, individual freedom must be respected, and sovereignty must ultimately rest in the people.
We want no condescending saviors
To rule us from their judgment hall,
We workers ask not for their favors
Let us consult for all:
To make the thief disgorge his booty
To free the spirit from its cell,
We must ourselves decide our duty,
We must decide, and do it well.
Indeed, it is up to those in China and elsewhere still suffering under oppressive rule to lead their own struggles for liberation from tyranny. We cannot trust that the U.S. government or any other government can legitimately engage in "democracy promotion." However, global civil society can offer the kind of international solidarity -- in opposing arms transfers to human rights abusers, in providing workshops on strategic nonviolent conflict, and in raising global awareness of these struggles -- that is so important for those struggling for freedom and justice.
It is a solidarity that is based not upon whether the oppressive regime being challenged is an ally or an adversary of the United States or what kind of economic system it claims to adhere to. It is a solidarity based upon nothing less than a universal respect for fundamental civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
11 Comments so far
Show AllThanks for remembering a powerful moment at a Peoples Music Gathering, Stephen.
Meantime, this weekend, the Peoples Music Network is meeting again for its annual summer gathering, this year at Camp Epworth in High Falls, NY. www.peoplesmusic.org is where you can get directions and register- it's not too late.
In memory of the events of 20 years ago, I'll sing a song I wrote about the Chinese demolishing homes in preparation for the 2008 Olympics, and the elderly women who they jailed for attempting to protest the loss of their homes.
"Liberal democracy does not automatically bring social justice, but it is a necessary first step."
Shame on Pete Seeger for standing on stage with you.
"Liberal democracy" is the deadliest and most repressive system in the history of mankind. Just not for the people living in the actual liberal democracies. All the crimes of empire in the last two centuries--millions upon millions of dead, billions more kept on the brink of death by privation--have been perpetrated by "liberal democracies". And you talk about "human rights abusers" in China without a trace of irony.
I have never read an article on Common Dreams as full of shit as this one, and that's saying a lot.
I wonder if Stephen Zunes wrote an article last year commemorating the 40th anniversary of the extremely comparable Tlatelolco Massacre in Mexico? Oh that's right, probably not, because he doesn't give a shit when Third World "democracies" (read: Western finance capital vassal states) massacre hundreds of students. No, because the peaceful students gunned down there were "free".
Tank Man lives. Updates of this iconic image are all over the Web today. Here, for example:
http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/20th-anniversary-of-tiananmen-square/
The guys in the square probably didn't know an better and the words to the song are revolutionary in nature but gimme a break. I can't believe that while people were being massacred by communists you were singing the Internationale. It would be like singing the Horst Wessel Song to protest the Holocaust.
No it would not.
Read the article again. Read up on why the students were protesting. And why their singing the Internationale was PRECISELY the point.
There was almost nothing in the US media when Tiananmen went down.
Why?
Because it was the middle of the Most Favored Nation status negotiations.
However, in Europe the story was different. My daughter and I went to France for a month right after the June 4 massacre--and in France the aftermath of Tiananmen--kangaroo courts, imprisonments, etc. went on 24 hours a day on the television. If I am not incorrect, much of the camara footage was done on site by a photographerer/videographer from Spain.
Coming back from Nice on the plane, I noticed that CBS showed some kind of monthly recap of the world news--with Dan Rather. Barely a peep, no footage whatsoever.
In fact, the lid was on so tight that when I wrote a piece for the Albuquerque Journal when I got home--indicating some elements of the subtext of a Zhang Yimou film, I got a phone call from a retired CIA agent (supposedly) accusing me of being with the CIA and insisting that I could not possibly know what was going on in China unless I were.
Man, that's screwball gringo arrogance.
Here in Mexico the political magazine Proceso has for this week a middle section remembering Tiananmen 20 years after--from folks who were there for it.
Richard Roth, of CBS, and his cameraman, were both imprisoned in China during the crackdown. In fact, he was arrested while filing a report, via phone.
And if you go to the wikipedia page on Tian An Men, you will see a large number of links to US media sites from 1989.
Not to mention, Zunes contradicts your claim that there was no media coverage.
Really?
What coverage did YOU see in the US?
(I checked your wiki page--and it confirmed my claim that the only footage shot during the massacre in the plaza was by TVE--Television EspaƱa.)
I didn't see anything substantial on US t.v. And, as I was a journalist then, it should not have been too hard to see what was around. Obviously I am not blind, as I saw the coverage in France.
What you don't seem to get is that all coverage of everything has been censored in the US since April of 1986.
Look at the references in that wikipedia article. There are references to newspaper articles from June 1989.
And, Roth could hardly be arrested while reporting live via phone, if he was not reporting.
I did not disagree that the only footage was from TVE, since the Chinese did their damned best to prevent footage from getting out.
Your last sentence is a non sequitur. I never said anything about whether the media does or does not censor things. Just because they do censor things, does not mean that they successfully reportage of Tian An Men.
It was in any case simply impossible to prevent Tian An Men from being reported.
I see you posted something completely incoherent, and you still did not tell me what YOU saw in the US media.
I have to assume that you saw nothing.
The almost complete absence of posts in response to this article goes a long way to showing that the US media didn't show shit.
I see that you have not responded to the references in that wikipedia article. Or to the fact that Richard Roth, of CBS, was arrested while broadcasting. Or that Zunes and Seeger listened to reports of the massacre on radio.
"The almost complete absence of posts in response to this article goes a long way to showing that the US media didn't show shit."
LOL. You call that logic? You want to know why there are so few posts here on Tian An Men? See jimmyjazz's post for an idea why. Anti US progressives sometimes have a tendency to refuse to say or hear anything bad about any possible anti US regime, or perceived to be anti US regime.
As for what I saw at that time, I am not going to tell that to a stranger on the web. It is too personal.