The Big Gay Shrug
Sorry, enemies of gay marriage. Prop 8 or no, you've already lost
Here's a fun thing to do to calm your frazzled, saddened nerves in the wake of the CA Supreme Court's very unfortunate, but also merely annoying and karmically fleeting Proposition 8 decision:
Head on down to your local high school -- hell, make it a junior high or even an elementary -- and take yourself an informal survey. Ask the various wary, bepimpled youth of Generation Tweet what they think about those scary gay people getting married.
Ask them, in your most panicky, alarmist, Mormonified voice: Aren't they horrified at the very idea? Aren't they shocked at the very thought of two people in love having their union officially recognized and validated by the state?
Don't they know the musty ol' Bible mutters some barely coherent, mistranslated silliness about it in a single word or two written 1,500 years ago in a long dead language by acidic church elders with powermad political agendas and violently repressed libidos who nevertheless wish to instruct us all how to live and love and screw?
Please note the response. Please observe how the kids merely look at you as though you're more than a little bit deranged and prehistoric, so out of touch you might as well be Dick Cheney talking up the diesel-powered rectal thermometers he so loved back in World War I.
Watch carefully as they sigh and roll their eyes, then whip out their Nokias to text their friends about how this creepy elder just tried to convince them that the harmless, yawningly commonplace homosexuality currently saturating the popular culture all around them, from fashion to Facebook, movies to "American Idol," is not only wrong, but so wrong that the law should ban it forever because... well, no one really seems to know exactly why.
Did you see it? That big, sighing shrug of what-the-hell-is-wrong-with-you, combined with lots of who-the-hell-cares? Because that's the reaction to note most of all.
Here is what it tells you: Gay marriage is a foregone conclusion. It's a done deal. It's just a matter of time. For the next generation in particular, equal rights for gays is not even a question or a serious issue, much less a sinful hysterical conundrum that can only be answered by terrified Mormons and confused old people and inane referendums funded by same. It's just obvious, inevitable, a given.
Let us hereby be reminded, before sadness and frustration overwhelm once more: Proposition 8 and its ilk are merely the last, fitful gasps of a long-dying ideology, markers of a certain kind of sad, conservative desperation. They are the final clawings and scrapings of a reactionary worldview that attempts to outlaw and punish all it cannot, will not understand. Same as it ever was, really.
The pattern is as old as fear itself. Remember, only rarely does true progress appear as a single, momentous, Obama-like shift that reverberates across the planet and changes everything in an instant. Most frequently it comes in fits and starts and hiccups, small lurches and hard-fought battles shot through with little spitballs of hate and intolerance and heaps of misunderstanding. You know, just like now.
Evidence? Plenty. Just look at the numbers: Support for gay marriage is now the highest it's been in American history, somewhere between 42 and 48 percent nationwide. Just a few decades ago, support was down in the 20s. It's been rising steadily ever since, never once regressing.
Or, flip that data around. According to FiveThirtyEight, marriage bans like California's are losing support at a rate of about two percent a year. According to that model, more than half of U.S. states will vote against bans like the contemptible Prop 8 as soon as 2012, if not sooner. By 2024, even miserably homophobic joints like Alabama and Mississippi will be flying the rainbow flag.
You could say, then, that we are, right this minute, at the tipping point. You could say that very soon indeed -- sooner than many people expect, in fact -- we will all look back on this inane gay marriage hysteria and wonder, what the hell was that all about? What the hell were we thinking? And by the way, isn't President Obama's second term going just astonishingly well?
As for massive, schizophrenic California, well, what can we say? In our convoluted, lurching, two steps forward eight steps sideways sort of quasi-progressive way, we flail and flip and frequently fail. It's just our way.
We may be a die-hard blue state overall, full of revolutionary ideas and world-class academics, Nobel Laureates and wondrous alternative belief systems, but we are also messy and flat-footed and just too damn big for our own good, and our southern half is packed to the Orange County rafters with piles of aging social conservatives and religious zealots with far too little spiritual/sexual awareness and far too much money. Sorry.
It's an undeniable shame indeed that this powerful, iconic, world-altering state couldn't get its damnable act together on The Last Civil Right. But, you know, oh well. Can't be the vanguard for 'em all. Iowa and Massachusetts, et al, please show us how it's done. And by the way, thank you.
Do not misunderstand: Setbacks like this Prop 8 decision are painful and even cruel, and the gay couples and activists who've been at the forefront of the fight since the beginning are nothing short of heroic. Like civil rights activists of any stripe before them, the subsequent generations who will take gay rights for granted will have them to thank forevermore for paving the way and fighting the good fight.
What's more, there is still an enormous amount of work to be done, new referendums and protests and fundraisers and awareness-raisings. The change will not come without help and push. Hate and homophobia still seethe in myriad pockets of the culture and the populace at large, even trickling down to dumb-blond silicon-injected beauty pageant runner-ups who parrot the same childlike religious misinformation her handlers have pumped into her kind for 2,000 wickedly patriarchal years.
But these setbacks are not insurmountable roadblocks. They are merely obnoxious speed bumps on what social conservatives see as our nation's ungodly highway to hell. They only slow us down a little.
A new campaign in the fight for marriage equality is already taking shape. Evolution is happening, the energy and momentum are unstoppable. Simply put, the ignorance and homophobia that fueled and funded Prop 8 in the first place will not stand.
Don't believe it? Hey, just ask your kids.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
19 Comments so far
Show AllAt this point the CASC ruling has nothing to do with President Obama and his position on marriage. The CASC ruling has to do with whether or not Prop 8 is an amendment or revision of the California Constitution. The California Constitution has different rules for amendments and revisions.This will take time but we will win. There was only a 5 point difference.
Never Give UP!! Fight Bsck Effectively!!
I'll bet Obama would take a far different view than the one he has stated if the wording used to define marriage was "the union of a caucasion man and a caucasion woman" and of "a black man and a black woman"! And the California supreme court made the whole joke perfectly clear when they ruled that the gay marriages that have already taken place will stand! If the claim that "marriage should be between a man and a woman" is valid then how can they make any exception? And if, as the bigots claim, allowing gays to marry endangers marriage and family and all that crap, how can they allow any such exception! The whole thing is a joke!!!
I keep thinking that the tipping point will come when one of the MSM reporters works up the courage to ask Obama just what harm would come to America if same-sex marriage was legalized. I kept hoping someone would ask that to any of the candidates during the presidential campaign, but no one did. Right?
If gay marriage is outlawed, only gay outlaws will be married.
· Yr Obd't Servant
I'm not so optimistic about the little kiddies. Why is gay bashing on the rise? Why are 'sissies' subjected to bullying by their school comrades?
I see the future and it looks very gay, lol. Much love.
Mark Morford details in his piece attitudes that anyone whom spends any amount of time with younger folks who are not their kids (like teachers, coaches [myself included, as I coach soccer], etc.) that this demographic has tolerance (though not for the foibles of their elders) as a core value. Those of the troglodyte right who actually have their ears to the ground know this, and as Morford explains, are desperately putting up legal blocks on their way towards irrelevance, lest their bigotry become history merely by fait accompli. Their narcissism dictates that those whom value fairness go through travail, and perhaps fail...thus leaving their "legacy."
Finally___California came to their senses and did the right thing. Equal rights have nothing to do with gay marriage, and everything to do with gay unions, which is all they are. As for asking the kids opinion on this matter, that is a waste of time, as they have a lot to learn, and they should learn it from something besides the media. Watch the animals, they know the difference between male and female when they mate and raise their young.
I'm fine with calling ALL marriages civil unions.
But only if heterosexual couples are also called (in the eyes of government) civil unions.
Having separate legal terms for gays makes about as much sense as having separate terms for African American marriages. It stinks of "separate but equal".
"Watch the animals, they know the difference between male and female when they mate and raise their young."
Never mind that that science has proven the existence of gay animals. So now rape should be legal if animals do it? Murder too? Are we now basing our legal standards on the law of the jungle?
Prop 8 was propped up and pushed in great measure by out-of-state propagandists, chiefly Mormons and Catholics.
The Mormon Church and the reactionary evangelicals should have their tax-exempt status cut off for interfering in secular politics.
The Catholic Church should lose its tax-exempt status, too, especially since in practically every country in the world it acts virtually as an agent of a foreign state (the Vatican), disseminating Catholic ideology among the general population, largely through heavily funded publicity and bussed-in demonstrators, and enforcing it among Catholics (including politicians and public servants) under threat of excommunication .
It's pathetic that these authoritarian, feudal behemoths can keep their tax status --even as they violate the separation of church and state and advocate for removal of that separation, which is the ultimate protection of individual and minority religious (or atheist) rights. How many community groups have lost their tax-exempt status and how many activist organizations have failed to qualify, because they are said to engage in "lobbying" or "political action"?
As for marriage vs. unions, there are more than a dozen reasons for gays and lesbians to have the right to expect the same protection as heterosexual couples.
Kernelz, you might actually look at some animals sometime, and stop spouting off ignorant, right wing drivel.
Hate to burst your bubble, but check out any scientific journal on the mating habits of many animals and you will find that the incidence of homosexuality/homosexual behaviour is the same as for human animals. That is to say that the percentages of male/male or female/female sexual activity is not unknown or less in the non-human animals than it is for humans. Some non-humans can even change their sex, how about that!
Re Kernelz May 28th, 2009 10:22 am
Flat-earth drivel. Animals don't have estates to probate, don't have community property to divide, don't have custody fights, don't have visitation problems, etc., etc.
The word "marriage" confers over a thousand specific legal benefits, currently unavailable to certain people, based on nothing more than gender-orientation. This is in violation of the equal-protection clause of the 14th amendment, and seems to make marriage less a sacred covenant than a contract between business partners.
Marriage was first of all a contract, a matter of property rights and establishing parenthood to ensure the kids would be cared for. Males did not want to spend their resources feeding somebody else's offspring, after all.
The sacred part comes in later. In early societies social control is iffy and authoritarian reinforcement is seen as necessary. If Jews won't stop eating pork because of trichinosis, tell them Yaweh forbids it. If people want out of their marriages, make it a sin to get divorced.
As for civil unions, I've been in several of them, all successful. One time we told the JP we wanted a civil service and he asked did we mean we wanted to work for the government. That was in Ocean Park, Washington, right next door to Oysterville.
I'm not sure the author is correct in this. Facts that have come before me indicate that, among middle- and high-school youths, calling someone "gay" or one of the worse synonyms remains the preferred insult.
Has anybody reached out to the Mormons with this proposed deal: back off on opposition to gay marriage and we'll let you have your polygamy?
Young people, typically young males, use "gay" as an insult. Older people, do not. Older people are polite, and kind, and "hate the sin, not the sinner".
Yet, when push comes to shove, it is the younger generation that (overwhelmingly) supports equal rights. When push comes to shove, it is the older generation that does not.
In the recent prop 8 vote for example, ~70 percent of voters 30 and below voted against prop 8. And looking at the age groups, the older the voters, the greater the support for prop 8. This trend is repeated in quite a few polls. Both sides, both the GLBT community, and those who oppose equal rights vehemently know this. There actually have been a few of the religious right who have resigned themselves to equal rights for gay and lesbians. Their new strategy is to target and attack transgendered people.
And this isn't unique to California or even the US. In many countries around the world, including countries where being gay / lesbian / trans is still a crime, it is the young who tend to be (far) more tolerant. They might crack juvenile gay jokes, yet, in the end, they support equal rights and decriminalisation. The older generation might be nice and polite, but when push comes to shove, they resist equal rights, they even support criminalisation.
The mainstream Mormon Church has distanced itself from polygamy and it's horribly insulting to them when it's brought up. I guess that's why they now feel free to dictate the religious beliefs of others.
I already know what's wrong with Mormans.
But what's wrong with polygamy?
I am glad that the younger generation supports equal rights. I would be happier yet if it wasn't familiarity that made the difference. It would be nice if they supported equal rights because they understood that in America, every citizen is due the same respect under the law -- even those people we don't agree with.