Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Using Law License to Facilitate Torture Should Result in Disbarment
Statement Made Upon the Filing of Complaints Seeking Disbarment of Bush-Cheney’s Cadre of Torture Lawyers
My name is Kevin Zeese, I am an attorney licensed to practice law in Washington, DC and before the U.S. Supreme Court. I serve as the executive director of VotersForPeace.US and on the board of Velvet Revolution. Today, we filed complaints with the District of Columbia Bar and with four other states seeking the disbarment of 12 Bush-Cheney torture lawyers. These lawyers misused their license to practice law to provide legal cover for the war crime of torture. This misuse of their license requires the bar association to disbar them or the bar will become complicit in torture.
Complaints have been filed against: John Yoo, Judge Jay Bybee, and Stephen Bradbury who authored the torture memoranda. As well as attorneys who advised, counseled, consulted and supported those memoranda including Alberto Gonzales, John Ashcroft, Michael Chertoff, Alice Fisher, William Haynes II, Douglas Feith, Michael Mukasey, Timothy Flanigan, and David Addington. These detailed complaints, with over 500 pages of supporting exhibits, have been filed with the state bars in the District of Columbia, New York, California, Texas and Pennsylvania, and they seek disciplinary action and disbarment. Copies of the complaints and exhibits are available on-line at DisbarTortureLawyers.com and VotersForPeace.us.
This cadre of torture lawyers colluded to facilitate the abuse and torture of prisoners (detainees) that included, evidence suggests, deaths at overseas U.S. military facilities. Human Rights Watch reports 98 deaths of people in custody of the United States in Iraq and Afghanistan. Making torture even worse in this case is that it was used to try and get information to tie Saddam Hussein to al Qaeda - a relationship that did not exist - as well as information about non-existent weapons of mass destruction in order to justify the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq.
We have asked the respective state bars to revoke the licenses of these attorneys for moral turpitude. They failed to show "respect for and obedience to the law, and respect for the rights of others," and intentionally or recklessly failed to act competently, all in violation of legal Rules of Professional Conduct. Several attorneys failed to adequately supervise the work of subordinate attorneys and forwarded shoddy legal memoranda regarding the definition of torture to the White House and Department of Defense. These lawyers further acted incompetently by advising superiors to approve interrogation techniques that were in violation of U.S. and international law. They failed to support or uphold the U.S. Constitution, and the laws of the United States, and to maintain the respect due to the courts of justice and judicial officers, all in violation state bar rules.
Torture is illegal under United States and international law. It is illegal under the U.S. Constitution, domestic law and international treaties to which the United States is a party.
This includes:
1. The United Nations Convention Against Torture (UNCAT), Articles 1, 2, 3 and 16 (ratified in October 1994). Article 2(2) of the Convention states that:"No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture."
2. The Geneva Conventions, Article 3, (ratified in August 1955). Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006), held that the Geneva Conventions are applicable to accused members of al-Qaeda. Thus, due process protections apply to all detainees in U.S. custody, including those in military prisons.
3. The Eighth Amendment against "cruel and unusual punishment."
4. The United States Criminal Code, Title 18, Prohibitions Against Torture (18 USC 2340A) and War Crimes (18 USC 2441).
Torture is a clearly defined term under international and U.S. law. The Convention Against Torture defines torture as any act by which: "severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental; is intentionally inflicted on a person . . ."
The torture memoranda did not provide objective legal advice to government decision-makers, but instead twisted the state of the law so that it was unrecognizable. They were so inaccurate that these memoranda are more justifications about what the authors and the intended recipients wanted the law to be, rather than assessments of what the law actually is.
These laws provide no exception for torture under any circumstances. Moreover, the United States Criminal Code prohibits both torture and war crimes, the latter which includes torture. The Army Field Manual prohibits the use of degrading treatment of detainees. The individually tailored complaints allege that the named attorneys violated the rules of professional responsibility by advocating torture.
We decided to take action today because the federal government seems unable and unwilling to act. The Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility has taken nearly five years to complete its report, as some of the memoranda at issue became public in June 2004. Further, this OPR investigation is focused only on two lawyers, John Yoo and Jay Bybee rather than all those involved. This inexcusable delay is unfair to the public because the consequences of any wrongdoing are diminished. The delay has already benefited the two men under investigation, John Yoo now has tenure at Berkeley law school and Jay Bybee now has a lifetime appointment as a federal court of appeals judge. If OPR had completed its duties in a timely manner it is unlikely that either appointment would have been made.
In addition to inaction by OPR, the Congress where select Members were briefed 40 times by the CIA, seems unable to take action because of fear of its own complicity being exposed. And, Attorney General Eric Holder, has now testified that he approved renditions - which results in prisoners being tortured by other countries at the behest of the United States - during the Clinton administration. And, sadly, the President of the United States has now decided to hide evidence of war crimes by refusing to release photographic and video evidence despite a court order to do so. Finally, the administration is appointing General McChrystal to be the head of operations in Afghanistan despite being responsible for commanding Fort Nama in Iraq as well as special forces involved in torture:
"An interrogator at Camp Nama described locking prisoners in shipping containers for 24 hours at a time in extreme heat; exposing them to extreme cold with periodic soaking in cold water; bombardment with bright lights and loud music; sleep deprivation; and severe beatings. When he and other interrogators went to the colonel in charge and expressed concern that this kind of treatment was not legal, and that they might be investigated by the military's Criminal Investigation Division or the International Committee of the Red Cross, the colonel told them he had "this directly from General McChrystal and the Pentagon that there's no way that the Red Cross could get in."
Nicolas J S Davies, "Suspected War Criminal, General McChrystal, to Lead U.S. Forces in Afghanistan " http://votersforpeace.us/
press/index.php?itemid=1576 .
The unit's slogan, which set the tone for its practices, was "If you don't make them bleed, they can't prosecute for it." Reportedly prisoners died in the custody of troops in General McChrystal's command and five officers were convicted of prisoner abuse. Therefore, the people must act to face up to this issue and restore morality and Rule of Law to the United States. In addition to filing these complaints we are starting a campaign for disbarment, public torture hearings and for the appointment of an Independent Prosecutor. People who want to get involved are urged to go to DisbarTortureLawyers.com and VotersForPeace.us. Only by taking torture out of politics and allowing an independent prosecutor to pursue the facts and apply the law will the United States recover from these war crimes. Application of the rule of law, beginning with disbarment, is a necessary part of the process of healing the nation.




15 Comments so far
Show AllHURRAH!!!!
/cm
It almost seems like a contradiction in terms, doesn't it, that the lawyers would actually be standing up FOR the law rather than being the ones trying to obfuscate and break the law?
Go get them. Kick their asses out of the profession. They have proved that they don't belong there, anyway. After that, can you get them put in jail as well? While I am not usually a big fan of the public having to pay the room and board of people, I do think these scum deserve it, far more than the huge numbers of cannabis users we currently have locked up.
It's about time that some AMERICANS with the ability and power to do so actually stood up for what is right in this country. Go get 'em!
t almost seems like a contradiction in terms, doesn't it, that the lawyers would actually be standing up FOR the law rather than being the ones trying to obfuscate and break the law?
Kind of like the firemen who burn books in "Fahrenheir 451".
No lawyer has ever tried to interpret the law in the spirit in which it was written.
They make their living trying to convince some authority that the law should be interpreted in a way favorable to the wishes of their clients.
Laws, lawyers, and the adversarial legal system render justice only slightly preferable to trial by ordeal.
Nietzsche, you seem to have entirely missed the point. Kevin Zeese, a lawyer, and others working with him, have spearheaded the most effective attack on the sins of the Bush administration I've seen to date. Lawyers are no more responsible for evils done under the guise of law than scientists are responsible for evils done with technology.
there obviously are some decent people who are lawyers, but as a whole, the profession is corrupt and works for profit, not for justice
so it is not surprising that these lawyers would think so little about extending their opinions to justify torture
Interestingly, rulers and governments of authoritarian and totalitarian countries very often agree with your view of laws and lawyers.
Thanks, Mr. Zeese and those working with you, for doing the necessary hard work to develop a practical strategy for addressing this problem. You have my support, even though I've argued that a "ticking bomb" exception should be enacted in international law, and that Obama should be accorded some leeway on release of the photographs.
Ernst Janning got life in prison for twisting the law to suit Hitler.
Is Disbarment the same as Dismemberment?
And for every disbarred torturer, ten new advocates will step forward.
Disbarment means nothing to individuals who have many, many others to do their bidding.
I agree with Humbaba - they should be dismemembered.
Ernst Janning was prosecuted because he knew the laws he was enforcing were immoral - but not illegal, since the Nazis made up whatever laws they wanted, just as your fascists have done in the last couple decades... Janning didn't 'twist' the law - he just didn't speak out against the monstrous miscarriage of justice.
The small number of comments on this article is surprising. In my opinion, and to my knowledge, Mr. Zeese and his organization have taken the first tangible step toward holding accountable the persons who are most responsible for violation of the laws Mr. Zeese lays out in his article. The persons being targeted will no doubt worry much more about VotersForPeace.US and the Velvet Revolution than about the U.S. Justice Department or the unfocused clamoring by millions of people for "prosecution." This effort has a real chance of success, and deserves support.
Bravo, Counselor!
I hope that the state boards of medicine, psychology and nursing not controlled by right-wing political contributors to conservative governors chosen for the size of their checks, and not the content of their character or quality of their practice, will attempt to learn the names of professionals involved in torture and murder and take action against them.
there obviously are some decent people who are lawyers, but as a whole, the profession is corrupt and works for profit, not for justice
so it is not surprising that these lawyers would think so little about extending their opinions to justify torture