Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
What's So Funny about Washington?
A joke is a sometime thing, as wide as a church door or as delicate as a rose. The right or wrong word, too many or too few, their placement or emphasis can determine whether it's a total dud or fall down funny; the difference, as Mark Twain said, between the lightning bug and lightning.
Too much explanation or thought can whip a joke to death, so it was with trepidation that I went down to Washington last week with some fellow members of the Writers Guild of America, East, the union of which I'm president. I moderated a panel discussion of writers from The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, The Colbert Report and Late Show with David Letterman, among others, to discuss news and late night comedy.
The driving impulse for all of this was the White House Correspondents' Dinner last weekend, "The Nerd Prom," as it's become known, when inside-the-Beltway journalists and their chummy government sources cement their unholy alliance over rillettes and risotto. Over the last few years it has become an Oscar-like event, with Hollywood migrating east to hobnob with the stars of politics and commentary, distracting each other into a trivial frenzy. And you wonder why we can't get universal health care passed.
Toward the end of our strike last year, the Guild presented a successful event on Capitol Hill, a mock debate in which a team of Daily Show writers representing the Guild went up against a Colbert team posing as the studios and networks. Former White House Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers moderated. Hilarity and mirth ensued.
This time we thought we'd hitch a ride on the hoopla around the Correspondents' Dinner and succeeded. A crowd of several hundred showed up at the Newseum on Pennsylvania Avenue. The Huffington Post streamed live video and C-SPAN, which hadn't covered anything as funny since the last hearings on horticulture and organic food safety standards, videotaped the whole thing.
Not that you saw all of it. Parts of an hour of stand-up comedy by Guild writers apparently were deemed a little too raunchy for the followers of Brian Lamb and so when telecast, C-SPAN cut right to the chase -- our panel discussion.
People have been making jokes about the news and having an impact on it since the Greek playwright Aristophanes cracked wise about Socrates. Now, the late night shows are affecting traditional journalism and mainstream coverage of events, and influencing public opinion, more than ever, whether it's John McCain dissing Letterman and appearing on Katie Couric's newscast instead, President Obama on Jay Leno, or Tina Fey imitating Sarah Palin to devastating effect on Saturday Night Live.
In March, a Rasmussen poll reported that nearly one-third of Americans under 40 say they get more of their news from Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and other late night comedy shows than they do from traditional sources of news. The poll also found that 39% of the public says the late night shows are making Americans more informed; 21% said they're having the opposite effect.
Recently, in The Nation magazine, media critic Eric Alterman noted that the late night programs had been responsible for three of the most important and cathartic media moments of the last decade: Jon Stewart's evisceration of confrontational talk shows posing as political dialogue when he appeared on the CNN show Crossfire in October 2004 (which many believe hastened the program's demise); Stephen Colbert's controversial speech at the correspondent's dinner three years ago (in which he attacked the White House press corps' cuddly relationship with President Bush); and Jon Stewart's recent assault on CNBC's Jim Cramer and the misleading, uncritical coverage presented by financial television news in the months leading up to the crash.
Alterman wrote, "It's a sad -- almost terrifying -- comment on the state of the American media that we have come to rely on these two funnymen to tell us the truth about our country in the same way we relied on Murrow in the '50s and Walter Cronkite in the '60s."
But as we began the panel, buzzing in my head were the sage and terrible words of the late, great New Yorker magazine essayist, E. B. White: "Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog," he wrote. "Few people are interested and the frog dies of it."
Nonetheless, we plunged ahead. So, I asked, is late night comedy telling us a truth that news can't? Are audiences turning to you for news because you ask questions and make points the mainstream media can't or won't?
"No," said my friend Tim Carvell from The Daily Show. "On some level, I'd like to think so, but I don't think that's the case. We're dessert at the end of the news menu. I actually think people who say they're getting their news from us say that as a way of protesting what they see in the news. But I feel the media isn't a monolith; there's good media and bad. We're just off to the side of it, sitting at the back of the class making comments."
Opus Moreschi, who writes for The Colbert Report, agreed. "I think if anyone's getting the news from either of our shows then that's unfortunate. Because we're not there to provide news, we're there to provide entertainment, obviously. But it may be that people who see something on our show and want to learn more find their own news sources and make up their minds. That to me is a pleasant side effect of having comedy that informs. But if all they've got is our punchline, they may walk away thinking Denny Hastert is apparently a crossdresser and that's not accurate information... Wait, sorry, I'm being told that he is."
J.R. Havlan, a comic who writes for The Daily Show added, "I feel like comedy shows and satire, what they do is not inform so much as help people learn how to watch and decipher the news. It's not about watching us to learn what's going on but learning to see what's going on and take it with a grain of salt -- that not everything they see is the truth."
And so it went. There's lots more -- war stories, background on how the shows are put together, interesting questions from the audience. You can go to the C-SPAN website to view the whole thing.
But in the end, for all the analysis and commentary that have been written about the late night shows, the bottom line remains: it's all about the funny.
By the way, we didn't actually attend the White House Correspondents' Dinner the next night, but did go to one of the after-parties at the Corcoran Galley of Art, mobbed with more than 600 guests and roaring with music at an ear-splitting pitch. We met a berobed Arabian prince who had two of the most formidable body guards I'd ever seen, big and impassive, like the statues on Easter Island.
Then we were straight-armed aside by an even larger phalanx of black-suited security men. Who's coming through, we wondered -- a cabinet member, Joe Biden, the President?
No, it was Eva Longoria, the diminutive but self-important star of Desperate Housewives.
Now that's funny.
- Posted in


8 Comments so far
Show AllAlterman wrote, "It's a sad -- almost terrifying -- comment on the state of the American . . .
Drop the word "almost".
Alterman wrote, "It's a sad, terrifying comment on the state of the American . . .
Now it's accurate.
We have always relied on the comics to point out that the emperor has no clothes. They are our modern day court jesters and philosophers.
The Tax rate in Somalia ranges from 0 percent to 18 percent, the taxes only collected IF the government can manage to collect them.
The vast majority of Somalis pay no taxes and rarely see a Governmnet Official.
Outside of the main city the Government does not exsit.
It is a Libertarians paradise and an ideal place for the Libertarians of the world to set up shop and put their theories into practice.
I mean it patently obvious that Somalis live far freer and better lives then say....the Swedes?
While old news, the article highlights the fact that the USA has the most self-censoring, sycophantic, tabloidized, junk-news MSM in the developed world. It is not funny, but a laughingstock, as well as something to be pitied.
GwNorth (above) nicely illuminates Libertarianism's hyper artificial view of the human world.
Doctrinaire Libertarianism is maybe excusable as kind of naivete in the very young, but it becomes a form of sociopathic infantilism in those who spout its premises into adulthood.
Mush like rigid Marxists who can't psychologically tolerate ANY degree of ego-driven self-interest and/or private property (even if democratically regulated), rigid Libertarians can't tolerate anything BUT unregulated self-interest and total private ownership of everything.
Both ways of apprehending the hard-wired creaturely humanity within us are suffocatingly one-dimensional, or to use a Freudian term: anal retentive.
Neither 'system' is a workable basis for organizing a humane society.
To put it more crudely as a general observation: Anal retentive thinking, no matter left or right, can only yield systems that are full of sh--.
I think the late night shows are invaluable for using humor to reveal that the MSM is blitzing the public and young people especially are paying attention. They are learning AT LAST that the MSM is not to be trusted. So maybe we will have a movement toward people informing themselves. Unfortunately it appears to be proceeding at a snail's pace. But the financiers are doing their best to speed that up.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
I loved the Daily Show's interview with Henry Kissinger. So funny.
It's more like a Tragic- Comedy anymore. DC is like the old Roman games. It was said that as horrifying as they were , they were also addicting and riveting. People who considered themselves immune to them, wrote comments that have come down to us, that watching even once could ruin you and did them. DC is the same. It's a horrible place made worse by the total assholes that seem to swarm around and in it like the flies and maggots they are.