Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Senate Stiffs the People, Cheers Wall Street
Sam Rayburn, a longtime speaker of the U.S. House, once said, "Every now and then, a politician ought to do something just because it's right."
Last week, 45 U.S. senators dodged an excellent chance to do just what Mr. Sam advised. At issue was a straightforward, common-sense amendment proposed by Dick Durbin, D-Ill. It would have allowed bankruptcy judges to help hundreds of thousands of financially strapped homeowners who now find themselves trapped by exploding, exorbitant interest rates that bankers had attached to their loans.
Here was a conspicuous opportunity for even the most ethically blind of our congress-critters to take a principled stand, for Durbin's bill practically had a flashing red-and-yellow neon arrow attached to it, declaring, "Vote Here for the People Against Greedy Bankers."
Actually, even GBs would've benefited, for the bankruptcy provision would have allowed families to stay in their homes and keep making monthly payments to banks (albeit in reduced amounts). Also, banks could still make a profit (though not a killing), and there would be far fewer vacant homes going on the market, thus giving a badly needed break to America's depressed housing market.
What a sensible idea! So, naturally, the Senate stomped it to death.
The members were prodded to do so by Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and other upstanding members of the hyper-aggressive GB lobby. These are, of course, the same banksters who for years speculated rapaciously on people's homes, created a housing bubble that has since burst and shattered our economy, reduced their own financial fiefdoms to insolvency, then rushed to Washington to unscrew the Capitol dome and help themselves to a taxpayer bailout that is nearing $3 trillion.
Yet, the very idea of allowing bankrupt families to get a small break in bankruptcy courts has caused Wall Street elites to squawk like a banty rooster choking on a peach pit. They dispatched hundreds of well-connected lobbyists to Congress, to the White House and to key government agencies to nix Durbin's amendment (which, ironically, would've been attached to a bill that awards even more billions of taxpayer dollars to the banks).
Among the influence peddlers hired by bailout recipients were more than 100 former lawmakers, top congressional staffers, White House aides and agency officials.
Goldman Sachs alone has more than 30 ex-government officials in its lobbying army, including former House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt and the former top staffer to house banking chairman Barney Frank.The first and chief target of this furious lobbying blitz was a guy who had long backed the homeowners protection plan, promising again and again last year that he would lead the fight to pass it: Barack Obama. The banker lobbyists were aided in this effort to back off Obama by two White House insiders who have shown themselves to be shameless Wall Street softies - Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and top economic advisor Larry Summers. Timid Timothy reportedly argued that even a small, tightly targeted bankruptcy provision for common folks would create "uncertainty" for big investors in Wall Street banks.
Never mind that millions of homeowners are facing crushing uncertainty over their mortgages, Obama and team promptly disappeared from the legislative fight, abandoning Durbin.
This let Wall Street's hired guns go after pusillanimous, bank-financed Democrats. Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana, for example, was a swing vote, counted on by Durbin. But with no pressure from Obama, Bayh was free to sidestep principle and vote his own political pocketbook. Up for re-election next year, Bayh's top campaign donor is Goldman Sachs.
Needing 60 votes for passage, Durbin got 45. In all, a dozen Democrats gave Wall Street a big wet kiss by voting against Durbin's amendment, which also was a vote against America's hard-pressed homeowners - and against Mr. Sam's sage admonition.
"The banks are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill," sighed Sen. Durbin afterward. He added this sobering note: "They frankly own the place."
- Posted in


67 Comments so far
Show AllImportant matters tend to express themselves in very clear scenarios. The historic failure of Durbin's amendment demonstrates an institutional "chickening out" by the Dem leadership which we're seeing repeated too often. Indeed, gutlessness seems to be the theme of this Congress.
q
"Gutlessness seems to be the theme of this Congress."
If so, they're simply reflecting the gutlessness of the voters who elected them.
If you look around the web, you'll see that liberals and progressives rarely defend their own--especially one-on-one--against right-wing attacks. On the contrary, they often join in attacking their own leaders--a clear sign of utter cravenness.
Obama was the progressives' guy, and he is quite clearly a gutless wonder. With Democrats like these, who needs Republicans?
Though lefties think attacking their own leaders is cool, I think they do it largely because they're too scared to go up against the enemy. In other words, they are just like their representatives in Congress.
"Who are these "our own leaders", kimosabe?" (Leftist)
Perry.
Leftist poses a good question here. Perhaps you could provide clarification to your comment.
"Obama was the progressives' guy"
Not true AT ALL. Obama was the Democrats' guy. True progressives don't vote Democrat or Republican.
'Don't get fooled again' - Pete Townsend
"We cuss our elected officials and we joke about 'em but they are all good fellows at heart and if they wasn't in politics, why, they would be doing something else against US that might be worse." - Will Rogers - May 18, 1926
I don't go after the Democrats because I'm afraid of the Republicans. I do it because they have shown some pretty bad judgment in enabling the agenda of the radical right over the past 16 years.
I see nothing craven in criticizing Democrats because they joined Republicans in supporting the Iraq War, the Patriot Act (TWICE!), the evisceration of FISA, bankruptcy "reform", Supreme Court Justice Alito, bailouts for banks but not for homeowners, etc.
No "progressive" that I know voted for Obama. Please get that part right. Obama is just part of the same old pay-to-play corrupt politics that the Republican-Democrat party is famous for.
"Though lefties think attacking their own leaders is cool, I think they do it largely because they're too scared to go up against the enemy."
Who are these "our own leaders", kimosabe?
And it not called "fear of the enemy", it is called: "collusion with the enemy".
Despite its banality the following remains true: Unless and until corporate money is removed from politics and term limits are initiated, nothing will change in this broken system of government.
Actually, even GBs would've benefited, for the bankruptcy provision would have allowed families to stay in their homes and keep making monthly payments to banks
---------------------------
Also, if people are able to continue making payments on their house it should increase the value of the nearly worthless toxic mortgage-backed securities on the bank's balance sheets.
It's a WIN - WIN - WIN scenario for the bankers, homeowners and debt-holders.
But because it would mean the people might benefit and therefore reclaim a larger stake of the nation's wealth it had to be CRUSHED!
Also, it would lay the ground work for a legal precedent that the Bankers do not want, and I think they would fight it on that merit alone.
I was looking at the U.S. Code, Title 2 -- THE CONGRESS, Section 8A -- REGULATION OF LOBBYING.
The whole section was repealed in 1995 (Effective Jan 1, 1996).
This is what passes for democracy in the United States. Our elected officials are not servants of the people, they are hired mercenaries for the wealthy elite.
Our Declaration of Independence says, "whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends (The rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness) it it the right of the people to abolish it and institute new government in such form, as to them shall seem lost likely to effect their safety and happiness."
THAT TIME HAS COME!
To start off, our new Constitution must clearly state that a CORPORATION IS NOT A PERSON, and does not deserve the rights of a person in this nation.
Our elected officials are not servants of the people, they are hired mercenaries for the wealthy elite.
--------------------
Our elected officals could be thought of as Blackwater mercenaries with suits, law degrees and gumby-like principles.
"Look at these politicians! They are a bunch of local bandits, sent by their local voters to raid the public treasury; and if they come home with enough public loot, they are known as statesmen." - Will Rogers - January 12, 1928
We don't need to change the Constitution to fix that problem, that ruling was made by the SCOTUS about 100 years ago when Big money really ran the Government. Some scholars have even said that the SCOTUS didn't even rule that way but was misinterpreted.
WHAT IS THE NAME OF THIS BILL?
WHO VOTED AGAINST IT?
i liked what happened on another post where someone posted the phone numbers of the elected officials who voted against the bills that just made sense.
Edited because I can't get the link on one line. So you will have to piece the link together....
See:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists
/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00174
This link may be better, as you can click on any individual Senator's name & get to their official website, & from there get their contact info:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2009-174
I blogged about it last week at Quick TAKES -- http://QTAKES.blogspot.com -- where there are some live links, but:
Traitor Dems Cause Foreclosure Bill to go Down
Bank lobbyists persuaded traitorous conservative Democratic senators to vote against American homeowners this past week in Dick Durbin's bill which would have allowed judges to have mortgages renegotiated for Americans facing foreclosure on their mortgages on their initial homes, just like the wealthy can have done on their mortgages on second homes. Huffington Post listed their names and contact info after Arianna Huffington appeared on Countdown with Keith Olbermann. Call and tell the sentors what you think of their traitorous votes (and tell them you are donating to their primary opposition -- then do it!):
Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) (202) 224-2651
Senator Michael Bennet (D-CO) (202) 224-5852
Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV) (202) 224-3954
Senator Thomas Carper (D-DE) (202) 224-2441
Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) (202) 224-2551
Senator Tim Johnson (D-SD) (202) 224-5842
Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) (202) 224-5824
Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) (202) 224-4843
Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) (202) 224-6551
Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR) (202) 224-2353
Senator Arlen Specter (D-PA) (202) 224-4254
Senator Jon Tester (D-MT) (202) 224-2644
Reporting on Huffington Post, Ryan Grim documented the dollar amounts these traitors received from the banks -- in essence TAX payer stimulus money -- ARGH
1-800-828-0498
This is a FREE call to the Capitol Switchboard.
Simply ask the operator to connect you to any congressperson's office.
Call as many times as you desire. Heck, call all day long if you can.
But don't waste your money on a 202 call!
I used to do that, waste my time calling our so called "elected officials". The congresscritters don't give a damn what you or I or we the peeps think. The system is rotten to the core, time for a regime change here in the USA.
Kate Anne, not just their second homes, but their yachts and Rolls Royces. Just in case there is any misunderstanding about this being the land of, by, and for the rich.
When the people fear their government there is tyranny,
when the government fears the people there is liberty.
~ Thomas Jefferson
Thank you!
all though I am from none of these states I will be calling them to voice my opinion!
lets keep on doing this!
"We can't alibi all our ills by just knocking the old bankers. First he loaned the money, then the people wanted it back and he didn't have it; now he has it again and is afraid to loan it, so the POOR DEVIL don't know what to do."
Will Rogers June 8, 1932
I would like to see a complete list of all of Congressmen and women and exactly how much campaign funds they each reciever from Wall Street and the Banks. That would give us a pretty good indication of how they will vote on any given issue prior to voting...that is the time to begin the blitz of public outrage. They can take as much money for campaigning as they want from the lobby pressuring institutions but the public will have had enough and will not continue to vote for them, democratic or republican. A vote or lack of a vote should prove to be as meaningful as coffer filled to the brim. Congress has stopped listening to their constituents and have forgotten how they got to where they are. We need to remind them continually.
here's what gets me - this is nothing new
the bought and paid for congress and senate have always done right by their masters and it is no surprise that they have done so yet again
you/i/we/us don't matter - nothing personal - we just don't matter to them
as chomsky says - the two parties are factions of one party
the vote is an illusion of democracy aimed at deluding the sheeple into thinking they matter
as we see in this peice - we don't
worse, we never will
the republic has become supplicant to the corporations
we fight their wars, support them on welfare, while their boys in congress resist any attempt to make them socially concious, environmentally conscious
lots of benefits and no responsibilities
isn't that the definition of a bum
"We are the champion yap nation of the world for swallowing propoganda. You can take a sob story and a stick of candy and lead America right off into the Dead Sea."
- Will Rogers - October 30, 1932
This would have just been throwing scraps at the masses, anyway, while the GBs gets even more sumptuous morsels to gorge on.
If the GBs didn't get their bailouts, they would have gone under, and the whole house of cards would have fallen, leaving all of us homeowners free and clear, and a lot renters able to come into ownership through squatting. This sure remedy to the growing income gap and immediate lifting of all people into enormously greater prosperity is the exact opposite of what Obama, Congress and their masters want.
Nevertheless, the house of cards, glued precariously together for now, is still ready for a slight huff to send it crashing. Let's hope it's soon.
So much for a Democratic Senate majority. Not that it ever meant much anyway. For every Dick Durbin there are 3 or 4 Blue Dogs lurking to scuttle every piece of legislation unfavorable to the killers and thieves. But by all means, keep voting for Democrats!
Why shouold we keep voting for Democrats? Ephraim just said it doesn't matter---and he is correct on that. It doesn't matter if you vote Dem or Repub because they are both paid mercenaries for the wealthy. So, by all means, stop voting for either of them! Vote third party or independent.
In earlier times people responded to such situations with demands for new leadership, with demonstrations, letter campaigns and solidarity with each other.
I'd like to see, as a start, a law banning lobbying by any corporation recieving taxpayer dollars; we shouldn't finance our own torture at the hands of the wealthy.
Secondly, we need to band together more. Far too often progressives are so utterly cynical that there's no way to gather a critical mass for unified action.
And finally, it passed the house. That means it's not impossible. We have to make the senate pay attention, and mobilizing people to gather petitions, write letters and swamp the switchboards of the traitor senators' offices would be a good start.
In the final analysis, it is OUR country, but nobody's going to give it back to us; we have to take it -- legally and peacefully, but take it we must.
As the late great former Treasurer of the state of California, Jesse Unrah, quipped, "Money is the mother's milk of politics," and the banks are in the money business, is it any surprise this happened? Unless some of those Blug Dogs lose primaries as a direct result of this shameful vote, this will remain a persistent problem.
Do the right thing? Now why would anyone want to do that?
Until lobbyists and the contributions made to the politicians are banned and made illegal, not one of them will have any incentive to do the right thing. In an ideal world, politicians are elected to do the right thing, which is represent the people who elected them, or they are publicly humiliated, disgraced and banished from office forever (or worse).
Perhaps in our world today, the people should voice their rights, protest, and/or round up all the lobbyists and shoot them like rats in a barrel. But that would be doing the right thing, and we can't have that, can we?
from what I am reading here, 45 Democrats voted for this bill, 12 voted against it, but it seems that ALL Republicans voted against it - so, now, who is the enemy? I think the big story is not that 12 Democrats voted against this, but that the Republicans are still obstructing any effort to stimulate the economy and help the Joe the plumbers and Marsha the milkmaids out there who are on the verge of being thrown out on the street. So much for the Republican's feigned interest in the "common man and woman". This is proof positive that they are still the most in bed with big business and greedy bankers. Hooray for the 45 Democrats who had the balls to stand up to them.
Not so fast with hoorays - there's a game afoot here...
See, once the fix is in, the 45 who voted aye have permission to "stand up to them" because, well, the fix is in, so it doesn't matter. This way, said 45 can go home and claim they "stood up to them," when, in fact, they did no such thing.
Standing up to them would be daily interviews and editorials repeating and elaborating on Durbin's "they own the place" slip. Standing up to them would be to return all bankster "donations" and vow to never accept another penny. Standing up to them would be standing up to them at every turn, demanding heads on platters and transparency and truth...
Don't believe the hype - especially coming from this little oligarchy...
Can the Senate be fixed? Will it ever be a body that does more than protect the interests of the privileged? My big idea--get rid of the Senate.
"Every now and then, a politician ought to do something just because it's right."
Like not forcing apartment renters to pay more taxes to bailout home owners who can't afford their mortgages?
Like not artificially propping up the housing market with easy credit fueled expansion via the government and central bankster printing press over at the Federal Reserve?
Like abiding by Article I, Section 8 for a change?
For those of you who don't have a copy of our Constitution in hand, Article I section 8 says that the monetary system of the United States should be in control of Congress and the Treasury Dept. The Federal Reserve Bank (a private bank---not a Federal agency) is against the Constitution.
The Constitution also states that the Congress in the only group to lead our nation into war. Iraq and Afghanistan are Bush's wars and not legal. Pakistan is Obama's war and it too is illegal.
smipypr
Yay! Someone else out there has a copy of the Constitution! I have one at home, one in my briefcase, and one in the car. All three copies are well-thumbed, and every once in while, when conversation at work or wherever turns to things governmental, I whip out the Constitution booklet and that usually shuts up the dipsticks. While the Code of Federal Rules and the US Code can be pretty tough to hack through, the Constitution contains the basic, simple rules.
If we want change we should just buy the government/senate/congress the same way lobbyist and corporations do. The people need an organized lobby, all our voices screaming at once, to get the attention of these idiots.
Evan Bayh is the banks' boy toy among the Dems. Check out his donors and see for yourself. In addition, his wife--Susan??--sits on seven--yes, count them--seven corporate boards.
So waht are all you stupid democrats going to do now? Vote republican?
dedicate yourself to the destruction of the democratic party. They are going to keep scewing you until you stop funding them and voting for them. Only people who voted for Ralph Nader knew what they were doing. The rst of you are abunch of stupid bastards. Wake the hell up. Obama and his buddies are the enemy of the people. whan will you ever learn?
Virtually everyone who frequents CD would prefer politicians far to the left of the Democrats, or at least far less corrupt. But many, if not most, realize that the only way to put into power any politicians of that nature is through the use of bullets, or at the very least universal strikes, not ballots. No way in hell the powers that be will allow ballots to depose them. They have more levels of defense to that sort of takeover than most can imagine. I know it is a nice little safe dream to believe in, that voting and ordinary political activism will solve the problem, kind of like dreaming about winning the lottery, but life is rarely like that. It is likely that the only way one will ever pry control over the political/economic system from the oligarchs is from their "cold, dead hands," and that would require a great number of people taking huge risks.
Haha, a bit on the nose comment but I can't fault it. It seems that even a smack on the nose won't wake them up. But maybe it's just a bit too hard to look behind the curtain if one was always fed a fake world.
It's just so 'American' how people 'consume' their right to vote with the same banal glitzy Hollywood attitude which fills an otherwise vacuous collective mindset. I guess times have to get much harder (and they will) till a public understanding takes place and we see some decisive action against the real unhinging factors and factotums behind the curtains.
www.scribd.com/people/documents/2169400-ep-heidner
Read Collateral Damage part I and II.
Sioux Rose
YACHTIE: I got to page 30 and then my companion came by for a bike ride... had to find where you listed the site again. Unbelievable information! It shows that the nation elected a traitor and then his son. The only thing that's murky to me is that if these events were staged to cover up that $240 billion, how come now it's so easy just to write a check to the bankers directly? Was the 911 event necessary to cause such a state of panic and fear as to render 50% of US citizens equivalent to those suffering Stockholm Syndrome or shock? Was such an event also required to begin the massive campaign of spying on citizens, making sure the right wing locked up the Supreme Court and had enough $ floating around DC to tie up both parties? I mean if now they can just make 2 trillion disappear at the stroke of a pen, apart from the boogy-man wars between US and Russia going back several decades, I don't see why all the skullduggery was necessary? Maybe the last half of the article will explain that. Definitely worth reading. I plan to keep a secure copy of it.
Well, you have to take into account the evolution of civic manipulation in getting the populace used to increasingly brazen ‘measures’ to avoid whatever the flavor of media-hyped calamity might DICTATE. Shock Doctrines get refined, the parasites improving their traits and trades.
The $240 billion gold loot was used for clandestine operations, ‘lobbyism’, pay-offs, bribes, weapons, wars in order to create and consolidate an order - or better to say – chaos. Now this ‘order’ has delivered the slaughtered USA on a platter to the real ‘investors’. It appears that a full attack on the web of the United States of America is underway but the punters are all watching the wrong channel.
There is a real pandemic underway. Something so gigantic, so convoluted, so abhorrent and so sick, that it’s hard to contemplate.
We talk after you read the second part.
That is, if you still have words............
Sioux Rose
YACHTIE: Thank you, I will take you up on that. I am one who never took 911 as the event that matched the SCRIPT force-fed to the public. I suspected Bush-Cheney operatives behind it, realized Bush's father retains old CIA connections, and unlike many people who seem to think a killer will only kill foreigners, it was clear to me that these sociopaths would not blink at eliminating Americans as "necessary collateral damage" to their plans of empire. The way soldiers have always been treated, the travesty at the military hospital Walter Reed, and the newest statistics about DU exposure...shows the ease with which necessary bodies are dispensed with. Unfortunately the concept of a code of honor, the lie of patriotism and its blinded-by-the-light idiocies, and a Hollywood culture that celebrates violence all make it harder and harder to unmask the illusions and present the Truth. I hope the authors (what research!) of that long article watch their backs!
In conjunction with the articles watch this: http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov11.htm
Again, brutally obvious and painfully implicating.
Yes, the CIA was involved in 9/11 but so was Israel. Remember those Israelis dancing and high fiving on the roof top watching the towers fall? The people that planned the event feared that if Americans set the explosives that took down the buildings they might feel some remorse for killing American people. No fear with the Israelis. They didn't flinch when they attacked the Liberty and killed the survivors who were getting away in small boats.
Do you know that scientic study of the ash from the World Trade center show there was the very latest form of thermite explosives in the ash? This grade of thermite was made by our military industrial complex right here in the U.S. of A.
Israel wanted the wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. Now they want us to attack Iran.