Most Popular This Week
- Not to Worry, Rape Victims Who Want An Abortion: We Won't Charge You With Felony Tampering With Evidence, Just Your Doctor
- The Non Zero-Sum Society: How the Rich Are Destroying the US Economy
- Obama Administration Compromise Would Implement No-Cost Birth Control
- The Right of the People, Even At the Airport
- To End Extreme Poverty, Let’s Try Ending Extreme Wealth
- The Non Zero-Sum Society: How the Rich Are Destroying the US Economy
- Don’t Put a Fork in It: On the Perils of Genetically Engineered Salmon
- Five Possibilities for the Next Great Progressive Push
- An Economic Alternative to Exploitative Free Market Capitalism
- As Hurricane Victims Freeze, Billionaire Mayor Gives Away $1 Billion to Wealthy Med School
Popular content
Today's Top News
Al Jazeera Strikes Back at Pentagon, Releases Unedited Footage of US Soldiers' 'Bible Study' in Afghanistan
Hours after Al Jazeera first broadcast a video showing US soldiers in Afghanistan being instructed by the military's top chaplain in the country to "hunt people for Jesus" as they spread Christianity to the overwhelmingly Muslim population, the Pentagon shot back. It charged that Al Jazeera had "grossly misrepresent[ed] the truth." Col. Greg Julian, told Al Jazeera: "Most of this is taken out of context ... this is irresponsible and inappropriate journalism."
Now, Al Jazeera and the man who filmed the controversial material are striking back. The network has just released unedited and unaltered footage (see below) of US soldiers in ‘bible study' in Afghanistan. Jazeera describes it as "Extended footage shot by Brian Hughes, a US documentary maker and former member of the US military who spent several days in Bagram near Kabul."
In Al Jazeera's original report, Hughes addressed the fact that soldiers had imported bibles translated into Pashto and Dari. "[US soldiers] weren't talking about learning how to speak Dari or Pashto, by reading the Bible and using that as the tool for language lessons," Hughes told Al Jazeera. "The only reason they would have these documents there was to distribute them to the Afghan people. And I knew it was wrong, and I knew that filming it ... documenting it would be important."
Regarding allegations that the sermon of the military's top chaplain in Afghanistan, Lieutenant-Colonel Gary Hensley, where he instructs soldiers to "hunt people for Jesus" was taken out of context, Hughes said in a statment, "Any contention by the military that his words are purposefully taken out of context to alter the tone or meaning of his sermon is absolutely false."
Hughes is completely standing by the accuracy of Al Jazeera's report. Here is Hughes's statement:
On Sunday, May 3, the Al Jazeera English network and I made an agreement to produce a broadcast segment from a rough cut of my documentary film. This opportunity came after a May 2009 Harper's magazine cover story called "Jesus Killed Mohammed." While he researched and prepared that article, I allowed the author Jeff Sharlet to view the work-in-progress documentary. Sharlet's article brought the film to Al Jazeera English's attention.
My documentary, titled The Word and the Warriors, is inspired by a personal experience I had while serving as a combat flight crew member during the first Gulf War. During a very difficult and emotional time at war, an Army chaplain provided me comfort and counsel. I will never forget the important advice or the man who - without questioning my own faith - helped me at a time of need.
For two-and-a-half years, I have been researching and producing this film. I have traveled the world, interviewing both military servicemembers and civilians about the important role of these religious leaders/military officers.
During April/May 2008, I went to Afghanistan. With the assistance and full cooperation of the U.S. Army, I was allowed to film at Bagram Air Field. During that time, I was always wearing press credentials, and I was always accompanied by a media liaison while filming. The media liaison staff knew everything I filmed and - as I was told by them - they filed reports every evening about what I had filmed. It was my primary media liaison, an Army NCO, who - on my first day - invited me to meet LTC Gary Hensley. Hensley, the ranking chaplain in Afghanistan talked to me off camera expressing a concern he had about allowing me to film his chaplains. At the conclusion of the discussion, he agreed that I would be allowed to embed with his chaplains and invited me to film several hours of religious services.
Those hours at the Enduring Faith Chapel included his own sermon at a service called Chapel Next. With the exception of a few minutes I could not film because I was reloading my camera or moving to position for another shot, I videotaped Hensley's entire sermon.
Any contention by the military that his words are purposefully taken out of context to alter the tone or meaning of his sermon is absolutely false...
In recent press statements, the military also contends that - in the footage depicting the Afghan-language (Dari and Pashto) bibles - a cut was made before "it would have shown that the chaplain instructed that the Bibles not be distributed." This is a false statement. The chaplain - as seen in the footage before the cut - instructs the group to be careful and reiterates the definition of General Order #1. After this cut he begins to organize the group for the evening's bible study lessons.
Finally, and in my opinion most important, is the fact that EVERY FRAME of the rough cut from Bagram was provided to the U.S. Army Public Affairs Office in advance of this release. On Thursday, April 30 at approximately 1 pm EST, the Army took possession of a DVD with this footage by accepting a FedEx from me. Since Al Jazeera English first aired the piece Sunday, May 3 at 10pm EST, the Army had every frame of this rough cut for more than 80 hours.
Here is Hughes's unedited footage released by Al Jazeera:
See related:
US Soldiers in Afghanistan Told to "hunt people for Jesus... so we get them into the kingdom"
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


82 Comments so far
Show AllSioux Rose
I find as title, "Jesus Killed Mohammed" inflammatory. Jesus, as teacher of peace had NOTHING to do with the martial, bombastic inverted teachings of some of his followers; and they have had a lot of help over the centuries as a concerted effort was made to distort the teachings of the Avatar of tolerance into one of hatred and enmity. If anything constitutes the anti-Christ, it's those who purport to speak for God or Jesus who demand that others kill in his name. That fundamental delusion has been a huge factor in the costly redundant lessons of history. Of course the economic aspect, the tension between workers and elites is another factor; but both have often worked together. After all the church was the state (power) and vice versa until not very long ago. The devotees of the nouveau "unitary executive" theory would have their king/father/fuhrer/dictator back all over again, and seek to use theology to control persons--especially women--not unlike the equally rigid patriarchal Taliban, their enemy, yet ideological peer.
I haven't read the Harpers article, but I'm guessing they meant it to be inflammatory to emphasize a point in the article: that there are Christians who actually WOULD NOT consider it odd or unusual to invoke Jesus in their effort to "kill" Islam.
*RE: "I find as title, "Jesus Killed Mohammed" inflammatory."
*EXCERPT FROM THE "HARPER'S" ARTICLE:
Humphrey headed down from the roof to get a briefing. He found his lieutenant, John D. DeGiulio, with a couple of sergeants. They were snickering like schoolboys. They had commissioned the Special Forces interpreter, an Iraqi from Texas, to paint a legend across their Bradley’s armor, in giant red Arabic script.
“What’s it mean?” asked Humphrey.
“Jesus killed Mohammed,” one of the men told him. The soldiers guffawed. JESUS KILLED MOHAMMED was about to cruise into the Iraqi night.
The Bradley, a tracked “tank killer” armed with a cannon and missiles–to most eyes, indistinguishable from a tank itself–rolled out. The Iraqi interpreter took to the roof, bullhorn in hand. The sun was setting. Humphrey heard the keen of the call to prayer, then the crackle of the bullhorn with the interpreter answering–in Arabic, then in English for the troops, insulting the prophet. Humphrey’s men loved it. “They were young guys, you know?” says Humphrey . “They were scared.” A Special Forces officer stood next to the interpreter–“a big, tall, blond, grinning type,” says Humphrey.
“Jesus kill Mohammed!” chanted the interpreter. “Jesus kill Mohammed!”
*EXTENDED EXCERPT - http://killingthebuddha.com/mag/dogma/jesus-killed-mohammed/
Sioux Rose
DICKERSON: Thank you for the context. Obviously the offensive part is this god killing god insanity. Then we hear leaders speak about winning hearts as citizens are blown away by bombs and ordnance. Sickening, sickening, sickening. Sadism and depravity given the always-false cover that "God/Jesus told me to do it." Did any of Hitler's officers try that stunt? Following orders, yeah, from whom?
Actually Hitler himself believed he was acting as gods agent on earth. See Mein Kampf. A fact Christians have been trying to cover up ever since.
Jesus never existed. There is no historical record of a man named Jesus. He is a myth, in the same way as Apollo or Venus. Talk about delusion.
Exactly. Jesus is Santa Claus for adults.
maybe he did...but whether or no:
thomas jefferson actually said this:
i paraphrase of course:
:"after studying the bible in its many versions...i am convinced that he was either a genius or a deranged person.."
something to that effect.
he also said that a scholarly study of the grammatical structure of particularly the "new testament" shows that authors who wrote in it were motivated by fantasies .
then he said:
"THE TIME shall come when the Mystical Generation of Jesus from the Virgin Womb of Mary will sit alongside those of other legends and myths such as the Full-Grown Birth of Minerva from the head of Jupiter"...
and then said:
"christians believe they have a god - but in reality - they are Demon believers - for to believe in such things as a divine author is to believe in fantasy and demons..they are truly Demon Worshipers....i have come to the conclusion that the bible is nothing but a collection of Superstitious Nonsense"...
and then said
From the article, "Jesus Killed Mohammed" :
http://harpers.org/archive/2009/05/0082488
The rest of that Easter was spent under siege. Insurgents held off Bravo Company, which was called in to rescue the men in the compound. Ammunition ran low. A helicopter tried to drop more but missed. As dusk fell, the men prepared four Bradley Fighting Vehicles for a “run and gun” to draw fire away from the compound. Humphrey headed down from the roof to get a briefing. He found his lieutenant, John D. DeGiulio, with a couple of sergeants. They were snickering like schoolboys. They had commissioned the Special Forces interpreter, an Iraqi from Texas, to paint a legend across their Bradley’s armor, in giant red Arabic script.
“What’s it mean?” asked Humphrey.
“Jesus killed Mohammed,” one of the men told him. The soldiers guffawed. JESUS KILLED MOHAMMED was about to cruise into the Iraqi night.
have you all read the recent poll news where it showed that of americans:
those that answered they were regular church goers, white anglo-saxon, white-nonhispanic or non-colored catholic, evangelical whites -
as a whole answered YES or "there are circumstances that allow" --
TORTURE?
these are the equivalent of the "jews" that allowed Jesus Christ to be tortured and die from torture - because he was declared - what in modern parlance would be:
"an enemy of the state" (whether an enemy to roman law and order and rule, or jewish "values and way of life").
translate that into the Modern Rome -- USA -- the self-proclaimed "army of christ on earth"....
and history repeats itself.
the other irony is - the western point of view - under the US "flag" has for generations painted a picture, in movies, in propaganda, in christian views "my god is bigger than your god", in "the american way", in "those are backward nations", -- it has always had an undercurrent of a "clash of civilizations" behind it - openly declared by some as "the communists are coming -- and will destroy our GOD-FEARING GOD BLESS AMERICA freedom..those GODLESS communists"!!!
or : "the muslims are so backward...look at them they are so POOR, and THAT's because they DON"T have FREEDOM like our JESUS loving country that JESUS SAVED our souls and Gave himself for OUR salvation and we must therefore be BLESSED because of HIS Grace and THAT's WHY we are RICH"....
and that "the muslims want to create a CALIPHATE in the middle east" and "seek to destroy OUR way of life"
WHILE AT THE SAME TIME -- the USA has created a CALIPHATE of Christianity in the USA - goes abroad with the FLAG of JESUS right along the FLAG of the DOLLAR and MILITARISM
and actually has soldiers in an invading army in MUSLIM LANDS
trying to "spread the word of christ".
errrrrr...EXACTLY who has been trying to "convert" and "conquer" and "Destroy" the way of LIFE of someone?
roflmaooo....
the poll also differentiated between churchgoers groups - who gave the majority YES TO TORTURE answer
as opposed to the very far minority NO - ABSOLUTELY NO - answer
from NONchurchgoers and even more NO from those that answered "atheist or non-religious".
it appears that the "christian religion" actually gives justification for TORTURE and UNETHICAL behavior and mentality than
NON BELIEF in a god.
if - as some scientists are beginning to say that "goodness" is HARDWIRED into the human organism....
religion must by nature be an UNNECESSARY function to "promote goodness".
if anything as a jewish lady told me long ago, because she is nonreligious :
"religion? it is the source of all wars and hatred...it is useless".
thank you teddy for that exceptionally honest comment.
...peace...
Sioux Rose
KANE: I agree with your analysis, but I still find it pretty grotesque as a title.
Siouxrose, I'm guessing you weren't a big fan of the title of Sheldon Kopp's "If You Meet the Buddha on the Road, Kill Him!", either.
That's what popped into my mind when I saw this title.
· Yr Obd't Servant
While the aphorism "kill the Buddha" came much later from the Zen master Lin-chi I-hsüan (9th century), the Buddha himself would no doubt have agreed that we must kill the Buddha...
Sioux Rose, this Jesus you speak of, is this the same one with the magical powers to transform matter, heal the sick, raise the dead, and perform exorcisms?
Do you get this offended when people misrepresent Santa Claus or Xenu?
Heaven forbid that someone says anything inflammatory about Christianity! Dear God!!!
How many have died fighting over Santa Claus?
Seeing as how adults aren't so foolish as to believe in him: none.
I wish I could say the same about Jesus.
Sioux Rose
You are diminished by what you cannot see or fathom. I would not want to have a spirit as bankrupt as yours. Keep arguing for your ego/intellect as if that paltry thing can begin to embrace the whole of this marvelous Creation. What can be said to a mind as closed as yours that thinks it has the answer in nothingness?
Do you want the truth, or no?
If there is a GOD, it is unlikely that murderers like these US Goons will ever get to meet him/her. "THOU SHALT NOT KILL"
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
"will ever get to meet him/her"
It's Him, definitely Him. You are talking about Christianity.
So true. Christianity, like the Bible, puts women just one rung up from the abominations we call gays, and one or more rungs down from the beasts of the fields. No way would they have created a female God.
Is it a new CD policy that most, but not all, comments can't be read unless logged in?
Not sure what you mean, please elaborate.
Maybe it's just my computer but if I'm not logged in and search the comments area there are either no comments or just two or three. As soon as I log in then they all show up. When I log out and go back to check the comments section they are gone again, until I log in, then they reappear. That never used to happen. It's intermittent and has only been happening for the last few days.
I just tried it. When I'm logged in, this article indicates that there are "26 Comments so far"; logged out, it indicates that there are 20 comments. I didn't check to see if the actual lists of comments are different.
John Mitchell, what I noticed is that when you reload to see if anything new has come on, you can't view the comments until you click on "show all." If there are too many comments for one page, you may go back to a previous page to the one you were on when you reloaded, when you hit "show all." I've never seen a comment deleted from the site, and never had the experience you relate. Do you think comments are being deleted?
yes
...peace...
Maybe this is a new method of stealth censorship that the CD editors are so infamous for doing (or, to be fair, maybe just a computer glitch).
Even right-wing newspapers let there readership know when they censor comments, unlike the Potemkin village here on CD, where comments (and commentators) are so often banned and then expunged from the site - without cause or explanation. Free speech? Not here.
Nothing unusual here. When the Iraq mess began, a sincere Christian man who was in the Air National Guard, told me he was ready to go and prove "our" god was stronger than "their" god. His wife, another nice person, was a 10 year Air Force vet who then worked as a postal inspector. These aren't tobacco chewing rednecks. Really astonishing.
Well, George W got the ball rolling in telling us that God told him to attack
Afghanistan and then God told him to attack Iraq!!!
Some of George W's comments were originally about a "Crusade."
And how many right-wing voters thought that "God" had put George W in the White
House -- !!!????
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
No, actually this tendency predates the Nasty Frat Boy ex-President. Listen to Bob Dylan's early 60's classic song "With God on Our Side" and realize from the lyrics that this idea of "Holy War" predates the settlement of America. Whether it was called the Inquisition, the Crusades, the conquistadors of Latin America, the final solution, or Jihad, it attempts to morally validate murder, genocide, and conquest in God's name.
It is no more Christian or Muslim, than radical Zionism is devout Judaism--it is a lying fraud and an insult to all sincere believers.
Poet
Sioux Rose
The concept of killing/death attributable to God under any name is antithetical to what spirituality should and ought to mean. Yes, killing the Buddha (although it holds a different meaning in that the Buddhists fully understand reincarnation, as well as the idea that each must find his or her own way to The life stream/source) bothers me, but I find far more nauseating the piss contest that turns religion, the nonsensical all-too-flawed human notions of the Infinite into games of which god is bigger. Next thing they'll be measuring the phallic extensions of each of their purported gods. And people mock astrology? My God-dess, which system is more civilized? How many populations have been sacrificed for Zeus? or Venus?
The only spirits that exist are those you find in a bottle.
Jesus didn't preach Christianity, and he certainly wasn't a typical Jew among Jews. He exemplified Faith in his father in heaven, his creator; not the "in God we trust""God bless America" bullshit that oozes out of this countries icons and elected officials. He taught a new way of seeing that God, as a true Father figure.. Even a Centaurian of the Roman legion recognized Jesus' faith. The Centaurian asked for his slave to be healed, and the slave was, by Jesus, healed. This is not a message for the merits of slavery, or lack of, nor is it a message for the merits of military; it is a message of faith. Jesus obviously was against corporal punishment as in the story of the adulteress and the stoning. Saul, as Paul, converted from persecutor to being against the persecution of Christians. Upon conversion behaviors seem to change, which seems to fly in the face of professing "Christians" serving as occupation forces "defending" our country from within the borders of someone elses country. It seems that Conversion comes when life as one knows it becomes meaningless, or hopeless. Then open-minded Faith that Something will give meaning and purpose to that lost life creates a new person inside out. If all the military men and women who claimed Christianity had already had their conversion they probably wouldn't be there, they would be here protesting the occupation and inhumane treatment in our name. I guarantee that a prostheletizing would be easier over here without a gun in their hand.
Man is subject to innumerable pains and sorrows by the very condition of humanity, and yet,as if nature had not sown evils enough in life,we are continually adding grief to grief and aggravating the common calamity by our cruel treatment of one another: JOSEPH ADDISON
Johntwodogs:
Thank you for your mature and well informed comment on progressive Christianity today.
it is a ahame that there is a total blackout on Al Jazeera TV in the US.
I think it is pretty funny that these throwback military xtians seem to have really liked it that their crusading activities were being filmed - until they found out who used the film.
Never underestimate how much the US military hates Al Jazeera. I once sent a very sympathetic Al Jazeera flash cartoon on Pope Jonn Paul II when he died to my right-wing Catholic family - thinking it would be peace offering - only to get viciously attacked from a number of family members - particularly the one who was a career navy officer.
And, I always thought that the very idea of "chaplians" - military officers who are priests or ministers, to be pretty disgusting. Once one visited our office when I was working for the Corps of Engineers (Locks, Dams and flood control - no military crap in our District). I could hear him saying "Gawd bleeass Amerrrica!" from the other end of the office - so I quickly got up and pretended to have to go to the bathroom so I wouldn't have to talk to this vile individual when he went past my cubicle.
There isn't a blackout of Al Jazeera. Just Google "Free To Air televison". Buy the equipment about $150 tops and point towards the Galaxy 5 satellite. It is all legal and free as al Jazeera and thousands of TV and radio broadcasts over 67 different satellites readily accessible are NOT scrambled and thus subscription free. Progressives educate yourselves.
alJazeera english is streamed live and has a multi format web site. peace
Does this mean the US military is adopting the Ann Coulter strategy? Converting people in the Middle East to Christianity?
Kill for Christ has always meant that some group was having its resources ripped off.
Sioux Rose, Kane Jeeves, and anyone else having difficulty with the title of the Harper's article: Please refer again to Dickerson3870's posting, or better yet, read the Harper's article. I read the article, coincidentally just a few hours before seeing these articles on CD, and urge anyone who wants to open her or his eyes to this particular dimension of the depth of the mess this country is in to read it. (While youre at it, read Chris HEdges' 'American Fascists'). THE TITLE IS TAKEN FROM AN ACTUAL EVENT, PERPETRATED BY U.S. MILITARY PERSONNEL. IT IS THIS ACTION WHICH IS INFLAMMATORY. It is actions like these that confirm what many have said about the U.S., as well as British, et. al., presence in Afghanistan and Iraq as being itself endangering to Western security, and inflaming tensions, driving up recruitment in Al Qaeda, etc. It is obtuse in the exreme to suggest that Harper's or any publication or journalist should shy away from reporting the real nature of what is going on. IF the people of the U.S. can be woken up to the realities of what is being done in their name, the more no-holds barred journalism the better.
As Mr Hedges points out in his book there is an extremely dangerous situation developing within the U.S. with radical 'Christian' fundamentalism. And as Jeff Sharlet covers in the Harper's article, corroborating Hedges, these psychotic 'Christians' believe that their real war is at home.
That the Pentagon should race to deny or claim that Hughes' footage was 'out of context', or do anything but state that they'll clean up the military, is a crime.
Good points, Barry Greene.
Hughes is said to have told Al Jazeera, "The only reason they would have these documents there was to distribute them to the Afghan people. And I knew it was wrong, and I knew that filming it ... documenting it would be important." In what sense did Hughes mean it was wrong? In an open society, I can see nothing wrong in distributing the books. Wouldn't mind having them myself. But in context, it sounds like Hughes was adopting the Islamic point of view, which puts distributing Christian literature in the same criminal category as proselytizing and apostasy. I think it was very wrong, but only because the military mission was to knock out Al Qaeda. If the books actually were distributed, the deliberate insult to Islam by U.S. soldiers, whose only justification for being in Afghanistan was to militarily attack Al Qaeda, helped Al Qaeda a great deal. If the books weren't distributed, then the people in the video can still be faulted for showing a stunning lack of judgment.
I'm not having any trouble with the title. I was just suggesting it meant something different than what Sioux Rose was thinking. Regardless, I think we're all on similar pages.
I want to second your recommendation of Hedges book. A good compliment to it is John Dean's "Conscience of a Conservative".
Sioux Rose
BARRY: I noted and thanked the individual who related the context. Needless to say I find any activity using religion to kill others inflammatory and insane.
*EXCERPT FROM THE "HARPER'S" ARTICLE:
-- The Iraqi interpreter took to the roof, bullhorn in hand. The sun was setting. Humphrey heard the keen of the call to prayer, then the crackle of the bullhorn with the interpreter answering–in Arabic, then in English for the troops, insulting the prophet. Humphrey’s men loved it. --
Enthusiastically interfering with a religious assembly while abusively spewing hateful words about what the intended listeners care about, some even more than life itself. Winning hearts and mind!!! (three exclams to denote my usual derision and scorn).
Sun Tzu was correct... no nation benefits from a protracted war.
Advice thousands of years old and still unheard.
"Sun Tzu was correct... no nation benefits from a protracted war.
Advice thousands of years old and still unheard."
Sun Tzu's advice does not apply here. The people who are waging these wars are not doing it for the benefit of the nation.
Having just watched the unedited film provided at this site, I have to say that the reactions to it here are a bit unfair. Time and again it was stressed in the film that soldiers should NOT go and hand out bibles and should NOT shove Jesus down people's throats. The way to 'hunt people down for Jesus' was repeated again and again: be a good person. Be kind. and sure, have bibles on hand should people want to know the source of your goodness. So I'd like to know if any of you have watched the unedited version. The BBC presentation was obscenely sensationalist media circus BS. It doesn't sell to cover people who are told to be good and kind. What sells is shock and awe bullshit distortions! My view here is ONLY in relation to the unedited video above. Combine it with other firm evidence of converting the heathens, and I would be of an entirely different opinion. There ARE those who want to shove Jesus of Mohamed down everyone's throats. And they have caused more wars than almost any other group of humanity. Religion is the opium of choice for those who need to justify their selfishness. To tell people to be good and kind to others and to not shove religion at them is not such a bad idea.
I think you're being a bit disingenuous.
Even if the BBC did sensationalize the story, the essence of the piece is that US troops are indeed being encouraged to proselytize. This is certainly the core of evangelism, but it is incompatible with military service.
The fact that our armed forces have permitted an evangelical culture to thrive due to a cadre or cabal of high-ranking fundamentalists officers and chaplains doesn't make it right.
Even if the troops aren't beating the Natives over the head with Bibles, or conducting forced baptisms and such, the Bible students aren't being told just to do good works and set a good example that might make locals curious about the basis for their humane and kindly behavior.
They are also being encouraged to keep a Bible handy to whip out and bring the Natives to Jesus at any chance opportunity.
To tell people to be good and kind to others AND drop in a little religious instruction along the way IS such a bad idea.
· Yr Obd't Servant