Justice Delayed is Justice Denied: Accountability, Torture, and the Obama Administration
Witness Against Torture’s 100 Days Campaign to Close Guantanamo and
End Torture began in the heady days following President Obama’s
Executive Orders, signed on day one, promising the closure of the
detention camp at Guantanamo within a year and ending the CIA’s
“enhanced interrogation” program. Years of protest-- including a 2005
demonstration at the detention camp itself, arrest actions in
Washington, D.C., and a resulting trial in which we condemned
Guantanamo in the name of the detainees-- had paid off. The nightmare
appeared close to over.

As we vigiled at the White House every day since inauguration to support Obama in his plans, countless people we met celebrated President Obama’s promises and questioned our being there. “Guantanamo is shut down,” we heard again and again. Yet the accumulated outrages of the last seven years and the tenacious defense of torture policies by some sectors of government and the media, cautioned against a premature sense of victory. Sadly, the cynicism of politics, the ignorance and paranoia of the right, and the Obama administration’s own failure of both conviction and nerve have kept the nightmare of indefinite detention, torture, and immunity for war crimes alive. So we’re coming to the White House, on day 101 of the Obama administration, to demand again that Guantanamo be closed, torture decisively ended, and torturers held to account.
Despite early, encouraging signs, the Obama presidency has been a disappointment with respect to detainee issues and torture. While releasing so called “torture memos” drafted under Bush administration, the Obama administration has been reluctant to investigate possible, past crimes by those who may have committed or provided pseudo-legal cover for torture. Without such an investigation (and prosecutions, if warranted) Obama’s pledge to bring accountability to government will ring hollow. Neither can Obama fulfill his pledge to restore the rule of law if he won’t enforce the law. Domestic and international law indeed require that the U.S. legal system investigate possible breaches of bans on torture.
Less acknowledged, but equally disturbing, the Obama administration has left untouched — and even actively affirmed — some of the worst of the Bush-era detention policies. The pledge to shut down Guantanamo has done nothing to relieve the ordeal of the men still held there, many of whom are innocent of allegations of terrorism and have been cleared for release. This is true of the 17 Uighur Muslims whom Judge Ricardo Urbina ordered last October to be released immediately into the United States. Yet the Obama Justice Department pursued a challenge to the ruling by the Bush administration, and the Uighurs remain at Guantanamo. The administration’s recent pledge to release seven Uighurs into the United States leaves the status of the other Uighurs-- and dozens of prisoners wrongfully detained-- unresolved.
The denial of the rule of law and the abuse of detainees continues at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. The Department of Justice recently indicated it will challenge the April 3 ruling by conservative U.S. District Judge John Bates that habeas corpus rights, affirmed for Guantanamo inmates by the Supreme Court (Boumediene v. Bush), extend to Bagram inmates not captured on the Afghani battlefield. Bagram is fast becoming Obama's Guantanamo, where the same violations of American law and values take place.
Finally, in line with the Bush administration before it, the Obama administration has twice invoked the “state secrets” defense in efforts to dismiss lawsuits seeking redress for those rendered and tortured and damages against private companies participating in rendition (Arar v. Ashcroft et al; Mohamed et. al. v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc). This craven defense — which seeks to bar discussion of these tragic cases even from courts of law well-equipped to handle sensitive national security matters — adds insult to the ex-detainees’ enormous injuries. It not only puts the United States above the law and public reproach, but denies the defendants’ right to have their victimization acknowledged and their humanity recognized.
Witness Against Torture, like other human rights groups, is well aware of the awful dilemmas the Obama administration faces. Obama inherited a legal, political, and moral mess not of his own making. For his administration to pursue a criminal inquiry into alleged torture under Bush would be to invite further partisan backlash and possibly jeopardize many of his worthy policy goals. The CIA, by warning that that prosecutions of its officers would “weaken morale,” all but says to Obama that his administration risks losing CIA cooperation in ongoing anti-terrorist operations. And the political right, led by Dick Cheney, continues to mangle the debate, defending torture with garish zeal, and fraudulently claiming that closing Guantanamo and trying its “high-value” detainees in real courts means letting terrorists loose in the streets of America.
Whatever these pressures, the Obama administration faces a clear choice to fulfill the rhetoric of true change by upholding the law, leading the country in reckoning with sordid policies, and putting institutional mechanisms in place to assure that the United States never again commits torture. To grant immunity to those who may have carried out torture upholds the Bush administration doctrine that the Executive, operating in secret, has the power to determine what is and is not lawful regardless of what U.S. and international law state. Any Department of Justice inquiry must also extend to the architects of the torture policies, as well as the widespread use of “enhanced interrogations” beyond the CIA's notorious program. And Obama must urgently address the cases of remaining detainees; bring those against whom evidence of wrongdoing exists into a real system of law and releasing the others without needless delay.
President Obama himself insists that the true measure of America’s greatness lies how its people respond to daunting challenges, hard times, and tough choices. It is to time to be great, by simply doing what is good and right. Otherwise, America’s intricate compact with the evil of torture and disregard for its laws and best traditions will continue.
What is Happening on April 30? Witness Against Torture On Thursday, April 30th, hundreds of human rights activists will gather near the White House to call on the Obama administration to support a criminal inquiry into torture under the Bush administration and to fully break with past detention policies.
At a rally at Lafayette Park at 11:15 am, members of Witness Against Torture, Amnesty International, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Torture Abolition Survivors Support Coalition will speak out about the need for accountability and an end to Bush-era policies. At noon, sixty activists from Witness Against Torture — each representing one of the Guantanamo inmates cleared for release but still imprisoned – will risk arrest.
Why Are We Protesting? Witness Against Torture
We seek to demonstrate, in a forceful way, that there is an informed and active public constituency for justice, the rule of law, and accountability in this country that is demanding a criminal inquiry into possible torture by the CIA and other US military personnel, as well as how torture policies were crafted, who crafted them, and what culpability they bear. We seek to pressure the Obama administration to stop its equivocation and move toward some process aimed at genuine justice and which will safeguard the country against the future use of torture.
We are not now content to wait, years into torture policies, for the slow wheels of the opinion machinery, bureaucracy, and partisan grinding to produce some watered-down version of what should be an investigation into lawbreaking, extending to the highest reaches of the Bush administration.
We are also marching to dramatize the ongoing plight — at some cost to ourselves by virtue of our arrest (during which we'll wear orange jumpsuits with detainee names on our backs) of the are men at Guantanamo who have been cleared to release, pose no threat to the United States, and could be freed by the Obama administration much sooner than one year he has given himself to close the detention camp.
Please join us in Washington, DC on Thursday, April 30th. We gather at 10am at the Capitol Reflecting Pool, and then march in silent procession wearing orange jumpsuits and black hoods to Lafayette Park for a brief rally. Then 60 friends will cross onto the White House sidewalk to bring the names and identities of the 55 Guantanamo men cleared for release who remain in the prison, and those of the 5 men who died at Guantanamo, to the attention of President Barack Obama.
To learn more, and support this effort, please visit www.100dayscampaign.org
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
15 Comments so far
Show AllI think that one of the things that bothers me most, is that Bush knows he's safe, and he can give the finger to everyone in this country that knows he is a terrorist. Torture is a tool of terror, and he is a torturer, ergo, he is a terrorist. Obama should be feeling the utter contempt that these people are showing toward him and his entire administration. The more he soft shoes this, talking about only looking forward, the more contempt they show. Look at Cheney...going on every right wing outlet he can manage, and openly insulting Obama with every word he utters. He openly is championing torture, claiming it works. One thing I didn't hear tonight in the press conference, among many things said, was that torture is ILLEGAL. Obama never used that word, or the term criminal. He referred to the torture policies as a mistake...much like a bank robbery, carefully planned and executed is a mistake, if you get caught! The torture memos make it utterly and completely clear that this was all done with full knowledge of the illegality, with the added knowledge that the executive branch would protect them. Our government institutions cannot be allowed to be used this way, as platforms for atrocities against human beings across this world.
I realize that Obama has no place in making a judicial decision, and with that surely in mind, where's the political harm (Obama has nothing to lose with the Republican machine that only insults and denigrates EVERYTHING he does...even if he does things they want!) in just calling this what it was, a crime syndicate, fully versed in illegality, parsing the language of the law to make the un-defensible defensible. Making crime legal.
It is this perversion of the law that should be most outrageous from a legal standpoint. The law is not plastic, or rubber, it is a firm statement of principled philosophy, and when a group of people so high in the structures of government are allowed to use those structures for covering their criminal activities, something must be done to redress that grievance. It is long past time to do this, and this country can never be whole again, or be the country that honors human rights and human dignity first and foremost, till this task is undertaken, and the criminals are brought to justice to pay for their heinous crimes against humanity.
Nanoo
Poor Obama, sure he doesn't know how to design a car or run a big banking house. He has no excuse when it comes to the law as that is his chosen field. So what the fuck gives. What Cheney did was illegal, and he publicly brags about it. Looks like political gaming to me as Cheney knows several democrats are involved too. So will Obama honor his oath of office?
There is more. President Obama's citing of Premier Churchill refusing to torture "detainees" while London was bombed in 1940 is so much hokum. Who were these "detainees"? Did they organikze the bombing? What information might they possibly have had that would have stopped the bombing? Were they prisoners of war? Were they diplomatic personnel? Just a bunch of Germans that happened to be in England?
Moreover, Churchill gave the green light for the carpet bombing of Dresden by the RAF in 1945 which even some of his own RAF pilots called a war crime.
Listening as I did to President Obama's evasion of the issue of torture I retched. Here is what he said:
"What I've said -- and I will repeat -- is that waterboarding violates our ideals and our values".
Bullshit. You can repeat your bullshit as many times as you want but waterboarding violates our laws and you did not say that because when you know that a law has been violated, especially a law that deals with crimes, you must investigate.
Ask Sister Dianna Ortiz and Jennifer K. Harbury about U.S. involvement in torture. Many of us have been protesting America's support for dictators who torture and have called for the School of the America's to be closed because of the torture training at what is now called the U.S. Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation for many years.This includes most of the wonderful Activists who are working for justice in Washington April 30th. Thank you all. I wish I could join you. Justice delayed is justice denied not only for the detainees at Gitmo but for all the innocent Muslim men who have been imprisoned for many years due to unfair trials in U.S. Courts.
I admire Berrigan and Varon for doing what they're doing, but I'm afraid the problem runs much deeper. US torture and abuse of power more generally didn't start with Bush II. It goes back to the founding of the country at least and involves a sense of privilege among the US ruling class, a belief not that they are above the law but that they ARE the law.
To question Bush torture is to question the right of our rulers to do whatever they please, whether it be invading another country, bombing another country, overthrowing another country's government, supplying drugs for our favored "freedom fighters" to finance their freedom fight with, or disappearing anyone and torturing them anywhere at any time any imaginable way.
Jarhead
Shhhhhhh, Obama and Holder are taking orders from Bush and Cheney.
If only a few million people could descend on the white house, then perhaps we would see the direct move to uphold the law and investigate and prosecute the Bush/Cheney criminal cabal. The world is watching!!
I hope you also intend to prosecute Pelosi, Reid and the other Democrats who knew about and approved of what was done. You should add Obama to the list as well.
'Don't get fooled again' - Pete Townsend
I'm pretty sure that federal correctional institutions for high rollers have standard-issue pajamas featuring prints of both Dumbo and Eeyore.
Old-school black & white stripes will suffice for Lieberman.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Your suggestion now seems to me to be the only solution to this dilemma. Massive, peaceful, well-coordinated demonstrations demanding justice. Nothing short of that will elicit any type of meaningful response from this sham government.
Let's do it...get organized!
Since we are a slacker nation in the 3rd world groove,I'd quit complaining.Unless it is just more press manipulating the country,have you notice where crime seems to be the only party getting it's message more progessively than any other party in america.And other nations know this,even though refugees still come here,only to be slaughter on the streets for their valuables,by american made gangsters.
Since we're slackers, or our gov't is, KEEP complaining.
What one realizes appears obvious. Those who don't recognize it do not find it so.
Repeat yourself. That doesn't mean don't try anything else, but you have to repeat yourself over and over again.
"Obama['s] administration risks losing CIA cooperation in ongoing anti-terrorist operations..."
what a crock! the cia is the world's most powerful and dangerous terrorist organization. eliminate the cia!