Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A New Wave of Community Organizers for the Obama Era
I usually have about 20 students in the Community Organizing course I teach each year at Occidental College in Los Angeles. So far, 42 students have registered for next fall's class.
I haven't all of a sudden become a more popular professor. There's clearly something happening on American campuses and in the broader culture that's tapping the pent up idealism of today's students. An important element of that new mood on campus is Barack Obama.
More and more college students want careers where they can help make society more humane, fair, and environmentally sustainable. They want to put their skills, their idealism, and their energy to work promoting social justice. My colleagues around the country tell me that the same thing is happening on their campuses. A growing number of students are asking faculty and staff about internships, summer jobs, and careers working with non-profit, advocacy, and grassroots organizing groups. Why wait on tables when you could be changing the world?
That's what reporter Sara Rimer learned when she interviewed college students (including several of mine) for her article in this Sunday's New York Times, "Community Organizing Never Looked So Good."
Given that headline, and the fact that it appears in the Fashion & Style section, you might think that Rimer asked students what they were wearing to the next protest demonstration. But, in fact, hers is a serious piece of reporting about what today's student activists want to do when they graduate. Many of them want to become community organizers, inspired by our new president.
Fortunately, there are many more opportunities today to work for social change than there were when I was in college in the 1960s or even when Obama was in college (at Occidental and Columbia) in the 1980s. The number of nonprofit organizations engaged in the struggle for justice -- community groups, unions, environmental and consumer groups, public health and food justice groups, civil rights organizations, women's and gay rights groups, fair trade and anti-sweatshop groups, groups advocating for children, for the disabled, for the elderly, and for immigrants -- has mushroomed dramatically. In addition to the thousands of issue-oriented advocacy groups, there are many publications, think tanks, and, of course, websites that promote progressive causes, most of which didn't exist even 20 years ago.
As Rimer discovered, community organizing groups and networks like ACORN, PICO, DART, the Center for Community Change, the Industrial Areas Foundation, National People's Action, U.S. Action, Gamaliel Foundation (whose Chicago affiliate hired Obama after college) and others are getting more applicants from college students and recent graduates. Many of them already have some organizing experience through college internships, summer jobs, or volunteering for political campaigns like Obama's presidential crusade.
Perhaps because so many of them get practical experience while still in college, working with off-campus groups, today's student activists are much more pragmatic, savvy, and patient than their counterparts in the 1960s. They are skeptical but not cynical. They are not paralyzed by old ideological battles or identity politics. They respect differences of opinion, including religious beliefs, as well as the right to dissent. They understand that they can disagree with their government and still love their country and its ideals. They want major changes in our institutions and policies, but they know that people need to win stepping-stone reforms before they can envision a different kind of world.
For sure, student interest in political activism and community organizing was going on long before the Obama campaign. In the 1990s, students mobilized against sweatshops and for "fair trade" consumer products, in support of "living wages" for university employees, and around global warming and "greening" America's college campuses. The AFL-CIO began the Organizing Institute, a summer internship program for college students who want to learn about union organizing. After years of watching the conservative movement spend millions of dollars to recruit and train activists on campuses, and plug them into jobs with politicians, think tanks, and right-wing publications, liberal groups like the Center for American Progress, Wellstone Action, Democracy Matters, the Student Environmental Action Coalition and others began to focus more attention on college students -- to invest in the next generation of progressives. In addition, over the past decade, a growing number of colleges and universities embraced the idea of "service learning," linking classrooms and the community.
But there is no doubt that Obama's campaign and victory lit a spark, accelerating student interest in politics in general and grassroots organizing in particular. Millions of young people, including college students and recent graduates, got involved in the Obama campaign. Thousands learned organizing skills at Camp Obama training sessions. The efforts of these young people -- as well as the expanded youth vote -- made a big difference in Obama's triumph last November. Many of the students who volunteered in the campaign got a taste of organizing and now want to pursue it as a career.
In many ways, Obama has given community organizing a new cache. He has described the three years he spent after college as a community organizer in Chicago as "the best education I ever had."
Obama has provided enormous visibility and credibility to organizing as a career and profession. Obama's campaign stump speeches typically included references to America's organizing tradition. "Nothing in this country worthwhile has ever happened except when somebody somewhere was willing to hope," Obama explained. "That is how workers won the right to organize against violence and intimidation. That's how women won the right to vote. That's how young people traveled south to march and to sit in and to be beaten, and some went to jail and some died for freedom's cause."
Change comes about, Obama said, by "imagining, and then fighting for, and then working for, what did not seem possible before." His campaign slogan -- "Yes, We Can" -- was borrowed from Cesar Chavez and the United Farmworkers movement
Credit must go, too, to Sarah Palin, who attacked Obama's community organizing experience during her Republican National Convention speech in St. Paul last September, and then, along with John McCain, went on the warpath against ACORN, one of the nation's largest and most effective community organizing groups. The GOP assault triggered a huge backlash not only among community organizers all over the country (who were happy for the free publicity) but also among newspaper columnists, editorial writers, readers who wrote letters to the editor, and bloggers. In the aftermath of that attack, more newspapers and magazines published stories about community organizing -- describing and praising the activists who improve communities by bringing people together and giving people the confidence and leadership skills to promote change -- than had been written in the entire previous decade.
Despite our serious economic crisis, the country's mood has changed for the better. Americans are worried about their jobs and their families, but they still give the new president high marks for moving quickly to address our problems. This is important, because significant improvements only occur when people believe that things should be changed and that they can be changed. Obama has restored a sense of possibility and hope to American politics.
Even so, if Obama has any chance to be a transformational President, like FDR, it will require a powerful progressive movement that aligns itself with, but isn't controlled by, the young president and progressive forces in Congress. There is plenty of evidence from polls that Americans want a more activist government to address the problems of economic insecurity, health care, the environment, and U.S. military intervention in Iraq and elsewhere. To win universal health care, labor law reform, or legislation to reduce global warming -- and to stimulate the troubled economy to promote shared prosperity and green jobs, and rescue people from foreclosures -- Obama will confront fierce resistance from powerful forces in the business community and their friends in Congress.
The Millennial generation - Americans now under 30 - voted overwhelmingly for Obama. They are also ready to follow Obama's lead and join the growing ranks of progressive activists.
They also know, however, that grassroots organizing is only one way to bring about change. Increasingly, for example, students who go to law school want to use their legal talents to right wrongs rather than represent banks, corporations, and developers. Fortunately, there are a growing number of public interest law firms around the country that link lawyers to social movements concerned about the environment, housing, consumer protection, immigrant rights, and other issues.
Likewise, students interested in medicine and health care can take many paths to help change our failing health care system. A growing number of students are pursuing careers in public health, where they can combine their concerns about the environment, medicine, social justice, and creating livable communities. Or they can go to medical, nursing, or nutrition school and use their skills by working in community clinics that serve low-income people and agitate for change with such groups as Physicians for a National Health Program, Physicians for Social Responsibility, and the California Nurses Association.
Whatever profession they pursue -- architect, city planner, teacher, biologist, engineer, nutritionist, accountant, aide to an elected official, child care provider, lawyer, or physician, among them -- they can use their talents to help move society in a more progressive direction or to protect and defend the status quo. They understand that it isn't simply a matter of having skills. It's a question of what values those skills will be used to promote -- and what kinds of organizations they work for.
Obama has already helped change the nation's mood -- and helped to inspire a new generation of organizers and activists. More and more young people want to pursue a career with a conscience.
But will the nonprofit groups that help advocate and organize for change have the resources to employ them? Many environmental, community, and other groups that do this work are facing difficult times, since they depend on members' dues, foundation grants, bake sales and other fundraisers to keep their organizations afloat. And will today's young people be able to pursue their ideals if they can't afford to stay in college, or if they are saddled with college loans that they can't afford to pay back on an activist's salary?
Here's another way that Obama, and Congress, can help. They have already expanded the federal budget for AmeriCorps, the nation's major community service program. But what's needed is a major commitment similar to the GI Bill that gave returning World War 2 veterans funds to attend college. America should guarantee all students in two- and four-year colleges financial assistance -- allowing them to graduate debt-free -- if they pursue careers in public and community service. This means encouraging doctors and nurses to work in clinics serving the poor, architects and planners to work for nonprofit groups building mixed-income housing, teachers to work at public schools in low-income areas, engineers and technicians to work with organizations that design and install "green" technologies in our homes and workplaces, and community organizers to work with groups that help people help themselves, through their faith-based institutions, neighborhoods, and schools, in the great American tradition of voluntarism.
A character in George Bernard Shaw's play, Back to Methusaleh, says, "You see things and you say, 'why?' But I dream things that never were, and I say, "why not?'"
That's the essence of an activist -- someone who doesn't just criticize awful conditions, but tries to change them, not on his or her own, but with others. We endured eight years of White House contempt for the practical idealism that makes change possible. Obama has restored Americans' faith in themselves.
You can find that new mood on almost every college campus today. When a skeptic asks me if the students in my community organizing class have what it takes to change the world, I'm proud to say: Yes, They Can.


23 Comments so far
Show All"Obama has restored Americans' faith in themselves. "
This man is a continuation of George W. Bush.
When he stops killing men, women and children and destroying THEIR homes, neighborhoods and towns in Iraqi and around the globe, then you can speak good of this man.
Until that time, your words fall on deaf ears.
Wake the hell up. We don't live in a vacuum here in America. 9-11 proved that.
Great points HK.
Particularly the insight about today's call for more "nurses and doctors on the battlefield".
It is well to be optimistic, what is life without hope?
But, as you say so clearly, we are up against a monster that has only gotten more shrewd, more sophisicated over the years.
People are already showing their exhaustion over the organizing push it took merely to get a Democrat elected- never mind a fundamental change in the overall system.
This is a lifetime's work, but it does seem that we make one step forward for every 1.5 steps backwards (or something like that!).
Just one example: as a feminist, I'm horrified at what I see in the media each day- T.V., movies, music videos, magazines, and so on. The awful way women and girls are depicted and continually degraded, it's as though all of our consciousness raising efforts and struggles of the past forty years had never happened!
Sioux Rose
PENELOPE: I agree about the media. The sexism is so thick one can cut it with a knife!
Obama put on a great act of smoke and mirrors, but if it means creating a new generation of community organizers, perhaps that will turn out to be a good thing. Given the collapse of our economy and the climate changes ahead, communities will need skilled persons to bring citizens together for their common survival.
A very encourging article by Peter Drier. Good points by highkarate.
I wish to post what I posted on Sara Rimer's article above (Community Organizing Never Looked So Good) as it was directed to the negative postings to her article. With added posts to Peter Drier's article, I am sure it will be relevent as well.
Yes, I agree, we need a positive attitude on the community level. We cannot be naive and put our full trust in Obama. However I do NOT believe President Obama is a hypocrite. President Barak Obama is up against the powers that be, the capitalistic rulers of the universe. Radical social change will never come from the top, because the unjust status quo is maintained from the top. Radical social change can only come the democratic power of well informed people in the community. Such thinking must spread like wildfire if we are to ever have radical social change.
I agree, the Bush faith based communities were a dissapointment because the Bush administration was too influenced by the narrow authoratative mind set of Christian fundamentalism that supported the election of Bush. However, you cannot ignore the fact that churches are the last bastion of community in America. Church communities must learn the transformational power of democracy from below.
A renewed democracy though is dependant upon a mature Christianity that wishes to work for a more just, sustainable and compassionate society. This is what Christ really preached about, but much of Christianity has been seduced by the gospel of prosperity. Christianity was meant to be a counter culture faith, not to become part of the culture of money. Christianity is meant to think in a different way, to create a change in human consciousness
Sioux Rose
STEPHEN: It is the great deception, my friend... the love of money as the root of all evil; and as the churches began their march in lockstep with the drumbeat of the God of Mammon (which conveniently was in the US wedded to Mars) they lost any RIGHT to speak of Christ, no less co-opt his teachings for their own purposes.
For the most part organized religions have come to serve the dark powers. Their leaders got drunk on their own power. Yes, there are Christian soup kitchens, but I for one resent when charity comes with prosletyzing. And when government agencies lose funding so that these church groups can instead BE funded. To me that smacks of diffusing the line between church and state. Plus how often did the church send its emissaries into "dark continents" to convince the locals that their ancient ways of living were "ungodly." How often did they teach shame and thus poisoned the well of Love? The church as A LOT to answer for.
Of all the Masters that have given themselves to time on earth and chosen to incarnate in this primitive sphere, I would say the followers of Buddha best honor their master. I have known WONDERFUL Catholics, and seen faces twist into hatred when touting Southern Baptist rants. And yet Bill Moyers comes from that faith.
In nature there are always exceptions. Today, the Christian that TRULY sees the whole of humanity as a singular family of mankind is the RARE one. If I am speaking in hyperbole, then it's due to my sense of OUTRAGE that it was the mega church MILLIONS that voted for Bush and believed they had "a man of god" in the White House. And this, when he never met a torture tactic he didn't covet, a war not worth murdering innocents to pursue. There is a disconnect at work here that is so grave that it makes me think whatever force has coalesced into that entity some call Satan has been made proud by these churchgoers. Their Zionist cousins along with the Islamic version (all fundamentalists, all equally narrow-minded) neither earn any spiritual respect.
The only religions that make sense are the ones that impede fighting and competition among tribes in favor of teaching unity and tolerance of differences. Where are those? (Perhaps Buddhism qualifies.)
I share greatly your anger about Christianity but it is also about the power of institutions and the fraility of humankind and the evil of capital;ism that preys on human weakness.
Thank you SiousRose for always sharing with CD your beautiful mind and great love of humankind.
Sioux Rose
STEPHEN: I believe much of perception is ultimately projection. You truly do have GRACE because even when I point out the glaring flaws in something so very precious to you, you can be so kind, while at the same time seeing the beauty in a religion that as you have often related (accurately) has produced some amazing human beings and profound thinkers (as well as doers). It is a privilege to share the forum with you.
You hit the nail on the head. If most people, especially the Obama bashers, had actually taken a look at the electoral map and had understood the trouble Obama had to go through to get the support he needed to win, they might stop acting so childish and give the man a chance. No Democrat has won CD2 in NE since 1964 btw.
Hello there highkarate,
I've missed you for a while. CD could use some real folks such as yourself in addition to Thomas More to balance out all this silly Naderite madness that's been going on here. It's still fundie land out here but the eastern part of the state isn't as bad. Contrary to what some would say about Obama winning CD2 by fluke, a few months before the election, a few people started getting folks organized in the community and recommended that regardless of whether or not Obama even comes close to winning any of NE, just get out there and organize and push for progressives on local and state level offices and just get out there and turn out the votes and negotiate with the voters. Eventually, it paid off although I admit there had to be a compromise of ticket splitting to put CD2 in play. Whatever the successes and failures, at least trying was the best thing that could happen. We'll try harder on CD1. CD3 is hardcore fundie land since that's the most rural district in the state. Still, if we can pull it off in CD1 and CD2, CD3 will follow just like CD2 in Maine. Don't give up in TX by the way. Obama broke the 3.5 million record for a Democrat. Some reaching out and compromise in the suburbs and rural areas should put your state in play. But yeah, we really need to pressure the White House and Congress. Our ancestors had to do just that during the Great Depression Era and my late father told me all about it.
I loved the positive tone of Peter Dreier's article but unfortunately cannot share it.
In an ideal world, the interest and energy of the young people he mentions would be rewarded by results. In the real world, they are up against deeply entrenched systems backed by seemingly bottomless amounts of money = lobbying power.
It isn't just a matter of taking on Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Farming, etc. but the systems that they built and that continue to feed them.
We should by now have or be close to having automobile-less cities in which we all get around either on foot, bicycle (even electric bicycle) or via public transit. We should have local food systems in which the bulk of food is grown in or near to where people live and not trucked across the country or shipped or flown from across the world. We should have localized energy production (wind turbines to power each city, etc.) We should have an economy based on reality - the actual productivity of workers, the actual usefulness of products - not wild speculation and created "needs." We should have single payer health care in which the emphasis was on prevention. There should be regulatory measures and subsidies in place to ensure that, for example, fresh produce is more affordable than processed or fast foods.
Obviously massive changes/overhauls are needed to make any of this possible. Even with millions of energized students at work in non-profits, up against corporations fattening themselves on the current systems can any of us say that without, say a total collapse of the current systems that these kind of changes are underway?
Re: President Obama. I think he is suffering now from the immense expectation and hype around his election. While I would love to see him do more to further real change, I feel that we all need to acknowledge the limitations of the Presidency. As a lone actor, he can do little and requires the cooperation of Congress to get most changes made. If they are not behind "change" even the most change-minded President will be able to accomplish little.
That said, although I hardly think him a progressive, I do wish that he would push harder. The issues we are currently facing are too important to be subsumed by personal ambitions or partisan politics. There is just too much at stake, to continue the status quo when everything that matters is falling apart.
"I do wish that he would push harder."
Where shall Mr. Obama push harder? Maybe push for more bombings in Pakistan, or Afghanistan. Maybe he can push harder for more money from the Treasury for the banks? Or maybe he can push harder to bankrupt the auto industry so as to cripple the UAW unions.
If he continues to push harder, the USA will become a third world country before his second term.
What ?!?!? Community organization is not new. In fact, the so-called new wave has existed big time even in the reddest states out there. Obama didn't push for this new wave alone. In fact, what with Obama's playing kissyface with Corporate America, I don't know if and how these non-monied community organizers will be rewarded. In Los Angelos, anything's possible. How about giving credit to community organizers in the rural Midwest or even in the Deep South ? They've had more hell and persecution to go through what with the economic mess.
Since all you can do is bash Obama, I'm not surprised to see this kind of childish post from a loser such as yourself. Your complaint about Obama playing kissyface with Corporate America holds no water unless you can prove otherwise. Things take to to build and repair. For a long time, community organizing was abandoned until Obama came from nowhere to victory. His community organizing has been attacked mercilessly by both the Far Right and the Far Left and this has got to stop. Obama has at least credentials of his calm, cool, and organizing nature to show that he can get things done. Nader, on the other hand, has nothing more than a record of being rebellious, running a one-man show instead of organizing and engaging in team work at least after the 1970s, and finally being a kill-joy in 2000 and beyond. I've seen childish people similar to you who have mental problems of expecting too much in life and then crying and showing emotional anger when they find their wishes not granted. Maybe you would have been married had you not demanded too much from your partner to be and not pissed him off like you probably did. You're just going to have to learn to lower your demands and expectations, settle down, learn to compromise and be realistic, and quit being a fault finder. You're listening to the wrong people who are finding fault with Obama and praising Nader to no end. Your places of community organizing will get their due credit but it takes time and patience. Now quit being a crybaby and grow up and learn to date well.
Nebraska Nathan1, if you want to make a point, lay off on Jennifer's personal life. She has a right to be herself and not be someone else's punchbag. Why should Jennifer listen to Obama shills such as you and azjoe? She has every right to express herself and help heal herself and help others as she wishes. There is nothing wrong with fighting for what one truly believes in life. All this shit on "compromise", "realistic", and "pragmatism" are nothing but slick ways to trick others into accepting total betrayal. Jennifer, don't let this asshole troll ruin your life. Continue to believe in yourself, keep building that courage, and may God bless you.
A little harsh? Dude, he's been attacking Jennifer and Red Rick relentlessly just because they proudly voted for Ralph Nader. There is nothing wrong with expressing one's frustration on this forum and can in fact prove to be helpful. As for personal problems, I wonder if you even read her posts and Nathan's because if you had, you would have realized that it wasn't Jennifer who brought up her personal problems but Nathan who exploited and attacked her unfairly on her personal life. She once posted about it on an earlier post when she was replying to someone so Nathan and azjoe thought they could toy around with someone's feelings because they couldn't make a point. Maybe Jennifer doesn't want to be someone else's punchbag and Nebraska Nathan1 has no business telling her to shut up and let her partner abuse her as he pleases. We can try to delude ourselves into believing that community organization is all of a sudden taking off just because President Obama was once one himself but you're only deluding yourself. He's still carrying on with the corporate and war agenda and even Thomas More is having regrets. Jennifer does bring in a lot of great ideas on a lot of posts such as the need to switch from big bank accounts to local banks or even credit unions. Sometimes it helps when someone or another expresses their general problems in life that others are also going through but are afraid to speak up for it so that maybe we can all use our online communities to figure out possible cures and solutions. A doctor can't give the patient the correct prescription unless he or she knows the actual problem.
Thanks highkarate. Dennis Duncan once admitted to supporting Republicans over Democrats so don't take that loser seriously. I didn't mean to attack Jennifer on her personal life and while I do apologize on the marriage remark, I can't stand the way she screams like a little girl about Nader being always right. So what if he was correct? He never capitalized on it and he never organized. All he ever did was run a stupid one man show once every 4 years to play spoiler. He ruined this country by giving us Bush in 2000 as it was and now Obama is trying his best to undo the severe damage. I know there are some things about Obama to be disappointed in but he's only been in office for just under 3 months.
You should have seen her obnoxious behavior on Alternet.org although she has somewhat toned down lately. Every time an issue comes up, she keeps ranting about Nader being right and attacking others who don't agree with her as Obamabots and Limbaugh dittoheads. I don't know if she posts anymore but some idiot told her to come over to CD because there were plenty of Naderites just like her. She does have a lot of allies there but I think she has pissed off more people though both on here and on alternet.org . I know some stupid Naderite such as Red Rick will come to her rescue. Maybe Red Rick and Jennifer Bedingfield should get married and never procreate.