Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
London Calling
While thousands of protesters at the G-20 summit peacefully pushed for a global economic policy that values people over profits, the media wants to focus on the more violent acts of dissent.
In London on Wednesday, Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev agreed to make cuts in their nuclear arsenals; Obama and Gordon Brown announced that the G20 were "within a few hours" of agreeing a global plan for economic recovery; and Nicholas Sarkozy, in cahoots with Angela Merkel, threatened to scupper the whole show if his calls for tighter financial regulation are not met. But at 11 am, outside the Bank of England, we waited under an eggshell sky for the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: red against war, green against climate chaos, silver against financial crime and black (the website said) against borders and land enclosures, in memory of the Diggers.
War got there first, escorted by a small crowd offering the usual British cocktail of whimsy ("Queers against capitalism and other nasty things" "Eat the bankers") and testosterone ("We are fucking angry"). There were fists in the air, and singing, to the tune of "Clementine": "Build a bonfire, build a bonfire, Put the bankers on the top..." Small knots of anarchists in black drummed up a rapid rhythm; police in day-glo green formed equally rapid cordons; the last red double-deckers tried to nose through the crowd. Everyone was taking pictures, with cameras and mobile phones: if it isn't mediated, it isn't happening. "Jump! Jump!" people shouted up at the windowless bank, and "Where's our money?" and "Shame!"
The protest seemed a broad bricolage of causes: a young man waving a red flag allowed that we're not in a revolutionary situation yet, "but I think we might be soon"; three feet away, a woman holding one end of a banner ("Capitalism isn't working") said she was furious with Gordon Brown for saddling her children with debt and may well vote for the Tories in the next election. But Mary--retired, with a "Wage Slave" label on--rebuked my cynicism. "I refute the idea that we're all talking about different things," she said. "The kind of world we want to see is the same world---a world where money is used to help people. We're all just talking about different bits of it."
Within the hour all four horses had arrived, and several thousand of us found ourselves penned (or "kettled") by the police in the broad plaza at the end of Threadneedle Street. A woman in business clothes, down for a meeting, had to get home to pick up her baby son from nursery; no dice, the officer said. No one was getting out. Back in February the Met issued dire warnings of an impending "summer of rage". Today they seemed determined to fulfil that prophecy. There's nothing like being hemmed in to make you want to push back; a panicky anger wells even if you don't want it to. When the cordon briefly parted, the crowd surged forward, and I saw the first scuffle between a policeman and a protester--no political content there, just two guys losing it.
Once I'd escaped I walked a few blocks to the European Climate Exchange (which trades in carbon credits), where a very different, "fluffier" protest was taking root. A tent city had sprung up between the office buildings, complete with bunting and colourful posters: "Welcome to the Bright Side." Instead of red and black, hot pink and brilliant green; instead of shouting, cake and daffodils--because "Nature doesn't do bailouts." The police stood around, bemused, with their arms folded.
This was Climate Camp, a network (mostly young and mostly white) of people who've gathered regularly since 2006 to talk and to protest--earlier camps were held at Heathrow Airport and at Kingsnorth, where there are plans to build a coal-fired power plant. Dave, a post-doc doing research on carbon dating at Oxford University, sat in the doorway of his tent dressed in a business suit "so the police won't stop and search me and take all my belongings." This feels to him like the birth of a new movement. "With most protests, people turn up for the day and then go home; this is an ongoing thing. It's the only thing that makes me feel optimistic, though I don't know if we can actually stop climate change."
There was a definite buzz here, a purposeful party atmosphere. People talked about reclaiming something that was lost, a sense of ownership of the streets and of the land, about building communities. Young men wandered about offering gingerbread. There were workshops on carbon trading and Copenhagen, Samba and self-defense. Two mermaids in green wigs and long blue sparkly dresses worried about sea levels; a land-based woman wore a T-shirt reading "I heart ethical investment." Apparently there are factions here, as everywhere--"some people want capitalism to end, while others simply want it to take note of science"--but the core ethic is non-violence and consensus building. What made the camp so different from the protests round the corner, which felt, from here, a million miles away? It's not so simple, they insisted. We're the same people; it's just a different style, a different tactic.
Back at the Bank, the police were putting on riot gear; there had been a few things thrown, a few heads cracked. Someone had smashed the window of the Royal Bank of Scotland (whose former director, Sir Fred Goodwin, was rewarded for his failures with a million dollar pension); but as this picture shows, the cameras' black snouts outnumbered the missiles. The whole thing felt like a painful tempest in a teapot: the simulacrum of a riot, dreamed up by the police and a handful of protesters.
There have been three different demonstrations in London today, in three very different styles: a traditional march to Trafalgar Square let by the Stop the War Coalition, with speeches by the big beasts of the left; the Climate Camp; and the "meltdown" at the Bank. No prizes for guessing which one made the most headlines. On my way home I passed an Evening Standard billboard: "Anarchists battle for City," the big black letters read, as if we were on the verge of civil war.

6 Comments so far
Show Allhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#30001674
Listen to the exchange between Keith Olbermann and Richard Wolfe framing the demonstrators as "professional protestors" towards the end of the segment including Olbermann's snarky final remark.
and Olbermann carps about FoxNews?
This is echoed everywhere (except Democracy Now)along with sneering at Code Pink or red-baiting of ANSWER (hello "the Nation" who lined up to attack ANSWER).
And folks wonder why the US can't muster up any momentum to hit the streets?
Vern
Excellent point. I had recorded Countdown last night and decided to skip over Olbermann's interview with Richard Wolfe after I heard Olbermann criticize the British journalists who had the temerity to ask Obama if the United States government should be held responsible for the deepening economic crisis that has occurred in that country. Obama's response to that question was that he believed that it was time, to use his phrase, to "look forward." That remark, of course, was the same thing that he said when he was asked if the U.S. was intending to prosecute the Bush administration for their misdeeds.
Perhaps someone should give Olbermann the collected works of Noam Chomsky [who, of course, has never been on his program] or Chalmers Johnson or Andrew Bacevich or Lance Selfa's Thje Democrats: A Critical History in order for him to finally come to the realization that the Democrats are just as corrupt and inept and capitalistic [while not caring a whit about the average worker] and imperialistic as the Republicans.
He knows where his bread is buttered and that he has to ultimately marginalize activism in order to hold folks hostage to the Republican (Fox) vs Democrats (Olberman, Maddow Air America TheNation)camps--with the same corporate intersts dominating both.
Did you see Obama's response to the "Is the US to blame" question? I notice his response has been scrubbed. He said when folks get scared they look around for a scapegoat (the US). Ironically enough, early this morning I watched some financial kingpin on MSNBC Wall Street network, admit that the US was to blame and that it had spread from the US "like a virus". Obama couldn't say it. How is that going to garner any international respect ESPECIALLY since he opposes the regulation the other EU states want to inact.
A disgraceful report of a major event. It was a police riot. The fighting escalated by the police after 7 at night. This was when one demonstrator was killed, already the police are changing the story about how he died. Worse than that was the attack on the climate camp by the police. Hundreds of peaceful protestors were beaten by batons and shields as they bravely stood with their arms up as a sign of peaceful intent. Its on youtube and is disturbing. Today people are gathering to commemorate the dead protestor. They are surrounded by riot police. This is ongoing. This reporter has not only diminished the event, not only missed the real violence that erupted but also brought journalistic shame on the magazine she works for. As they are still chanting at the Bank of England, "Shame on you".
Hey Errol and Vern
Do you not think that the weight of what Thebley just dropped might be more important to be chatting about?
I have just come back from two days of having the police act like mad dogs, smashing peaceful protesters to the ground. I and a great many others believe that the man who has died did not die from natural cuases and in fact, has died as a result of police actions. In fact, if you had witnessed some of the police violence that I have seen over thje past two days, you'd be surprised that more people haven't died.
The Royal Bank of Scotland that was smashed is another very suspicious story. The bank was right in the heart of where the police and the authorities knew the demonstrations would be happening and every other building in the whole area had their windows boarded up, everywhere, that is, except this bank. Which was also unprotected by the police. So, why do you think that was?
After seven, when the main media had mostly left, the police became rabid dogs. Smashing young peaceful people everywhere. They were letting their dogs attack people too. Three people who were meditating cross legged, as their form of protest, had the heads smashed in by police. It was carnage. Dissent being smashed. people being terrorised.
Today, when we gathered to remember the dead young man. The police turned up and surrounded us, (Kettled us) and commenced to terrorise us all over again. And this was when we'd come to mourn a man who died yesterday in extremely suspicious curcumstances, (The reports claim natural causes/heart attack, but he was beleding from the head... You go figure)
Miss Margaronis, with all respect, you simply have not told the real story here.
Thanks for listening and thanks to Thebley.