Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Avigdor Lieberman, Israel's Shame
Imagine a country that appoints someone who has been found guilty of striking a 12-year-old boy to be its foreign minister. The person in question is also under investigation for money-laundering, fraud and breach of trust; in addition, he was a bona fide member of an outlawed racist party and currently leads a political party that espouses fascist ideas. On top of all this, he does not even reside in the country he has been chosen to represent.
Even though such a portrayal may appear completely outlandish, Israel's new foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, actually fits the above depiction to the letter.
- In 2001, following his own confession, Lieberman was found guilty of beating a 12-year-old boy. As part of a plea bargain, Lieberman was fined 17,500 shekels and had to promise never to hit young children again.
- In 2004, Lieberman's 21-year-old daughter Michal set up a consulting firm, which received 11m shekels from anonymous overseas sources. Lieberman, according to the police, received more than a 2.1m-shekel salary from the company for two years of employment. In addition, according to an investigation by Haaretz, he allegedly received additional severance pay - amounting to hundreds of thousands of shekels - in 2006 and 2007, while he was minister of strategic affairs and deputy prime minister. According to Israeli law, this is illegal.
- Lieberman is an ex-member of Meir Kahane's party, Kach, which was outlawed due to its blatantly racist platform. Moreover, his views towards Arabs do not appear to have changed over the years. In 2003, when reacting to a commitment made by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to give amnesty to approximately 350 Palestinian prisoners, Lieberman declared that, as minister of transport, he would be more than happy to provide buses to take the prisoners to the sea and drown them there.
- In January 2009, during Israel's war on Gaza, Lieberman argued that Israel "must continue to fight Hamas just like the United States did with the Japanese in the second world war. Then, too, the occupation of the country was unnecessary." He was referring to the two atomic bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
- Lieberman does not live in Israel according to its internationally recognised borders, but rather in an illegal settlement called Nokdim. Legally speaking, this would be like US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton residing in Mexico and UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband living on the Canary Islands.
And yet, despite these egregious transgressions, newly-elected Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has no qualms about appointing Lieberman to represent Israel in the international arena. Netanyahu's lust for power has led him to choose a man who actually poses a serious threat to Israel. Both Lieberman's message and style are not only violent, but have clear proto-fascist elements; and, as Israeli commentators have already intimated, he is extremely dangerous.
Politics being politics, most western leaders will no doubt adopt a conciliatory position towards Lieberman, and agree to meet and discuss issues relating to foreign policy with him. Such a position can certainly be justified on the basis of Lieberman's democratic election; however much one may dislike his views, he is now the representative of the Israeli people. Those who decide to meet him can also claim that ongoing diplomacy and dialogue lead to the internalisation of international norms and thus moderate extremism.
These justifications carry weight. However, western leaders will also have to take into account that the decision to meet Lieberman will immediately be associated with the ban on Hamas, at least among people in the Middle East. In January 2006, Hamas won a landslide victory in elections that were no less democratic than the recent elections in Israel. While Hamas is, in many respects, an extremist political party that espouses violence, its politicians are representatives of the Palestinian people and are seen as struggling for liberation and self-determination.
If western leaders want to be conceived as credible, they must change their policy and meet with Hamas as well. Otherwise, their decision to meet Lieberman will be rightly perceived as hypocritical and duplicitous, and the pervasive perception in the region - that the United States and Europe are biased in Israel's favour - will only be strengthened.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


19 Comments so far
Show AllSioux Rose
What stands in plain sight is that persons who feed on hatred and fear create the NEED to maintain those stances because these mental emphases generate ACTUAL dangers. Policies of aggression masked as defense end up building up genuine opposition, or what then is seen as "enemies."
As persons in this forum have recognized, Israel's over-macho stance is ultimately working to destroy what's left of its integrity from within. I do feel that Bush, as world bully, provided a role model that Israel, little brother, followed. Although Obama is not backing away from overt, care-less militarism (yet), he may or may not grant cover to Israel's penchant for naked aggression. (I know he and his team have not yet done anything to rope Israel in, even via diplomatic measures; but the overall tide of tolerance for unabashed acts of war is altering.)
It amazes me how nation after nation, leader after leader falls to the same seduction of hubris, this idea that weapons make the man, that power results from how you harm or exploit others in a wish to control what is not yours TO control. Each seems to think he is an exception to the cosmic clause of Justice for all. What a painful and redundant morality play this scenario has proven for mankind.
I think Baby Bush was the little brother to Sharon. Never before has the US been so compromised by Israel as in the Bush administration.
Sooner or later, however, Israel will test Obama to see if his vision of foreign policy is really seen through Israeli colored glasses. Taking Obama at his word so far, the Palestinians are in for a lot more of the same.
Sioux Rose
DAMN: Here's why I think you're off, not withstanding that the Israeli lobby is strong and influential. Which nation has a longer track record of aggression? Which nation has more funds to DEVELOP military armaments? Israel is COPYING the U.S. because it believes through this powerful alliance it's granted impunity. And of course the MIC benefits from selling or "donating" weapons to Israel. Neither nation is serving either its people's best interests OR the premise of democracy. Partners in crimes against humanity, it might be said that each is using the other for its own diabolical ends. Don't forget the US wants a strategic ally in the Middle East, and if the Arab states ever were able to unify they'd have better luck targeting Israel (due to proximity) than the U.S. It would not be the first time the Jews became sacrificial lambs to empire. Unfortunately in this case the worst of the neocons are courting such a potential outcome.
"It amazes me how nation after nation, leader after leader falls to the same seduction of hubris, this idea that weapons make the man, that power results from how you harm or exploit others..."
Doesn't amaze me at all. Those are the exact symptoms I'd expect to result from a couple thousand years of the disease we call western religion, with it's emphasis on Us versus Them.
Sioux Rose
KJ: I'm sure you haven't missed my elaborate takes on patriarchal religions and the notion of God that seems a lot like a hybrid Mars-Saturn character drawn from ancient mythology. I agree with your point.
Considering the Hamas scum bags that have come to power in Gaza, is it really surprising that a similarly tainted sleaze bucket like Avigdor Lieberman has come to the fore in Israel? Desperate times breeds desperate "leadership."
"hamas scum bags"???- more "israel"i psy-ops, or if a real opinion, something even worse...
If you truly believe Hamas are the ones with clean hands in this, then the judgment what is worse is easy to make: it is you.
Perhaps it would help to know that Israel financed Hamas in 1987 to combat the Palestinian Liberation Organization.....In other words, Israel helped create their own enemy just as the United States did with Al Qaeda ......
Lieberman seems a moderate next to many others who have occupied the highest political offices in Israel. The assassin and bomber, Menachem Begin—described as a "fascist" by among others Albert Einstein and Hannah Arendt—managed to get himself elected Prime Minister of Israel. Begin's successor, Yitzhak Shamir rose to prominence by assassinating senior UN diplomats. Israeli currency carries the picture of Vladimir Jabotinsky, a man approvingly called "your fascist" to a visiting delegation by Benito Mussolini.
phys4.harvard.edu/~wilson/NYTimes1948.pdf
www.washington-report.org/backissues/0995/9509083.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_David_Hotel_bombing
Israel has audacity, gall, chutzpah.
That's why they appoint someone who beats children.
It isnt Israel's only shame, just the latest in a long list.
Going backwards
the t-shirts that glorify killing infants,
the picnics over battle zone prisons
the chants at soccer games making fun of dead children,
the various atrocities in Gaza including shooting caged animals in the zoo,
I could be all day at this.
The more right-wing the israeli Gov't is, the better - it makes the essntial confrontation all the more likely.
While Obama has done little of a concrete nature to forward I/P peace to this point, when he talks about the "big picture" he always mentions Miidle East peace in the same sentence with health care, energy concerns and education.
Having an intransigent and racist gov't to attempt to deal with will bring the support of the US public into play and the MSM will follow suit.
So, bring it on!!
Let's hope you're right.
As someone remarked elsewhere, the Israelis have to first recognize the Palestinians are human before there will be any progress. To what extent will Lieberman attempt not to appear racist? For appearances' sakes?
Hopefully, here in America, that basic recognition will finally come. That it is not anti-Semitic to believe the Palestinians have basic human rights.
Israel acts more like an American enemy than a friend. Who gives a shyt about them anymore. They have become the perpetrators in a holocaust. Stop all foreign aid and stop patronizing their businesses.
What the Israelis need now is an aircraft carrier (or do they already have one?) so Netanyahu and Lieberman can land a Stuka dive bomber on deck and dramatically climb out, dressed in their powder blue Luftwaffe unis, black leather jackets and high peaked white caps with swooping eagle insignia. The Mossad is still trying to find out who has the giant vinyl MISSION ACCOMPLISED banner Bush used.
t_g
In the new post-Bush world it has apparently become the norm, that elections routinely throw up these truly obnoxious parties: Hamas, Likud, Yisrael Beiteinu, etc. with leaders who are beyond obnoxious. Fascists, to say the least.
Can we imagine meetings between them? And can we believe in cool and level headed discussions?
I am not young any more, but what of the Jews in the diaspora, who have absolutely nothing to do with these clowns who are now representing Israel in the international arena? Hopefully we are not associated with these maniacs.
Avigdor Lieberman is an unfortunate but predictable outcome of the disproportionate recent immigration of Eastern European Jews to the land. They will stall progress that just 10 years seemed tantilizingly close at hand for probably another 10-15 years, but I do think that after being in the reality that is the Middle East, these newcomers will understand that there can be no real lasting relative peace in that corner of the world with absolutes and blind defiance.
The Palestinians are not going to go away, and a less destitute Gaza is far less likely to breed rocket launchers. Lieberman's followers want Israel to accept a simplistic answer: elimate the Arabs at our doorsteps and our problems are over. Kill the (fill in the blank) has always been a great rallying cry and vote getter. It proves itself an undeliverable promise when one is actually governing, and while it will be a painful and long decade before sanity returns to the Knesset, it will return. Our job as (hopefully) honest brokers will be to help minimize the damage until Israel moderates itself politically and to forge more honest and open ties with all willing Palestinians to be ready for that window in the future.
Wait just one minute.
This "guys" bio reads like a southern, christian, republican holding office some where else than Israel.
Wait, what am I talking about?
The real question is or should be, which one learned this behavior from the other.
The "chosen ones"----or the---- "chosen ones by proxy"?
and they are 'elected'-----that is the really scary part for those of us who do not 'believe'--------. These fools are very heavily armed you know?
Good luck world, we really need it.
Any relation to Joe Lieberman?