Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Walmart Workers Walk Off Job in First Wave of 1000 Protests
- How Germany Is Getting to 100 Percent Renewable Energy
- Already? Obama Tells Supporters to Expect 'Bitter Pills'
- Bailout 'Of the People, By the People' Exposes Bankers' Greed
- FBI's Abuse of the Surveillance State is the Real Scandal Needing Investigation
- How Germany Is Getting to 100 Percent Renewable Energy
- FBI's Abuse of the Surveillance State is the Real Scandal Needing Investigation
- Walmart Workers Walk Off Job in First Wave of 1000 Protests
- Human Intelligence Peaked Thousands of Years Ago: Study
- Bailout 'Of the People, By the People' Exposes Bankers' Greed
Popular content
Today's Top News
Six Years Later: An on-the-Ground View of Iraq
As Iraq enters into the sixth year of war and occupation, there's been varied analysis from many different perspectives. I have been in Iraq every year since late 2002 until the present time working with Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT), an international human rights and violence reduction organization based in Chicago and Toronto. CPT lived outside of the Green Zone in Baghdad until 2006 when virtually no other foreign independent human rights group existed in the country. CPT currently lives in the Kurdish north where another element of history is unfolding that gets little attention in the west.
Prior to the 2003 invasion, many United Nation organizations emphasized that another round of war in Iraq would result in an humanitarian crisis of unconscionable proportions. After decades of war and economic sanctions, there was simply no buffer left to absorb the devastation of more war. Six years later, the magnitude of the resultant humanitarian crisis is still hard to absorb.
CPT stood by the people of Iraq during the 2003 "shock and awe" bombing campaign. In 2004, CPT compiled testimony from detainees who were abused and tortured in U.S.-run prisons in Iraq. In January 2005, the document was released to world media and members of US Congress. The BBC ran the story as top headline news for 3 days but hardly a whisper was heard in the US. In May 2005, US soldiers released the now infamous pictures of Iraqis being tortured. The rest of the story is history. If forgotten, we may be condemned to repeat it.
In early 2005, CPT saw the razing of Fallujah and the world later learned that the chemical "white phosphorous" had been used indiscriminately as a weapon.
By late 2005, CPT saw at the grassroots level what failed US-counterinsurgency policies looked like. Identified as the Salvadoran Option, certain factions of the Iraq population were trained, armed and pitted against other factions. The same military advisors that once ran the failed counterinsurgency wars in El Salvador and Colombia were in the halls of Iraq's Ministry of Interior in Baghdad. Mass executions, disappearance, torture, and dismembered bodies found along the roadside were daily occurrences. Fear, confusion and scapegoating led to near total collapse of Iraq's civil society. With the explosion of the Al-Askariya Shrine, Iraq was teetering on the edge of civil war. It's infrastructure was destroyed and its societal net had just about unraveled.
In 2007, a reverse counterinsurgency plan was instituted and the faction previously labeled as terrorists were now being trained and armed. The "surge" arrived in the summer of 2007 and Baghdad neighborhoods were ethnically cleansed. People who once lived together as neighbors now remain divided by concrete walls. Each group lives in its own little neighborhood prison. Nobody knows what will happen when those walls come down since there has been little in the way of political or personal reconciliation.
Meanwhile, in northern Iraq, the Iraqi Kurds have their own story to tell. Brutalized beyond imagination under Saddam, the Kurds were elated when his government fell. These were the people that greeted the coalition troops with flowers, flew American flags, and named their children after George Bush and Tony Blair. When Turkey denied the coalition forces permission to launch their invasion into Baghdad from the north, the Kurdish Peshmerga cleared the way and marched alongside them into Baghdad. They are proud to say that not one coalition soldier was killed while under the Peshmerga's accompaniment.
Even though the governments of the West remained virtually silent during Saddam's genocidal Anfal campaign and the gassing of the Kurdish village Halubja, and that the US had turned a blind eye to the Kurdish uprising against Saddam in 1991, the Kurds believed that the US might become an ally in their struggle for political autonomy. So far, this has not been the case.
Where the Kurdish villages were once decimated under Saddam and rebuilt after the uprising and the institution of the northern "no-fly zone", they are currently being decimated by Turkey and Iran. The US provides military intelligence and opens the Iraqi air space to Turkish surveillance and bomber planes. Millions of Kurdish civilians have been displaced, some killed, and property damage and human rights violations are ongoing. Turkey's justification for these attacks is to eradicate the armed Kurdish liberation group, PKK which is considered a terrorist group by Turkey, the US and the European Union. Evidence of their military strategy proves otherwise. Turkey is accused of mounting an intimidation campaign against Iraqi Kurdish autonomy and trying to get control of the oil rich city of Kirkuk
The recent provincial elections were filled with fraud and large numbers of Kurds were excluded from voting costing them important seats in certain provinces that have cities with high Kurdish populations. The people of Kirkuk were not allowed to vote at all.
With Nouri Al-Maliki's government in power and the US finalizing plans for troop withdrawal, the Kurds have been threatened by their Arab countrymen and threats of civil war between the north and the south are growing louder. Recently, the US turned over 140 Abrams Battle Tanks to the Iraqi Army and the Kurds fear that those tanks will be used against them as they have been branded as traitors to Iraq during the US-led occupation and invasion.
The UN, located in the Kurdish city of Erbil, severely restricts its staff from leaving its base for security reasons. Unless briefed by their local staff or teams such as CPT, they are largely unaware of human rights violations and volatile tensions.
It is estimated that the healing process for the people of Iraq will take decades. Those at the governmental levels, both foreign and domestic, appear far too removed from the people's reality. A massive campaign of healing and reconciliation at the grassroots level is seriously needed. Whoever helps in this healing process however, should best consider doing so for the good of humanity and not for the good of national interest.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



9 Comments so far
Show AllSioux Rose
Michele, thank you for your excellent report "from the front lines."
One thing a nation that idolizes the military will prove efficient at is turning one people on another to ensure a furtherance of conflict. The U.S. played this game in Central America, and all through the Middle East. How can it own the slightest basis for integrity? It must be that so-called allies to the U.S. only pose as such either for immediate economic advantages, or to avoid the threat of being the next fixed-case-for-war target(s).
The Howard Zinn of the 21st century will have much to document in the way of depraved indifference, state policy for the U.S.
Excellent article. The world needs more people like yourself, Noam Chomsky, Amy Goodman, Naomi Klein and as Sioux mentioned Howard Zinn, to get to the truth and report it in the face of overwhelming opposition at home from both the government and the press.
It's amazing how this report from the ground in occupied Iraq by a human rights activist differs from the narrative being pushed in the US media which ballyhoos the "success of the surge", and a more recent spate of stories describing Maliki's emergence as a strong, centrist political figure suddenly enjoying substantial support among Iraqi voters.
The situation in the northern Kurdish area looks particularly ominous. One would have thought that patching up US relations with Turkey would have been a top Obama diplomatic priority. If American troops are to be completely withdrawn by 2011 as announced, it sure would be handy to have supply routes heading north to bring the troops and materiale out as a complement to the route heading south to Kuwait.
Bill from Saginaw
Bush, Cheney, & appointees lied about WMD, aluminum tubes, & Niger Uranium to con Congress into approving an invasion of Iraq, a country that did not have anything to do with 9-11.
In WW-II, in 4 years, FDR put 13,000,000 men in the fight, beat 3 dictatorships, their leaders dead at the end.
After 7 years of War On Terror, neither Bush nor Cheney could find Osama Bin Laden, our US reputation is in the gutter, we're still at war, over 4,200 US Soldiers are dead, over 30,000 maimed for the Bush-Cheney arrogance & lies. They ordered Torture, a violation of Federal Law.
Unless Obama's statement that “no one is above the law” is a lie,
Obama must appoint a Special Prosecutor for Bush, Cheney and the appointee lawyers that advocated Torture, violated many Federal Laws, our Constitution & the Geneva Convention on Torture.
Sign The Petition To Prosecute
http://ANGRYVoters.org
.
Thanks for the website.
Spotters in northern Irag report Mad Max sighting.
"davethered March 23rd, 2009 4:30 pm
Excellent article. The world needs more people like yourself, Noam Chomsky, Amy Goodman, Naomi Klein and as Sioux mentioned Howard Zinn, to get to the truth ..."
BE CAREFUL ... not to fall into idolatry, but you did neglect other excellent people who are not of North America (Klein's Canadian, I believe); like John Pilger, f.e.
However while the article provides a fine statement and some evidently valid information in some respects, perhaps all but one, there is one in which the article's evidently wrong. The bio. on the author says, "Michele Naar-Obed lives at the Loaves and Fishes Catholic Worker in Duluth MN. She has spent over one year in Iraq".
ONE year; not two, three, or decades, but one year. That's good; it's far more than most of us can say, truthfully anyway.
She was not present during the 1988 war. She was not present when there really was [no] mass gassing of the Kurds by Saddam's military forces. She has not been reading much on this topic at all, evidently.
Reports have come out over the past several years and shedding some serious "light" on this topic of the 1988 matter. These include that [no] mass graves have been found that'd account for ... what was it, the Kurds' claim of Saddam's forces having gassed like around 180,000 Kurds in 1988; that only 5,000 or so corpses of Kurds were found and that by far most of these were Kurdish Peshmerga, who Michele Naar-Obed seems to think fondly of, but who are [not] human specimens to be fond of, not from what I've read, and certainly not when we consider what the hell they were doing in 1988. They were then fighting with the Iranian forces inside of Iraq against the Iraqi military and government! There was no genocide of Kurds committed by the Iraqi forces, and the Peshmerga got what they'd get regardless of which country this would've been.
If the U.S. is at war with a neighbouring country and a faction of the U.S. population joins to fight with the then enemy, then what do you think would happen? The U.S. military would of course include the targeting of these enemies from within and if thousands of them were killed, then it would not be considered genocide.
These are the Kurds the Iraqi forces fought against; evidently not Kurds in general.
I think it was in 2006 that a fair-minded segment of the Iraqi Kurdish population protested over this 1988 matter; having demonstrated publicly, including demanding that the monument commemorating the 1988 conflict in the Kurdish north of Iraq be eliminated, because they were not going to support such commemoration, because it was not deserved. The rotten, U.S.-leaning Kurdish government, the KRG I guess, cracked down on these peaceful and righteous Kurdish protesters or demonstrations, but the KRG is very corrupt, very unethical, a bloody trouble-maker that has nonsensical demands, and is actually complicit in this latest war on Iraq and the ongoing criminal occupation of the country. The KRG is rather guilty of treason, even if the pin-headed bosses of this faction of Kurds think they have some moral right to separating northern Iraq from the rest of the country. That they think that they have such a right doesn't mean that they do or that it's a sane objective to try to implement.
Michele Naar-Obed's reference to the 1988 matter stinks of western msm "news" bs; like from the Guardian, UK, perhaps. Certainly a lot like U.S. msm "news" media anyway. She apparently is only repeating what she's read without having read any other, alternative sources reporting in strong contrast to what she's read. The Shi'ite judge who was presiding over the trial of Saddam Hussein in September, the one before he was executed, criminally too, was not being harsh towards Saddam, was allowing him to present his defence, and in what Saddam presented, the judge wasn't finding Saddam to be particularly mistaken. Saddam's defence was much about defending Iraq.
One of his defence team lawyers wrote an article about the 1988 matter and assuming that everything he said in it was true, Saddam's forces did [not] commit genocide against the Kurds! That was the first article from which I gathered some of the above information.
But that's not the only person I've read this information from, yet we also know that that Shi'ite judge was sacked because the Bush-Cheney administration clearly was not willing to accept anything less than the death penalty for Saddam, which he evidently would not have received for sentencing from this Shi'ite judge.
I don't even think that that Shi'ite judge could really fault Saddam's government alone for the killing of I guess a little over a hundred Shi'ites in the town somewhere south of Baghdad and where Shi'ite idiots had attacked Saddam's presidential convoy as it was passing through, trying to assassinate him. Try doing that to the U.S. president to see what happens to you! I think the government acted too hastily and harshly, definitely too harshly, for they killed many members of the relatives of the jerks who tried to assassinate Saddam; but the idea evidently was to try to make sure that no males among close relatives would live to try to do what these jerk relatives of theirs had tried to do. That's understandable logic, but shouldn't be carried out. Nonetheless, the fault is first with the jerks who tried to assassinate Saddam and idiotically doing this in a Shi'ite town or village, instead of distant from it, like in the middle of the desert, before the convoy came near any Iraqi town or village.
The author of the above article is still demonising Saddam a little too much.
Salvador Option in Iraq, the author speaks of?
I've posted on this topic here, CD, before, and will include a couple of links now. I'm not finding the same index page as before, but the following pages that links were turned up by the Web search just performed still are at the same Web site.
This first page evidently is an index of articles by Max Fuller and he's very good from what I've read of his articles; revealing some mighty or very powerful articles, if everything I've read from him so far is really what's been happening, "shock and awe" sort of "stuff", definitely. Some of the I articles I read by him are linked in the short index at the top of the following page, which is for the topic of, "Proof of US orchestration of Death Squads Killings in Iraq".
http://www.brusselstribunal.org/FullerKillings.htm
It's not really all that shocking, as in surprising, if we view documentaries like John Pilger's "War on Democracy" and the "Secrets of the CIA" clips posted by TheNewPatriot at Youtube.com, f.e.; but definitely hellish history anyway. We might not be shocked, as in surprised, when we've learned of recent hellish history and then read about more of the same elsewhere happening sometime later, so more recently; but it's still shocking in all other respects.
"Secrets of the CIA", part 1 of 6, posted by TheNewPatriot
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QYZBMIBOck
There's another set of clips for that documentary at Youtube and posted by CIACoupsOfTerrorism, but while I think it's his or her set that has 7 clips, this is around 7 minutes shorter and the extra 7 minutes TheNewPatriot included are important; they definitely are for or to me anyway.
Another BRusselsTribunal.org page referring to the Salvador Option in Iraq is the following. There might be more at the website if doing a Web search using "Salvador Option", leaving out the "in Iraq" part, perhaps. I use the four words.
http://www.brusselstribunal.org/ArticlesIraq3.htm
Michele Naar-Obed says:
"Where the Kurdish villages were once decimated under Saddam and rebuilt after the uprising and the institution of the northern "no-fly zone", they are currently being decimated by Turkey and Iran."
WHERE'S the proof that the "villages were once decimated under Saddam", and decimated in what way(s)? See my first post in this page about the so-called and evidently non-existent genocide of the Kurds in 1988 by the Iraqi forces. And don't forget that it wasn't only the Iraqi forces that were in that part of Iraq at that time; they were there fighting against the Kurds aligned with Iran [inside] of Iraq. All three of these groups were fighting and surely all three committed some destruction as well as killings, etcetera.
And why is it that absolutely [no] one else is reporting about Iran attacking the Kurds, [presently]?
If that's true, then I suppose it provides all the more credibility to the reports on the Iraqi government, not the U.S. part of it, just the Iraqi or Persian-Iraqi Shi'ite part of it, being very associated with the Iranian government, the Ayatollah there anyway. It'd show that the Kurds of northern Iraq were welcome to assist Iran in every way and as much as possible, but that Iran was going to be firm about which of the two was boss.
Michele Naar-Obed:
"The US provides military intelligence and opens the Iraqi air space to Turkish surveillance and bomber planes."
DOES Turkey need the U.S. for that; couldn't Turkey know enough about the Kurdish area of northern Iraq without needing additional "intelligence" from the U.S.? What other people are reporting that the U.S. is providing Turkey with strategic military "intelligence", and I mean people who aren't from msm "news" media?
Michele Naar-Obed:
"Millions of Kurdish civilians have been displaced, some killed, and property damage and human rights violations are ongoing."
Millions of them and millions of all other Iraqis? The figures are that somewhere between 4 and 5 million total Iraqis have been displaced, internally and externally.
Michele Naar-Obed:
"Turkey's justification for these attacks is to eradicate the armed Kurdish liberation group, PKK which is considered a terrorist group by Turkey, the US and the European Union. Evidence of their military strategy proves otherwise."
Of the military strategy of the U.S., E.U. and Turkey?
I told Dahr Jamail years ago in an email that the Kurds would come to regret having sided with the U.S. in the war on Iraq; although that's not all Kurds, for not all Kurds supported the war on Iraq to begin with. Some were definitely not of a mind to support this war ... ever; according to what I've read anyway.
Michele Naar-Obed:
"Turkey is accused of mounting an intimidation campaign against Iraqi Kurdish autonomy and trying to get control of the oil rich city of Kirkuk"
The Kurds should've not bitched about autonomy as in a totally independent state thus like a separate country. They, the pin-headed leaders, should have instead put aside their little egos and worked [with] the secular government of Iraq. But their little egos became too inflated and took up all of the space inside of their little heads. Might have large torsos, maybe, but pin-headed, narrow-minded, short-sighted, ... they are and were.
Michele Naar-Obed:
"The recent provincial elections were filled with fraud and large numbers of Kurds were excluded from voting costing them important seats in certain provinces that have cities with high Kurdish populations. The people of Kirkuk were not allowed to vote at all.
With Nouri Al-Maliki's government in power and the US finalizing plans for troop withdrawal, the Kurds have been threatened by their Arab countrymen and threats of civil war between the north and the south are growing louder. Recently, the US turned over 140 Abrams Battle Tanks to the Iraqi Army and the Kurds fear that those tanks will be used against them as they have been branded as traitors to Iraq during the US-led occupation and invasion."
Well, I guess the leadership, rulers of the U.S. government believe that their puppet Iraqi or Persian-Iraqi government is well in place, can now be trusted with taking up where the U.S. forces are partially going to leave off.
From recent articles, the Obama administration's planning on leaving around 50,000 or so U.S. troops in Iraq, besides private company mercenaries, and I suppose also strong USN ready-to-strike forces in the Gulf or very, very nearby. Hence also aerial forces of the U.S.
As for the Turks or Arabs attacking the Kurds in northern parts of Iraq, everything I've read has included fighting between the two, but very much stated it was the Kurds who were enflaming the situation by aggressively or offencively acting against the Turks and other Iraqi Arabs.
Is Michele Naar-Obed Kurdish by any chance?