Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Senate Votes to Extend Sweeping Bush Era Surveillance Powers
- Six Weeks After Reelection, Obama Sells Out Liberal Democrats
- The Only Way Left to Beat GOP Fanatics: Call Their Bluff and Go Over the Fabricated "Cliff"
- The Financial Elite's War Against the US Economy
- New Year’s Revolution: Connecting the Dots, Coming Together and Fighting Like Hell
- Six Weeks After Reelection, Obama Sells Out Liberal Democrats
- The Financial Elite's War Against the US Economy
- Revealed: How the FBI Coordinated the Crackdown on Occupy
- Senate Votes to Extend Sweeping Bush Era Surveillance Powers
- New Year’s Revolution: Connecting the Dots, Coming Together and Fighting Like Hell
Popular content
Today's Top News
America, One Nation Under No God?
The number of secular Americans is rising faster than any other religious group. But faith will continue to influence politics
In recent years, non-religious Americans have won a modicum of public acknowledgment. Not long ago, politicians insulted them with impunity or at best simply overlooked them. But the heightened public religious fervour of the Bush years led the country's infidels to organise as never before, turning atheist authors like Sam Harris into celebrities and opening lobbying offices in Washington, DC, just like religious interest groups do.
Politicians have responded. In his inaugural address, Barack Obama - doubtlessly realising that secularists constitute a big part of his base - described America as a "nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus ... and non-believers." Even Mitt Romney came to express second thoughts about leaving atheists and agnostics out of his high-profile campaign speech on faith. The United States is not Europe - it will likely be a long time before we have a publicly agnostic president - but it is becoming more tolerant of the godless.
It has to be: no religious group in the United States is growing as fast as those who profess no religion at all. The latest American Religious Identification Survey, which Trinity College published last week, shows that the number of non-religious Americans has nearly doubled since 1990, while the number of people who specifically self-identity as atheists or agnostics has more than tripled. An astonishing 30% of married Americans weren't wed in religious ceremonies, and 27% don't expect to have religious funerals. This suggests whole swaths of the culture are becoming secular, since one can assume that non-believers in religious families often acquiesce to traditional marriage rites and expect to be prayed over when they're dead.
The irony, though, is that even as the country becomes more secular, American politics are likely to remain shot through with aggressive piety. What we're seeing is not a northern European-style mellowing, but an increasing polarisation. In his recent book Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us About Contentment, the sociologist Phil Zuckerman described the secularised countries of Scandinavia as places where religion is regarded with "benign indifference". There's consensus instead of culture war. That's not what's happening in the United States. Instead, the centre is falling out.
According to the American Religious Identification Survey, Christianity is losing ground in the United States, but evangelical Christianity is not. Just over a third of Americans are still born-again. Meanwhile, the mainline churches, beacons of progressive, rationalistic faith - the kind that could potentially act as a bridge between religious and non-religious Americans - are shrinking. "These trends ... suggest a movement towards more conservative beliefs and particularly to a more 'evangelical' outlook among Christians," write the report's authors.
In some ways, there's a symbiotic relationship between evangelicals and secularists. The religious right emerged in response to a widespread sense of cultural grievance stemming from the social upheavals of the 1960s and 1970s. Today's newly organised atheists and agnostics were mobilised by the theocratic bombast of Bush-era Republicans. More than ever, one's religion is tied up with one's political choices rather than family history.
That means faith won't fade into the background. If European secularism is defined by disinterest in organised religion, American secularism is largely defined by opposition to it. Thus non-believers in the United States are increasingly becoming an organised interest group, demanding their share of civic respect. The more they want to escape organised religion, the less they can ignore it.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

120 Comments so far
Show All"... no religious group in the United States is growing as fast as those who profess no religion at all."
Welcome to the Enlightenment, a process now in its fourth century. This is the most encouraging news I've heard in years.
"Just over a third of Americans are still born-again."
These folks are cement shoes on the Enlightenment, and always have been. Hopefully, we can recover public, secular education to the point that the lightbulb can go on for these people, too. What a shame to be "left behind"!
"These folks are cement shoes on the Enlightenment . . . ."
Nice image.
I like to think of religious fundamentalism as an intellectual black hole, sucking not only all of the light out of the universe but all of the joy, love, and hope along with it.
People who spend every second praying "PLEASE, G-D! DON'T KILL ME!" are afraid of life itself.
q
The worship of the oligarchy-controlled nation-state is the religion of US.
The corporatists are in full control, and religion is only waning with their approval, just as its power only grew with their approval. I suspect that they worry that religious concepts such as the value of human life might get in the way of their profit-maximization plans of the future. Most progressives are not nearly suspicious enough.
Eh, their brand of "muscular Christianity" already does not value all human life. Their brand of "muscular Christianity" only values the lives of those they say are to be valued. Which is why believers in "muscular Christianity" have no problems with the death penalty, with waging aggressive war.
I believe that many of the corporatists can go much further than they have and will if they feel the restraints removed. I suspect that in their heart of hearts many of them are hoping for the day of selling and buying human organs and human slaves, making the lives of the non-wealthy and non-well-connected virtually worthless. Even the most lunatic sincere Christians will only go so far, and I doubt it is far enough to suit some of the amoral predators in positions of power.
Maybe.
This presupposes that ethics and morality are grounded in religion and religious belief. Which is what believers, whether Christian, Muslim, Hindu, or those who believed in the Olympian pantheon in the past, have claimed throughout history.
Atheists, also throughout history, have disputed this claim.
Certainly some ethical concepts have grounding in religion. However, not all ethics and morality is grounded in religion.
And it isn't as if religion has not been used as an excuse, or a motivation to commit various atrocities. Of course, one could say that atheism too has blood on its hands.
As a lifelong agnostic, I certainly do not presuppose that ethics and morality are necessarily grounded in religious belief. However, I do know that US corporations are completely amoral, and that such pure amorality would have caused moral catastrophe well before now if they had not been restrained by the prevailing moral belief, which in the US has been Christian. Unless and until we develop an alternative basis for moral beliefs that sufficient numbers can agree on to push back (whether through legal means or otherwise) against corporate predations, it may be dangerous to completely defang the Christians.
I wonder where your assumption would lead if the US were Muslim?
I would certainly prefer Muslim control to total corporate control without any countervailing moral force. I suspect that pure corporate control would make Orwell's imaginary society depicted in "1984" look like utopia by comparison.
Agreed.
Total corporate control would be tantamount to a form of totalitarianism.
Preferable, if you're not a woman. Or gay. Or lesbian. Or transgendered. Or bi.
I would bet that except for an elite few women and GLBT individuals, pure corporate control would be infinitely worse for women and GLBT individuals just like it would for everyone else. Sometimes people cannot imagine that no matter how bad things are, they can always get worse, and with totally amoral autonomous organizations in total control, there would be no bottom.
"Unless and until we develop an alternative basis for moral beliefs..."
There is such a thing. It's called Character Counts. Google it.
I am sure there are any number of proposed bases for moral beliefs. I could come up with one or two. The problem is in getting a sufficient number of individuals to coalesce around one. What makes one pessimistic is the realization that force was responsible for getting sufficient numbers of people to coalesce around moral belief systems in the past to the point that such belief systems could become predominant.
"However, I do know that US corporations are completely amoral, and that such pure amorality would have caused moral catastrophe well before now if they had not been restrained by the prevailing moral belief, which in the US has been Christian."
True, Christianity in the US has done good. But Christianity in the US is also often used to justify corporate predations. It is often used to justify repression.
I'm not convinced that on the whole, it has prevented moral catastrophe. As it is, I'm not convinced that it has overall been either a positive, or a negative.
I would add that the corporatists supported Christianity when they felt threatened by an alternative moral system based on communism, as they were much more comfortable with Christianity, obviously. Now that the corporatists no longer fear communism and its associated moral rules, they see no reason for supporting Christianity, as they never have been fully comfortable with it.
Aldous Huxley:
"At least two thirds of our miseries spring from human stupidity, human malice and those great motivators and justifiers of malice and stupidity, idealism, dogmatism and proselytizing zeal on behalf of religious or political idols."
And GOD knows (pardon the pun) that ameriKa has got a damn near lethal dose of religosity dragging this entire planet to the abyss in the name of Rapture southern fried chiken freaks and the zionist warmongering necro mob who have the lumpenprotoplast slurping sludge from the Pavlovian sewer pipe of Hollyweird dripping into the culture from ever media connection wired to the USan brain.
The family that preys together slays together!
http://www.flixya.com/video/1185713/ZEITGEIST_-_THE_MOVIE_-_Remastered_-_Final_Edition
takes a while to kick in but then worth the watch!
Huxley wrote a book called "The Perennial Philosophy" in which religion is explained in terms that everyone can understand and that I at least can accept. I am a very religious person as he describes it.
"The number of secular Americans is rising faster than any other religious group. But faith will continue to influence politics"
Religion thrives on ignorance. With the Internet, we are much better informed.
Faith will continue to influence politics until we get online.
The sample size was 54,461 adults and excluded Alaska and Hawaii. So, the report has some faults. "Northern New England has now taken over from the Pacific Northwest as the least religious section of the country, with Vermont, at 34 percent 'Nones,' leading all other states by a full 9 points." Hopefully, some of our Vermont residents will comment. Of course, without any data from AK or HI, the previous conclusion ought to be qualified as the whole country wasn't surveyed. "Adherents of New Religious movements, including Wiccans and self-described pagans, have grown faster this decade than in the 1990s."
Overall, it's good to see believers in superstition and magic are declining, which ought to be accompanied by a rise in political awareness. Perhaps the most prolific, brilliant, yet marginalized writer and intellectual besides Chomsky is DM Murdock, aka Archaya S, whose books and Truthbeknown.com website have battled religion in general and the validity of Christianity in particular. Another controversial figure is the late Joseph Campbell, whose Masks of God volumes are required reading for those seeking Gnosis and Logos, as is the video series of interviews and lectures with Bill Moyers. Ridding oneself of Sunday School indoctrination can be a painful experience, but it must be done if we are ever to attain a civilized country and world.
joseph cambell talked a good game, but mostly full of crap. his forcing of the diverse myths and traditions of thousands years, widely varied geographies, languages, etc., etc. into his neo-Jungian paradigm is more sunday school indoctrination.
Sorry, but your analysis of Campbell is just plain wrong. He was an historian, anthropologist, philosopher, philologist, and teacher, not an ideologue; and the information he provided in his books and videos set many people free.
the intellectual value of campbell's views is about that of the star wars hexology.
Technically speaking, secularism or non belief is a religious system.
I think the more accurate phrasing would be those who either dont believe in organized religion, or specific revelatory theism, which is the main bugaboo.
Any religious system where you think you get specific messages from a divine power leads to trouble.
But secularists can have the same problem. i.e believing humans are more important than the rest of Nature. Since you cant provide an absolute verification of such a belief, it means that you are clinging to the God-like mind in Nature, as theists believe, while saying you dont believe Nature has a mind behind it at all.
Its like saying the chair has no mind, but I am better than my neighbor according to the chair.
Non thinking subjects arent supposed to be able to make judgement calls.
There is no demonstrable value to human life. Its a human construct. Nature certainly doesnt care, or can be shown to care since gravity affects humans the same as anyone else.
People who say: "well morality is too complicated so we should only care about humans," has a fatal flaw. Why should we only care about humans when we can fragment it even further and only care about family, or nation, or class, or race(as humans have always been doing)?
Since one is claiming that morality is only a matter of convenience, there is no legitimate argument for saying that we should draw the line at humans.A dcitator or a criminal doesnt need such a moral system if he can get away with the actions or exploitation he wants. In other words, if you dont want humans to be elitist, dont encourage elitism at all. If you dont want to encourage white supremacists, dont be a human supremacist.
They both spring from the same fountain of arbitrary, subjective beliefs.
And the notion that one cant be perfectly moral so we shouldnt even try is flawed. Its suggesting, well, since we cant stop bacteria from dying why should we care about cattle being slaughtered by the millions in factory farms?
The problem is you draw the line conveniently at humans. Someone else could easily say, well since we cant be morally perfect I wont even try, so if i can benefit from killing my neighbor or exploiting someone I will.
If you dont want humans to be exploited, you cant actively say you encourage any exploitation.
Its merely fairness.
These type of things always spring from lazy thinking or a belief in human supremacy but when you focus on it, it cracks into a million pieces like any supremacist view.
>"Technically speaking, secularism or non belief is a religious system."
Not believing is a religion in the same way that not collecting stamps is a hobby.
Excellent, witty reply!!
Agreed, this is indeed a witty reply.
Nonetheless, I have a couple of reservations.
Please let me know if you can identify a single argument in the Bible. I see numerous stories, parables, and commands, but I am at loss to find arguments: for instance, I don't recall a single argument indicator (words such as 'therefore') in the five books of Moses (the Torah)
Arguing for or against something, presenting reasons and grounds for a belief and being ready to discuss those reasons and grounds, is already a step outside religious consciousness.
"Arguing for or against something, presenting reasons and grounds for a belief and being ready to discuss those reasons and grounds, is already a step outside religious consciousness."
That's why the period after the so-called Dark Ages is termed the Renaisance and Enlightenment, Ages which have yet to be completed.
OK not believing is not a religion, but anybody who bothers to call himself an atheist, defend his position, write books----this is a religious person.
I don't believe in the existence of unicorns but I don't go around arguing that position.
Given your moniker, you should know the difference between a system of philosophy and religion, the former being emperical and the latter superstitiuos/fantastical/mythical and highly subjective. Which is to say that being an atheist is a foundational component of a larger philospohical system, Existentialism, for example. Such philosophical systems also contain their own moral and ethical school of thought within them, which can indeed be negative as with De Sade's and Cheney's brands of Libertinism.
Since you use Existentialism for an example, Sartre, arguably the spokesman for modern existentialism in "Being And Nothingness" Merely mentions parenthetically "There is no God".
If he had not done that many people who consider themselves Christians would have seen no conflict between his thought and religion.
Neither Sartre nor Nietzsche were concerned with religion. The worn Quote "God is Dead" from Nietzsche is in reference to human psychology. I have never read anything by him to suggest he concerned himself with a big guy in the sky.
I found De Beauvoir much more stimulating than Sartre, and her investigation of De Sade invaluable for comprehending people like Cheney, Hitler and Stalin. The most saddening aspect of our discourse is that so few people--many with PhDs--don't know the first thing about philosophy and its systems and their differences from religion. I view philosophical systems being on a higher evolutionary plane than religion. But I also feel we would all be much better off if the planet was the center of worship as a religion as it was throughout most of human history. If that were so, it's unlikely we would be using the internet and computers to communicate. But I would gladly trade that and much more for an undamaged planet populated by civil humanbeings.
"I have never read anything by him to suggest he concerned himself with a big guy in the sky."
Try his "The Antichrist", one of the most devastating critiques of religions and Christianity in particular.
Religions are created by people. It was this mentality that he could not condone.
The question of the existence of a personal God is another subject---which he ignored.
The worst thing about this country is Christmas! Smiling little neocons wrapping presents for orphans so they can pretend they even care. The only thing they care about is their next vacation to a third world banana republic created for their amusement. I hope they enjoy watching barefooted dirt-smudged children serving them latte's because that's what's coming to Detroit!
ha ha! yes...re-orient christmas...we could still do some fun activity for the kids that morning...maybe a communal food thing for the neighborhood...then, later in the evening, maybe a fun little alcohol\marijuana-enhanced clothing-optional dancing\relating thing for adults in the tribe lodge...ain't the solstice great?
Deepa
"America, one nation under no God"???
Is it true? Just have a look at the dollar bill. That will reveal the American GOD. The AMERICAN FAITH STATEMENT ON THE DOLLAR BILL: "IN GOD WE TRUST".
So the God who has been controlling American life and society is DOLLAR (MAMMON). It is this GOD who has been legitimizing AMERICAN GREED AND GENOCIDAL VIOLENCE through out American history.
Everybody is the same. Loneliness, fear, disappointment, feelings about family members, a sense of wonder, excitement, surprise, etc. are the same in everybody. The God shaped hole, the sense of being incomplete, the need for transcendence, the nameless longing for an inexpressible something. I could go on.
The fact that one person finds transcendence (for example) in a personal God and another finds the identical state of consciousness in a sexual/romantic relationship is irrelevant.
We are not different, we just can't communicate. It's impossible. The same words mean different things to different people. I suggest that other cultures know this and ours does not.
It's not about agnosticism or atheism v. christianity or any other religion. It's about the necessary separation between church and state.
Religion and civil society are different worlds with different purposes. Both Israel and fundamentalist Islamic republics demonstrate that democracy and a religious state are incompatible. The U.S., which is on the verge of becoming a fundamentalist christian state, is not far behind.
It is about Reason vs. Religion Some of the founding fathers were functional atheists (the big red headed dude...Jefferson) and understood completely that a "wall of separation" is needed between church and state. Remember the inquisition was still underway when the country was founded. And shortly after the Revolution the Religious trashed Thomas Paine and attempted to put "GOD" into the Constitution.
Our history is a cycle of the interplay of these two forces.
I never thought I would see the day when we would return to the Age of Reason in our Federal govt. Celebrate small victories. Susan Jacoby "Freethinkers a history of American Secularism" 2004 Required reading!!
Thanks for the reference. I've placed it on hold at the library.
You might also want to consider, Doubt: A History, Jennifer Michael Hecht, which is a history of doubt throughout world history.
Deepa
Christian religion played the most important role in the extermination of millions of Native Americans and occupation of their land. It continues to give legitimacy for the European-origin Americans' genocidal violence and plunder of natural resources in other countries.
The public in the US believes in the myth of American exceptionalism, moral superiority and innate goodness, and of its divine mission to spread “light” to the world. It is clear from the founding of the Anglo-American colonies on the land of the Native Americans, and from the time that John Winthrop made his famous sermon and declared that “we shall be as a city upon a hill” that there has been a strong sense among the European invaders and their descendants that they are a special people with a providential mission to the world.
The claim of American exceptionalism or the “city upon a hill” (Biblical phrase for Jerusalem) mindset has been a pillar of American expansionism since its inception as a country. It was John Winthrop, who first used this phrase in defining the new settlement in North America as the “city upon a hill". John Cotton, a Puritan preacher, used this phrase to embody the idea of American exceptionalism.
Considering themselves as the chosen people of God and as reenacting the Biblical narratives of exodus and conquest, the European colonizers occupied the “promised land” through divinely sanctioned violence against the owners of the land. The Puritans of New England applied the biblical texts of Israel conquest of Canaan to their own situation, casting the Native American tribes as the Canaanites and Amalekites. In 1689, Cotton Mather urged the colonists to go forth against "Amalek annoying this Israel in the wilderness." A few years later, Herbert Gibbs gave thanks for "the mercies of God in extirpating the enemies of Israel in Canaan." He was referring to the European colonists as “Israel” and the Native Americans as “the enemies of Israel”. Similar rhetoric persisted in American Puritanism through the eighteenth century. Indeed biblical analogies continue to play a part in American political rhetoric down to the present. Ownership of the “promised land” is conferred by divine grant, and violence against the Native Americans is not only divinely sanctioned and legitimate, but also mandatory.
One of the pillars of the “city upon a hill” mindset is bipolarity: good and evil, where European invaders considered themselves good as God’s chosen people, and their enemies evil. That is why, Puritans saw the Native Americans as "brutes, devils" and "devil-worshippers" in a godless, howling wilderness filled with evil spirits and "dangerous wild beasts." Native Americans were targeted for removal as the European invaders moved to occupy the “promised land”. God’s invaders “cleansed” the land by exterminating most of the Native Americans (about 18 millions) through sacred violence in 40 Native Indian wars during 1622 – 1900 C.E.
The characterization of America as the “city upon a hill” has become part of American self-understanding and a basis of American expansionistic policies. The US has a virtuous and divine mission to the world, that is, the establishment of its form of peace and freedom by exterminating evil. This divine mission to further peace and freedom by eradicating evil in the world is a basic American impulse and justification for its violence.
Therefore, christian religion was instrumental in the foundation of the US as a country on the land of the Native Americans. It continues to give legitimacy for the American GREED AND VIOLENCE in other sovereign countries.
the churches and the states must come together, re-orienting their foci toward planetary health and a looser alliance of local, acoustic, agrarian sects...
An excellent beginning for rebuilding society after capitalism is destroyed.
let us stop confusing the church structures with religion
turns out my local priest - over a twenty year period - was more preoccupied with raping the little children of single parents, uneducated parents, drug addicted parents as often as he could
what god was he representing when he was doing that i couldn't say
the catholic church - which knew of his dark proclivities - just bounced him around from parish to parish - unleashing this monster on one trusting population after another
let's stand the churches down, start taxing them like any other business and let's class action sue them for abetting the largest pedophile ring the world has ever known
finally, let's all agree that the bullshit story about the wise old bugger who lives somewhere "upstairs" keeping notes on all us is just crazy
that is clearly the job of the nsa and homeland security
we are all divine creatures and i don't need a child rapist to get me any closer to my own spirit - thank you very much
Since superstition is a hobby, all churches, mosques, halls, or whatever their meeting places are called should be taxed like any other property. This business of giving them tax breaks is nonsense. Nobody else can use their pasttime as a tax loop-hole. Nobody is forced to be superstitious (except children, of course, who have little value in this economcy, other than begging for advertised junk). If you want to indulge in fantasy, please don't ask sane people to support your addiction. It makes no sense to make some vices illegal while giving others tax breaks. Maybe taxing the hell out of this particular vice would discourage it - oops, that doesn't work either - but why give them a free pass? If I call my dog 'god' - can I deduct him? (And I do often call him g-o-d instead of d-o-g since he rules my life)
Let's face it - too many people are worshipping RELIGION - and such nonsense controls far too much of our lives, especially those of us who see it as EVIL. (Please don't rail on me - I LOVE mythology. And comic-book heroes, etc. It's just the mistaking of entertainment - the difference between fantasy and reality - that gets to me.)
Catholicism is also Dorothy Day, Catholic Worker communities, Liberation Theology, Sandinista Fr. Miguel D'Escoto, Daniel and the late Phil Berrigan, Phoughshares actions against militarism, defiant revolution against British protestant opession and ethnic cleansing in 1919 to 1921...
---USAn---