EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- Naomi Klein: 'Anti-Shock Doctrines' Show the Way to Resist
Popular content
Today's Top News
The US Is Facing a Weimar Moment
In early 1919, Germany put in place a new government to begin rebuilding the country after its crushing defeat in World War I. But the right-wing forces that had led the country into the War and lost the War conspired even before it was over to destroy the new government, the "Weimar Republic." They succeeded.
The U.S. faces a similar "Weimar Moment." The devastating collapse of the economy after eight years of Republican rule has left the leadership, policies, and ideology of the right utterly discredited. But, as was the case with Germany in 1919, Republicans do not intend to allow the new government to succeed. They will do everything they can to undermine it. If they are successful, the U.S. may yet go the way of Weimar Germany.
World War I left Germany utterly devastated. The landed aristocrats, industrial magnates, wealthy financiers, weapons makers, and the officer corps of the military that formed the locus of right wing power were completely discredited. Their failure in provoking and prosecuting the War was catastrophic, undeniable, and complete.
The economy was destroyed. Prices were at 800% of pre-war levels and rising quickly. Agriculture, pillaged for the War, lay in ruins. Social insurance payments for the War's injured, to widows and orphans, and newly unemployed soldiers were astronomical. And all this was before the cost of rebuilding was even begun.
At the same time, Germany faced massive reparations payments to the Allied victors, France and England. But Germany's foreign properties had been confiscated and its colonies turned over to the victors. The combination of these conditions, both domestic and international, made it extraordinarily difficult for the German economy to recover.
As a result of the failure of the right, the German people elected a moderately leftist government to lead the nation's rebuilding. It was named the Weimar Republic for the city in which the new post-imperial constitution was written. The new government was led by Friedrich Ebert, head of the German Socialist Party.
But the country's new parliamentary system had allowed dozens of parties to run, making it impossible for any one party to win an outright majority. Ebert's party had achieved the highest portion of votes, 38%, in the first post-War elections, held in January 1919. Ebert would have to govern by coalition.
It was at this time that the right wing made its crucial decision. Despite its shocking, naked failure over the prior decade, despite the horrific devastation it had wrought on the German people, despite the discrediting of everything they had purported to stand for, they would fight Ebert, his new government, and its plans for recovery. They would do everything they could to make sure that the new government failed.
Their strategy was two-fold: first, stoke the resentment of the population about the calamitous state of its living conditions-no matter that those conditions had been created by the very right-wing oligarchs who now pretended to befriend the little guy. Rage is rage. It is glandular and unseeing. Once catalyzed it is easy to turn on any subject.
And stoking resentment was easy to do. Just before the War ended, the military concocted its most sensational lie: the German army hadn't actually been defeated. It had been "stabbed in the back" by communists, traitors, and Jews. It was an easy lie to sell. It entwined an attack on an alien political ideology - liberalism- with the latent, pervasive myth of German racial superiority.
The second strategy of the right was to prevent the new government from succeeding. To begin with, success of the left would conspicuously advertise the failure of the right. Moreover, success by the left would legitimize republican government, so hated by the oligarchs of the right. Much better for the people to be ruled by the self-aggrandizing right-wing autocracy that had governed Germany for centuries.
So the rightists set out to do everything they could to make it impossible for the leftists to govern. They would use parliamentary maneuver, shifting coalitions, domination of the new mass media, legislative obstruction, staged public relations spectacles, relentless pressure by narrow but powerful interests, judicial intimidation and, eventually, outright murder of their political opponents.
Contrition for their abject failure, humility for their destructive hubris, compassion for their crippled country-those had nothing to do with it. All they possessed was a blinding, visceral hatred of the left and a masturbatory lust for the return to power.
Eventually, they succeeded. Every setback in recovery - and there would inevitably be many - was met with hysterical demonizing of the left wing government. The lie was repeated relentlessly that the government was run by communists, traitors, and Jews-the same furtive cabal that had purportedly stabbed the country in the back at the end of the War. They steadily chipped away at the efficacy and, thereby, the legitimacy of successive republican governments.
By the time of the Great Depression, Adolph Hitler's ironically named National Socialist Party had become the biggest vote getter in the nation. The Nazis had once been derided as the lunatic fringe of the far right. But the "respectable" right-wing power brokers who had started and lost the Great War anointed Hitler Chancellor in January, 1933.
He immediately suspended the constitution, abolishing most civil liberties. He outlawed opposition parties, began a massive military build-up and a relentless propaganda campaign, and set Germany and the world onto the path of the greatest destruction it would ever know.
America now faces its own "Weimar moment."
The failure of right wing policy and leadership over the past eight years, especially in matters economic, is comparable to Germany's right-wing failure in World War I. It is catastrophic, undeniable, and complete.
Consider:
According to the World Economic Forum, forty percent of the entire world's wealth has been destroyed in the recent financial collapse. In the U.S. alone, between housing and the stock market, more than $18 trillion in wealth has already been destroyed.
The private mega-banks that anchor the financial systems of the western world are bankrupt. This makes it all but impossible to jump-start the western world's economies which are heavily dependent on bank-system credit to operate.
More than 10,000 homes go into foreclosure every day. More than 20,000 people lose their job every day. And the collapse is accelerating, developing its own self-reinforcing dynamic. Job losses breed foreclosures, reducing demand, leading to more job losses and further degradation of the financial system. None of the stopgaps designed to stanch the bleeding have yet worked. There is no bottom in sight.
Meanwhile, debt has risen to astronomical levels. Reagan and Bush I quadrupled the national debt in only twelve years. Bush II doubled it again in only eight. It is now ten times higher than it was in 1980 when Reagan was elected. Total public and private debt exceeds 300% of GDP, half again higher than it was in 1929.
The government's unfunded liabilities, promises it has made to the American people but for which no payment source can be identified, now exceed $60 trillion, a literally inconceivable sum that can never, will never, be paid. Federal Reserve economist Lawrence Kotlikoff has suggested that the U.S. government is "actuarially bankrupt."
The full measure of the nation's plight is revealed in Hillary Clinton's first trip as Secretary of State. It was to China, to beg them to fund Obama's new fiscal deficits. Without loans from China, the U.S. economy cannot be revived. The significance of this cannot be overstated: the U.S. no longer exercises sovereignty over its own economic affairs. That sovereignty now resides in the hands of China, the U.S.'s greatest long-term rival.
Thanks to Republican policies of massive debt and shipping jobs abroad, the U.S. has technically become a colony of China. It exports raw materials and imports finished goods, together with the capital to make up the difference. Should the Chinese decide not to lend the trillions of dollars the U.S. is begging for, the U.S. economy will implode, plummeting onto itself in a World Trade Center-like collapse that will leave dust clouds circling the planet for decades.
Notwithstanding the destruction inflicted on the economy by Republican policies, the most devastating breakdown is in the intellectual foundation on which right wing economic ideology itself is premised. Free market doctrine, the secular religion of right-wing America, is in utter, irretrievable shambles.
One of the most lofty tenets on which free markets are premised is their claim for themselves that they are "efficient," that is, that market prices always reflect "fundamental values" of assets. But if that's true, how could the world's largest insurance company, AIG, have lost 99.5% of its market value in only 18 months? How could the world's largest bank, Citibank, have lost 98% of its value over the same period?
How could the world's largest brokerage company, Merrill Lynch, have gone bankrupt and need to be bought by Bank of America? How could the world's largest car company, General Motors, have lost 95% of its value and stand on the threshold of extinction? How could the world's largest industrial conglomerate, General Electric, have lost 85% of its value in only 18 months?
If the largest companies in the world, those at the very heart of the capitalist system itself, can lose virtually all of their value in only 18 months, what is the possible meaning of the phrases "efficient markets" and "fundamental value"?
The other core tenets of free market ideology are equally compromised. Major actors are clearly not rational - a breakdown of theological proportions admitted by no less an avatar of the cult than its pope himself, Alan Greenspan. Free markets clearly cannot, will not, regulate themselves. It is precisely their innate, irrepressible propensity for sociopathic greed and predatory fraud that has brought the whole of the world's economy to the precipice of collapse.
Free markets clearly do not align risk and reward, allocating capital to its most productive uses, as its promoters advertise. They clearly do not automatically return to equilibrium, but must be bailed out with trillions of dollars of injections from the shrinking coffers of the public to the ever-bulging coffers of a private priesthood of pillage and plunder.
And in perhaps the greatest indictment of all, one going back to its primeval roots in Adam Smith's eighteenth century opus, The Wealth of Nations, the unrestrained behavior of self-interested individuals clearly, manifestly, does not "coalesce as if by an Invisible Hand to the greatest good for the greatest number."
These are not peripheral premises that have failed. They are not tangential tenets. Efficient markets. Rational actors. Market equilibrium. Risk and reward. Self interest. These are the essential sacraments on which the entire free market system is founded. They are in tatters. And it isn't that any one of them has been discredited by the glaring, merciless force of events. All of them have been. All of them together. And all of them at the same time.
Free markets have long been the basis for a legitimate - though rightly debated - economic policy framework. But they have become little more than a robotically-recited cultural catechism, a mindless mantra mumbled to mask the looting of the nation's resources that is the true purpose of Republican economic policy as demonstrated by the staggering upward transfers of wealth that inevitably occur under Republican regimes. A more complete, conspicuous, catastrophic, and irrefutable repudiation of right wing leaders, right wing policies, and right wing ideology could not possibly be contrived.
So what is the right wing response?
They have adopted the strategy and tactics of the failed right wing plotters in Weimar Germany. First, stoke the resentment of the population about the increasingly dire state of its living conditions-no matter that those conditions were created by the very right-wing oligarchs who now pretend to befriend the little guy. Rage is rage. It is glandular and unseeing. Once catalyzed it is easy to turn on any subject.
Second, prevent the new government from succeeding in any meaningful endeavor. The Republicans have set all their efforts to doing everything they can to make sure the Obama administration fails. Rush Limbaugh's infamous, "I hope he fails" pronouncement is only the beginning of the fomenting of hatred from the right. As Limbaugh said, "Let's be honest. Every Republican in America is hoping for Obama's failure."
The same malignant hope oozes unadulterated from all the other Dogpatch Demagogues that rent themselves out to the Republican party to foment resentment against anything liberal: Joe the "Plumber," Rick Santelli, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, Ann Coulter, and virtually every other wing-nut operative whose intellectual stock in trade has been vaporized by the collision of right-wing policies with objective reality.
Equally so for the "respectable" members of the party, the all-but-three Republican members of Congress who refused to sign on to Obama's first stimulus package and continue to grandstand against every effort toward any form of progress. Contrition for their own abject failure, humility for their destructive hubris, compassion for their crippled country-those have nothing to do with it. All they possess is a blinding, visceral hatred of the left and a masturbatory lust for the return to power.
And what else can they do? Bereft of ideas, bankrupt in ideology, architects of collapse, obstruction is all they have. If Obama is successful, it will not only advertise the full extent of their failure, it will provide a model of liberal governance that would render Republicans irrelevant for decades, much as FDR's success left them out in the political cold for an entire generation. Liberal failure is a matter of life and death for Republicans.
And it's not at all clear that the liberals won't fail. No one should underestimate the task at hand. Never before - not even during the Great Depression - has the country inherited such a daunting, intractable set of economic problems: a debt burden so crushing; inequality so vast; a loss of financial sovereignty so constricting; an intellectual edifice so bankrupt; a private economy so uncompetitive; or an opposition so callously self interested in its own recovery and so cavalierly disinterested in the nation's.
The economy has been so damaged, successful rescue requires threading a series of policy needles, each of them so complex in their own right that none could be solved by any administration of the past 50 years. This includes rehabilitating and re-regulating the nation's banking system, restructuring health care, reducing national dependence on oil, reviving manufacturing so as to reduce the trade deficit, rebuilding the nation's crumbling infrastructure, dealing with a soaring national debt, trying to resuscitate a collapsing housing market, and all the while maintaining the safety net under 77 million baby boomers entering retirement with a net worth 60% what it was only 18 months ago.
Success will require much more than luck, hard work, brilliant policy, or soaring rhetoric. It will require cooperation and contribution from every American. It is those two offerings, cooperation and contribution, that Republicans are intent on withholding, the better to ensure Obama's failure. Simply put, the Republicans hate Democrats more than they love America.
If they succeed in derailing Obama's efforts, the cost will be incalculable.
After World War I, one of the consequences of the liberal government's failure was Adolph Hitler. Hitler had a genius for exploiting the resentment of the German people for their condition. More than 80% of the Nazi party's members were unemployed. It was these legions of idle thugs who made up the ranks of Hitler's brownshirt militia, the SA. The right wing oligarchy that had set out from the beginning to destroy the Weimar Republic recognized the potency of resentment and Hitler's genius at exploiting it. It was they who sponsored Hitler's ascension to Chancellor in 1933.
Resentment and obstruction are all the right wing in America have to peddle. Their policies are utterly discredited. Their ideology - even by its own standards - is a sham. They are so bereft of leaders, their de facto leader is a former drug addicted, thrice-divorced radio talk show host. That is literally the best they can muster. But they have built a national franchise inciting the downwardly mobile to blame the government, not the right, for their problems, exactly as Hitler did in the 1920s.
The Republican propensity for fascism must not be underestimated. Witness their phony justifications for the war in Iraq, fanning the flames of nationalistic aggression, just as Hitler did with Austria, the Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia, and Poland in the 1930s. Consider their symbiotic embrace of corporate interests in the oil, weapons, telecommunications, pharmaceutical, finance, and other industries-the same type of corporate interests that sponsored Hitler's ascent to power. Look at their efforts to dismantle civil liberties with the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act. Or their relentless, pervasive propaganda laundered through their corporate-owned right-wing media machine.
These are the classic hallmarks of fascism. The strategy is to obstruct recovery, facilitate collapse, and then incite the faux-populism of public resentment to re-install a corporatist oligarchy which has failed, but which will not abide a reduction of its privileges or a diminution of its control. It is a fetid, seditious agenda, awaiting only its own latter day mustachioed messiah for its final fulfillment.
World War I was a once-in-a-millennium upset in the architecture of global power. In four years, it shifted the center of that power from Europe to the United States. But failure now by the U.S. will shift that center once again, from the United States to China, out of the western world where it has resided for the past 500 years. The psychic shock to the billion-odd people living in western civilization, with its liberal democracies, capitalist economies, and Enlightenment ideals, will be incalculable, irretrievable.
This shift may be inevitable and only a matter of time. It is quite possible that the damage inflicted on the western world's economy by rapacious Republicans is already beyond repair. But it will be tragedy beyond measure if such a shift is consummated by the very wrecking crew that took us down the road to ruin, all the while so unctuously proclaiming "patriotism" as its crowning ideal. They are not patriots and their goal is not the revival of American power. It is the revival of their own power, even at the expense of America's. They represent a very dangerous threat to the nation's future.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



212 Comments so far
Show All'The German economy collapsed... but this is not the same as military defeat"
You like potato and I like potahto, You like tomato and I like tomahto,
Potato, potahto, Tomato, tomahto, Let's call the whole thing off.
'Democrats (like B Clinton, Rubin, Summers, Geithner, Schumer, Frank) have been just as notorious in the criminal project of deregulating Wall St as Republicans like Phil Gramm'
I don't think that's true. It's not coincidental that the bubbles whose popping created this debacle grew especially during 6 years of total Republican control of every branch of our government. Deregulating the financial sector is NOT the same as standing by mute while it drives the country into a ditch. THAT takes a particular, almost theological, fascination in the efficacy of the 'invisible hand'. Freeman has it exactly right in placing that belief on the backs of republicans, who have done much to promulgate the idea in the general public, and STILL do, despite all evidence to the contrary. It was HOPED that deregulation would allow American banks an easy stake in the explosive growth in China/India, which would leverage globalization into profits and jobs back home. Who didn't want that? But when, by 2003, it clearly had created a monster, what did Bush do? Cut taxes. Yeah, that boost of liquidity should help reign in a monster that feeds on liquidity, NOT.
What you're saying is the equivalent of saying 'Democrats voted for the Iraq War too'. They certainly did, proving that they didn't have a backbone. Which is NOT the same as saying they actively promoted a crazy idea (which takes backbone, if nothing else). They were reluctant co-conspirators.
Republicans have been VERY EFFECTIVE at being wrong on too many fronts to mention, and too many, like Limbaugh, insist that they never were. The danger Freeman points out is that they may likely NEVER come around, but will fester in secret societies, AM radio, blogs and newsletters until the general anger they feed under the surface finds a lightning rod like Hitler, and explodes into a wildfire.
Obama is propping up our financial sector because what else is there to do? Democrats aren't anti-capitalist, they are pro-regulation (pro-BIG government). THAT's really where the DNC/GOP divide should be occurring, instead of one side being completely 'free market' and the other always in danger of being called 'communist'. One wants more regulation and progressive taxation, and the other wants less. We need to get back to THAT discussion, so successfully hijacked by powerful media forces that would like nothing better than an American implosion.
"[the financial sector] should not operate as a privately-held industry, but rather as a totally regulated public utility, like the Post Office
I agree that its domestic component should be thus regulated. What they're propping up is its international component. Hedge funds operate offshore and beyond our laws, yet have created a system whereby if we DON'T prop up these failed international bankers the INTERNATIONAL consequences would be truly devastating. China is basically saying, 'you better do it, or else'. On the brighter note: these firms were engaged in globalizing the financial markets. The investments they made are only half done, but have the same promise they've always had. The best thing is for the G-20 to turn them all, globally, into public utilities, at least until these investments begin to pay off, then they could go private again, though heavily regulated. I'm not against capitalism, just against deregulation. And I'm not sure that going after bankers who exploited a deregulated environment to make $$$ is proper: what law did they break? Instead, tax the c**p out of them. I'd prefer that we go back to an FDR level 90% maximum marginal income tax bracket until these various debts weighing so heavily on the public are discharged, and that further we use our global connections to make sure the same tax levels are enforced around the world, so rich Americans can't just take it offshore. Threaten countries if necessary with payback.
Globalization had huge potential. But the wealthy saw in it a way to engage in piracy, beyond the reach of government regulations. I think the answer here is NOT to throw away globalization, but extend governments reach so piracy can't be engaged. Somehow, governments need to enforce transaction transparency so taxes can be levied on anyone calling himself an 'American', wherever they are. I know this is a scary step toward 'one world government', but the alternatives, as we see, are either to be treated like sweatshop workers or isolationism, and neither is really a viable alternative, for the long term. Like it or not, we're global players. We just need to ensure it works for ALL Americans rather than just the jet set.
This comment reflects the nihilstic fantasy the right has been foisting on the country since the election: pointing at democrats and saying, they are as bad as us. A pox on both our houses. Now let the elites have the government.
Once one no longer recognizes the differences in motivation between the two parties, there is absolutely no reason not to allow neo-conservative facism to have its way, which is just what the GOP wants.
Thus, already buying into the total damnation and utter destruction that will be visited upon us, you give aid and comfort to enemy #1 of the American people.
I agree with everything in this article, and would like to emphasize one important truth above all others: the GOP has destroyed our political institutions nearly as completely as it destroyed the economy. We can no longer go about politics as the same old game between parties. Now, it is a choice between possible salvatlon (with the democrats) or absolute and total destruction with the Republicans.
By making no choice, you choose for the republicans and doom.
Thank you, foxwizard, for expressing my feelings so completely.
Jesus, Madcow you really are mad!
yep, a total nutter!
I'm not real sure why I come here any more. All the comments appear to be either total nihilsts, communists or absolutists of one stripe or another. IOW, the worst of the wingnut left.
The United States has problems, and has caused more than its share of problems on the world stage; yet everyone here is so anxious to identify everyone who engages on the political stage in the US a right wing zealot, there really is no purpose to the discussion on this board any longer.
I am finally offended by the total garbage that passes for discourse here, little better than Rush Limbaugh's rightist rants. Once one has decided the United States is hopeless and ought to fall, what is there left to talk about?
Why haven't you picked up a rifle and stormed the local police station? Or gathered in the beer hall and fomented revolution? If the US is as bad, unrepentant and far from salvagable as you say, you ought to be leaving the country, or campaigning in your own countries to drum the US out of the UN and off the world stage.
My sadness is that there is no longer room for moderation in the world. I cam here when the right started telling me I had to bow down to Reagan and the Bush. Now I hear the left telling me our country, which still has a constitution and laws, is a hell hole where any participation in civil discourse, legislation or governing is ipso facto support of the right.
Perhpas a new dark ages is descending, only this time not just upon one continent, but upon the world stage. Maybe we deserve it. But the howling of the leftists wolves and jackboots of the right tell me that there is no purpose to life any longer.
The thing I like about this site is the ability to exchange responses. I completely understand your frustration at the level of discourse. All I can tell you is your outlook is refreshing and your voice is appreciated by at least one regular here.
I find your comments rather sad, frankly. Castigating, and from a rather lofty perch, those who criticize your Party and your own view of American politics seems little different to me that the comments of most others here in that it expresses only your own view. You may believe your position writ large and in stone but it isnt.
You would posit that the radical left holds sway here, yet it doesnt. You may posit that those who are critical of our current system of governance are hypocrites for not fomenting revolution, but they arent. You may insist that moderates and moderation hold no cachet here, but it obviously does.
You descend into hyperbole when you compare the tenor of this forum to Limbaugh's style, and you are certainly welcome to leave as you intimate you should. I find this place little different from so many others in that there are diverse views expressed here, and I also find CD a bit different from some in that it appears to allow those who do not believe the Democrats are the solution to speak their minds.
Democraticunderground,Daily Kos, and other popular forums are little more than shills for the Democratic Party and any negativity expressed within those walls is quickly pounced upon and , in one instance, led to what is still referred to as "the night of the long knives", when a handful of the most radical posters were summarily incised from the ranks. So I like this place precisely because of the posts to which you object, because one finds a diversity of political views and not an homogenized sameness that you seem to prefer. You are more than welcome to seek it elsewhere.
well you really bought this article hook line and sinker. "obama or fascism!" uh huh, sure....
foxwizard: what the hell cloud are you on? Or are you not taking your meds?
I believe this poster typical of many in that she cannot understand why everyone doesnt see the wisdom of her position.
Right, and one of the most vocal supporters for the occupation of Iraq has been Joe Biden right from the very beginning!
Hitler had a genius for exploiting the resentment of the German people for their condition.
Hitler was NOT a genius, any more than George Wanker Bush is. You keep hearing this over and over; it never ends. The secret of Hitler's success, as Bush's, was his all encompassing mediocrity, coupled with a penchant for cheap histrionics that would have shamed a ham actor to death. Mediocrity, unlike fear, is constant. It is the right's greatest asset and ally. It mirrors the larger population, hence its success. Britney Spears, Danielle Steel, most of what is on television, George Wanker Bush and the nation's desire to sit down and have a beer with him. It all bubbles up out of the same place. Due to circumstances, this has temporarily gone into hibernation. But as sure as you'll draw your next breath, it will be back.
I agree. Hitler was on par with the other evil genius of his period Stalin. Something about European culture @ that moment brought the absolute worst out of humanity. Then Mao topped it off after the war in China. BV$H even Saddam are just 3rd rate bullies compared to those 3.
I agree, I think Britany Spears is one fuckin' whack job along w/Paris Hilton and I can think of many more!
Robert Freeman-Nice analysis of the RapistRepublicans and their bankkkrupt 'ideology'.
The massive upward drafts of wealth under Republican Regimes mentioned is what I see as well.
While Fox drips 'trickle down' logic into the minds of brain-numb flag-waving rag-head hating Amarikans.
Thanks Obama, for not being a filthy Republican,
For Deposing them,
I know InSaneMcCain could very well be GOPing us further into the dirt as I type. Only Obama prevented it.
Joe.
OH PLEASE! azjoe!!!
davetethered, Hello. I'm open to being wrong, but feel this-Obama won that election w/ the Net, youth, some vision, many thrilled by his charisma after the Republican Rape.
Postulate he was never born. Easy. McCain sure was. Might you fill in the blanks as you see them?
Who or what would have prevented McCainPalin from continuing Reagan, BushI & BushII?....then, remember last fall? McCain!......You, politely, thank you! infer I'm quite far off the mark,
Okay, your turn, say Obama is never born, where ARE we this Spring 2009, WHO is in the White House?
PLEASE!!!!! Joe.
Azjoe: As long as we have a one party system w/two factions which represent the same class interests (which clearly they do), it doesn't matter who the hell is in the White House. Obama is carrying on the same Bush policies right now as I print!! The only thing that's changed is the rhetoric.
Dave, you been checkmated.
I said no Obama, McCain would be in. You said bs. I said who would be in then???
Now you are backed up saying they are the same. PLEASE!!!!!!
If you think Palin/McCain would not wildy escalate war, much, much, much more greatly than Obama....who reached out to the Taliban who have reached back AS I TYPE,,well, that is insane. As in insanemccain, remember our bomber pilot potus wannabe?
If you think McCain & Obama are the same, you will tell me Gore, Nobel Peace Prize winner and champion of global warming would have been no bettter than Bush2 also!
Is that true? You believe that?
Tell me you do, I like hearing that from Dem/Obama haters. It is the BEST!
ThankYou! Joe.
davetethered, though our perspectives differ, thanks a lot for being absolutely gentelmanly in our communicating. Rad.
Great article.
Conservatives lurking here on CD doing their best to make Obama fail, forget that Jesus was a liberal.
"A liberal is a conservative who's been arrested".
Tom Wolfe
"anyone who criticizes Obama & the Democrats is a "conservative," right?"
Straw man.
Judging from your constant personal attacks, I think you're angry at me because you are a conservative and I think conservatives are the crooks, criminals, jingoists, liars, ignoramuses, morons, fundamentalists, murderers, dictators, Republicans, war-profiteering, war-mongering, thieving, imperialist, polluting, science denying, racist, elitist, authoritarian, oligarch serving, Mammon worshipping, your kids-for-cannon fodder cowardly conservatives from left and right like Hitler and Stalin? The beasts among us?
You say I am a "Dem apologist", as opposed to what, an angry reactionary, a Republican, a conservative, a shill, a third party advocate? What? If we could all only be like you?
As for Tom Wolfe, nobody's perfect.
"One can't say all conservatives are stupid people. One can say that all stupid people are conservatives"
John Stewart Mill
daveb, if CD were a porno, your comments would be the money shot.
Just because conservatives caused the holocaust of the last eight years and many years before that doesn't mean everything I dislike is conservative, as you condescendingly put it. I don't like grits.
The Republicans, with one or two exceptions, are pretty much all scumbags, on that we agree. Conservative Democrats are too, but there are a few good progressive Democrats left. That's why I place the blame squarely on conservatives where it belongs instead of demonizing the entire Democratic Party.
Supporting Obama doesn't make me a democrat either. He is the best we could get elected. If we help him instead of helping him fail, he will continue writing progressive laws we could not have imagined a year ago. He faces fierce opposition from conservatives of both parties, from the MSM, from disaffected third party reactionaries, from conservative shills and operatives of the oligarchy, from conservative Bush appointees and even from impatient progressives. President Obama is under the gun. But who else could be so cool under pressure?
I was starting to agree with you until last sentence where you had to take your last cheap shot. Lumping everybody together in one tidy Democrat demonization is an "annoyingly simplistic formulation".
"For you to assert that all third party supporters are automatically "reactionaries" is using words in a way that robs them of meaning. You are just trying to DEFINE the world so that anyone who doesn't support what you like is labeled "conservative" or "reactionary.""
Straw man. I didn't say ALL of them were. Are you trying to DEFINE me? Don't patronize me.
You don't know if President Obama is an operative of the oligarchy but it doesn't make much difference either way because in the end, he's all we got and much better than we could have expected. Arrogant rants, insults, and condemnations can only help him fail. We expect this from Limbaugh, not from people who call themselves progressives.
Give the man some credit for the good things he's doing. Why stand outside ranting and raving and throwing stones with the Republican and other conservative Obama bashers? What good does that do? We all know what he's not doing. Why not sign petitions, contact our reps and push him but support him too. Why not be more constructive and less reactionary? What do you have to lose?
You nailed it ezeflyer!
davebronstein,
like almost all who enigrate Obama you insult personally any who dare see any good in his policies. Standard operating procedure on CD.
Nothing ezeflyer said was said "lamely'
He is no kind of 'tard,'
His vision is not 'impaired'
Personal insults are retarded, lame and impaired. get it?
Try to stick to facts with your lame personal attacks deleted.
Joe.
I cannot believe you do not like grits..You do understand that this strange affliction colors everything you posit, dont you?
When I think of the Democratic Party I think of its leadership, its direction and its public voice. I do not stop to consider the factions within that party only the powers that control it currently and the direction it seeks to take this nation. I see a silenced Black Caucus and an equally disappeared Progressive Caucus.
I do not seek to take from you your choice to remain within that party, though I hope that you seek to change its direction from within. Nor do I think Barack Obama completely and utterly wrong in everyting he says and does, that is your definition not mine, though I do understand that you object to a stream of criticisms that offer no sop to that which is being done correctly. That is rather a typical position in any political discourse though, folks always fasten upon that to which they object rather than including a line about that to which they give support.
You seem to ignore that comments tend to generalisation, to analyze trends and directions, actions and inactions. I see little in the way of criticisms from you directed at your chosen party and our President's actions. Should I then assume that this makes you complicit in all those actions?
I do not answer for any but myself in response to your plaintive cry to join you within your Party. But what I have to lose by joining the Democratic Party is my integrity, I further resent the position you take that automatically assumes that those who refuse the membership you offer are automatically inactive or reactionary. That is far too pompous a position, ezeflyer, and says more about you than about those who work in other fashion.
I believe that the building of a third party movement is essential to the continuation of that which our founders wrought. Thus I joined the Green Party though I am not fully in accord with everything they stand for, nor am I happy with the internal machinations of that fledgling party. I made my choice, I stand behind that choice. I do not castigate those who work for the overthrow of the real reactionaries, those in power within your chosen party, only those who believe everything and anything that leadership hands them.
ezeflyer: Tom Wolfe's an asshole! The guy writes a book titled THE ELECTRIC KOOLAID ACID TEST and never took any acid in his life!
Patgarret: personally I DON'T care if he ever dropped acid but if you're going to write a book about such you should at least have some idea of what you're writing about which he clearly does not. I, too remember the days in which it was written and I WAS THERE. But what makes him an asshole is that when the book came out he was parading himself around like he was some libertarian socialist when he is a Reagan/Thatcher/Bush1/Bush11 neocon and he always was.
Nonsense.
The book was written in the 60s. At that time Reagan was governor of California and busy gutting the university system--which is why I and most of my colleagues from San Francsico State left in 1968 for the Midwest and the East Coast.
There was no thought at that time that Reagan was going to become president--and Tom Wolfe was not a fan of his, either.
Folks change. Example: Mario Vargas Llosa, a famous Peruvian writer (most of his books have been translated into English and he has taught in US and UK universities). He was very Left, a strong supporter of the Cuban Revolution, his books for many years were written from a leftist point of view.
As he got older, he moved further and further to the right. When he ran for poresident of Peru he lost to someone even more on the right. Since then he has trotted around as a gun for hire--for Spain's far right political party, among others, with the mission to spread libelous propaganda about any leader who is even vaguely on the left. Of course his main enemy is Hugo Chavez.
He also hasn't written a book worth reading for the past 10 years.
This is a common phenomenom among aging writers: Carlos Fuentes is another example. Octavio Paz also moved very much to the right before he died.
I agree with much of what Robert purported and he delivered a very succinct picture of the current state of our Judao-Christian indoctrinated culture. also, I agree with Cygnus who said 'whoever controls the media controls the country'.I say that the way to undo their control is to establish a social movement with the succinct strategy of boycotting these right wing media giants! Take away their finances and you immediately strip them of their power.On the other end of the boycott give all your support to 'real' journalism and independent reporting with industry ethics maintained! This will prove to be one of the essential strategies for returning to a democratic country.
One of the reasons I prefer progressive taxation is to redistribute wealth. We need to get wealth back to where it was in the 1960s, where the wealthiest 10% of the country owned 55% of the country (unlike todays 75%+). And the reason we need to do this is because money will ALWAYS influence our democracy and media, but that's not as bad when the money is STILL owned by the people. Its only a problem when the money is owned by just a few people. We can pass laws outlawing lobbying, and trying to distance money from editorial content. Money will 'find a way' to influence these things anyway, because there's so much money to be made doing so. But, if the money represents a broad spectrum of ideas, similar to the spectrum held by the general public, the corrupting influence of money is greatly reduced, I believe.
My two cents:
I believe America's Weimar moment came in 1968. It appeared as such with the decline of the New Left and the rise of the New Right. The shift took hold as an attack on the Great Society and the New Deal, a repudiation of the antiwar and civil rights movements and the public efficacy of a politics founded on bitterness, racism and authority. This was a politics that took Nixon and Wallace as its first emblems. It was a politics that strongly preferred guns to butter, empire to peace. And it was a politics the United States gave itself as it began its steady but unavoidable decline as a global power.
The United States seemingly approached its nadir under George W. Bush’s administration, a thoroughly illegitimate government that seemed to be on the cusp of installing a dictatorship of one kind or another for much of the post-9.11 period. Whether the country suffers this particular catastrophe in the near or distant future is something we cannot know with certainty today. But an American dictatorship is one feasible possibility the country faces, although a fascist dictatorship a less likely possibility. In any case, the developmental path that has brought the country to this critical point stretches back to the founding and beyond. It will not be mastered easily if at all.
s.zielinski:
seems to me the foundation was set in the election of '68..the decision to move forward with the agenda was kent state..seems accepting one's fair share of abuse was ok..this action moved the stakes to grounds the new left was unwilling any longer to play on..we did not disappear, we just took a break..non-violent victory takes a little longer..like one mind at a time..
ken
Well thought-out and written piece.
Why is it that one ever hears these straightforward accusations in the MSM? As you point out, if the public isn't educated, the results may well be off-the-charts catastrophic. Has the Left yet to find it's spine; or, is it that the Right is using its echo machine to muffle the rage out here?
Here's a pet peeve: Why is it that no one has pointed out that the Right has DELIBERATELY bankrupted our Treasury? It's so obvious it was done to deep-six the hated gov't entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare, etc.! Obama is wrong to focus laser-like on the future. Unless forced to pay for their sins (Bernie Madoff style), the Right will rise again as you correctly observe in your opinion piece.
You are what's left, do you have a spine?
And yes, in the second paragraph, I agree with you.
I would say that what Mr. Freeman is talking about is the "show" played out for the public which masked the activities of the Central Bank kleptocracy. They hyperinflated the economy before cutting off credit, then bought up industry for pennies on the dollar in order to consolidate wealth and power, to discredit the Weimar government, and to scapegoat, by demonizing, foreign nationals and 'communists' as 'terrorists'. They put in power their charismatic, passionate orator under the guise of 'socialism' when in fact he was a tool for the oligarchs. I seem to remember something about a domestic, civilian security force as well.
Sound familiar?
And what are those FEMA camps for anyways?
The issue is the private Central Bank kleptocracy that exists in the US, as it did in Germany post WWI.
Both Dims and Repugs are controlled by the same monster, err master; the international banking cartel and their minions at the Federal Reserve.
Other minions own the media.
The Democrat vs. Republican, among other divisive rhetoric, is just a smoke and mirrors game designed to obfuscate the banking cartel that ultimately governs the country.
Ideology has nothing to do with it, that's just an excuse to motivate the masses, it's all about wealth and unfettered power.
Now there is a call for a 'new world order' banking system, a.k.a. a World Central Bank.
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
Thomas Jefferson
"Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
Baron Mayer Amschel Rothschild
Max Warburg (Warburg bank of Hamburg) was Rothschilds 'agent' in Germany, who's brother Paul Warburg (also a Rothschild 'agent') was instrumental in establishing the Federal Reserve central bank in the US. Both central banks wrecked their respective economies then pumped money into their newly consolidated war industries leading into WWII.
Obviously Mr. Freeman did his 'homework', but he failed to follow the money trail.
Solrey,
Actually, I am quite aware of the money trail but can only fit so much into any single article. Thank you for your comments.
Robert Freeman
Robert,
I should have said that you failed to mention the money trail.
I do respect your work. You brought up issues most people are not aware of. Thank you.
I understand your dilema, the 'rabbit hole' runs long and deep.
I guess I'd like to see less of the ideological 'us vs. them' discussion and more exposure of the 'money masters' that manipulate public opinion and finance both sides in politics and war.
One of the great things about commenting on the internet is the opportunity to expand on information presented by the writers, and to occassionally interact with them as well.
Thanks for taking the time to respond, I appreciate that.
peace
Tim Erney
Tim,
I've no love lost for the Democrats. For my take on them, please read this piece which addresses your concerns:
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0329-22.htm
Robert Freeman
Dear Mr. Freeman, thank you for taking the time to look at some comments and respond. Always a pleasure, and thanks for the link to your previous article on CD, from 2006. quite good.
my question: what has changed since 2006? you flayed the donkeys in that article. what have they done since then, since the election even, that would cause you to write, as in this current article:
"If they succeed in derailing Obama's efforts, the cost will be incalculable"?
it seems like your article was geared toward saying "obama or fascism!" given obama's actions, that strikes me as a false dichotomy.
secondly, there seems to be some fear-mongering about the financial situation of the US. $60 trillion in unfunded mandates (ie, commitments via social security/medicare)? In reality, this is over a 50 year time span, is it not? so isn't it an almost meaningless figure? and, despite the massive hits on the market in the last 6 months, we are still talking largely about "paper wealth". The global economy has not lost 40% of its wealth, unless you are defining "wealth" as the speculative assets of the FIRE sector, figures that are totally irrelevant to the vast majority of humanity.
anyway, gotta go. thanks again for your time.
Jason
Good article from '06.
Quite prophetic, as it turns out, since Biden, Emanuel and Hillary are numbers 2, 3, and 4 in the WH.
Keep up the good work.
peace,
Tim
Whew! I'm glad you cleared that up Rob, you had me frightened!
B.S..
Keep you eyes on and follow the money, not the republicans or martians.
They're all guilty.
This article was a complete waste of energy and space --even cyberspace. (Thank God no tree was felled for it.)
Raid the rich & take their s--t along with your best shot at 'em whenever the opportunity arises.
Stop them.
Technological progress is impressive. Human progress is a fiction. What happened in Germany in the 1930's is probably inevitable in the US.
Just as there is nowhere to throw anything away, there is nowhere to run away to. Just like before, it will engulf the whole world.
Liberal voices are encouraging. But Democracy Now!, The Nation and Mother Jones magazines could vanish overnight. There is lots of prison space for publishers, writers, and subscribers.
Seen the movie "The Right; Feeling Wronged"? This mentality spreads like wildfire when unemployment becomes epidemic and people look for scapegoats.
Buy a gun, lots of food, and keep your mouth shut. What I am doing right now is probably not a good idea.
This kind of alarmist is just what the elites want people to say. I think Americans are smart enough and resilient enough to not only make their way through this mess that has been created, but also to do so without mayhem breaking out. They will not start imprisoning writers, publisher and subscribers, there are simply too many of us. People are smarter than you think and slowly justice will be served, it is a process of gaining knowledge, realization and then action to build up institutions which will set right misdeeds. Again, your attitude is what they want in order to be able to take over again, if we don't allow that to happen, they will continue to lose the power that they once wielded without scruples and with such arrogance.
He does have a point 'though. Did you know that Noam Chomsky travels w/a body guard? No shit, due to threats on his life!
Good point, however i don't understand what do u mean when u said that Democracy Now!, The Nation and Mother Jones magazines could vanish overnight?!?