Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Health Summit or American Healthcare Brought to You by Humana and Friends
WASHINGTON, DC - So the healthcare summit convenes in the White House, and there is dancing in the streets by all the reform stakeholders, eh? OK, well maybe for the powerful and the well-connected stakeholders that is.
For millions of Americans held hostage by many of these same stakeholders, they may spend the time during the summit standing at pharmacy windows trying to negotiate expensive co-pays and the like or wondering if they'll get a doctor visit in time to diagnose troubling symptoms or trying to fend off medical collectors made rabid by the prospects of the commissions they can collect if they garnish another patient or two today.
The insurance industry will be front and center at the summit today. So will the hospital industry and the drug companies. They are all giddy with the prospects of having 47 million more customers.
And Republicans are poised to protect the big industry boys and girls under the guise of "preserving the true free market principals of insurance" - Republican Senators and even some Dems -- are laying down "markers" about allowing no public plan option for this nation and starting all the old scare tactic saws about nationalized healthcare. Watch them all flip on themselves as they slam the very Wall Street bailouts they voted for - and watch them now praise and protect profits over human life and market-driven financial healthcare products over the basic human right of healthcare.
The experiences you are having in the doctors' offices, pharmacies and hospitals of this nation are mildly interesting but the real driving force behind all of this is protection of the money. Period. Protect the flow of wealth. And to the extent that average citizens will contribute to that flow of wealth, through payment of insurance premiums, taxes and out-of-pocket costs, that's where your voice will be valued. Period. You are leverage. You are widgets. And as this economy has faltered and frayed, the engine of healthcare and its impact on our national economic conditions has only become more critical.
Let's see what our market-based, for-profit healthcare companies have envisioned for us all and for our taxpayer funds, shall we? Just look at what they did to Medicare with the full blessing of the same Republicans who now say government funded care is bad for their precious market.
Good thing Humana and all the other insurance giants got to call the plans "Medicare Advantage," because that's exactly what they do. The insurance plans take advantage of seniors and disabled people. And though President Obama's healthcare policy plans include asking the Humana gang to have to bid for the business in the future, many of the disabled and elderly are suffering and will die waiting for care they thought they had and they thought they paid for under Medicare.
Karen Ignagni, president and chief executive of America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), reportedly said members of the insurers group are deeply concerned about Obama's proposal to switch the Medicare Advantage program to a competitive bidding process, arguing that it would force seniors to bear a disproportionate share of the costs. Really, Karen and friends are worried about seniors? Since when? Karen is part of the industry that openly and with the government's blessing is harming seniors - killing them if necessary - by holding total control over their access to care.
So the insurance companies can live with screwing the American taxpayer a little less on this end (Medicare Advantage) while getting 47 million more of them as customers on the other end? Big of ya'. Really the way to be an American team player, eh? It makes me sick.
The deep concern of the AHIP folks will translate into some policy change, you can bet on that. But the deep concern of Medicare Advantage patients will not do much. They are not seen as stakeholders. Widgets. One and all. If adjustments are made it will be money-motivated not care-centered. Human rights be damned. We have friends to protect here.
My husband is but one of millions serving as sad examples of what the market wants to do with us all. He carries his Medicare coverage, pays that monthly premium out of his Social Security and also carries and pays for a Humana plan as well. Humana also gets to zap his Social Security directly for their premium. Like that market driven approach? He should have the "gold standard," eh? Not so much.
When we recently moved from Illinois to the DC area, we found that even his Medicare coverage is now not in effect and will not be honored by any provider here - unless and until the almighty Humana either allows his coverage to transfer or drops him from their roles. Really. That's the grim reality for people hog-tied to the for-profit insurance industry. Medicare-eligible folks become healthcare system refugees as the government continues to collect the monthly premium and Humana also pockets their share.
And what if my husband has a health problem tonight? Well, he'll just have to take his chances and either wait it out, hope not to die, and beg for care - or he'll die wondering how his own public plan was so subverted to the for-profit industry that he signed away his own right to treatment. A worker and taxpayer for more than 50 years - he is paying for two forms of coverage and yet has no coverage. He is denied. He is being bilked - and all with the blessings of both Republicans and Democrats.
My husband is not singled out by any means - he is one of millions from whom the insurance companies we're being asked to trust are taking money and providing no service and no coverage in return. It is racketeering in the classic sense. And our government is part of the racket stealing from us. They just don't care enough to fix it with any sense of urgency. Widgets.
The private, for-profit insurance companies want to do more of the same with the whole lot of us. They'll have to be cagier this time, but the insurance giants clearly know how to work the system to their benefit. And if folks like my husband die, well, it's just one of the costs of doing business.
So before we all jump too high in praise of anyone's new plan for us in terms of healthcare reform, let's have a look-see at what we - the patients and the peons who pay the bills - stand to gain from reform.
Right now, we've sold out our most vulnerable folks. We force people on Social Security to pay for insurance they cannot use. Do we care? And we want these companies that were willing to sell out our most vulnerable citizens to be charge of our entire healthcare system? Come on. Get real. Follow the money. Follow the widgets.
Will we really reform healthcare or just bail them all out - all the big money interests and industries - one by one by one until we truly have shifted all of our wealth to the top and left the rest of us groveling at the bottom? Or might we see it another way, as civilized people with a need to care for one another in a civilized way at a price this nation can afford? The single payer solution is not un-American, it is just the opposite. It is far more in line with American values of fairness and justice and fiscal responsibility than the convoluted, corrupt system that would funnel our hard-earned dollars straight to the top without regard for our national well-being.
Follow the money. And that cash does not presently lead to you and to me getting a fair shake. We'll have to fight for it. Or we'll die for it. When the next summit is convened, do you suppose it could start with the basic premise that healthcare is a basic human right and first design what we think we need to provide that right to our citizens - one and all? That would forever change the discussion and drive the agenda accordingly. We're not there yet. And it remains to be seen if this President can set that tone and that agenda.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


16 Comments so far
Show AllI think MMFA is sort of working on this right now...just saw an email that said we found that opponents of healthcare reform have been calling any and all proposals to change it 'socialized medicine' since the 30s, and we're noting everyone who mentions that phrase right now...with luck, soon it will all be debunked :-)
http://capwiz.com:80/pdamerica/callalert/index.tt?alertid=12846641&PROCESS=Call+Now
PDA has set up a call and fax to representatives encouraging a national call in to support single payer
Personally I do not see Americans getting Universal health care via single payer using a top down (Federal level) approach.
The American system is just too corrupt and the monied interests in Washington at the Federal level far too powerful and entrenched.
Canada's catylyst towards Single payer started at the Provincial level with the first elected Socialist in North America, one Tommy Douglas.
Yes he was a SOCIALIST. People have to get over that word. Being concerned about the SOCIAL well being of a community is not a bad thing. In fact the common welfare of the people is why we formed Governments in the first place.
He faced tremendous opposition from Doctors groups who claimed it would drive them all out of business.
Some State like a Vermont is going to have to go this route at the State level first.
I am 100% behind the Republicans on this. Let's get rid of socialized health care. No more payments to providers - hey, they either make a competitive product or they outsource to India. Let's let our old people, our widgets, or chickens who have laid their last egg die. No free rides. Poor people can live in the street and starve. No sir, the only socialism we can afford is a couple of trillion for de po' wittle captains of fiance. If the people wanted a government that worked for them, they should have bought one. (Sarcasm, folks.)
Sioux Rose
DONNA: I sure wish they invited YOU to the decision-making tables! Darkest of ironies that socialism bails out banks and bankers, but the right echo chamber screams, "No! No! A thousand times no!" when it comes to securing a modicum of health services to the nation's own people. More twisted priorities would be tough to find.
"We're not there yet. And it remains to be seen if this President can set that tone and that agenda."
Does it really remain to be seen?
Donna, is it fair to say that with regard to meaningful reform, advocates for single-payer have virtually no leverage?
Supposedly Obama invited John Conyers to the summit after public protest that single-payer advocates were entirely excluded from the summit; Physicians for a National Health Program cancelled their planned demonstration/protest in response to this olive branch.
But I'm leaning with gregsdiary. I assume that Obama apologists see this 11th-hour invite as proof of their assertion that Obama is responsive to public pressure, and would urge continued public protest to keep Obama's cloven hooves to the fire. That is, they would argue that the inclusion of (a) single-payer advocate proves that the Obama System works.
In my view, it is equally likely that Obama merely HUMORS dissenters in order to deflect or suppress criticism. Here, for instance, allowing a token single-payer advocate to attend the summit handily rebuts the charge that Obama is effectively dooming single-payer by excluding it entirely from the debate-- at least in the context of corporate media reporting and opinion, and its dumbed-down audience of We the Sheeple.
But an aging hack like Conyers, who was so readily and permanently brought to heel by that harpy Pelosi after the 2006 elections, is hardly going to upset the apple cart.
I believe that Obama, in true modern Democratic tradition, is a master at stringing along the hopeful and desperate, while all the time intending to do exactly as he thinks best.
ยท Yr Obd't Servant
"I believe that Obama, in true modern Democratic tradition, is a master at stringing along the hopeful and desperate, while all the time intending to do exactly as he thinks best."
He'll do what is exactly in his best interests--like any politician.
That is why "pushing" Obama--whatever that is--obviously is not working.
"Pushing" from within has nothing to do with the kind of leverage that's needed for meaningful movement.
What we need is people to DEMAND a basic human right. Preferably, DEMANDING their human rights collectively.
That's leverage.
If Physicians for a National Health Program really wanted to push the single payer agenda they should withdraw the services they provide to insurance companies (while providing a minimal service to prevent the death of patients). While this would save the insurance companies money it should put the people in the streets.
All they need to do is frame the issue so that it impacts on government and insurance companies.
Our leverage is thousands of dead Americans who didn't need to die and millions of lives disrupted and damaged who all give us energy and passion to stand on along with huge amounts of evidence about what works and what will not work. We'd like to see the evidence of what the costs would be and what works worldwide.
The evidence and making sure we use that evidence to pull away the veil of market-based ideology that ignores the evidence in favor of slanted and slogged half-truths and scare tactics.
Either we protect human rights or we do not in this nation.
And, to bloat and inflate this broken system is completely wrong-headed no matter how popular the leader putting it forward may be.
Black and white issues. And unfortunately, the leverage will be
Donna Smith, American SiCKO
If you missed seeing it on C-span - Obama and the rest of the politicians at the health care summit - unbelievable. When Karen Ignagni, representing the insurance industry, stood, she received applause from the politicians and members of Congress. It was like a scene out of a cult movie. No doubt about which side Washington is on and it ain't our side.
Maybe it is time for sit-ins in hospitals - blockades of insurance companies. We owe it to the 18,000 who have died in the last year and the 18,000 more who will die this year because of lack of access to medical care.
This is a real crisis - an emergency of epic proportions - bigger than 9/11. Does anyone, other than the prez, think that digitizing the medical records should be the #1 priority? Follow the money on that one.
I actually think some folks could win Academy Awards for their performances during the summit-- really insulting to call it a healthcare summit when it was more a rally in support of the powers that be already involved in the racket in place right now...
Donna Smith, American SiCKO
"Maybe it is time for sit-ins in hospitals - blockades of insurance companies."
That--sounds more like leverage.
But so far, none of the current advocates for single-payer are pursuing similar ideas. Why not?
Obama = hope, remember why you guys voted for him. Don't question Obama either, we are all suppose to give him a chance and get along.
FAIR Study: Media Blackout on Single-Payer Healthcare
Proponents of popular policy shut out of debate
...Over the past week, hundreds of stories in major newspapers and on NBC News, ABC News, CBS News, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, NPR and PBS's NewsHour With Jim Lehrer mentioned healthcare reform, according to a search of the Nexis database (2/25/09-3/4/09). Yet all but 18 of these stories made no mention of "single-payer".. and only five included the views of advocates of single-payer--none of which appeared on television.
Of a total of 10 newspaper columns FAIR found that mentioned single-payer, Krauthammer's syndicated column critical of the concept, published in the Washington Post (2/27/09) and reprinted in four other daily newspapers, accounted for five instances. Only three columns in the study period advocated for a single-payer system (San Diego Union-Tribune, 2/26/09; Boston Globe, 3/1/09; St. Petersburg Times, 3/3/09).
Full and unedited:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3733
--------------------------------
Whoever controls the media controls the country. Period.
Donna,
Correct me if I am wrong.
Medicare recipients have the choice between Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage. Original Medicare is administered by the government and Medicare Advantage is administered by private insurers.
Part B Premiums of $96.40 per month are paid through your Social security check to Medicare - not directly to the insurer. If you stick with Part A and Part B, no part of your Social Security is paid to insurers.
The problem with Original Medicare is relatively high deductibles, relatively high co-pays, little emphasis on primary care and preventative care and limited protection against catastrophic medical costs. And there is no government coverage for drugs - you must take a part D plan from insurers.
I would rather be on Original Medicare if I received a free physical every year and I did not have to pay for routine screenings. I'd rather pay lower deductibles and co-pays for Original Medicare. I'd like to have a cap on my out of pcoket expenses. I'd like to have a real drug plan that negotiated fair prices with the drug companies and eliminated the "doughnut hole" or coverage gap. Original Medicare needs reform so we can eliminate the abuses of private insurers who control Medicare C and D.
In order to understand the Medicare debate, all of us need to visit Medicare.Gov and do a comparison between Original Medicare and Medicare advantage Plans.
When you see what is missing from Original Medicare, you will see why your husband had to choose a private insurer over the government plan. Millions of senior and disabled Americans have the make the same choice. You must ask yourself why your husband and millions of Americans choose Medicare Advantage plans over Original Medicare.
I say, reform Original Medicare and eliminate private insurers. We cannot eliminate private insurers without reforming Original Medicare.Do not put the cart before the horse....