EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Conservatives and Their Pity Parties
Out of power and out of touch, they feast on stale slogans and whine.
Just as the financial crisis has created toxic assets and "zombie" financial institutions, so has it transformed conservatism into a movement of the living dead. Its partisans cling to a now-toxic portfolio of discredited notions, rhetoric, gestures and strategies. They lumber comically on, their only goal being to obstruct efforts to save the economy from catastrophe.
These days the zombie right is rallying around CNBC commentator Rick Santelli, who won fame last month when he railed against a rescue of the economy's "losers."
Mr. Santelli claimed he was backed in his outrage by "the silent majority" -- meaning a floor full of traders at the Chicago Board of Trade -- and he called for a "Chicago tea party" to protest the administration's mortgage plan.
Next thing you knew, there were "tea parties" all over the land. When I showed up for one last Friday in Washington's Lafayette Park, however, my suspicions were immediately raised. A fellow in an expensive-looking pinstriped suit came hustling into the gathering knot of the discontented, handing out pink pig balloons. This had to be a put-on, I thought, one of the "Billionaires for Bush" pranksters in his capitalist costume, preparing to lead us in a chant of "Four More Wars."
But no, this was for real: the pigs symbolized "pork," the stuff of which President Barack Obama's stimulus package was supposedly made. Suits were common among the protesters. And the slogans on the signs made their undead politics impossible to misinterpret: "Liberalism Socialism Communism," read a typical one, "What's the Difference?"
Lending proletarian authenticity to the proceedings was the famous Joe the Plumber, who took up the bullhorn to deliver a dose of working-class cynicism that would have been convincing in, say, 1978. "Our politicians up on the hill, Republicans or Democrats, don't give a rip about you, and that's the bottom line right there," Joe Wurzelbacher declared.
Banks are insolvent, asset prices are falling, GDP has taken a nose dive, but what exercised this bunch was the possibility that government -- understood as a force of pure evil -- might get too big.
"America wants people who are gonna come to D.C. and say no," exhorted Andrew Langer of the Institute for Liberty. "No more taxes! No more spending! No more expansion of government!" Another speaker insisted that deregulation was not at fault for our troubles, and that the free market had never really been tried.
As the event wore on, the speakers began to repeat, zombie-like, some version of the famous line from "Network," the 1976 movie, "I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore."
I got out of there quick. This was no place to find the changed, chastened conservatism that all the pundits are looking for.
But at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), which was going on in the swank Omni Shoreham hotel on that same day, what I found was merely a smoother version of the same grumbling.
Capitalist self-pity was much in vogue. Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney, looking tanned and groomed and yet strangely mechanical, joked that he needed to get through his speech "before federal officials come here to arrest me for practicing capitalism."
Jim Gilmore, a former governor of Virginia, moaned that the "philosophy" one encountered in the land these days was that "people who succeed and have wealth are bad people, and they're entitled to be discriminated against in the tax code."
Perhaps this was because the current economic crisis was being "overblown," as claimed Lew Uhler, who heads the National Tax Limitation Committee. The administration was trying "to create as much trouble for all of us as possible, and we're here to create trouble back, back, back!"
A little while later, Mr. Uhler lapsed into the same confused zombie cry as the tea partiers across town: "We're not going to stand around and take it anymore! We're mad as hell and we're not taking it!"
They're not going to take it anymore? I guess it's supposed to be obvious that conservatives are history's real victims -- that their imagined suffering at the hands of that Big Deficit to Come trumps the global systemic economic crisis and all the upheaval it may unleash.
Or is it that the mind of the right is running on some spooky kind of autopilot? "Silent majority," "Mad as hell": These are the sayings of the 1970s. Remembering them brings back all the false populisms to flicker across the screen since then, all the stale illusions that brought us to our present disaster -- all the fake cowboys, the folksy radio talkers, the regular-guy billionaires, the middle American tax rebels, the salt-of-the-earth bankers.
There is much to dislike about President Obama's approach to the financial crisis. But opposition, it seems, will have to come from somewhere other than conservatism. The party out of power is also a party out of touch.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


22 Comments so far
Show AllI'd love to gloat about the conservatives being in defeat but I have bad news for you. They're already controling the puppet Democratic Party and getting more of what they want. Obama's not even trying to reach out to true moderates and independents let alone the base. If Obama keeps up his kissing up to the right, we're gonna have to change this title of the article to "Democrats and Their Pity Parties" by the end of 2010, 2012, or both.
Solution 4U; Vote GREEN party.
How's that going to work?
Never never never underestimate the Gross Stupidity of the American people. McCain got 46% of the vote last year, despite the glaring fact that it was his party that largely put us where we are. The reactionaries (they're not conservatives) will be back because they make money the old fashioned way - they steal it. And the USA is now the land of Bernie Madoff, Richard Fuld, John Thain and their legion of thieves and kleptocrats for whom there is never enough.
After more than 2 years of Democrats in control, no re-regulation of the financial industry has occurred to put an expiration date on Madoff, Fuld, Thain and others' licenses to steal.
We still don't know how many more Madoffs are yet to be identified or how many copy cat crimes are being committed this very moment because the financial industry continues to operate unregulated.
The same scammers that sold people hot potatoes are now finding ways to extort more money from their victims.
We DO KNOW that Obama keeps handing more of the victims' money to the perpatrators of the crimes.
Reality is stranger than fiction. The economic elites, the top one percent in wealth, are "mad as hell" that they only have 90 percent control over the federal government and demand that their level of control go back to 99 percent as it was under Bush. My gosh, they might actually have to pay an overall tax rate comparable to that of the "losers," those people not clever enough to be born into the right households or conniving enough to make the right connections or unprincipled enough to con enough people to make themselves fabulously wealthy. And they might only get benefits from federal spending that are worth 10 times what the average schmo gets, rather than 100 or 1,000 times as they are accustomed to receiving. I can see why they are "mad as hell." Sheesh. But what I really can't understand is when they can con the working class rubes into identifying with them and their struggles. Maybe this time they won't succeed in that. Maybe they have overplayed their hand. Hubris is always with us.
"The party out of power is also a party out of touch."
And when, exactly, was said party in touch? Bush 2? B1? Reagan? Ford? Nixon?
Eisenhower, maybe - but his party was still wacky as shit. Roosevelt and Lincoln, fine - but also leaders of an out of touch cult of wingnuts.
So the answer to my own question is: never. The Rs have never been in touch...
Whether from right or left, conservatives can't govern.
Why Conservatives Can't Govern:
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0607.wolfe.html
No single payer health care=No hope. The financial mess can never be fixed as long as big insurance, big pharma, and the military gobble up and hoard all the resources the working class produce.
No single payer? We are going down.
Exactly!
And the "financial bottom line genuises" are doing everything they can to ensure our economy keeps walking farther out on the plank. It's blatently obvious that if business has no health care costs because the government covers them all, then their products are more competitive. I think the crux of the problem is that the individual CEOs of these corporations actually stand to make more by bankrupting their corporations. That grossly greedy, criminal behavior is at the center of the "apparant" stupidity of corporations today. It's not stupidity, it's greed.
Obama will never agree to a single payer system. You have to look somewhere
else. Obama is beholden to big Money/business ,including of course, the
insurance companies.
You know, very soon it's not going to matter whether you vote Dem or Repub.
Soon you will be doing the bidding of who ever holds out a bag of food and says 'Go that way and kill whoever isn't one of us.'
And deep down you know I'm right.
Dystopia Now! Dystopia Forever!
There they go again.
matthew loughran
yes vote green now vote green often. support the green party.
the two crappy corrupt corporate parties have brought us to where we are now.
I agree with 100%
* Goldman Sachs spent more than $46 million on political influence buying;
* Merrill Lynch threw more than $68 million at politicians;
* Citigroup spent more than $108 million;
* Bank of America devoted more than $39 million;
* JPMorgan Chase invested more than $65 million; and
* Accounting giants Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG and Pricewaterhouse spent, respectively, $32 million, $37 million, $27 million and $55 million.
The number of people working to advance the financial sector's political objectives is startling. In 2007, the financial sector employed a staggering 2,996 separate lobbyists to influence federal policy making, more than five for each Member of Congress. This figure only counts officially registered lobbyists. That means it does not count those who offered "strategic advice" or helped mount policy-related PR campaigns for financial sector companies. The figure counts those lobbying at the federal level; it does not take into account lobbyists at state houses across the country. To be clear, the 2,996 figure represents the number of separate individuals employed by the financial sector as lobbyists in 2007. We did not double count individuals who lobby for more than one company the total number of financial sector lobby hires in 2007 was a whopping 6,738.
See Counterpunch web site for the full artcle by Weisman.
So there you have it folks. There are 6,738 people who KNOW exactly how the corruption went down for wars and banks. Sopeana them. Repubs are making negative noises because they are bought and paid for. Unfortunately, there are too many democrats in the same place. We need to keep screaming bloody murder at the top of our lungs or nothing will happen. Keep the pressure on, people.
All those figures were obviously money well spent. Lay out a cool hundred Million, get a nice round hundred BILLLION back. If I give my federal rep a thousand dollars would he make sure I get a hundred thousand back? Thats the same ratio. Hell, man, I'm sending Todd Platts a check today for TEN thousand. I hope to have my one million "bailout" in my pocket by the end of June!!
"To be clear, the 2,996 figure represents the number of separate individuals employed by the financial sector as lobbyists in 2007. We did not double count individuals who lobby for more than one company the total number of financial sector lobby hires in 2007 was a whopping 6,738."
Do those numbers include hookers?
Well, of course in includes hookers, but I meant the kind that are women selling their bodies for sex.
One of the perks of being a citizen of the Roman Empire was that food was free. If this brand of political lunacy had been around then, it would have been the bizarre spectacle of Cato claiming the emperor was telling people what to eat.
Cato was a conservative, of course, and he opposed the emperor – but he supported the privileges of the patricians. Today's conservatives oppose generous government, which they invariably call big government, but support the privileges of the patricians.
America has boosted this rhetoric since its foundation, but nary a word of it was ever true.
"Out of power and out of touch, they feast on stale slogans and whine."
Wasn't it former Republican Senator, Phil Gramm, who recently told the Democrats to "stop whining"?
Do you think he's dispensing that same wisdom to his fellow Republicans?
Any right wing nuts got a problem with government expansion and spending should take it up with Bush and his gang of thieves.
Bring America Back !!!!.......Don't take the Repubby PityPoopers too lightly, because there is method to their madness !
***They know there are several initiatives considering investigating the Bush Cabal, and their lawmaker enablers, so the Gran Plan is to scream loud enough to distract the New Administration from supporting those initiatives.
***If the PityPoopers can get the Obama Bunch to take ownership of Iraq and the Big Bailouts Mess==then the distractions will have succeeded.
***All those Conservacans, Limbaugh, all the Fox TV war cheerleaders, and their Capitol Hill Enablers have virtually ignored the traditional Honeymoon period given to a New Prez & Administration==and their motives are not pure !!
So, they are not Dumb, they know what they're doing, and it is up to us
to recognize it for what it is, and TURN THE CHANNELS !!!!
Wake Up America !!!