Nation's Food System Nearly Broke
As our government enacts a stimulus package and President Barack Obama announces bold initiatives to stem home mortgage foreclosures, disaster threatens family farmers and their communities.
The government's response to plummeting commodity prices and tightening credit markets leads to the basic question: Who will produce our food? This is a worldwide crisis. U.S. policy and the demand for deregulation at all levels -- from food production to financial markets -- contribute greatly to the global collapse. The solution must be grounded in food sovereignty so that all farmers and their communities can regain control over their food supply. This response makes sense here in Wisconsin and was the global message from the 500+ farmer leaders at the Via Campesina conference in Mozambique in October.
Many U.S. farmers are going out of business because they receive prices equal to about one half their cost to produce our food. How long could any enterprise receiving half the amount of its input costs stay in business? As an example, dairy farmers in the Northeast and Midwest must be paid between 30 and 35 cents per pound for their milk to pay production costs and provide basic living expenses. Until 1980, farmers received a price equal to 80 percent of parity, meaning that farmers' purchasing power kept up with the rest of the economy. Unfortunately, a 1981 political decision discontinued parity, and today the dairy farmers' share is below 40 percent.
"Free trade" and other regressive agricultural policies have decimated farms. We are now a food deficit nation dependent on food imports, often of questionable quality.
Our food system is nearly broke, which is almost as serious as our country's financial meltdown. With fair farm policies, farmers would get fair prices that would not require higher consumers prices. The Canadian dairy pricing system is the best example that proves fair farmer prices can and often do bring lower consumer prices and a healthier rural economy. In addition, excessive middleman profits are taking advantage of both consumers and producers.
As more farmers face bankruptcy, we all face a food emergency. European farmers speak from thousands of years of experience on the importance of family farms when they warn us, "Any time a country neglects its family farm base and allows it to become financially bankrupt, the entire economy of that country will soon collapse. It may take generations to rebuild the farm economy and that of the country."
Despite the magnitude of this food emergency, the "farm crisis" does not appear in headlines, so politicians are not compelled to provide political or financial assistance to something that would likely fail to bring votes. As farmers, we are now only about 1 percent of the U.S. population, and have little power to expose and prevent our demise. However, our urban and rural friends could be vital voices and advocates.
Bailing out the financial giants will not solve the financial crisis in the country, but the right policies and stimulus dollars could prevent a severe food crisis by saving farmers and workers. Furthermore, farm income dollars remain in and multiply at least two to four times in the local economy.
Family farmers have proposed fair food and farm policies that can be implemented at a fraction of the present multibillion-dollar policies destroying us. As the Treasury Department develops plans to distribute the bailout funds, the National Family Farm Coalition and others urge it to require banks receiving funds to treat their borrowers fairly by providing debt restructuring as an alternate to home or farm foreclosure or bankruptcy.
Concerned citizens can call the White House, 202-456-1111, or your members of Congress, 202-224-3121, to urge them to support policies that enable farmers to earn a fair market price; request an emergency milk price at $17.50 per hundred weight; provide price stability through government grain reserves and effective supply management; support the TRADE Act to be reintroduced in Congress; increase direct and guaranteed loans to family farmers; and ensure that the food we raise can be marketed to local schools and institutions, providing a better food supply at a fair price. We need these immediate changes in our food and farm policy.

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
53 Comments so far
Show AllIt's great to see this article at Common Dreams. These matters are too little understood across the country, throughout the mainstream media, and among progressives.
Check out the Family Farm Defenders Web site. They do the good Commodity Title stuff, the organic stuff, and the LDC dumping stuff. I just met a bunch of them at the huge MOSES organic farming conference in LaCross. 2000 people attended. They're great pamphleteers.
Kinsman himself has been at this for a long, long time. He's the kind of guy that deserves a Nobel prize. He fought with African American farmers during the civil rights movement in the South.
Vandana Shiva, the excellent leader and author from India, spoke at MOSES this year. I spoke with her. She fully supports price floors and ceilings, supply management and strategic grain reserves that Kinsman supports, as in the National Family Farm Coalition's Food from Family Farms Act, and as I've often advocated for here. Iowa Senator Tom Harkin, Senate Ag Chair, with his former Harkin-Gephardt farm bill (not his recent freedom to farm with a green mask) is key on the issues raised here. Also all of the ag committee.
The powers that be probably figure they can simply import farmers.
How does HR 875 and Senate Bill 814 effect this? I have heard rumor those pieces of legislation will drive small sustainable ag to extinction... A quick look via Thomas.gov seems to confirm those fears, and a friend of mine, w/ a small family farm, concurs. Yet certainly, our environmental survival NEEDS these small, local farms now more than ever. Will Monsanto et al be the ruin of us no matter what?
According to Richard Heinberg, the US alone needs 50 million new farmers or with the economic collapse that's now in its beginning stages, we'll all go hungry. Guess we'll need someone to invent a video game about farming instead of zombie killing and senseless battles, to get the kiddy population up and jived for their new lives as backyard serfs...
There already is... It is like simcity, but for a farm...
The good example of Canada's sense of fairness is cited by this author in promoting dairy prices; he describes "the Canadian dairy pricing system is the best example..." and I would add that Canada is routinely cited for its success in providing universal and affordable health coverage. "Universal" as in "For Everyone."
Health care along with dairy-pricing policy are two areas that we in the US would do well to adopt the successful ideas of our neighbors to the north.
Plus, Canada provided us Gordon Lightfoot. After all these years, I can still listen to him any time.
Our marketing boards ( A system setup wherein quotas set and a minumum price set for farm produce to ensure they can make profit) is one of the things "Free traders"
attack.
Just as they attacked the "Protectionism" of the Canadian Banking system wherein the large American Banks tried to dismantle our banking system via "Free trade" so that they could take over our financial services industry.
Had we caved to such pressures our Government would be paying hundreds of billiosn to bail out Canadian banks.
What this shows is that it "free trade" and the dismantling of borders when it comes to economics is NOT a good thing.
Globalization does more harm then good. I can see no real benefits other then those given to the Corporations.
Globalization IS The Fascists winning the World War. The well being of the Corporation and the State elevated beyond that of the people.
Prior to 1981, farmers were paid to overproduce. Surplus food went into storage or was use as "aid" to developing countries. The US Government subsidized this foreign aid through payments to American farmers.
While populations in developing countries were better fed, farmers in the developing countries could not compete with subsidized imports. Some nations, such as Rhodesia produced a surplus. The same nation, now Zimbabwe no longer produces anything but cholera. Politicians in Zimbabwe were able to buy the local populations through US subsidized food. Small farmers could not compete.
Local agricultural systems were underdeveloped to a large extent and entire populations left the farm and headed to rapidly growing cities.
Modern American agriculture does not make its money through subsidies. It makes its money through commodity futures and extremely unsafe factory farms. The small farmer cannot compete.
With the death of subsidies, there has been an extreme cutback in food aid to now dependent countries which no longer have any agriocultural capacity.
With the golbal economic meltdown, combined with ecological insanity, we are approaching the point where hundreds of millions of people will suffer severe malnutrition and famine.
The small farmers who fed America and the world has been forced off the farm.
The end result ... extreme food insecurity in the US and the world/
The best farm programs of the past required farmers to manage supply, it didn't pay them. Payments went with inadequate voluntary supply reduction programs.
I don't follow the logic of the claim made above that the government paid subsidies to farmers and used that money (the money the government no longer had) to subsidize exports. I guess you mean that oversupply was subsidized, that farmers were encouraged to oversupply through subsidies, and the extra was sent over seas.
Actually, oversupply and below cost prices are typically found in farm commodity markets, as they lack price responsiveness on both supply and demand sides(http://agpolicy dot org/weekcol/248.html; http://agpolicy dot org/weekcol/325.html). No subsidies are needed, and subsidies do not "cause" it oversupply or low prices, but they're "related" to it as they're given to quiet down angry farmers, in partial compensation for low price policies designed to lose money on exports but provide below cost grains and cotton to agribusiness buyers in the US and overseas.
Historically, we managed this problem through New Deal farm programs, managing supply and implementing price floors, and maintaining strategic reserves on the top side with price ceilings to release them. (See Harkin-Gephardt or Food from Family Farms Act, nffc.net, for recent examples)
We still have subsidies, but they are farther from actual costs, so we're set for a farm crisis or depression.
What killed Least Develop Countries (70%+ rural) was, dumping, exporting at below cost for a quarter century or more, and also speculation (no supply management or reserves) and the WTO/World Bank forcing market access.
Saw an article the other day about the way the market has affected beef producers. Beef steers are produced and grown on ranches and farms belonging, usually, to families. When they are weaned, they are sold to corporations that then fatten them in feedlots. Not too many years ago the calf producers got about a dollar a pound of live weight. It is now less than half that because a very few big corporations that slaughter and market the beef have cornered the market and can pay whatever they want. You will notice, however, that the price in the supermarket hasn't gone down by a similar percentage because the packing houses are keeping a much bigger cut for themselves.
Real Milk is YELLOW AND RAW
Yellow increases in the summer. It's from grassfed. More carotene?
...As an example, dairy farmers in the Northeast and Midwest must be paid between 30 and 35 cents per pound for their milk to pay production costs and provide basic living expenses. Until 1980, farmers received a price equal to 80 percent of parity, meaning that farmers' purchasing power kept up with the rest of the economy. Unfortunately, a 1981 political decision discontinued parity, and today the dairy farmers' share is below 40 percent.
----------------------
This paragraph doesn't make sense to me and I've read it three times.
Can anybody do a better job of explaining this.
"100 % of Parity" or "Parity" is a traditional standard for a fair trade or living wage price. It's measured by the Government.
See examples of parity data here (scroll down to chart, the data may be a few months old vs the date of the newsletter): http://nfu dot org/newsletters (look at newsletters)
USDA Economic Research Service found that dairy net vs full costs was above zero in 2007 and, prior to that, in 1992, and in some more years prior to 1991. Get spreadsheets (net vs. full costs are at bottom of historical charts): http://www dot ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/testpick.htm
Pete Seeger song "60 Percent" (itunes) refers to parity, I think the Eisenhower plan to lower price floor triggers to 60%, though parity overall didn't lower to that low until 1981 (59%). Today the price floors are 0% of parity (there are no price floors for grains and cotton, they were endeed in 1996 Freedom to Farm, but there are some for sugar).
Parity is the price that the average farmer has to get in order to make a profit. Some farmers cannot stay in business even if they are at parity, but the better managers will do well. The example he is using here is $35 a hundred pounds of milk, which is usually how you measure the price of milk to the farmer.
I also want to ask about this since a year or so ago when the price was between $20 and $24 a hundred (a record high), the dairymen were able to pay off a lot of their debt. Last year the average price was $17.44. Right now the futures price through June is $10.39, which is less than farmers were getting over 20 years ago NOT adjusted for inflation.
We need to change the way we produce milk and stop denaturing it into poison with pasteurization. "A hundred years of tradition unmarred by progress"
Our company Circul8.com is a holistic closed loop nutrient management system. The nutrients that go into and then out of the cows are flushed from the free-stall barn alleys. The solid nutrients are then separated from the liquid nutrients. The liquid nutrients are then routed to our CIRCUL8-ed lagoons where they are stabilized in the bodies of the hungry phototropic Purple Sulfur Bacteria (PSB) that appear naturally. “Build it and they will come.” The nutrients are therefore not allowed to putrefy, or volatize in the form of methane, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. The nearly pathogen free, non-crop burning “Nutrient Waters” from the lagoons are used to irrigate pastures (nearly 30% protein) and other fodder crops in balanced, measurable agronomic amounts preventing soil and ground water contamination. The very healthy and “Happy Cows” then feed on the nutrient rich crops, lowering veterinary bills and raising milk quality. The “Nutrient Waters” chock full of hungry PSB, are also used to flush/scrub the free-stall alleys preventing putrid off gassing, bacterial slime and hoof problems, also lowering incidents of lunger and downer cows. The monetary value of the nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium stabilized in the “Nutrient Waters” and not lost to the atmosphere, is worth between $ 300 and $400 per cow per year. (depending on fuel and amendment prices}. The odorless separated solids are processed into high nutritive value compost that can be used as soil amendments, or as a pathogen free bedding material in the free-stalls barns.
Dairy producers do not have to be perceived as gross polluters In fact, they can be revered as “Climate Change Heroes”. By transforming the biology in their lagoons from toxic cesspools into beneficial “Nutrient Waters” they can become the nutrient engine for regenerative organic crops. Dairy farmers can sequester carbon and store water in the healthy soil that will be created by utilizing what is now considered “Dairy Waste”, lessoning our dependence on high cost hydrocarbon based fertilizer.
“With regenerative farming, we're building in the soil mychorrhiza fungi, which creates a protein, an encasement, that has a 1,000-year half-life. So it sits down there in the soil and holds carbon for a long, long time. When you pour fertilizer down there, you kill the fungi and it volatizes into the atmosphere into carbon dioxide. Agriculture as we now practice it is one of the biggest contributors to global warming, but it could be one of the biggest mitigators. Organic farming can also help us deal with another actor of global warming: droughts. We know that healthy, carbon-rich soil holds water: 1 pound of carbon holds 40 pounds of water. We know that we can put 1,000 pounds of carbon back into an acre each season; that means 40,000 pounds of water will be in that soil. In wet years it will permeate through the soil. The plants will do better.” Timothy LaSalle
Please see Rodale Institute CEO Timothy LaSalle’s excellent interview in Grist magazine http://www.grist.org/feature/2008/05/09/index.html
Todd Callaway a USDA researcher reviewed DNA scans performed in 2003 by J. McGarvey to identify pathogens in Prins Dairy lagoon, He determined that no methane producing Achaea were detectable. No Archaea, means no methane. He has proposed a testing protocol to better substantiate our claims. (Attached) It would be nice to be on the same testing protocol page with the Air Board. Perhaps someone at the board has suggestions as to what they would like the testing to include.
The proven Circul8 System has successfully helped dairies in several states over the last decade to stop stinking and significantly reduce both air and water pollution, while increasing animal health and profits. The two most mature installations of the CIRCUL8 System are the Prins and Verburg Dairies, both located in Modesto CA.
Please accept our invitation to visit our dairies and see for yourself what we can do to create environmental and economic health for dairy farmers and their communities.
Our system works for swine and humanure also.
I have been totally fascinated with reading all of the comments posted. Two thoughts came to mind:
First, in addition to calling the White House and Representatives, I think it would be good if one of the Farmer Associations developed a petition to be signed, similar to what CommonDreams is doing for bank nationalization. I can get a lot more people involved that way, than by asking them to call - just human nature, I guess.
Second, I feel there needs to be a way to push ideas/businesses that are good for the economy and environment, such as Circul8.com to the forefront. I represent a new green building technology that can build a certified green, 2x6" stick-built (or steel),plywood wrap (no OSB) custom home or commercial building at tolerances within 1/32",pre-wired,pre-drilled, pre-ventilated in 60-70% less time, that is a fraction of the cost of building a traditional home/building, can withstand >150 mph winds, reduce energy/operating expenses by 50% even before the introduction of solar, and is guaranteed for 40 years against mold, termites and fire.
As I'm sure Circul8 has experienced, getting exposure or support for these new technologies can be difficult. I was happy to hear that the Obama administration was looking to establish an office specifically to look at this issue, but whether it turns into any real action, I question. Meanwhile, Circul8, I hope you've spoken to "the powers that be" in the state of North Carolina, where I'm from, because the swine manure problem is huge!!!
Thanks for sharing what you do, regenerative farming is a great concept, and a step in the right direction. We can argue all day long about whether milk (I call it cow pus) or meat (I'm a vegetarian) makes you sick or not, and I did appreciate Jesus Hussein Christ's comments, but it really isn't important. Sort of like the stimulus package, somewhere along the way you have to put aside the bickering and do something! What was the Einstein saying, "if we do what we've always done, we'll get what we've always gotten?" We're not going to be able to change the apathetic, spoiled and mostly ignorant mindset of America overnight, but action in a positive direction towards environmental sustainability is what is needed.
Dairy Farmers are:animal husbandry experts,soil scientists,mechanical engineers,chemists,welders,mechanics,designers,meteorologists,plant pathologists,botanists,I.P.M. practitioners,hydrolic engineers,and increasingly computer geeks with GPS in thier John Deere.And that is just the short list,now they have to be politically active to survive.The government wants to put microchips in all livestock,at the farmers expense.Corporations patent seed varieties and sue farmers that save seeds for patent violations when thier genetic drift contaminates the crops.The margins are so slim in profitable farming most farmer operate at a loss.In my town there used to be hundreds of farms! Now there are a few dairys, a couple of beef farms,an orchard and a small vegetable operation.Aside from loggers who are technically farmers too ,mayby 30 people work in ag related bussinesses.In the 1800s everyone was a farmer to a certain extent.We need to prevent the extinction of farmers,honey bees and other industrious creatures. peas in
That is what I have found. Farmers work very hard and need some support so we all can eat a variety of foods. Otherwise we are down to corn chips, high fructose corn syrup and factory raised animals.
This article points out that we need MORE farmers. Because of the scientific, social, economic and political complexity of running a family farm in the world of pollutants and agribusiness, we should offer agriculture scholarships, land grants and start-up assistance to young folks who want to engage in some small scale organic and humane farming enterprise.
Also some collectivized transportation systems to get their products to markets.
Joe
8 years of Bush equals much more unprotected people
masso
In China there is a 'back to the farm' movement from recently unemployed peasants who flocked to the cities for manufacturing jobs a few short years ago. Sort of what Americans did during the Great Depression.
Except we don't have grandpa and grandma's cow and chickens and pea patch to return to, and too many of us think a hoe is an easy lady rather than hard work.
Dig out those old Whole Earth Catalogs in your parent's attic and learn to homestead.
Of course there's also Eat the Rich.
I was wondering what a little spit-roasted Cheney or lightly sauteed Bush would taste like?? Chicken???!!!
If commodities prices are falling why are retail food prices increasing? The cost of fuel has come down, but not the price of food, so transportation to market cannot be the cost. Jobs in food processing have been taken over by illegal immigrants working for a third of the former employees so it can't be labor costs. Why? It couldn't possibly be price gouging because... er... well... it just couldn't, because Americans wouldn't do that to each other.
d.k.shaw
Overall the farm share of the food dollar has fallen from 41% in 1941 to under 8% in 1997, with projections down to zero by 2010. The agribusiness output complex has the lions share of the food dollar, followed by the agribusiness input complex. They are heavily concentrated, with a few companies in control of various sectors, sometimes the same companies in many sectors.
Because Europe has better subsidies.
The loss of the small farmer was one of the factors involved in the decline of the Roman Empire. There may be hope, as the city folk are starting to see some light. Laying hens raised in back yards are a new rage. This will get them in the right frame of mind.
John is right about the current situation regarding the state of our smaller US farms. I was a dairy farmer until last year but kept the land. There are many farmers such as me who could be re-employed on the farms we still hold. The methods we got sucked into since WWII have killed our soils, water, livestock, crops and souls. None of these are DOA yet. The land can be brought back to viability. So would the food produced by us.
One ray of hope is the young who enter farming these days. They are not our kids(who saw no future on our farms) but professionals who have burnt out from the same soul killing going on in our business models all across the economy. They bring to farming new paradigms, based on ages old understandings, which embrace the elegant dance of the energies at play in a healthy farm which the boardroomers controlling our "modern" agricultural practices never concieved of. I also know retired farmers who do not want their farms sold off to development( a corruption of that word!) but who don't know exactly how to manage the transition of their farms, which are quite large and relatively secure assets, to the next generation of farmers while allowing them fair compensation beyond the securing of the futures of their land as farms. Perhaps even some of our children may return to the land as we adopt healthier production methods and local food practice.
Policy makers need to tackle ways we can promote the well being of the PEOPLE of farming to promote a secure source of food. I have no doubt that we still have the basic elements of a viable farm sector. It's just been diverted on a temporary fools errand that can be corrected fairly rapidly given the energy and resourcefulness of farmers.
Serf no more,what a great handle!I take care of a retired farmer right now and if you know of farmers looking for someone to start a C.S.A.in the northeast i would love the opportunity.luddite@smokesignal.talkingdrum , make a large fire and beat a big drum! peas in
The plight of small farms is catastrophic and must be dealt with. This article however, should have been written by a tobacco farmer or cocaine grower pleading for a subsidy, as neither product is more dangerous to your health than dairy. Heart disease in non-dairy consuming societies is a minute fraction of those societies that use it as a regular part of their diet. The osteoporosis level for women in societies that traditionally do not consume dairy is almost zero. The diseases of dairy are legion and affect almost everyone who consumes it. If you need milk, suck your mother tits.
Dairy farmers are a big part of the problem, but dairy consumers are an even bigger part. Extreme environmental degradation is caused by dairy farming as well. To subsidize dairy is to perpetuate the calamities.
On the other hand, most organic vegetable farms, large and small, are prospering despite the collapsing economy, and urban food gardens in every back yard and empty lot are urgently needed to help repair the nation's broken food system that requires most of the ingredients for a simple salad to be shipped thousands of miles.
http://www.notmilk.com/kradjian.html
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:FFqIMlA77pwJ:www.rense.com/general26/milk.htm+dairy+dangers&hl=en...
http://us.mc564.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?.rand=59430155&uc=1
http://www.vegparadise.com/otherbirds10.html
This information on milk is not accurate. Milk has tremendous health benefits as have been well documented. But it makes a great difference how the milk is produced (industrial hormone injected corn-fed vs. organic grassfed)
The kind of bashing here comes from ideology (and zealotry) distorting science, as we often find among certain philosophical and religious systems.
Weston Price studied diets around the world.
See: http://www.westonaprice.org/transition/dairy.html
The controversy is expected. It can be addressed through science.
In contrast, there are many health problems associated with vegetarianism and veganism.
Dairy is great for the environment, providing a sustainable use of hilly lands.
Support the Heifer project. Don't further damage the poor farmers of the world on whom Least Developed Country (70%+ rural) economies rely.
It's clear that you have no respect for the thousands of scientific reports that conclusively uproot your opinion. But that's not the case for everyone.
http://www.notmilk.com/kradjian.html
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." Upton Sinclair
I read this comment and followed the first link. Thanks for this info.
It convinced me to drastically lower my milk intake. Maybe for my tea only.
Switching completely to soy milk.
Good work.
Get grassfed organic raw milk. Avoid soy, it's very bad for your health.
See the hundreds of studies against soy. http://www.westonaprice.org/soy/soy_studies.html
Certainly do not feed soy to babies. "Babies need milk, not beans."
Anyone thinking margarine is anything close to butter in nutrition should read the response of the Weston Price Foundation to the Margarine Association! See the "Know Your Fats" column of the Weston Price Foundation Journal, Wise Traditions, Fall 2008. There's a nice chart, page 61, on how saturated fats are good, but trans fats are bad, for cell membranes, hormones, inflammation, heart disease, Omega 3s, Diabetes, immune systems, and prostaglandins, sourced to M. Enig, Trnas Fatty Acids in the Food Supply: A Comprehensive Report Covering 60 Years of Research, 2nd ed. 1995.
Many of these myths people believe go back to the dominance of the Agribusiness output complex/transfat complex on government information, going back to the McGovern Committee in the 1970s. Weston Price folks are fighting the agribusiness complex, and also ideologues. Go with the good science.
Jesus, you can pry my aged sharp cheddar cheese from my cold arthritic rigamortic hand ,after my myocarial infarction! peas in
If you keep it in your hand and out of your digestive tract, no prying will be necessary.
"The osteoporosis level for women in societies that traditionally do not consume dairy is almost zero."
~They are also a great deal shorter too!
"The diseases of dairy are legion and affect almost everyone who consumes it."
~I drink milk nearly every day and i have yet to come down with disease.
You say, "They are also a great deal shorter too!" And much smarter. For calcium to be properly utilized in the body, we need foods that are high in sodium and chlorine. When there is an imbalance of calcium in relationship to sodium there is a great tendency for general hardening of the body known as calcification. Dairy products actually leach calcium from your body. The United States has the highest calcium intake per person, and the highest rate of osteoporosis in the world. That's because Americans get calcium from the wrong sources in a way that undermines calcium metabolism.
Diary products cause nothing close to what tobacco and cocaine cause. Besides, haven't you ever heard of grass-fed milk that was dominant before corn-fed milk for profit took hold?
It is not possible to get commercial, free range, grass fed, raw, organic cow's milk in the USA. Assuming you raise your own and are drinking milk from organically grass fed cows then you could be getting rid of the pus, growth hormones, herbicides antibiotics, radioactive iodine and the magnified dosage of pesticides that all the other milk drinkers ingest. What you are not getting rid of is the osteoporosis, heart disease, allergies, depression, softening of the bones, tooth decay, tendency to hemorrhage, cramps, vein fatigue, digestive problems, and weakened nervous system as well as the vector for other diseases including leukemia, tuberculosis, rickets and scurvy that are linked to ingesting the purest dairy products you can find.
I've been kind of addicted to cheese and yogurt.
Thanks again for this very important health information.
Your data is persuasive. I'm not being sarcastic.
I know a 95 year old woman who raised 4 small children after being widowed who has drunk milk every day of her life. Being a poor city-sweller she did not buy any special milk for herself and her children. All the children are the picture of health, as are their children and grandchildren. She is still cheerful, and healthy, if not completely mobile. She has started to use a walker for support.
How do you know that all the symptoms you list are attributable to milk? Could it be that some people's physiologies benefit from dairy and some are allergic or intolerant, as with any food? Please describe where you get the information.
Joe
I knew a smoker who lived to be 102. Llke your 95 year old milk drinker and her offspring, they are genetically lucky as well as statistical freaks. Aside from the sources I listed above, here are just a few more. If you examine them, you will be easily directed to hundreds more documented studies.
If you are surfing the net, try this site for detailed referenced and annotated medical studies on more diseases linked to dairy than you can count on your hands and toes.
http://www.milksucks.com
For a short video "Perspectives on Dairy with Dr. Gabriel Cousens, M.D." go to:
http://video.google.nl/videoplay?docid=6473176108991246006&q=perspectives+on+dairy&pr=goog-sl
an interesting book on the subject is
"The Milk Imperative, a Ticking Time Bomb Inside Your Body," by Russell Eaton. You can read a review of the book at:
http://www.amazon.com/Milk-Imperative-Russell-Eaton/dp/1903339162
The Kushi Institute studies
http://www.macrobiotics.nl/library/dairy.html
Meat and Dairy Industries Harmful Effect on the Environment
http://societyandenvirongroup.umwblogs.org/
Dairy Effects on Immune system
http://www.nativeremedies.com/
articles/harmful-effects-dairy-products-immune-system-real.html
Here is a link to one article called Dairy Milk is Harmful, by Dr. H. Kushnood, MD at the Be Well at Stanford site. At the bottom of the page is a link to many more reports and studies by medical doctors on the hazards of milk and dairy products:
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:9Cwkf_bkch4J:stanford.wellsphere.
com.healthy-living-article/dairy-milk-is-harmful/
462320+dairy+harmful&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=10&gl=us&client=safari
Doctor's Study links dairy to cancer
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=23061
Here is a referenced and annotated article on the Effect of Dairy Products on Bones by Sherrill Sellman, author of the book, "Hormone Heresy."
http://www.encognitive.com/node/1388
Since only northern Europeans adapted to drink cow's milk, it's probably as simple as everyone else's body hasn't adapted to it yet. Nobody in my family has problems with dairy.
Thanks for all the links. I'll take a look.
Joe
That's true. For the past nearly 50 years, the decline in family farms has actually lead to the depopulation of most of my state. And I have to travel to Omaha to get a decent paying part time job since all that's offered in my rural town are funeral jobs.
One system is still crashing (our elevator just quit buying oats and selling feed) and another (organic) is rising.
Iowa has been gaining in number of farms in recent years.
Mr. Bush was a disaster of biblical proportions. His administration screwed up banking, wall street, public safety, transportation, energy, medical care, and farming. I'm sure the list can go on.
And the American people voted for him, twice. Now they have Mr. Obama who is proving to be Mr. Bush Lite.
American's are dumber than a sack of door knobs.
Did you see the stock market after the proposed third rescue of CitiBank? It is down, and CitiBank shares down about 30 percent. Guess the market does not have confidence in Mr. Obama either.
Nationalize the banks Mr. Obama.
Government now owns 36% of Citibank but don't call it nationalization in case you get an enormous public backlash from those Americans who know that nationalization is akin to Communism and their deadly enemy.
I come from that region.
Nobody stays back to farm.
The only people left doing the 'family farming' are essentially past retirement age.
When they die or finally decide they have had enough they either:
1). Cash rent to a corporation.
2). Let the land go fallow and collect set-aside payments (gov. subsidy)
3). Sell to a developer or corporate farm interest.
The problem is huge. If you want to preserve a family farm it means having farmers who are rich enough to teach their children that farming is a good living with a future.
Americans really do not like to support people so they can actually do better than poorly in their lives.
So I see a major cultural problem that will make the political problem insurmountable for a long time to come.
There are plenty of farmers still out there. We need to charge hog factories above half price so they don't keep out competing pastures, also above full cash costs, above full costs, (above zero) and yes, parity.
Which region? Do you still live in the region?
A friend of mine from rural Iowa (redundant?) who attests that many organic family farms growing a diversity of crops are sprouting up and reflourishing rural communities... The irony is that these are Latino families who have saved enough money working the gringo industrial monocrop farms that they have been able to buy land through micro-lending cooperatives, and are converting an unsustainable agricultural system back to a polyculture that nurtured local community...
This is happening everywhere in the world, and is largely under the radar...
Organic farms seem to be thriving. Why is being a farmer good in Europe and bad in the US?
It's not good in Europe, they have the same problems, more or less, and we hear of their protests periodically.