EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Obama Cans Regulator Who Crossed Wall Street
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
Popular content
Today's Top News
On Capitol Hill, Money Is the Root of All Hypocrisy
The great movie comic and professional curmudgeon W.C. Fields once said, "You can fool some of the people some of the time -- and that's enough to make a decent living." Watching the news from Washington unfold this week, the truth of the late comedian's words never seemed more right.
The antics of the august members of the House and Senate remind us once again that money is the root of all hypocrisy -- especially in politics.
Take United States Senator Roland Burris, appointed by former Illinois governor and clown prince Rod Blagojevich to fill the seat vacated by Barack Obama. Testifying before the impeachment committee investigating Blagojevich, Senator Burris claimed he had no conversations with anyone from the governor's clan of cronies prior to his appointment. Now he says, oops, I just remembered -- the governor's brother asked me to raise $10,000. Or was it $15,000?
Luckily, Senator Burris still has some space in Chicago's Oak Woods Cemetery on that spiffy mausoleum he had built with a list of all his accomplishments. Like some ancient Egyptian pharaoh ordering up the hieroglyphics for his made-to-order pyramid, the senator has room to have inscribed there one final act of public service. "Resignation" would seem to fit rather neatly.
Then there are Republican congressmen John Mica of Florida and Don Young of Alaska. As the McClatchy News Service reported, both stood with their party -- good and true, cool conservative men -- voting against President Obama's economic stimulus. So did every other GOP House member. Twice.
But then, eager to ride a gravy train with a popular President at the throttle, each of them had the chutzpah to issue press releases praising aspects of the stimulus package -- while never mentioning they'd actually voted "nay." This was followed by the spectacle of several other Republican House and Senate members who voted against the stimulus going back home during the President's Day recess and touting the money the bill will provide their constituents.
But the prize of the week -- the ever-loving, loving cup -- goes to the multitude of Congress members -- both Democrats and Republicans -- who enjoyed balmy Caribbean breezes and substantial campaign contributions thanks to the largesse of financier Robert Allen Stanford, now accused of bilking investors of some $9 billion and, like W.C. Fields, making a decent living at it.
Stanford prefers being called "Sir Allen," as befits a Texas charlatan. He was knighted by the governor-general of the West Indies island of Antigua, offshore headquarters for his alleged con game. He bankrolled "fact-finding" missions to Antigua and other Caribbean ports-of-call for several members of Congress, including Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn and New York Democrat Charlie Rangel, chair of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee.
Stanford Financial Group was a main sponsor of last month's Texas state pre-inaugural ball in DC and his political action committee gave $10,000 to help cover the costs of last year's Congressional baseball game (the Republicans won, for the eighth year in a row, 11-10). "Sir Allen" partied with Nancy Pelosi and Bill Clinton at the Democratic National Convention last summer. And when Tom Delay was still House majority leader, he flew the friendly skies in Stanford's private jet 16 times in three years -- including a trip to Houston for Delay's arraignment on money-laundering charges!
Stanford showered millions on political campaigns, much of it from 2001-2002, the very time Congress was debating a bill to curb financial fraud with a computer network linking regulatory data bases. Two of the biggest recipients were Democratic Senator Bill Nelson of Florida -- who at the time was chairing the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, another big beneficiary of Stanford love -- and Republican Senator John McCain. Three key Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee -- then-Chair Paul Sarbanes, Charles Schumer and Christopher Dodd received checks, too. The reform bill never got out of the Senate.
According to the non-partisan and indispensable Center for Responsive Politics, over the last decade, Robert Allen Stanford spent nearly $5 million lobbying the Senate and House, on top of $2.4 million in campaign contributions to Federal candidates. Now that he has been tracked down by the FBI and charged with "massive, ongoing fraud," many politicians are rushing to give the money back to charity, including President Obama, whose campaign received $4600.
Altogether, however, Stanford's contributions were a spit in the bucket of what he's alleged to have swindled, and just a tiny slice of the multibillion-dollar pie the lobbying business has become in Washington. Already, lobbyists are jumping all over President Obama's economic stimulus, so much so the Washington D.C. Examiner newspaper renamed the bill "The Lobbyist Enrichment Act" and reported that, "In the first weeks of this year, about 50 companies, trade associations, municipalities or non-profits retained new lobbyists explicitly to lobby on the stimulus bill."
According to Washington Post associate editor Robert G. Kaiser, the lobby industry "has helped moneyed interests protect their status and privileges, undermined government regulation of business and turned our elected officials into chronic money-chasers."
Kaiser, an intrepid, longtime reporter and native Washingtonian has a new book out titled, So Damn Much Money: The Triumph of Lobbying and the Corrosion of American Government. He appeared as a guest on the current edition of Bill Moyers Journal on public television.
The fix is in, he told my colleague Moyers, eliminating a fair competitive system. We should ask for more transparency, Kaiser suggests. And campaign finance reform would go a long way to making a difference, but he doesn't think it likely anytime soon.
The "everybody does it" syndrome took over in Washington a long time ago and, in general, an indifferent, cynical public seems unmotivated to do anything about it. "They do not expect Congress to do the right thing," Kaiser said. "They do not expect high ethical standards. On the contrary."
So why should the lobbyists and the government stop their profitable roundelay if we fail to do anything to stop the music and fall for the "everybody does it" meme? Do we deserve what we get? The way lobbyists, special interests and politicians regard the citizenry brings to mind another W.C. Fields aphorism, the title of one of his movies: "Never Give a Sucker an Even Break."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




9 Comments so far
Show AllThe MUSTHAVES and getting Economically Stimulated
I was wondering to myself how I could get with the program and get myself economically stimulated in these trying times for the MUSTHAVES there in the biggest privy in the world. The one with the name of Washington D.C. there are others and the one in New York City is right there. Of course there are others but it would take to much of my time and patience to list them all
In all these privies the MUSTHAVES take care of their biological needs and maintain a superb style of living by shitting on all the Don’thavesomuches which are more numerous and lack the little things in life that would put them at least closer to the MUSTHAVES and those thing are big greed, and of course with greed there are always lobbyists and bribes.
Now the MUSTHAVES were going merrily along stealing, bribing and lobbying for more when there was a more greedy entity out there and they had to go begging the Donthavesomuches for the means to keep on being the greedy cretins they are. Since this privy is like a big public house and has differing parts and has more than one loo and MUSTHAVES change names but do maintain the status quo they think it is the duty of the Donthavesomuches to keep the privy clean by taking all the shit on themselves so that the MUSTHAVES don’t have to wallow in all the shit and we are talking muncho.
This was bad enough but now the MUSTHAVES in other privies and the same one as before want to spread the shit a ton more by asking the donthavesomuches to carry more of the shit left by the MUSTHAVES lying, cheating and bribing thru the banks using bank usury, auto license fees by other MUSTHAVES, A mileage tax and other methods that have not been brought forward yet and since the Donthavesomuches are all so full of shit anyway they think it is only fair that they take care of this also
If the is what getting Economically Stimulated is then I think it is time for me to go into rehab. Tony 2/20/09
If you get the idea that this word is expressive and on my to write list…You are right.
Given the Supreme Court's unconscionable conflation of money and speech in Buckley v. Vallejo, meaningful campaign finance reform is impossible. To suggest it as a remedy is, at best, wishful thinking. For a politician to suggest it is demagogy.
The only route to campaign finance reform is a constitutional amendment mandating public financing of elections, and federal bribery statutes that criminalize all forms of private contributions to officeholders at all levels of government.
W _ ◎ _ W
What we have in Canada is this.
Union and Corporate donations are banned outright. An Individual can contribute a maximum of 2000$$ per year.
1000$ max to a given political party and 1000$$ max to an individual candidate.
The rest of the monies come from federal coffers and there spending limits on how much can be spent in a given campaign.
http://www.waderowland.com/blog/2007/09/corporate-rights-and-canadas-supreme.html
This article describes the State of Corporate "personhood" in canada. Something we too have to rid ourselves of .
The Courts have so far ruled that spending limits are constitutional.
This is one of those topics met with silence by the political class. It's a Catch-22. Anyone in Washington has successfully networked a monied interest to get there. To stay there, they won't even respond to this topic. If you even cornered a representative on this, they fall back on the "money is speech" canard. If that is so, then billionaires have a lot of speech while people in soup lines have none. So acceptance of money is speech means a law has been passed that limits the speech of poor people. They have insured that speech must be purchased, and that defines Washington today.
If anyone knows a way to get Washington to stop taking money and do what is right for the country, I'd love to hear it. Near as I can tell we just have to wait for total collapse and hope something better comes from the ashes.
In the battle between conservative bestiality and liberal humanism, conservatives might have the greed advantage.
we need to vote third party
Yes,
but third parties also need to learn the facts about, well, fair trade farm policy, so they don't inadvertently advocate with these others, like they did last time (ie. Nader, McKinney), as did half of the farm and food reform movement in the lead up to the last farm bill.
As I just posted today at: http://www dot commondreams.org/view/2009/02/21-5 More on the movement (google my name and "false paradigm" or go to my ZSpace blog and read my White House Farmer essay, and other farm bill stuff. Hey folks, we share the same values, let's get straight on the facts. All this half-a-movement stuff is, well, moving at only half strength. What a waste, and opposing each other instead of the big money, (ie. the agribusiness input and output lobbyists). And see my other post here (soon) on this latter point, on Moyers and Winship, also often on the wrong side (see more of my comments on the details of this at other Moyers and Winship articles at Common Dreams).
Ok, great, I welcome this information.
But on the big money I'm yet to see a Michael Winship or Bill Moyers apology for Moyers (with help from Bread for the World's David Beckmann and the Wall Street Journal) falsely blaming "commodity growers" for being the big lobbyists on farm bill stuff http://www dot pbs.org/moyers/journal/04112008/transcript3.html. (Here's Moyers Wall street journal page: http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04112008/profile2.html It links to: http://online dot wsj.com/article/SB120657645419967077.html?mod=Letters, which mentions the Center for Responsive Politics as the source of the 80 million dollar farm lobby figure (for 2007) cited by Beckmann at the transcripts link above.)
No, it's not the struggling farmers that have the big money. It's the agribusiness output complex and the agribusiness input complex that shelled out the big money, as the lobby monitoring data of this cited group, the Center for Responsive Politics clearly shows http://www dot opensecrets.org/industries/contrib.php?Ind=A&cycle=2008.
Moyers and Winship falsely blamed farmers (commodity growers), and did not blame those that their own sources, actually show spreading out the influence money massively.