Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Innocence, Morality Ravaged in Gaza
"Every bomb ever made falls on all of us." -- Alice Walker
Israel has dropped tens of thousands of pounds of U.S.-made and/or U.S.-paid-for munitions on one of the most densely populated regions on Earth. Israel has been firing on known United Nations schools, killing dozens of civilians.
There are credible U.N. reports that Israel has bombed shelters to which Israel evacuated civilians 24 hours earlier. Israel is using artillery shells, widely banned cluster munitions and white phosphorus munitions, all of which guarantee an increasing proportion of civilian casualties (more than 50 percent of the more than 1,000 Palestinians killed). How can one justify the dropping of a 2,000-pound bomb on the home of a Hamas leader killing 18 others, including four children?
Could one imagine Britain claiming the right to bomb Northern Ireland during the four decades of "The Troubles" as a means of "self-defense" against terrorist bombings? Indeed, after Britain further militarized the conflict in January 1972, when 13 Northern Irish civilians were shot by the British Army, deaths nearly tripled that year. Militarizing the conflict prolonged it for another 25 years, resulting in more than 3,200 deaths. Did the Mitchell Principles accepted in 1997 end all violence? No. There were 129 deaths reported during 1998-2006. But negotiations are a critical step to decrease the violence and make peace possible.
How can Israel stop the Hamas rocket fire? By maintaining a cease-fire with Hamas. The cease-fire that started in June rapidly deteriorated after Nov. 4 when Israel launched attacks in Gaza -- killing six Palestinians -- and further tightened the 18-month blockade (with less than 1 percent of food trucks getting in, compared with two years ago). The blockade of food, fuel and medicines has resulted in far more death and civil strife than that caused by the rockets and mortars fired from Gaza into Israel. Rockets and blockades are crimes, and both must end. You cannot end two crimes by committing a far more terrible third crime.
How can Israel's war end Hamas' rocket fire? By brutalizing young Palestinians who watch family killed by Israeli bombs, thereby guaranteeing future recruits for Hamas? By bombing the Islamic University and other schools in Gaza to guarantee a society that has no hope? By bombing police stations and new police recruits (42 killed in the first days of Israel's bombing), a war crime, according to Human Rights Watch and others, thereby guaranteeing no peacekeeping authority to keep Gaza from descending into chaos? By killing the families of Hamas leaders, teaching Palestinians that there is no such thing as a civilian? By destroying the very infrastructure of police and security forces that had been enforcing the cease-fire before November?
When the great Rabbi Hillel was asked to sum up Jewish law, he responded, "What is hateful to thee, do not unto thy fellow man: This is the whole Law; the rest is mere commentary."
The Talmud, the second-most-important text in Judaism, says, "For the sake of peace, non-Jewish poor should be supported as we support the poor of Israel, the non-Jewish sick should be visited as we visit the sick of Israel, and the non-Jewish dead should be buried as we bury the dead of Israel."
Only a tribalism that hardens one's heart and blinds one to reality can reconcile Judaism's most sacred teachings with the death Israel has dispensed in Gaza.
"Every bomb ever made falls on all of us." They ravage the flesh and psyche of those who receive them, they ravage the morality and innocence of those who send (or supply) them.
- Posted in

20 Comments so far
Show All"The cease-fire that started in June rapidly deteriorated after Nov. 4 when Israel launched attacks in Gaza..."
Something else happened on 4 November. I wish I could remember what it was, as - cynic that I am - I'm sure it would have had some bearing on the Israeli government's decision.
The sages are not at the heart of contemporary Jewish life: the existence of Israel is, even for the vast majority of Jews who don't in theory support the brutality consistently exercised in the name of 'self-defense', but who in reality have already rendered themselves powerless to stop it. When justice is sacrificed at the altar of survival, even though survival can only be ensured by justice, then all ethical order is rendered meaningless. The state & society of Israel & their spokesmen in the US do all that the most virulent anti-semites could wish them to do & say.
Saint-Just, Amen..
How hypocritical,
Britain killed many more civilians in Iraq than Israel killed palestinian civilians in Gaza. During "the troubles" hostilities were mostly self-contained within Northern Ireland, which was under military control of Britain. Had, say, the republic of Ireland fired rockets at civilians in Britain, rest assured that the UK would have retaliated.
And if we go back 15 years before the beginning of "the troubles", to the end of world war 2, Britain massively targeted civilians in retaliation of German bombings. A particularly famous examples is the bombing of Dresden.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II
Civilian deaths are terrible. Always.
Now to bombing schools and UN facilities, the accusations should be directed first and foremost to Hamas. You can't use civilians as human shields, fire from schools and mosques and use them as weapon arsenals, and apply guerilla tactics that deliberately lure the opposing army into civilian areas, and then complain that these become targets.
I often wonder if this forum is really interested in human rights, or is an outlet of palestinian propaganda.
Hamas militants firing mortar bombs from a UN school, Oct 2007:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmXXUOs27lI&feature=channel_page
Launch between two schools, during cease fire:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f94_1232391171
Hamas Launching missiles from a mosque.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=165_JS4t0SE
Hamas using UN ambulances for militant operations (watch till the end and you'll see what a white UN flag means in Gaza):
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=116_1231063776
Hamas MP admitting the use of civilians as human shields (in fact, he's proud of it):
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aea_1231799681
Use of human shields, from Hamas Al-Aqsa TV:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3a4_1204807029
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=351_1231430391
The Geneva Convention on the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Article 28:
The presence of a protected person may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.
Are you trying to defend war crimes??
Not at all. As I said, killing of civilians is always terrible. In the case of the recent Gaza operation, the blame for the civilian casualties lies on Hamas.
Are you the type of person that blames the rape victim instead of the rapist? Because it sounds like you do.
Funny, this reminds me of the following video clip that I saw a few days ago.
Advocate Nagla Al-Imam Suggests Arab Men Should Sexually Harass Israeli Women and Declares: Leave the Land So We Won't Rape You
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NdtG88012s
To be fair, the woman is not from Hamas as the youtube title suggests, she is an Egyptian lawyer. And she is apparently not suggesting to rape the Israeli girls, because that might put the assaulters under criminal investigation. She's suggesting "only" to sexually harass them. All this was aired on Al-Arabiya TV, October 31, 2008.
A full transcript is available on Memri.
what has that got to do with Israeli crimes and who the hell is that character?? You are trying to change the subject like a typical zionist troll.
Oh I get it, Israel's killings are a lot nicer than Britain's killings. Defending Israel is your racket, but I can do without the absurdities.
While viewing some of your liveleak videos, for instance, the one where neighbors rush to gather on the rooftop of an Israeli-targetted Hamas member, another interpretation came to mind. I was reminded of the Bertolucci film "1900". It takes place during the rise of fascism in Italy and shows a troop of mounted soldiers being confronted by a group of peasants on a roadway. Women and children are gathered behind the male members of the village. As the calvalry, sabres drawn, become more threatening, the women move through the group of men to the front, then lie down in the roadway, staving off an attack till another day. This might be interpreted as a bit of romanticism by some, but I think it also pertains to the reality of the people in Gaza, where the overbearing oppression of the colonizer has forged an even greater consciousness and bond of solidarity and resistance in the oppressed group--a solidarity of purpose among men, women and children. I think this interpretation deserves as much consideration as the notion of "cowardlyHamas hiding behind the skirts of women". This kind of cohesiveness is not an isolated example in history, noting the battle for Algeria, for one instance of many.
Israel is the most egregious collective welfare bum in world history. It is a government without a trace of innocence or morality. And its Daddy Warbucks enabler, the USA, grins and hands out the cash.
Anybody else noticing the growing desperation in certain posters' feeble and pathetic attempts to defend the indefensible?
I wish it were desperation, opeluboy. Unfortunately it's simply mind-numbing, rote repetition, over and over. These people are ideologues. They are not interested in debate, but simply in hammering the same lies home with deadly resonance, in the hope that they will eventually sink in. It's the classic Big Lie strategy. Never mind that they themselves probably believe it. Their masters, who are smarter and more cynical than they, don't, but they know what they want, which is to clutter debate with the same lies and distortions, so that the naive and ignorant (i.e., most people) will be confused and passively accept their depradations and sick worldview.
You are probably right, but fortunately they are outnumbered here and at many other liberal/progressive sites. I also believe their repetitive lies are having less and less affect on the general public. They know they are in trouble. Expect a redoubled propaganda barrage.
"Judy Levy February 2nd, 2009 1:06 pm
One can always identify a pro-Arab writer, by scanning the text for "?"s. Arab polemecists are big-time addicted to rhetorical questions.
The math here is wrong. It does not take two sides to make a war. It only takes one side. There are a billion Muslims. Virtually all are committed to Jew-killing, one way or another. If you want peace, you'll need to start by fixing them."
THAT'S TOTAL BS, the words of another racist, as the Israeli govt is, extremely racist, supreme racist, as in believing to be the supreme race among humans and as is inferred in the so-called belief of being "God's (sole) chosen people".
"arnonrot February 2nd, 2009 4:19 pm
Funny, this reminds me of the following video clip that I saw a few days ago.
Advocate Nagla Al-Imam Suggests Arab Men Should Sexually Harass Israeli Women and Declares: Leave the Land So We Won't Rape You
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NdtG88012s
To be fair, the woman is ... an Egyptian lawyer. ..."
AN EGYPTIAN LAWYER and on what Egyptian side, with the Muslim Brotherhood, which stands by Hamas, or with the Egyptian govt, which is with the U.S. and Israeli govts? Or is she unrelated to both of those sides or factions?
If she's sane and therefore cares about others' lives, hence those of Palestinians and other Arabs aggressed by U.S.-Israel, then she certainly would never publicly say anything at all like suggesting that any men even so much or little as harrass girls, regardless of which ethnic, religious, ... groups they're members of.
I'm a Palestinian and I like to make a comment on using civilians as human shields. After Israel took over the West Bank and Gaza back in 1967 they began to establish military posts all around these lands.
Sooner than later civilians were transefered to these military posts, built on confiscated land and against international law, and became Jewish settlements.
I remember it as if it was yesterday when Israeli leaders kept telling everyone how important these settlements are to the defense of Israel.
I always thought it odd that Israel found pride in using civilians to guard itself against us savage Palestinians.
And now the Israelis are arguing that the Palestinians they're attacking in their own hometowns are the ones using civilians as shields.
I've always said that what makes the Israeli occupation so dreadful is not only the way they go about taking land or killing at will but also how they argue for it.
How the mainstream US and Israeli media covers the conflict and how its talkingheads frame their argument against Hamas, or Arafat, or whatever other Palestinian they find annoying even if he or she is only 2 years old.
If anything, this is what keeps me going, what makes me swear we will not give up until we find a peaceful solution or until Israel ends up getting rid of each and everyone of us.
philistinethear. Hello. YES. You hit a point that resonates with, infuriates and disgusts me-it's not just Israel's "killing at will but also how they argue for it."
Wherever you are, I shake your hand. Me too. The horrific slaughter is evil enough, but the twisted lies to justify it are SO revolting. They appall me as much as the murder. More if possible.
I pray for Palestine. post more philstinethear, azjoe.
Hi philistinethear: God bless your soul. As a US taxpayer, I apologize that my tax dollars has been used to subject Palestinians to unspeakable suffering. Please know that the US government does not speak for me on this issue. I pray for the day that Palestinians will walk under a beautiful sun in their own land without fear.
To all who post here: Palestine needs your love!