EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
In Support of Protest, Free Speech
In 2004 I ran for vice president of the United States representing the Green Party, an alternative political party. If Major League Baseball had only two teams, fewer people would care about that game, too.
I spoke at rallies, marched in parades, hand-delivered political documents to state houses across the nation: I even got to spend four days at Parris Island with the U.S. Marine Corps.
If you want to know why Marines are proud, spend a few days with them while they train.
After the election, our campaign challenged the election results in Ohio, which set me back on the road. Speaking around the country - repeatedly traveling to Washington, D.C. - I even got a gig hosting the festivities for the counterinaugural in MacPherson Square.
When people warn about the FBI bugging my phone or reading my e-mails, I laugh. Our country is all about protest and free speech. And anyway, they're watching the big fish, not little activists like me. George Orwell's "1984" Big Brother lives in a totalitarian anti-democratic nation.
The closest I've gotten to someone keeping tabs on me was my mom: When she died we found an old newspaper from 1979 with a picture of activists protesting apartheid and my face was circled.
But this week National Security Agency whistle-blower Russell Tice - who spilled the beans about our warrantless wiretapping program - dropped the dime again on the NSA. He told MSNBC that it has been watching the media, "24/7, and you know, 365 days a year."
Spying on U.S. citizens violates the Constitution. Illegally monitoring the press is tyranny. The press is the watchdog of the government, the eyes and ears of the electorate. The government and the people may not always like the media, but as Orwell said, "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they don't want to hear."
Let's say this went on in the Clinton years. And Linda Tripp's conversations with Newsweek's Michael Isikoff had been intercepted by the same White House she was telling sex stories about. Why, the White House could have tried to suppress the story.
Who does end up in secret prisons? Not members of the media? OK, how about people who talk to the media?
Now, I prefer to think my countrymen wouldn't do that to one another. But the problem with warrantless spying on U.S. citizens and suspended habeas corpus is that it becomes possible.
With the media in the cross hairs of the NSA only Congress was left to protect the liberties of the American people. Russell Tice explained that this too failed. The NSA spied on folks "in the middle of the country." Not foreign nationals, but folks who "never made a communication - foreign communications at all."
Tice said that Congress was powerless because "the agency would tailor some of their briefings to try to be deceptive."
I shouldn't be surprised - my friends tell me - if my big mouth and noisy keyboard get me watched. After all, I've got a history of this: I wrote to Richard Nixon when I was 11 years old asking him to do something about the race riots in my hometown so that they'd stop canceling school.
But when I write a column that defends gays or homeless veterans or the privacy of young women or the poor or the innocent victims of war, the few people who write invectives at the bottom of the column or to my e-mail think they have liberty and privacy. See, they refuse to sign their names or say where they work so that they can practice their hate speech with all the blessings a free country provides. But now, because they wrote to the media, they have no assurance of liberty or anonymity.
Thanks to Russell Tice we know that the NSA has been monitoring private correspondence with the press and that the government knows the origins of those electronic submissions. Once someone wrote to the press, the government got to decide whether to collect information on where he or she lived and what else was on his or her computer.
It's time to reread Orwell. He said, "When man turns tyrant, it is his own freedom he destroys."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


5 Comments so far
Show AllI'm sure, since the paranoid people who run these parts of the government have been data-mining, that quite a few people are listed in several places. The papers have reported how, in Maryland, the state police put several peaceful organizations and people on terrorist watch lists. Why would it be different for the alphabet spy agencies? But just because they have been doing this, and with their massive databases and supercomputers, doesn't mean they have made any sense out of the whole thing. It still takes a human mind to take what the computers can only do, which is collect and collate, and make a decision about what to be threatened by. I still think the thing we should do to make those databases and such useless is for everyone to get on as many as possible and overload the humans behind the keyboards.
Davd M. Kelley
ps. I'm not afraid!
Actually the media gets purposefully bombed and shot ( Iraq and Palestine). We should all know by now that all of us are being monitored through the ATT links with the rest of the telecom networks. Quest resisted (supposedly it was even before 9/11) and that CEO was quickly indicted with federal charges on stock trading. Kelly is right they are gathering just about everything but hopefully it will be an overload and along with their corruptness and ignorance they will not be able to use it effectively.
I like the Green Party, you guys walk the walk. Obama = a lot of talk. And the media and White House did try to supress the Monica thing. A guy named Matt Drudge broke it and to this day is hated by many that claim to support free speech. Many free speechers are all for shutting down Rush and all political talk radio. Why? If their ideas are so wrong, can't we trust America to figure that out? Who will get to decide what speech gets to be spoken? I have never had any issue with free speech. I don't care how many leftwing talk show there are, I know how to change the channel or turn it off.
Matt Drudge and Rush are not hated for telling the truth. The problem is right wing propagandists are given more air time than any accurate and unbiased reporting could ever hope to see.
Since the corporate media went into a frenzy of over-coverage of Monica, and continue with any other sensationalized and irrelevant story, the information a functional democracy needs is not available for the American people to "figure that out".
That's what you get when the "market decides'.
We live under a right wing, authoritarian, corporatized government. Thanks to Bush/Cheney, they are free to spy on any of us without a warrant. And they have a duplicate data feed of all our electronic communications, even yours, squarerootofone.
You and Limbaugh may feel secure with such a police state, but Constitution loving American patriots do not.
http://davedubya.com
Thank you, Ms. LaMarche, as a Democrat I am deeply grateful for your run. You and David Cobb managed to drive the final nail in the coffin of the Green Party which allowed Obama to win in 2008 (whereas McKInney and Nader combined got less than 1% of the vote). Again, thank you for your uninspired campaign.