EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Anti-Stimulus Crowd Blows a Gasket
The anti-stimulus crowd is getting desperate. The possibility that a young charismatic new president will push through an ambitious package that begins to set the economy right is truly terrifying to this crew. After all, if the economy begins to turn around and has largely recovered in three or four years, the Republican leadership can look forward to spending most of their careers in the political wilderness.
President Obama will cakewalk to re-election, and even his designated successor will be able to benefit from the glow of his success. If the New Deal serves as precedent, Congress will stay in Democratic hands long past the time that the current leaders of the Republican Party start collecting their pensions.
This explains the need that many Republicans feel to block the stimulus package. This desperation led them to fabricate a report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), which purportedly showed that most of the stimulus would not be spent in 2009, or even in 2010. Based on this report, they argued that President Obama's stimulus would do little to boost the economy out of recession. The Republicans managed to get a story to this effect in The Washington Post, in addition to extensive coverage in other major news outlets.
The only problem is that there was no CBO report. The CBO had done some very preliminary analysis of a package that was loosely modeled on a portion of President Obama's program. This preliminary analysis was done at the request of members of Congress to give them what was available at the time. It was not a full analysis that had gone through the CBO's normal review process, and was not posted on its web site where it could be assessed by budget analysts and the general public.
In short, this analysis was clearly not ready for prime time. But, when you're as desperate as the Republican leadership, you take what you can get. Unfortunately, many in the media got taken by this ploy and now have egg on their face as well.
The CBO will produce an analysis this week that examines the most recent version of the full stimulus bill. This analysis will provide a much more serious basis for assessing the proposals than the CBO "report" invented by the Republican leadership. It will provide a full analysis of the proposal, including an explanation of the methodology that the CBO used in its calculations.
In this respect, it is important to caution against one possible limitation of the CBO methodology. The CBO typically relies on rules of thumb in calculating spendout rates for types of projects.
For example, as a rule of thumb, the spending for highways in the first year after an appropriation may be just a small percentage of the total cost of the highway, with spending in the second year being a little bit higher. It takes time to plan a highway and to bid out contracts. Based on analysis of the time between the passage of appropriations and the actual spending, the CBO can project the time period over which a wide range of appropriations will actually be spent.
However, these rules of thumbs are likely to understate the spendout rate for the projects chosen as part of the stimulus package. These projects are being selected specifically because they are ready to go, with plans already in hand and contracts ready to be submitted for bids.
Furthermore, because of the severity of the economic downturn, contractors are likely to be able to move much more quickly than would usually be the case. Typically, contractors will have to find time to fit a government project in their queue of other work. With the sharp downturn in the construction sector, there are likely to be plenty of contractors who are ready to move almost immediately after a contract is signed.
Finally, the bill threatens state and local governments with the loss of funding if they do not move quickly to spend any money appropriated. For these reasons, the CBO's rules of thumb on spendout rates may substantially understate the amount of spending that will be carried through in the next two years.
The Republicans have raised a serious issue in questioning the rate at which the stimulus will be spent. The plan should be scrutinized to determine if there are not ways to get money into the economy more quickly. But this effort requires looking at evidence and data, not invented CBO reports.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



52 Comments so far
Show AllWhat I can't figure out is why these Democrats won't do anything. They seem willing to spend most of this 85 billion just to appease Republicans so they can say it was a bi-partisan effort. Can you imagine a Republican giving a damn about such a thing?
The repugs did the bipartisan thing too. They had good leiberman agreeing with them on everything, and they made a big issue then that it had been "a bipartisan effort."
Baker's blog says CBO now states that their projection is that 62% will be spent through 2010. (thanks for the info teddy)
All the Republicans want to do is be obstructionists. The difficulty in playing this role is its hard to get elected with no POSITIVE track record of what they have done instead of a long list of what they have prevented others in doing.
So the bottom line rationale here is if Republicans do a bail out, it's OK. If Democrats want to do a bail out, it's not OK. That's called partisan BS.
What we need to solve the financial crisis is a retroactive 100% tax on the fortunes made during the Bush administration. There's too much wealth concentrated in too few hands and it's time to do confiscation. It would be worth it just to hear the pigs squeal.
Just the opposite has already happened. The 110th Congress approved tax revisions that will allow homebuilders who don't make a profit on paper in 2008 and beyond to juxtapose those figures against the huge profits they made during the housing boom, and get a refund from the gov. on income tax they paid on those huge profits.
The NAHB is a very effective lobbying organization.
Isn't it though!
Yes, and we should work on repealing the tax cuts - not just the Bush cuts, but all the way back to the Reagan tax cuts.
As a result of the New Deal under FDR, it was 20 years before the GOP saw the inside of the White House. That's why they are so desparate to torpedo any economic stimulus.
The bottom line for them is power.
The bottom line is their CON STITUENCY!
Though highways are an important part of the communications network; it would be better to use huge amounts of the highway money to buy "train" type of public transit from GM/Ford.
This money could be used to transition the USA to a more efficient public transit system and put GM/Ford to work building the new system.
SOS in Washington.
It's amazing the way tax cuts are figuring into the stimulus package- middle class tax cuts in the income range between $90 and $250 grand a year, a group I figure could be most aptly described as 'major campaign contributors'. I suppose this is expected to stimulate consumption, if not on major foreign vacations then on erotic messages, if not the most expensive entrees at the nearest upscale resturant then a modest one, if not a 'total home security sysyem' then at least a few more lights and alarms, if not a mercedes then one of those prestiguous hybrids. Add a few tax cuts, subsidies and protections for the major corporations together with additional declines in hourly wages, benefits and pensions and- BINGO!- the WHOLE PROBLEM of the recession from the standpoint of the people who REALLY COUNT is solved!
"The possibility that a young charismatic new president will push through an ambitious package that begins to set the economy right is truly terrifying to this crew."
The problem I'm having with this is that the Republican stimulas packages either did nothing or has dissappeared into a bottomless pit without helping the economy at all. I don't see anything in this plan that will do any better. $75 million for a school lunch program may be admirable if needed, but how does that stimulate the economy? I'd also count on a lot of this money ending up in contractors pockets at the state level.
The only thing that will stimulate our economy, provide ongoing economic stability is Jobs. My view is that we should be doing everrything in our power to return jobs to the US, creating new manufacturing jobs and trying to make sure that the money from these jobs is spent here and not sent out of the country.
Who wants to work in America? Not the politicians, not the financial captains, hardly anyone it seems anymore. But, you're right. The idea is that we have to start producing real things. Real jobs. Homo habilis, tool maker. Not money maker, not law maker. Time to begin taking pride in producing Something of use.
Thats my opinion. We must produce something other than paper to push around.
Uhh, that $75M for a school lunch program is going to spent. On food, on contractors. How will that not help the economy? How will that not result in Jobs?
Contractors, and the people they hire, are human citizens too. How will that not result in Jobs?
Its a one time expense. A lot of that money sent to the schools will never make it to the food line. Do we need a school lunch program? Possibly, but not as part of a stimulas pkg.
If it doesn't produce lasting jobs its just borrowing more money for a single trip to the shopping mall.
Aside from that, I have great doubts that the government can stop devaluation by spending money. It hasn't helped so far. Didn't work in Japan.
In any case, emergency assistance for transit agencies -- which was eliminated from the House Transportation Committee's proposal -- would provide immediate stimulus, saving jobs and preventing fare hikes that would reduce workers' purchasing power. More on this at http://communitymediaworkshop.org/newstips/?p=406
I don't think the stimulus package will make it until the issue of rescinding tax cuts from those making 200k and above along with reigning in bailouts to Wall Street and war spending are taken into account. I think that this stimulus bill will undergo major revisions for the next few months as our new Congress and White House sit down and honestly deal with the economic crisis unlike the previous administration.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
Look at the good news: the Republicans still have nothing but short-term tactics, and they're the same ones they've been using for many years. They haven't changed even though they don't work all that well any more. Once upon a time the fake CBO number would have been a permanent part of the discussion, and Democrats would have to take that as their frame.
Two bad elections, and they haven't learned. We have to keep countering their spin and falsehoods, keep yelling at media and Democrats who fall for it, and watch for the Republicans to show they've learned new tactics, if not new strategies. For now, they will continue to spin half-truths that take greater effort to explain why they're misleading. Thank you Dean Baker for beating back this one.
Looking at this stimulas package further there seems to be a lot of pork in it. And I don't care who raised the pig, pork is pork. The very thing we were promised we would not have.
Where can I find the text of the bill so I can see what the pork is you're referring to? It's bad enough that just about every bill gets stuffed with it but if we taxpayers could only see it before they vote, it would be nice. Thanks.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
There doesn't seem to be a copy of the whole bill available. So far I have found bits and pieces. $50 million outlay for the National Endowment for the Arts (SF Chronicle) $276 million to fix the computer systems at the State Department, $44 million for repairs at the Agriculture Department headquarters in Washington.
$200 million to rehabilitate the National Mall.
$360 million for new child care centers at military bases.
$1.8 billion to repair National Park Service facilities.
$500 million for the Transportation Security Administration to install bomb detectors at airports.
$600 million for General Services Administration to replace older vehicles with alternative fuel vehicles.
$2.5 billion to upgrade low-income housing.
$400 million for NASA scientists to conduct climate change research.
$426 million to construct facilities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
$800 million to clean up Superfund sites.
$150 million for the Coast Guard to repair or remove bridges deemed a hazard to navigation.
$6.7 billion to renovate and improve energy efficiency at federal buildings.
$400 million to replace the Social Security Administration's 30-year-old National Computer Center.
Interesting. I'll check more out on it. Thanks. The tricky thing about pork barrell is that some of it looks so good that one feels they'll actually get some of it. In fact, I'd say that just reading the list, I was seduced by some of the pork while some of it didn't look like it was needed. For example, on the 6.7b, I was taken by energy efficiency but then I almost overlooked the fact that it was federal buildings only. Pork barrel spending is so tricky to tackle no doubt. In fact, you should see how my conservative friends and coworkers speak up against pork barell spending and yet they'll without realizing it support it when it comes to say repairing the military bases, subsidizing farms (corporate ones mainly), providing more money to churches and anti-abortion counseling centers designed to scare women against abortion, etc ... I tell them it's pork barral and the next thing you know is they suddenly say "NO ! NO ! NO ! It's called defending the country and life !!"
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
It may not strictly be considered stimulus, but I am all for $800 million to clean up superfund sites. It is in reality probably just a drop in the bucket, considering that the Bush admin slashed funding for superfund site cleanup, leaving horribly toxic areas to affect the lives and health of those who live nearby. And all the stimulus in the world won't help when you are living near one of these sites--just ask the people in Tennessee residing where the sludge from "clean coal" production escaped its dykes and flooded the area. As our friend Mullins who posts here often says, "Appalachia is now a 3rd world country.
Thats one of the few things that would not strictly be considered stimulus that I do think could be left in, but lets pay for it with money we don't give to states to bail out their irresponsible spending.
Well, the issue is, all those programs, on their own are acceptable, even good programs. Improving housing, renovating buildings to be more efficient, that will result in jobs.
The things is to ensure that that pork is efficiently used, and that you don't have people pocketing huge sums, way beyond the value of the work / services they render.
Yes, most of these programs are acceptable on their own merits, but what do they produce other than some one offs.
Renovating buildings for energy efficiency? How about homes instead of government buildings. How about local stimulas rather than mostly in Washington and a few other locations. New windows helps a manufacturing plant, installation priovides local employment....energy efficency in that house frees up mopney for that homeowner to spend.
Extrapolate this idea out and to me this is just mostly pork. $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts? Thats embarassing.
All these jobs that are being lost, wouldn't it be a good idea to make sure companies are not retaining H1B workers instead of American workers? Every dollar that is sent out of the country loses the multipliar effect on our economy.
When it comes right down to it the Democrats and Republicans are the same: as in SAME MESSAGE, they just use different language. The influx of pork, some of which might not be bad, as long as it is for a worthy project and not just a giveaway to a wealthy donor, would have been in the bill even if Congress was filled with John-McCains, who said that he would always vote against bills that had pork in them. (Actually it was earmarks, but they're the same thing.) The Democrats will say they want a bill that helps out the majority of the people, but in the end, the benefits will go to the rich. They know this, and you'd think that most of America would have learned this by now. But November showed that we, as a group of people, have really short memories: in October Congress passed, over massive objections by the masses, the $850 Billion Splurge, I mean bailout, and most of them were still re-elected! They count on us having short memories and attention spans. Now back to American Idol...
Oooops.
The anti-stimulus crowd is getting desperate. After all, if the economy begins to turn around and has largely recovered in three or four years, the Republican leadership can look forward to spending most of their careers in the political wilderness.
The most famous words from the Vietnam War were, "We had to destroy this village in order to save it." This is now the Death Wish, the mantra, of the Republicans regarding this nation. If we cannot come back into power, we will destroy the nation and then go somewhere else and repeat the process. McCain got 46% of the vote in the recent election. The Death Wish party is not that far away from seizing us by the throat again.
M O R D E C H A I,
I sincerely hope that you're correct:
… you'll have to pull my dead cold ( entitled to corporape welfare ) fingers,
from my throttling grip upon my taxpaying chump's throat …
An America that is not despondently oppressing it's own people and sitting on top of those of the rest of the world -- is just not worthy of its existence.
[____ It's __ M Y _ W A Y ____]
or
[________ N O _ W A Y ________]
at all
Without knowing how truly bad things can get
most people will likely go back fast asleep
Namaste
Look, I am a Liberal, and certainly no Republican, but I do NOT support this so called stimulus plan. I am sick of self proclaimed liberal journalist labeling anyone against the stimulus as brain dead hunch backed neo-cons.
Our current crisis was caused because of to much cheap credit and aggressive monetary expansion. The cure is not more of the same. Where will these trillions in deficits come from? The cannot be borrowed. Foreigners cannot handle more than about 500 billion and even that is unlikely as they are starting to use their reserves for themselves. That means it will be printed. There is simply NO WAY this will do anything other than create high inflation and devaluation of the dollar.
The current plan seeks to cure an alcoholic by giving him more and stronger alcohol. Anyone but the most deluded can see this is not going to work. The alcoholic, the USA, needs to admit it has a problem, and then start a 12 step program for real change.
expatincebu: "Look, I am a Liberal, and certainly no Republican, but I do NOT support this so called stimulus plan. "
Ever hear of the expression that you will judged by the company you keep?
Well, you might call yourself a Liberal, but on this issue you are in complete agreement with McCain and the Republicans. You might want to rethink your position...
Remember, most economists agree that Hoover deepened and prolonged the Great Depression by not spending. It was FDR who got us out of the Depression only through huge increases in spending.
It might seem counter-intuitive, like many aspects of economics, but it is the right thing to do.
That's a capitalist fairy tale. The people need only reminding that the REAL economy consists of trade largely between, of, by and for the people, the acquisition of necessities, food, shelter, clothing. This economy remains stable through all of wall st's implosions. It is only the elites' fright tactics that tear the people away from the security of this knowledge. We don't need no stimulation.
Well define "necessities". Food, shelter and clothing, you say? What type of food? Just enough food to exist? What type of shelter? Simply a roof over your head, and heating? What type of clothing?
You might rant and rail against consumerist culture as much as you want, but people all over the world, regardless of whether they are brainwashed or not, are not simply satisfied with the bare necessities of existence.
Is that computer that you made your post on a "necessity"? If not, why do you have it? Is the internet a "necessity"? If not, why are you posting here? What is a necessity to someone, might not be one to another, and vice versa. Who gets to define "necessity"?
Thanks....beat me to it.
joehope
First I'd say that WW2 got us out of the depression. Statistics pretty much prove that.
Secondly do you have knowledge of where the first stimulas money went? I don't.
Thirdly, on what basis do you claim "it's the right thing to do"? It's not that hard to recognize pork.
Liberals as well as Conservatives are going to have to make a change. Business as usual will no longer serve, of that, I'm sure.
4 years from now, if the economy improves, it will be because the Republicans were responsible for the primary strategy, reigning in government spending, and negating a weak and ineffective president and Democratic Party..... or so they will claim. If the economy is still struggling, well.... the Democrats will certainly be entirely to blame. As Bob Herbert noted... who's going to listen to these guys? (except for writers on the Daily Show, or Colbert Report)
The Democrats 2012 Reelection Stimulus or Why We Need Medicare for All ...
The stimulus as currently drawn will NOT kick in until 2011 and 2012.
Not so fast Baker ... Reuters~
"WASHINGTON, Jan 26 (Reuters) - The Democratic stimulus package the U.S. Congress will weigh on Wednesday falls billions of dollars short of President Barack Obama's goal to pump most of the money into the economy quickly, a report released on Monday showed.
The $816 billion package will pour some $525.5 billion, or 64 percent, via spending and tax cuts into the ailing economy within 19 months, according to the report issued late on Monday by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.
Last week, Obama's budget director, Peter Orszag, told lawmakers the administration's goal was to pump at least 75 percent of the money from the stimulus package into the economy by Sept. 30, 2010.
The report expands on another from the same office Republicans had touted last week as showing that less than 40 percent of the stimulus money would filter into the economy over the 19-month period. Democrats complained report was a partial review and CBO on Monday concurred."
Dear Mr. Baker, even if this report is preliminary the fact of the matter is that this stimulus will NOT work for at least 18 months! Being the skeptic that I am, this stimulus looks like it really starts kicking in just before the 2012 elections. What a coincidence!
This is exactly why we need Medicare for All. We could have the stimulus within a year ... everybody with health care coverage, businesses helped, the under and uninsured helped with state and local government coffers being filled once again. But NO, the Dems are playing politics with the lives of the American people to have a big spending spree for their reelections.
This Doesn't Pass the Smell Test Baker.
The peoples's deference to the elites on policy decisions such as whether to stimulate the economy is a crime. It turns the people into slaves of the elites. Do we need more roads? The people haven't a clue but they should. The fact is we don't need more roads. We don't have an ailing economy. We have an over-heated economy. We have too many roads already. But the elites push more roads on us, more economic overheating, to keep us addicted to over-production and over-consumption. We the people have a great opportunity today to put a real dent in the elites' gilded establishment by defying their cry for economic stimuli. This will further discredit the elites, toward the tipping point where they will lose their grip on power. The power will then disperse out across the country and settle into all of the local communities where it belongs. Get to work, people!
America's infrastructure couldn't be much worse...
Here's how the American Society of Civil Engineers last graded us:
Aviation: D+
Bridges: C
Dams: D
Drinking Water: D-
Energy: D
Hazardous Waste: D
Navigable Waterways: D-
Public Parks & Recreation: C-
Rail: C-
Roads: D
Schools: D
Security: I
Solid Waste: C+
Transit: D+
Wastewater: D-
The final grade for our country's infrastructure: D
Our government placed our critical infrastructure on the back burner for too long. It needs to be addressed......and now!
Thank you for this list. I hope that the crafters of the stimulus have one like it.
Boy, you should see some of our roads. We certainly have some that need repairing and bridges too.
"The power will then disperse out across the country and settle into all of the local communities where it belongs."
But we certainly agree where the power rightfully belongs.
No more bipartisanship shit. The Republicans jammed it to us for a quarter-century- yes, even during Clinton the Triangulator. Even now, they are still at it, even in the face of their crushing defeat. Show them no quarter. They ruined the country and the world. They should just sit down and shut up, especially the known-alcoholic boozer Bohner. Who would take directions around the block from that guy? Or Rush Limbaugh, the hillbilly-heroin junkie.
As for deficit spending, the reason the Depression lasted longer than it should have was that there was NOT ENOUGH deficit government spending, due to the obstruction of coutry club Republicans like Mellon - sound familiar? That all changed with WW2. Government could then spend freely -how so, you may ask, if they could not before the war? And it was continued with LIBERAL spending afterwards - education, science, housing, et al- which created a modern social structure the envy of the world. But it took a world war for Republicans to loosen their deathgrip on money -that is, it took a mortal threat to them. Even so, Prescott 'granddaddy' Bush helped finance the Nazis with his bank, until it was closed as a treasonous organization. Hey, it was just business, just one fascist to another.
As we will be forced to clean up the Quadrillion-dollar-mess the Republicans and Capitalists made of themselves, the pigs, just forget about complaining about ANY amount of government spending for the good of the country, for the good of the people. And let's vote to STICK the Republican Party and the banksters and Wall Street with the bill for their blowout. After all, it was their party.
Desperate they should damn well be.
The Right have been humiliated beyond belief.
Think about it. All that cheating. All the dirty tricks, propaganda, hate radio, right-controlled media, Rovean politics, Swiftboating, smear machines, corrupt Justic Department prosecutions, gerrymandering, vote caging, vote suppression, voter intimidation, vote-flipping, and nastiness--AND THEY STILL COULDN'T WIN!
Since the Right in America are mostly aging white males with brittle egos, you can imagine the world of hurt the poor bastards find themselves in. I'm sure their recent setbacks have shortened their lives by many years.
A favorite apothegm of mine is that the worst thing that can happen to Republicans is to get into power. Of course, it would all be a lot funnier if people weren't getting killed.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news.
Wait.
No I don't.
http://www.iht.com/articles/reuters/2009/01/25/europe/OUKWD-UK-FINANCIAL-UN-DRUGS.php
Here's why there has been a mild bump up in the stock market.
The funny thing is, a gent named Mike Ruppert detailed all of this in his book 'Crossing the Rubicon', and also laid out how a 'controlled fast crash' would be initiated to manage the collapse of Western society based on the consumption of oil.
As we all know by now, the massive outsourcing of jobs worldwide mixed with criminally risky lending and investment decisions have left the ENTIRE world at risk of a collapse. Just look at Iceland, Greece and Latvia for examples of what will be coming for us all, very soon. Britain's central bank came within THREE HOURS of total collapse on Octeber 10 last year.
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_G/threadview?m=tm&bn=7631&tid=947358&mid=947389&tof=21&frt=2
And don't expect any help from Asia. China is in the midst of it's own melt down. 1 million + are unemployed in China right now. And I am certain that number is MUCH higher than is being reported. The Chinese were making noises last fall they were going to dump the US dollar and pull their investments.
It doesn't matter how much fiat money you pump into the system. It's like a jug ith a broken out bottom. No matter how fast you pump water in, it all just falls to the ground.
The 'money' that Obama now, and Bush two months ago, want to use to 'stimulate' the economy JUST... DOES... NOT... EXIST! It's all 1s and 0s on a computer. You can create trillions at the touch of a key.
But without actual physical value, such money is WORTHLESS!
So the bankers (who despite their protests otherwise) turn to the one sourse they KNOW has value, that people will buy no matter how high the price.
Drug money. Laundered in plain sight, and reinvested in 'legit' activities.
Don't say that the government would put a stop to such pracices. They know all about it. Hell, they are often the ones controlling and transporting it. Just ask the CIA. And just for fun, look up the story of 'The Boys on the Tracks', and see how the trail of drug money led into the office of then Vice-President George H.W. Bush...
Walk in peace.
If nothing is done, then layoffs and crashing consumption and more layoffs will cycle us into a dreadful condition.
We need to use the stimulus to shore up employment (and there are plenty of areas in which the nation needs workers), leading to upward movement in consumption by those who need what they buy, leading to creation or protection of those jobs.
Longer term, we must, simply must, begin to rebuild America's manufacturing capacity and either limit importation or insist on worker and environmental protection in those nations with which we trade.
This will not allow for the luxuries of the bubble years; but kvetching and doing nothing will certainly not work.
Remember that last "stimulus?" What happened to that one? Oh yeah, the head bankers pocketed the entire thing and then laid off a few thousand workers. You people are SUCKERS if you give the bankers even MORE tax money to blow on commodes and hoard.
Suckers! Chumps! Morons! That's what you are. Handing tax money on a silver platter to corrupt politicians and corporations that do not have your interests at heart. The "stimulus" is going to be a stimulus of plutocrat's bank accounts, it will NOT create jobs.
You're fighting the entirely wrong argument! You have a completely fallacious understanding of cause and effect. The stimulus will NOT create new jobs. It will destroy old jobs - inflation cripples household spending. Printing trillions causes inflation. Damn are you libs stupid - cursing the people warning you about a pickpocket!
Now, now, Dammerung, lay off that caffeine.... We're doing all we can to stave off the vast trouble that "conservatives", with their economic views, have got us mired in. The stimulus doesn't have to be more for the plutocrats (that's all we've had for the last eight years, after all). If the states can be shored up, that will be to the good, providing both jobs (for medical, educational, and social workers, as well as support, clerical, and other personnel) and also help for those who are gasping as they go under.
If you are a "conservative", then you might not want to "damn" us. Where were your warnings about pickpockets when Bush and Co. were being elected?