Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- Remember All the Children, Mr. President
- Bolivia's Morales Calls for New Era of 'Peace and Unity' to Break Greed of Capitalism
- Thinking the Unthinkable: On Mental Health, My Son, and Gun Violence
- What If All the World’s Debt Just Went Away
Popular content
Today's Top News
Punishing the Palestinians
In the long sixty-year tortured history of the Palestinian expulsion from their lands, Congress has maintained that it is always the Palestinians, the Palestinian Authority, and now Hamas who are to blame for all hostilities and their consequences with the Israeli government.
The latest illustration of this Washington puppet show, backed by the most modern weapons and billions of taxpayer dollars annually sent to Israel, was the grotesquely one-sided Resolutions whisked through the Senate and the House of Representatives.
While a massive bombing and invasion of Gaza was underway, the resolution blaming Hamas for all the civilian casualties and devastation-99% of it inflicted on Palestinians-zoomed through the Senate by voice vote and through the House by a vote of 390 to 5 with 22 legislators voting present.
There is more dissent against this destruction of Gaza among the Israeli people, the Knesset, the Israeli media, and Jewish-Americans than among the dittoheads on Capitol Hill.
The reasons for such near-unanimous support for Israeli actions-no matter how often they are condemned by peace advocates such as Bishop Desmond Tutu, United Nations resolutions, the World Court and leading human rights groups inside and outside of Israel, are numerous. The pro-Israeli government lobby, and the right-wing Christian evangelicals, lubricated by campaign money of many Political Action Committees (PACs) certainly are key.
There is also more than a little bigotry in Congress against Arabs and Muslims, reinforced by the mass media yahoos who set new records for biased reporting each time this conflict erupts.
The bias is clear. It is always the Palestinians' fault. Right-wingers who would never view the U.S. government as perfect see the Israeli government as never doing anything wrong. Liberals who do not hesitate to criticize the U.S. military view all Israeli military attacks, invasions and civilian devastation as heroic manifestations of Israeli defense.
The inversion of history and the scope of amnesia know no limits. What about the fact that the Israeli government drove Palestinians from their lands in 1947-48 with tens of thousands pushed into the Gaza strip. No problem to Congress.
Then the fact that the Israeli government cruelly occupied, in violation of UN resolutions, the West Bank and Gaza in 1967 and only removed its soldiers and colonists from Gaza (1.5 million people in a tiny area twice the size of the District of Columbia) in 2005. To Congress, the Palestinians deserved it.
Then when Hamas was freely elected to run Gaza, the Israeli authorities cut off the tax revenues on imports that belonged to the Gaza government. This threw the Gazans into a fiscal crisis-they were unable to pay their civil servants and police.
In 2006, the Israelis added to their unrelieved control of air, water and land around the open-air prison by establishing a blockade. The natives became restless. Under international law, a blockade is an act of war. Primitive rockets, called by reporters "wildly inaccurate" were fired into Israel. During this same period, Israeli soldiers and artillery and missiles would go into Gaza at will and take far more lives and cause far more injuries than those incurred by those rockets. Civilians-especially children, the infirm and elderly-died or suffered week after week for lack of medicines, medical equipment, food, electricity, fuel and water which were embargoed by the Israelis.
Then the Israeli bombing followed by the invasion during the past three weeks with what prominent Israeli writer Gideon Levy called "a brutal and violent operation...far beyond what was needed for protecting the people in its south." Mr. Levy observed what the president of the United Nations General Assembly, Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann called a war against "a helpless and defenseless imprisoned population."
The horror of being trapped from fleeing the torrent of the most modern weapons of war from the land, air and seas is reflected in this passage from Amira Hass, writing in the leading Israeli newspaper Haaretz:
"The earth shaking under your feet, clouds of choking smoke, explosions like a fireworks display, bombs bursting into all-consuming flames that cannot be extinguished with water, mushroom clouds of pinkish-red smoke, suffocating gas, harsh burns on the skin, extraordinary maimed live and dead bodies."
Ms. Hass is pointing to the use of new anti-civilian weapons used on the Gazan people. So far there have been over 1100 fatalities, many thousands of injuries and the destruction of homes, schools, mosques, hospitals, pharmacies, granaries, farmer's fields and many critical public facilities. The clearly marked UN headquarters and UN school were smashed, along with stored medicines and food supplies.
Why? The Congressional response: "Hamas terrorists" everywhere. Sure, defending their Palestinian families is called terrorism. The truth is there is no Hamas army, airforce and navy up against the fourth most powerful military in the world. As one Israeli gunner on an armored personnel carrier frankly said to The New York Times: "They are villagers with guns. They don't even aim when they shoot."
Injured Gazans are dying in damaged hospital corridors, bleeding to death because rescuers are not permitted to reach them or are endangered themselves. Thousands of units of blood donated by Jordanians are stopped by the Israeli blockade. Israel has kept the international press out of the Gazan killing fields.
What is going on in Gaza is what Bill Moyers called it earlier this month - "state terrorism." Already about 400 children are known to have died. More will be added who are under the rubble.
Since 2002, more than 50 Arab and Muslim nations have had a standing offer, repeated often, that if Israel obeys several UN resolutions and withdraws to the 1967 borders leaving 22 percent of the original Palestine for an independent Palestinian state, they will open full diplomatic relations and there will be peace. Israel has declined to accept this offer.
None of these and many other aspects of this conflict matter to the Congress. Its members do not want to hear even from the Israeli peace movement, composed of retired generals, security chiefs, mayors, former government ministers, and members of the Knesset. In 60 years these savvy peace advocates have not been able to give one hour of testimony before a Congressional Committee.
Maybe members of Congress may wish to weigh the words of the founder of Israel, David Ben-Gurion, years ago when he said:
"There has been anti-Semitism the Nazis Hitler Auschwitz but was that their [the Palestinian's] fault? They only see one thing: We have come here and stolen their country."
Doesn't that observation invite some compassion for the Palestinian people and their right to be free of Israeli occupation, land and water grabs and blockades in the 22 percent left of Palestine?
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


194 Comments so far
Show AllEXCELLENTLY Sweeping post about fundamental Truths! Thanks for your post!
Too bad no politician is willing or able to explain the unconditional support Israel receives, apart from economic and militray aid. And too bad, not many voters are interested enough to put some pressure on them. The Palistinians are paying the price for this attitude, and for more than 60 years.
Perhaps it is a 'christian' thing. I mean we do have two reverands saying prayers at the inauguration on tuesday. Israel is the 'holy land' and they probably don't want the 'infidels' in charge. Especially during the 'tribulation'. That is an observation.
Where is this so-called "State of Israel"?
The rulers of this so-called "State of Israel" refuse to say where the boundaries are.
Their god faxed them a map and it includes most of the Middle East. What is strange is that most often throughout history the Arabs let the Jews live in peace and the christians were the ones who most often slaughtered the jews.
Thats true!
Most countries have defined boundaries, Israel is the exception, the two blue bars on their flag represent the rivers Nile and Euphrates. does Israel covet it's neighbor's land?
Sophie Scholl-The Final Days
China, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, and I'm sure many others also claim undefined boundaries, which they claim through military occupation. Are these not states too?
Pakistan and India have disputed areas that have remained the same for decades and do have proposed boundries in them. I believe China might still have disputed areas with the afore mentioned. But again it has remained the same and with proposed boundries for decades. Afghanistan did not have disputed areas when their tourist bureau provide me with a map. israel is unique in that it is continuously claiming more land. Also it has this delusional Greater israel concept which is anything they feel like stealing on any given day.
Iraq and Afghanistan suffered greatly by our occupation.
The USA government did a great job with all the news black outs over here.
Th surge served two purposes, wiping out entire villages in Iraq to wipe out the evil ( Terrorists, Al-Qaeda, insurgents, civil disobedience, war lords ).
Control of the Main Stream Media for the news black outs so Americans could not see or hear about the carnage during the surge.
Why? Because Americans cant handle the truth? Or because the powers that be would hear from millions of us to stop the surge.
One thing is for sure, War breeds War. Cha-Ching , USA military industrial complex.
BornFreeMen
The War on Terror is a War on our civil Liberties.
Are we going to allow a hand full of criminals and our fully bribed congress to perpetuate a never ending war?
Both of my liberal Democratic senators voted for this resolution in favor of Israel's massacre of the Palestinians that Ralph Nader alludes to. My representative is a Bush zombie in a gerrymandered district (he got reelected), so it's not worth bothering.
Pressure doesn't seem to work. We aren't represented.
-TIA
Unfortunately, you are right. I have sent countless letters and emails and all I ever get back is a form letter, filled with propaganda worthy of Fox News. 100% of the Senate passed a bill supporting Israel's "right to defent itself" and all but a few in the House went along as well. I'm not sure this would have received as much support in the Israeli Knesset!
... dont' complain too much about the political atmosphere. Look at CNN, WashPost, etc.
Haartez in Isreal is more even handed than the media here, and that is very sad for a "free" "democracy".
I had admired Senator Udall as an honest man of integrity. Do the congress people sell their souls just to retain their seats or is it something else? Do they go to Washington and morph into monsters?
You think he's bad enough? Try my mis-rep Stephanie Herseth Sandlin ! She'll show you a real blue dog to be ashamed of !
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
I guess now that I'm living in DC the only person I can complain to is the President?
Let's give the Jews Texas an call that Israel.
Just consider what that move would get rid of and what problems it would solve.
To be honest I doubt they would want Dubya and his merry band of fundamentalists as neighbors!
Thats the point.
I was hoping we could give Texas back to Mexico...along with all the Texans (after W has gone back, dear Lord!). To be fair, I'd give people 12 hours to head north or learn Spanish.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
You do know that Bush isn't a Texan but rather a yankee, born of Connecticut.
Seeing how the State of Texas is the 10th largest economy in the world i think that it wouldn't be Mexico controlling Texas but rather Texas controlling Mexico...
(lol)
Thanks. You defused my irritation at the joehopes and other trolls. And best yet, the glimmer of justice that lies just below the surface of your humor.
"no gods, no masters" --m. sanger
Much as I would love to see Zionists and Texans trying to live together, I believe true justice would have been giving the Jews a large part if not all of Germany.
Ethnically cleanse not, that ye be not cleansed.
Can anyone tell me the total number of Palestinians killed since about 1920 by zionist ( including refugee camp massacres in Lebanon and elsewhere) and the total zionist deaths for that same period?
I did a quick google search, I can't really tell, but I did find figures that said the total 'avoidable mortality', which apparently means deaths that would not have happened in a peaceful and decently-run country (which few in that area are anyway), is upwards of 500,000 or more, compared to 4,000 total Jewish deaths (not sure if that includes the actual wars with other countries, or just deaths from Palestinian actions). Don't think of this as a very accurate figure though...the vast majority of Palestinian deaths seem to have come from poverty and related problems, not direct violence. After all, the figures in America are around 18,000 who die every year because they are too poor to afford healthcare. As for direct violence, best figure I saw was about 5,000 Palestinian deaths since the 2000 uprisings.
Thanks zman!
It was, and is, 100 to 1. But then it is the "1" that gets all the sympathy. Who said things in this world have to be fair?
The situation is comparable to what the Nazis did to the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto.
And why were the European powers so adamant about protecting the Jewish people by establishing the State of Israel in Palestine. Because they did not trust themselves not to repeat the monstrosities of the Nazis regime and another "final solution"?
And is it not a very similiar "final solution" what the Israelis are now contemplating, at least subliminally embedded in their twisted rationale for these latest attacks, in the inchoate populist outcry to "defend Israel" against rocket attacks which claim but a tiny fraction of lives compared to auto-accidents on their frantic freeways?
I cannot imagine that the long term outcome of this hideous 'police action' will be anything but a tragedy for Israel itself. It is so misguided, such a bad decision, so pointless, so cruel, so ill-calculated to achieve even its own stated goals.
CORRECT
I feel as though I'm in the throes of revisiting a history wherein the Nazi Germans emerged victorious and ruled with impunity thereafter. Israel and the US lead the world now in war crimes with the EU tagging along because...well because that's what they've been doing for the last 60 years.
My own "liberal" Democrat Rep. who, 7 years ago stood with us at our antiwar demos (before he was elected to the House), voted "yes" on that wretched Israel's right to self-defense blah blah blah resolution. When questioned, his only response was a feeble "they had no choice" and you can bet the "they" in reference wasn't a Palestinian.
We the people are terribly insulted by the elites' refusal to adopt our universalist code of ethics and their insistence to instead embrace the law of the wild. A civilization built on the law of the wild? No thanks. Pathetic. All of the luxuries of civilization are a mockery under the law of the wild. What is the purpose of our civic institutions? To impose orderliness on the battle for zero-sum domination? Hilarious if it weren't so pathetic. Our civic institutions are chartered to extinguish the battle for zero-sum domination, not to regulate it, and most obviously not to perpetrate it. We gotta boycott the elites!
I just don't see killing anybody is the solution. Israel is a crazy killer! It is beyond any reasonable proportion. And the children! Shame, not death, to Israel. May they wake up and see the blood on their hands. I don't know how this could ever be made right again.
How can this lack of controversy in Congress over such brutality be understood? Nader cites several reasons, but makes no mention of the influence of the weapons industry in the U.S. The role of the weapons industry is almost never cited in articles on this issue.
see http://www.wrmea.com/html/us_aid_to_israel.htm#Taxpayer
"This may mean that U.S. government has given more federal aid to the average Israeli citizen in a given year than it has given to the average American citizen." "Total U.S. aid to Israel is approximately one-third of the American foreign-aid budget, even though Israel comprises just .001 percent of the world's popultion and already has one of the world's higher per capita incomes."
"Matti Peled, former Israeli major general and Knesset member, told Zunes that he and most Israeli generals believe this aid is 'little more than an American subsidy to U.S. arms manufacturers,' considering that the majority of military aid to Israel is used to buy weapons from the U.S. Moreover, arms to Israel create more demand for weaponry in Arab states. According to Zunes, 'the Israelis announced back in 1991 that they supported the idea of a freeze in Middle East arms transfers, yet it was the United States that rejected it.' "
Sioux Rose
OLD TOWN: Bingo! You nailed it...
"With Labor in power in Israel in the past, it was always possible to think that a two-state solution was possible between Israelis and Palestinians. This cannot be said about the Jabotinsky right. They do not believe that a settlement with the Arabs is feasible. They believe, as Barak has said, that the bombardment of Gaza must continue until Hamas is destroyed. Hamas is an unacceptable element in the region, as they envisage it. Israel was humiliated by Hizbollah in Lebanon two years ago. It must reestablish its position of total military domination of the Middle East. Destroying Hamas is the way to do it."
http://www.williampfaff.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=369
It is clear to me that defenders of Israeli military dominance, whether in Gaza or the Middle East as a whole, are either fundamentalists or morons and should either be denounced or ignored. Far better to denounce them otherwise they will continue to fester and infect us all.
Ralph Nader should shut up and try running for Senator of Connecticut instead of playing spoiler once every 4 years for the White House. Nice letter Ralph but unfortunately, thanks to your urge to spoil in 2000, the country was WRECKED for the last 8 years !
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
Oh sweet Jesus...
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
Sweet Jesus what? What's your point? Nader has done nothing to make a difference. He can whine and complain like the rest of us but unlike the 1960s and 1970s, his kumbaya crap is getting no one anywhere. Nader is D-E-L-U-D-E-D to even think that being in the White House will make a difference. He would have to face Congress, the media, and maybe even the courts and he's shown no signs of being prepared for facing any of it.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
Democrats who support the Democratic Party are deluded. Prepare to celebrate. Then, prepare for the delusion to continue. The "change you can count on" is less than two bits.
Not all Democrats support their corrupt leadership but so far they're in the minority no better off than if they were independents. Go find plenty of progressive independents to replace in Congress and let's see where we're at in 10 years if this nation is even alive by then.
.You do realise that you are embarrassing yourself, dont you? And on several levels too.....
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Name one major accomplishment for the nation produced by Ralph Nader for the past 16 years. NONE ! So there, you're embarrassing yourself, HAHAHAHAHAHA !
So why does Nader keep deluding himself into running once every 4 years and why doesn't he help young people struggling to run for local offices across the nation who just so happen to admire him? You shut up and go tell Nader to shut up and help push forth better pols on the local levels who share his vision and help them climb up the political ladder. It takes T-E-A-M-W-O-R-K, not running a one man's show unless you're an idiot who see things the way you want them to.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
Oh, tell it like it is, TM. Oops, I forgot, that's Nader's job. What is your take on what Nader is saying in his article, Terrance. Do you have anything to say that is not just rant and rave?
To be honest I sort of agree with him, Nader should run for Congress in some very progressive area and get elected to federal office.
.Had you taken the trouble to inform yourself of why Ralph runs, how he feels about both the Democratic and Republican parties and how he envisions his role in politics you might not post such as you have.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Ralph can run for various political offices where he has a chance to make a difference such as Senate and House but you see, he's just a crazy ego kid who relies on mutual funds from the same defense contractors he abhors and he sleeps in his brother's mansion, is gay, and isn't married. He's too crumbled to even bother running these days. Good thing Obama SUPERSMASHED his behind and didn't get bothered by the sore loser Nader has become. Apparently, you only see things as you wish and are oblivious to reality so shut up and sing.
Terrance Mitchell
Redfield, South Dakota
You are a bigot, TM, about gays. And you are stupid. The thing ass holes like you miss about Ralph is that he's an honorable, intelligent man instead of a politician.
By now, just about every place in Connecticut is progressive and since Dodd pushed for the Wall Street bailout and supported it big time and Joe Lieberman is turning out to be a Nazi warhol these days, there is no excuse for Nader to not run for House or Senate in CT.
Everyone knows by now that that is horse sh**..the Dems are their own spoilers. They will be again. They keep cowtowing to the Right. The neo-con Right thinks that it is hilarious, too.
Bullhockey. Tens of thousands of DEMOCRATS who voted for BUSH in Florida alone in 2000 spoiled the election that the DEMOCRATS allowed George Bush to steal. You, DEMOCRATS, wrecked the country with your complicity, with your giving Bush the go ahead to war in Iraq, with allowing torture, with the atrocities of Abu Ghraib, with the atrocities of Guantanamo, with PATRIOT Act I & II, with doing away with the Posse Comitatus Act, with extreme rendition, etc. YOU! DEMOCRATS allowed that to happen. Ralph Nader did not. So YOU, DEMOCRATS, wrecked the country and now REFUSE to prosecute BushCo because DEMOCRATS in Congress are complicit and would have to prosecute themselves. And YOU, DEMOCRATS know that this is not going to happen. So like a beaten and battered up spouse you go home to your decrepit One Corporate Party and vote the same way over and over again waiting for the same to happen again. Now.....bend over. More is coming your way from the One Corporate Party. Enjoy. Again.
In a REAL democracy there are NO spoilers. Only candidates that have a right to run and should be encouraged to do so from all perspectives and many parties. Accusers of Ralph Nader, Ron Paul, anyone, who runs as an other than One Corporate Party with two heads candidate are anti-democracy. It is YOU who are wrecking the country. So, screw you. Uh... Wait. Never mind the Democrats and Republicans are already doing this.