Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Holder: Waterboarding Is Torture
Attorney General-nominee Eric Holder faced often aggressive grilling from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday. But one of the first statements made by President-elect Barack Obama's designee to head the Department of Justice during the confirmation hearing was perhaps the most important.
Under oath, with not just senators but the world watching, Holder declared that "waterboarding is torture."
Judiciary Committee chair Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, referred to waterboarding -- which is broadly recognized as torture but which President Bush, Vice President Cheney and their legal aides defended, at times obliquely, at times overtly -- in his opening round of questions for Holder.
The former Deputy Attorney General responded: "I agree with you Mr. Chairman, waterboarding is torture."
Holder went on to say that "the president does not have the power" to authorize torture.
That statement came during a hearing that saw Holder adopt a humble stance, admitting past mistakes--particularly with regard to his counseling former President Bill Clinton regarding the controversial pardon of fugitive Marc Rich. "I don't mean to minimize what I did by calling it a mistake," the nominee said, under appropriately tough questioning from Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter, R-Pennsylvania. "I take what I did seriously and have expressed regret for what I did consistently."
Holder also expressed a regard for the Constitution that was rarely in evidence during the Bush-Cheney years.
Conscious of criticism he has taken for being too deferent to the presidents he has served in the past, Holder placed special emphasis on his understanding of his responsibility to serve not just the man who is appointing him but the Constitution.
Holder promised to be a "guardian of the document" and recognized that "congressional review and judicial oversight are necessary."
Holder is not a perfect nominee. He will not be a perfect Attorney General. But his declaration to the committee that the Department of Justice must serve not a president or a party but the Constitution and the American people was a refreshing indication that Holder "gets it" in ways that Alberto Gonzales and Michael Mukasey never did.
That said, while Holder's statements were important, he should also have been listening to the committee charged with providing not just consent but advice to the new administration and its Attorney General.
"We need an Attorney General, as Robert H. Jackson said 68 years ago, 'who serves the law and not factional purposes, and who approaches his task with humility,'" said Leahy in his opening statement. "The next Attorney General will understand our moral and legal obligation to protect the fundamental rights of all Americans and to respect the human rights of all people."
Leahy says he believes Holder will be that sort of Attorney General.
And Holder provided some evidence on Thursday that he would meet the standard. In so doing, he did his nomination prospects good service -- all but assuring that the man many see as the president-elect's most vulnerable nominee will be approved by the committee and confirmed by the full Senate.
Once that happens, Holder's first task should be to reward this confidence by using his powerful position to give meaning to his testimony of Thursday by assuring that no one detained by the United States will ever again be subjected to the torture that is waterboarding.
- Posted in


9 Comments so far
Show AllIt is really a shame that an article is written about a nominee to the attorney general office who agrees that water boarding is torture. Like why is this even news? This just shows what a wrong path we have been following over the last eight years.
How true...And check out Democracy Now report on Holder and his legal work on behalf of columbian gov't killings of unionists and farmers.
Actually, he is working for chiquita banana who has backed death squads.
I believe it IS important because Holder said this in a public forum, before the watching world. It is, if you will, a complete admission of the mistakes and terror of the Bush Regime. Yes, it may be obvious, but at least we now have (some) public officials stepping up to change the status quo of the Bush Regime.
Unfortunately, I missed who asked the question, but a senator on the committee asked Holder about possibly charging Dick Cheney for authorizing torture, and Holder replied that he would (paraphase)'investigate and prosecute wherever the evidence leads.'
I haven't read a transcript of the hearings yet, and I had just entered the room when he said this, but it's heartening that he's opened the door to pursuing Cheney for war crimes.
On top of that, I heard on the radio that scores of whistleblowers in the government are waiting for Obama's inauguration to come forward. Holder may be very busy prosecuting the Bush Gang for the next four to eight years.
Sioux Rose
RSJ: Great news! Your 3rd paragraph. There is an interesting alignment that takes place in the sign of Aquarius, and since it's considered the zodiac throne of Truth, it would seem cosmic events dovetail with trends towards letting "it all hang out." This is VERY strong during February-March, and then at the close of the year, the planet associated with judges and judgment calls, Saturn, enters Libra, the sign where the scales of justice are said to balance. That heralds a 2.5 year phase of potential prosecutions, or certainly inroads into realigning policy with the law of the Constitution. The AIR element, which favors dialog, discussion, and unique discoveries generated from the synergy of uncommon perspectives takes precedence in 2009; and after heavy gravity earth (most conservative element) dominating last year, I for one, am looking forward to this celestial (almost literal) breath of fresh air!
Sioux Rose, I really hope you're right. It's about time we 'balanced the scales' with some truth and justice in this country.
Sioux Rose
RSJ: In honor of Dr. King, the logos supports his contention that all things eventually arc towards justice... timing is the "cosmic trade" of my ideological kinsmen (and women)... but it involves a great many factors. Like "The Weather Channel" we have our tools for predicting events. I remember when The Weather Channel's many computer models led forecasters to tell Tampa residents to head for the middle of the state during one hurricane. That turned out to be WHERE the force hit. No system is perfect, and since human interpretations and unrecognized variables enter the mix, our precog attempts become more of a high art than a reliable given. What would life be, my friend, without the great mysteries? I suspect that has something to do with us engaging in this forum where like a rigorous tennis game for the mind, we get to match wits with others who compel us to consider perspectives (and facts) that we might have otherwise bypassed.
I hope this is true. All Obama has to say is "enforce the law". If he does that, he will have my prayers.
Joe
Holder may have said that waterboarding is torture, but what does he think of other interrogation methods? True, the ones more severe than waterboarding may be considered torture, but the ones that are less severe may be considered acceptable. That does not mean that they are not, in fact, torture.