Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama and Shinseki Should Let Vets Get Their Benefits
President-elect Barack Obama should make it easier for disabled veterans to get their benefits.
The VA routinely delays disability claims by wounded soldiers for months and years, often shunting them into poverty and homelessness.
On Jan. 14, retired General Eric Shinseki, Barack Obama’s pick for Veterans Affairs Secretary, will testify before the Senate. At the confirmation hearing, senators should press him to change this policy.
Former Lance Corporal Bob O’Daniel’s story is far too common. The proud Navajo has been fighting for more than 17 years to receive the veteran’s benefits he earned.
During the 1991 Gulf War, O’Daniel worked on board the USS Nassau, which was stationed in the Persian Gulf. Even before he came home, O’Daniel knew something wasn’t right. He was always tired, and he couldn’t see or sleep properly. He experienced sexual dysfunction and “just a lot of things that a young man shouldn’t have,” he told me.
O’Daniel suffers from Gulf War Syndrome. This comes with a range of symptoms including – but not limited to — rashes, stomach distress, brain legions, fatigue, severely swollen muscles and memory loss.
“Memories are what all people cherish,” he said. “Good times, bad times — whatever. But I was missing a lot of those things.”
Pentagon doctors now believe Gulf War Syndrome affects more than 175,000 veterans of the 1991 conflict. A blue-ribbon government report released in November said the condition is most likely due to exposure to toxic pesticides and pills that were given to soldiers to protect them against nerve gas.
But even though O’Daniel’s VA doctors tell him he has the syndrome, bureaucrats at the Department of Veterans Affairs refuse to grant him the benefits he earned in combat. O’Daniel lives in his wife’s parents’ home in North Carolina, subsisting off their charity with his wife and two children while they wait for the VA to begin paying his claim.
Across the country, more than 600,000 wounded veterans find themselves in the same position, twisting in the wind as they wait for the government to keep its promise to care for them.
Many descend into poverty during the months and years of waiting.
Others are simply unable to outlast the bureaucracy. In the six months leading up to March 31 of last year, 1,500 veterans died while they waited for the VA’s response.
There is a better way to handle military disability claims: Trust the vets.
In her exhaustive study of the long-term costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Linda Bilmes, who teaches management, budgeting and public finance at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, notes that almost all veterans tell the truth in their disability claims, with the VA ultimately approving nearly 90 percent of them. Given that reality, Bilmes suggests scrapping the lengthy process described above and replacing it with “something closer to the way the IRS deals with tax returns.” Great Britain, Australia and New Zealand all use similar systems to compensate their injured veterans.
Obama and Shinseki should streamline the benefits process. Our disabled vets have waited too long already.
- Posted in

16 Comments so far
Show AllSioux Rose
I want to make sure I convey the fact that I do not wish to see veterans suffer; however, a gigantic death machine (the MIC) is itself immune to compassion; and soldiers, like so many effete weapons or spent fuel, are considered discardable commodities, just one notch above the "collateral damage units" driven off "the board" in their war games or "theaters" of war. WAR is itself depraved indifference to human life and all things sacred. As the costs of war, financial, social, moral, psychological all pile up... perhaps the nation as an entity will OD on this depraved course to which it allots so much of its resources, with dire impact on too many as a direct result.
I tried to join the brain legion once but they wouldn't let me.
I don't want to see them suffer either; however, they signed on for this voluntary ride and I know SO many who draw checks for up to $4000.00 per month, TAX FREE for injuries that I remain hard pressed to see as they continue to draw civilian paychecks on top of the four grand.
The sole benefit should be that they escaped from that MIC, of which Souix Rose aptly described, with their lives. Nothing more.
sLiMsHaDy:Shame on you.
I hope you get hit by a hit-and-run, left to die in a coma, then permanently disabled.
But, hey, your compensation should be that you survived.
And fuck you asshole.
Oh and FUCK you too, asshole. I am talking about former military enlistees who are double and even triple dipping the system with the kind of "permanent disabilities" that allow them to also work a full time job. THAT's just plain WRONG.
Furthermore, if one is stricken as in the scenario your smarmy ass outlined, that IS all you get. Go to hell you ignorant SOB.
I really hope you get permanently injured and suffer on a meager SS pension. Then your days will be long with pain.
You must be a Republican piece of shit.
I really hope that I meet up with you one day, you IGNORANT piece of shit. Then YOUR days will be long with pain.
That's for calling me a Republinazi! Actually, we should both stop with this type of lunacy. There is no benefit.
I have a lot of sympathy for survivors living with Gulf War Syndrome. I have a "related" illness: CFS/ME, minor differences (no rashes) plus I have other symptoms (as do they,which were not listed). I had a rough time getting disability from Sec. Security. It boils down to the government does not want to pay out money for treatment or benefits. It's so ironic since the government throws money at corporations in various ways from corporate welfare to not collecting taxes from some of the biggest corporations, to the recent bailouts. And that doesn't even touch on military contracts and privatization of the military. For more on the politics of an illness (CFS/ME), and the book also mentions Gulf War Syndrome, see "Osler's Web" by Hillary Johnson, New York:Crown Publishers, 1995. There's a wonderful review of it in "Publishers Weekly" in Dec.1995 but I don't know if it's online.
I should apologize and clarify to you, NYCartist ~ I am not in any way intending to disparage veterans nor any other citizen for seeking compensation for real, true disabilities. I am VERY aware of how difficult the SSA makes it to collect benefits that we all pay in to.
I am, however, against the way that the VA does determine who gets what and why. I work for an organization with PLENTY of ex-soldiers who outright brag about their disability payments due to service related injuries while working a full time job. To find out that they deny their service members any form of compensation for Gulf War Syndrome (as one example), while paying out big bucks for a knee or back "injury" that does not prevent one from continuing to work, is a travesty.
THAT is what I am talking about (below), and I stand by that.
sLiMsHaDy(why that name?):the huge number of people being denied social security disability benefits by the SSA (so they have to reapply,and the SSA banks on half dropping out from "giving up")plus the veterans who are denied full VA benefits,and treatment in huge numbers, suggests that those who are as you claim, can only be a fraction, a miniscule fraction and it's not either or. I appreciate your replying to me. You are curteous, even if I think you are wrong. Edit add:I just got to your comment below and I stand by my "shame on you" for that comment.
sLiMsHaDy(why that name?): not any admiration for the rapper- just what friends called me awhile back because I am slim and have short blond hair. Where I work is approx 50% ex military and about half of them collect from the VA but would not be recent claimants by any means. And it was similar in North Carolina where I was before transfering to Kentucky ~ I think that it is probably a BIG fraction, based on what I hear those guys talking about, and they sure don't want it to change, but rather are always trying to get more!
Also, Mr. hoyt started all of "that mess" but no doubt that I "over replied."
Am older;didn't know it's a rapper, sigh. Thanks for the explanation. I think no matter how many people you know, it's still too small to change what about about a fraction. I am smiling at he "started it,but".... Good you could back off a bit. So difficult for guys to do, yes?
And how about the benefit of not prolonging their stay in Iraq? But then again, since there are as many contractors as there are troops, how will the VA answer that? See, unlike the Vietnam War where there were mainly troops and contractors were very few if any, today it's all volunteer and there are as many troops as there are contractors. I haven't bothered to keep up with the way this system works since the 1980s. Help please !
JWVerez:really good points. Never having been in the military, and only a child of a disabled/dead soldier, I am clueless to answer your question. I really like your first line.
VA would not cover contractors. That is probably why they are there.