Flow: Who Owns the World’s Water?
After seeing the new documentary Flow, my 2009 New Year's resolution is to stop buying bottled water. Over $100 billion is spent annually on bottled water, but it would cost only $30 billion to provide clean drinking water to the entire world. Unlike tap water, bottled water is not regulated for cleanliness. And don't even get me started on the mountains of plastic bottles created by the bottled water industry.
For 84 terrifying and informative minutes, filmmaker Irena Salina makes a very persuasive case for stopping the commoditization of water and ensuring that everyone has access to clean drinking water. Salina interviews an array of researchers and activists who all describe the frightening international situation: dirty water kills more people than wars, the world is quickly running out of clean water, and water has become a valuable commodity for multinational corporations to exploit for profit. Flow is currently available on DVD.
Those who exclusively drink bottled water may think they're safe. But according to the National Resource Defense Council Director of Advocacy, Erik Olson, water-borne chemicals can enter the body through the skin when showering. Bathing in bottled water doesn't guarantee safety either; organic chemicals, bacteria, and even arsenic were found in one-third of popular bottled-water brands.
The film's most surprising revelation is that water has become a highly valuable commodity instead of a human right. Water is now the third most valuable commodity behind oil and electricity. And the film blames the World Bank for colluding with multinational for-profit water companies, which has led to the promotion of water privatization in developing counties. In Bolivia, short-lived water privatization at the insistence of the World Bank polluted rivers with blood and sewage flowing from slaughterhouses into Lake Titicaca.
Though many Americans take their access to clean water for granted, many people throughout the world are not able (or do not want) to pay for privatized water. Maintaining the infrastructure that brings unlimited clean water to kitchen sinks across the country is an unnoticed luxury for most Americans, though they do pay for it: either directly in monthly bills from water treatment facilities, or indirectly in taxes.
Flow profiles the heartbreaking situation in South Africa where the world's poorest citizens cannot afford clean water. Instead of paying for clean water from privatized wells, many desperate South Africans are forced to drink free water from dirty stagnant rivers, even if that means contracting cholera. During an onscreen interview, Maude Barlow, author of the book Blue Covenant and co-author of Blue Gold, discusses the contradiction in providing affordable clean water to people through for-profit private companies. She describes privatization as a "disaster" because multinational corporations cannot help people gain increased access to clean water while also pleasing their shareholders.
Several countries have recently built enormous dams to divert and store water in an effort to resolve their water crises. According to Patrick McCully, Executive Director of International Rivers Network, dams alter ecosystems while displacing thousands of people. One example cited in the film is China's Three Gorges Dam - a project also depicted in the beautiful documentary Up the Yangtze - that relocated two million people as water levels rose. McCully believes that there are better ways to store water, especially for individuals; he cites the archaic practice of collecting rain water as a low-cost and effective way to ensure a steady water supply.The most inspiring interviewee in Flow is Ashok Gadgil, Senior Staff Scientist in the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley professor, who knows the dire consequences of biologically contaminated water firsthand. While growing up in India, he lost five cousins to unhealthy drinking water. To help solve this widespread problem, Gadjil invented a water disinfector that uses UV-light to kill water-borne bacteria and viruses. This "financially viable, self-sustaining model" is maintained cooperatively in local communities - not by multinational for-profit corporations. For only $2 per person per year, over 500,000 Indians living in rural villages now have clean drinking water.
Flow captures the complex nature of water supply and accessibility issues with well-researched and entertaining information. But at times there are too many people saying the same thing. The film could have benefited by focusing more on inspiring new technology, such as Gadgil's water filtration system, and creating a narrative structure, instead of a barrage of interviews. Still, everyone interviewed drives the film's message home, and by the end viewers will think twice about their current habits.
When I finished watching the film, I turned on my kitchen sink in my Oakland, California apartment and filled a tall glass with fresh clean water. I had never thought twice about where this water came from, and assumed the supply was unlimited, especially when taking too many long showers. But then I remembered Barlow's prediction, "California's water supply is running out - it has about 20 years of water left in the state."
Flow could not be a timelier documentary because the world is literally running out of clean water. The unanswerable question of who owns water will become irrelevant when there is not any water left to own.
•
•
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
13 Comments so far
Show AllNestle Foods Inc.
This is part of the ruling elites neo-malthusian genocidal plans. They want to take your water away (they already control food, energy and credit). Thats what it is all about people.
Their front agency, the WWF has established a "Global Freshwater Programme" dedicated to protecting water from any human intervention. The program’s mission is to prevent construction of any new water management programs globally—and reverse those already built; to stop desalination, the crucial technology for solving the depletion of fossil water; to shift irrigation strategies to conserving water; and to discourage water use by turning control over water to the markets so that water costs too much. They are even proposing establishing a market for using or trading "water allocation rights."
Their Dam Project states that for reasons of hydropower, river navigation, irrigation, and flood protection, rivers have been dammed, straightened, deepened, and cut off from the natural floodplains, which is true. But they claim such schemes cause irreparable ecological damage, by disrupting the natural flooding cycles, reducing flows, draining wetlands, and resulting in the destruction of species, the intensification of floods, and a threat to livelihoods in the long term.
OK, but what about the fact that such water control measures are essential for saving lives, and putting food and clean water in the mouths of the billions who now lack it? The WWF and their masters could care less, they want you to be gone.
One side argues about reducing consumption and convincing you that resources are limited, such as this article, another side wants to privatize the water which they argue will solve all problems, but they are both on the same side playing good cop bad cop. Development using technology and human creativity can supply all we need without hurting the environment.
But they want you gone, except for those they choose to keep on to serve the ruling elite. Those left behind will need permission to have children, and even their mates may need approval after testing to determine genetic compatability.
Human beings have been endowed with the ability to create resources on this Earth, sufficient resources to provide for current and future generations, to develop the Earth and its people. Any approach which denies man the right
to use that ability, will lead to genocide. And thats where we are heading.
Thanks for this piece. Everyone needs to become more aware of the scary things happening with water. Everyone born on planet Earth has a right to air and water, sustenance, provided, ultimately, by the Earth. The way we allow some people to divvy up the Earth's bounty and strip profit is not just unsustainable but venal . . . and we, collectively, allow it.
I take hope in the story about Bolivia. How the people fought back and 'won' back the right to water. For awhile, a corporation owned rainwater in Bolivia before it hit the ground and it was "illegal" to collect rain for personal use.
I swim laps most days in public chlorinated pool. I guess some might see something wrong with maintaining public swimming pools but there are public benefits to keeping people healthy. I feel okay about using a swimming pool.
But after my swim, I take long, hot showers. I've been a lap swimmer all my life but these days, the locker room at my PUBLIC pool is as nice as a fancy private club. And the hot water is always very hot (this is rare in public facilities). And endless. On cold days like today (it was in the thirties when I swam today -- a heated, outdoor, California pool), I tend to take longer showers. Gosh, the hot water is so luxurious after rushing in from the pool, wet, after my swim. The ground feels like ice on my feet as I run from the pool, carrying the night's lower temperatures. The locker room is not warm: the parks system tries to keep its energy usage down. But for some reason, the hot water is always very hot and endless. I am sure if the pool were being built today, instead of twenty years ago, they would use a different hot water system, a more energy efficient one.
Sometimes, after the chilld of my hour in the pool (even with heated water, it gets cold), then the icy dash from the pool to the locker room, then undressing in the chilly locker room, I dash into the shower and I can't get out of it heat. day after day, I linger in the shower.
And day after day, I think about the fact, as stated in this article, that California probably will run out of water in twenty years and I think about the fact, which I already knew, that in some parts of the world, clean drinking water is unaffordable. And I resolve to stop taking my long showers.
But I don't. So long as people like me act negligently (and I am a good person), we have a problem.
Is it wrong for me to take overly long hot showers in N. California while people in other parts of the world drink unsafe water? I'm not sure. But I know we're all connected.
I forgot to add the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/
Sophie Scholl-The Final Days
Bottled water is one of the most annoying forms of conspicuous consumption in the American economy only exceeded by McMansions and SUV’s.
Unlike most Americans I do not have access to city water; I live in the country and have a well. The farmer that farms the land near me has never seen a farm chemical he didn’t like. Given the watershed his runoff surrounds my property and the water table is very low so there are lots of springs and a thirteen acre lake nearby.
I buy reverse osmosis water from the local water softener dealer at $ .25 a gallon and we usually go through 10 or 15 gallons a week for drinking, cooking and ice cubes. An in home reverse osmosis system costs around $800.00 to $1500.00 from a dealer or if you install it yourself you can get one for $400.00 or so over the internet. Most in home RO units require three filters to be replaced every six months and use a little bit of electricity to sterilize the water with a high intensity ultraviolet light. The RO membrane should last several years in normal use. They also require fairly high water pressure to operate effectively. The residential RO systems produce only 20 or so gallons a day and they supply water to just one or two taps and the ice cube maker so the rest of the house still has non-RO treated water.
I would install a home RO unit but my house has poly butylene plumbing with insert fittings and crimped bands and since this plumbing system is notorious for developing leaks I’m not thrilled with boosting the water pressure above the current 30#/50# setting to accommodate a RO system even though one would pay for its self in less than a year.
My wife and I recently purchased several insulated 24oz. Polar Bottles like the kind used on bicycles. The last thing we do when we leave the house is to fill them up with water and ice. They stay cold much longer than bottled water does and were a great investment and you don’t have to fiddle around with a screw-on cap or a thin plastic bottle.
Alky, try these
http://thetyee.ca/
http://www.rabble.ca/
http://www.dominionpaper.ca/
http://www.publiceyeonline.com/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=home
http://oilsandstruth.org/
Sophie Scholl-The Final Days
Thanks, I'll check them out. I have read interesting books by Canadian authors, though:
"It's the Crude, Dude" - Linda McQuaig
"Five Ring Circus: Myths and Realities of the Olympic Games" - Christopher A. Shaw
I'm sure there are plenty more - must do more research :)
Highintel: Can we do better?
As joneden has pointed out, there are NO real shortages of ANYTHING.
Contrived shortages have been enabled by US Federal Reserve (Fed) monetary policy.
When the Fed lowered interest rates in 2002 they provided cheap money for speculators to control and inflate the housing market. When the Fed lowered interest rates in 2007 they provided cheap money for speculators to control and inflate energy and food prices. The Fed has now lowered interest rates again providing cheap money for the speculators to control water supplies and pricing.
Anybody see a pattern here ?
If Obama doesn't fire Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke by 2/20/09 you better have one hell of a lot of water under your control or be prepard to pay the price !
"Over $100 billion is spent annually on bottled water, but it would cost only $30 billion to provide clean drinking water to the entire world."
Ah, there's nothing like the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of privatization!
With inefficient and wasteful water management in the US, it's no wonder that serious efforts are on to tap the water resources of Canada. Having pretty much 'secured' oil and gas supplies from Canada and laying the ground work for cheap electricity sale from British Columbia, next on the list is water. And to see that many Canadians are worried that Obama would re-open NAFTA for re-nogotiation - what a joke! I wonder if there are sites such as CD, AlterNet, etc. in Canada that discuss issues not covered in the mainstream media.
Highintel: Can we do better?
With potable water well on the way to privitization and commercialization, can breatheable air be far behind?
Bite your tongue!
I just watched Flow last night. There was a short piece with T. Boone Pickens, who owns rights to a lot of water spots. In it, he said that air cannot be privatized...but I could see his wheels were spinning inside his greedy little mind.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
There is no shortage of water, or oil, or food, etc. The shortage is in a sufficient number of people who understand our position in the ecosystem, our necessity for maintaining it, and an understanding that the ecosystem is being destroyed by our ever expanding population and consumptive patterns. Till we figure this out, there will be nothing but "shortages" for as many generations as we can imagine.