Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The First Rule of Re-Election Is Don't Think About Re-Election
Why Obama Should Consider Himself a One-Term President
Barring some unforeseen cataclysmic event, Barack Obama will be elected president Tuesday. Please allow me to be the first to congratulate you, President-Elect Obama, on an historic victory following an extraordinarily disciplined campaign. Are you sure you're really a Democrat?
Enough BSing.
As a student of history and the American presidency and a guy who plans to vote for you despite serious doubts, here's the best advice I can give you: Starting on Inauguration Day, consider yourself a one-term president.
This isn't exactly an original idea. When John McCain launched his own run for the Republican nomination, he originally planned to center his entire campaign around a promise not to seek a second term. "Less than a day before he was set to speak in New Hampshire on April 25," The Atlantic magazine reported, "McCain ordered his aides to excise...the pledge." But McCain was on to something. Voters want a president who isn't constantly triangulating, studying polls, and sucking up to contributors.
I realize that telling anyone you're a one-termer would be dumb. Why tie your own hands by declaring yourself a lame duck on Day One? So don't.
I'm suggesting that you privately adopt a state of mind. Back in 2007, you laid out three guiding principles to your campaign: "Run the campaign with respect; build it from the bottom up; and finally, no drama." It worked. Now it's time to transmit a new guiding principle to your cabinet officers: "We don't care about 2012."
With one exception, I've never understood why presidents worry about getting reelected. The "second-term curse"--the tendency of lame-duck presidencies to flounder in scandal, blowback and impotence--has prevented every modern president from accomplishing anything worth bragging about during years five through eight.
Harry Truman squandered his credibility by playing footsie with McCarthyism and doubling down on a disastrous stalemate on the Korean peninsula. Johnson screwed up in Vietnam and on the burning streets of American cities. Nixon had Watergate; Eisenhower and Reagan succumbed to virtual senility and scandal (the U-2 spy plane affair and Iran-Contra, respectively). Of course, Clinton had Monica.
The exception, of course, was George W. Bush. His quest for a second term was understandable. "Bush knows that he did not carry the popular vote in 2000," Gus Tyler wrote in The Forward in 2003. "He ran a half-million votes behind Democrat Al Gore. He knows that he really did not carry Florida to give him his thin edge in the Electoral College." Dubya wanted to win in 2004 because he lost in 2000.
Technically, 2005-to-2008 was Bush's first term. Nevertheless, the second-term curse struck again. Bush had an ambitious agenda, but it was thwarted by both circumstance and the consequences of policies he pursued during his first four years. Privatizing Social Security, tort reform, stricter test standards for high school graduation--all abandoned and forgotten in the fires of Iraq and the maelstrom of Hurricane Katrina. Bush's approval rating is now 23 percent, the lowest in the history of the Gallup Poll. He wasn't even invited to the Republican National Convention. He seems destined to be added to the short list of our worst leaders.
So forget that second term. They never do anyone any good.
George Clinton said, "Free your mind and your ass will follow." Give up the hope you can't believe in and embrace the reality you have already achieved.
So, President-Elect Obama: It's true. You face challenges: Iraq and Afghanistan (which you are wrong wrong wrong about) and torture and our international standing and--obviously!--the economy. But think of what you've got going for you. You are young and sharp-minded and vigorous. The electorate is desperately worried, and thus more willing to embrace big changes. Your party will enjoy a commanding majority in Congress--I'm guessing 58 seats in the Senate and 268 (to 167) in the House, the biggest since Watergate. I'm pretty sure you're going to pick a team of top officials that will make Americans wonder how they ever tolerated intellectual midgets like Donald Rumsfeld and Condi Rice--the Best and the Brightest for the new millennium. The rest of the world already loves you, and you haven't even begun.
But be careful. The second you move into 1600 Penn, you will be surrounded by people, many of them your close friends, who will want nothing more than to keep the cool jobs you give them for as long as possible, i.e. eight years. Beware the "permanent campaign"--the drive to make every decision based on how they will affect you and your party's chances for reelection. "[Pollster] Dick Morris even asked voters where Bill Clinton should go on vacation," remembered Joe Klein in Time.
"[The permanent campaign] has been a terrible thing," Klein continued. "Presidents need to be thinking past the horizon, as Jimmy Carter belatedly proved. Some of his best decisions--a strict monetary policy to combat inflation, a vigorous arms buildup against the Soviet threat--bore fruit years after he left office and were credited to his successor, Ronald Reagan."
Radical problems require radical solutions. Guess what? We have radical problems. Your kids-only healthcare mandate concept would be a Band-Aid where major surgery is required. Iraq and Afghanistan don't need another division of Marines here, another detachment of Special Forces there. Nothing short of immediate pullout will satisfy the world, our ruined national budget or, for that matter, the Iraqis and Afghans. Your 90-day proposed moratorium on foreclosure evictions is nice as far as it goes--well, 90 days--but it's going to take years of direct government assistance to millions of Americans to save the country from economic disintegration.
Even with a bully pulpit and a Democratic Congress, it's going to take some serious nads to ignore the special interests. Big insurance companies like the current healthcare "system" just the way it is. Defense contractors are psyched about our serial preemptive wars against anyone and everyone (except those who actually attack us). And the banks aren't going to stop taking people's homes unless you take over the banks. It isn't going to be easy.
But running the country as if you had nothing to lose--running your first term as if it you knew it will be your last--will make it a little easier. For all you know, it might make a second term more likely.
- Posted in



16 Comments so far
Show AllI'm betting that part of the conflict between Palin's camp and McCain's folks is centered on Palin's insistence that McCain put the one-term pledge back into his speeches.
q
I wonder when the New York Times will bring Ted Rall's cartoons back after the reactionaries yelled so loudly that they took them down back in 2004 (2003?).
This is the best article an Obama-skeptic has written -- not the litany of why-Obama-will-be-Bush-or-Clinton, but sound advice: don't be thikning about legacies, don't be thinking about how to placate the implacable.
"Technically, 2005-to-2008 was Bush's first term."
No, his second term was't legitimite either. He only won his popular plurality there, and notably in Ohio, becsause of vote rigging in thousands of precincts by his supporters.
Great advice Ted. We will know him by those he appoints. At least Bush left him with a powerful, if undemocratic presidency he can take advantage of to carry out his positive plans.
Obama will be a one term President. Republicans are great at opposition. And Obama will disillusion all of his brainwashed supporters, who didn't understand that he is a conservative, not a progressive or even a liberal.
Today's list of brainwashed supporters would include Thom Hartmann and Mike Molloy.
Of course conservatives are not pro-choice or pro-science or pro-employee benefits of any sort -- except for stock options for the wealthy. But those aside --
Politics are not linear, despite the wishes of the literalist euclidean thinkers here.
The political landscape of 2012 will look nothing like the present. Only six years ago, only four years ago, the Repugs were certain that they had gamed the system forever; only it broke apart, because History, capital H, is a field which shapes actors against their design & will.
Americans are deadly sick of war; and they will not be forced into further ones on other pretexts. They'll support a further effort in Afghanistan, but nothing else; and no one is going to coax them into any long engagements. Obama's shrewdness has bought him sufficient military cover for a calculated withdrawal, not on anti-imperialist principles, but on purely pragmatic ones.
Great advice, Ted. Too bad you're wasting your electrons.
Oregoncharles
Stop bashing Obama! You filthy Republican trolls!
Look, the truth is, Obama will have to act like a neo-con in order be effective. We need someone who can reach across the aisle and gets things done. We don't need another Bush. We need a If Obama loses in 2012 to a Republican, the consequences could be dire. The survival of the Empire is at stake. The public is furious because of the shredding of our Constitution, the Wall Street bailout, and our endless wars. We need Obama to ease the public's fears, explain to them why these things are necessary, and once again make people proud of America.
So remember, until 2012, do not criticize Obama unless you want to help the Republicans. After 2012, we will apply grassroots pressure to force Obama to adopt progressive positions. That is, unless it will hurt our chances of electing Biden in 2016.
I would love to hear obama explain to me why "the shredding of our constitution, the wall st bailout and endless wars" are necessary.
And whats so important about the "survival of the Empire"?
And yes, I am a republican troll.
Look, you doubly-bent consonant-- if you actually read the comments instead of reading what you want to see, you would see that "do not criticize Obama" is total BS. No one is saying that, it's just the opposite.
But you have to criticize Obama in a loving way, a constructive way. Only a spoiled teenager expects instant gratification. Anybody who follows politicks and understands the REALITY of politicks knows that change only comes a little bit at a time. Obama believes in reaching out and compromising, so you cant expect him to turn progressive overnight.
If you werent so quick to put down and rip anyone who doesnt agree with your every position you might understand that Obama is a person who will meet you halfway and work with you. But you really don't want to make any kind of progress-- you would rather keep your loosing causes going and look down on people like us who are out on the street trying to make it happen.
And as far as Biden goes, he's not my first choice but I'm not so close-minded that I would rule him out. Who knows what shape things will be in in 2016? What if he's running against Palinzilla? Wouldn't you be worried about the REALITY of what Palinzilla would do to ordinary suffering people or are you just an elitist looking to be above it all?
"But you have to criticize Obama in a loving way, a constructive way. "
Hmm... Here goes: "I love you Obama, but you're acting like a neo-con. Don't be like that."
"Only a spoiled teenager expects instant gratification."
Are you comparing demands that a presidential candidate oppose corporate bail-outs, war, torture, and spying to teenage masturbation?
"Anybody who follows politicks and understands the REALITY of politicks knows that change only comes a little bit at a time - "
- and only moves to the Right.
"Obama believes in reaching out and compromising, so you cant expect him to turn progressive overnight."
Maybe by the end of his second term?
"you might understand that Obama is a person who will meet you halfway and work with you."
Like with...?
Let's see...?
Oh well, never mind, I get it. It's liked being raped, but only half-way.
Matt Gonzalez has written an excellent summary of all the ways Obama has already worked-over progressives.
http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez10292008.html
"But you really don't want to make any kind of progress--"
Are you referring to the progress listed by Matt Gonzalez?
"And as far as Biden goes, he's not my first choice but I'm not so close-minded that I would rule him out."
Yeah, to make a judgment of him based on his extensive record in the Senate sure would be pretty close-minded. Have you considered Lieberman?
"What if he's running against Palinzilla? Wouldn't you be worried about the REALITY of what Palinzilla would do to ordinary suffering people or are you just an elitist looking to be above it all?"
No, I completely agree. The REALITY is that we will always be choosing between two evil candidates. One MUST be the lesser evil and the other greater evil. It is our patriotic duty to set aside our values and vote in favor of evil, even when alternatives exist. For the sake of Democracy, we must never allow meaningful competition from a third party. Two parties are enough. One party would be even better.
Palin is scary. But imagine if Dick Cheney switched parties and ran against her as a Democrat! We would have no choice but to vote for him! Terrifying.
Of all the exchanges about this election i've read at CD (i have not read them all), this one is the funniest and most post-post-modern. Thanks!
You're very welcome, and thanks to z for priming the pump. ;)
Good article, Ted. Maybe someone here will listen to you.
"Are you sure that he is a democrat?". Obama is a Republican; he is a "Democrat" only in that he has a "D" after his name on the ballot.
After two stolen elections, should we be thinking this one is won?