Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Time Has Come
President-elect Obama . . .
I’m daring my own heart to write these words, to let hope’s preview ignite me for an instant. Despite all my reservations (Afghanistan) and all my fears (how will they try to undermine his presidency, or prevent it by theft?), I can’t help but feel history pushing at me and all of us as we vote, or try to vote, on Tuesday.
Yes, the significance of this election rises out of the nation’s past: Barack Obama’s articulate, courageous campaign represents the farthest reach of the civil rights movement, and a beginning of the psychological healing of our national legacy of racism. But even more significantly, this election speaks to the future: It’s about the creation of a new constituency and the careening, dying sputter of an old one.
And the Democrats finally have a candidate who unabashedly addresses this new constituency, rather than one who panders, ineptly, to the Republican core.
The brimming international excitement about Obama — who drew a crowd of 200,000 in Berlin, a crowd of 100,000-plus in Denver (two days after McCain drew 3,000 in that city) — which I feel myself with a ferocity that overwhelms my reservations, is the global whisper that the time has come . . .
The time has come not just to reclaim the world from the disaster of the Bush administration, not just to end the multi-trillion-dollar war in Iraq, not just to stave off further shredding of the Constitution, not just to restrain the reckless greed of the financial community and restore some semblance of a social safety net — beyond all this, the time has come for America to lead the way in building the foundations of a lasting peace based on fairness, cooperation, eco-awareness and global interconnection.
I say this with a wary eye on the unraveling, angry, “us vs. them” constituency that the McCain-Palin ticket continues to stoke, with the seeds of hatred and no-nothingism they have scattered pretty much blowing back in their faces.
“You know the other night in the debate with Senator Obama,” McCain told a crowd in Cedar Falls, Iowa, “I said his eloquence is admirable, but pay attention to his words — we talked about offshore drilling and he said he would quote ‘consider’ offshore drilling. We talked about nuclear power. Well, it has to be safe, environment, blah, blah, blah. And the fact is . . .”
The partisan crowd interrupted McCain with cheers — yeah, it’s us vs. the eggheads and global-warming nags — but beyond his immediate listeners, as his words spread over the Internet to a global audience, McCain morphed into an idiot, answering the fancy-talkin’ young guy from Harvard with “blah, blah, blah,” trying desperately to appeal to the dregs of human thoughtlessness: robo-candidate, reaching for some reptile nub of the white backlash that has sustained the Republican Party for four decades.
McCain and Palin, God love ’em, have set a new low, at least for politics in my lifetime: a new low in lack of seriousness, a new low in smear and hate. They have brought the Bush Doctrine home, with rallies that set “real Americans” against the rest of us and summon up the ghost of Jim Crow. In Clearwater, Fla., Palin tried to link Obama to Bill Ayers and domestic terrorism and wound up fomenting it herself, when someone in the audience shouted, “Kill him!”
And Fighting John McCain, speaking at a VFW hall in Murrells Inlet, S.C., answered a question about sending a message to Iran by parodying the Beach Boys: “Bomb, bomb Iran.” Later he said he was just joking with a bunch of vets, and if you don’t like it “get a life.” To which I say, wow, even George Bush’s “decisiveness” can’t hold a candle to the recklessness of John McCain. The only person I would less like to see in charge of national security is Sarah Palin.
“The size of our challenges has outgrown the smallness of our politics,” Obama said this week as he began the final push of his long campaign, and to these words I hear myself utter a silent, soul-deep “yes.”
The type of politics to which he refers is the us-vs.-them variety suddenly coming up short for the mocking Republican ticket, which still thinks it can ignore us and speak only the language of war and fear. But there is a new, ethnically and globally inclusive constituency that Obama understands he has to listen to and help solidify. Thus in Denver he chanted “yes we can” with the crowd in Spanish — “sí se puede” — and helped unify a country that’s sick of being divided.
I urge everyone who is sick of the smallness of the political debate, sick of being shut out by us-vs.-them politics, sick of the narrow, unworkable range of options with which the nation would continue to meet its challenges if McCain manages to pull off a miracle (or something else) and win this election, to join me and vote for change and expanded political horizons.
I repeat these words: President-elect Obama. This is the starting point we can achieve next week.
- Posted in



153 Comments so far
Show AllI, too, prefer Obama to McCain. However after two clearly stolen elections and the obviously continuing problems with black-box voting, I'm not going to get my hopes up.
A federal judge forced Georgia's version of Katherine Harris to re-enfranchise more than 50,00 voters that she had recently purged from the roles simply because their registrations had been "flagged." In the log run, the decision won't matter all that much. Georgia, the birthplace of American ignorance and narrow-mindedness, is safely in McCain's pocket. The scumbag Saxby Chambliss will be returned to the Senate to continue his six-year nap.
The unrelenting efforts by republicans to prevent as many people from voting as possible combined with the treachery of the voting machines and the inevitable lawsuits designed to throw the election into republican-controlled courts will probably give this election to McCain.
It's hard to find a silver lining in this situation. I suppose one would be that we'll be spared the embarrassment of watching a washed-up McCain doing Cialis commercials.
q
"And the Democrats finally have a candidate who unabashedly addresses this new constituency, rather than one who panders, ineptly, to the Republican core."
Koehler, Obama's votes belie his rhetoric. From war funding and support of the Patriot Act and FISA, to the Wall Street bailout, his votes are anti-people. Hope based upon rhetoric is no hope.
Afghanistan is "all" your reservations?
A) Please us tell that that's not true, and just a poor phrasing.
B) Afghanistan isn't enough to turn you off all by itself?! Please leave your Progressive Club ID card at the reception desk on your way out of the building.
Thanks, high-k, but you're barking up a greased tree. It's apparent that too many third party supporters here (not all) are more intent on repetitious posting and picking fights with those of a different view. They often disappear when the discussion gets serious, when they are challenged to offer part of the solution. They like to loudly accuse Obama voters of falling for a cult of personality but are totally blind to their own hero-worship. They want to point to Obama's "tragic" voting record and tell us he's "all talk", but never discuss the non-records of their untried champions or face the fact they they too are in essence "all talk." Their pack mentality, intransigence and intolerance is often staggering, and reasoning with them is all too often futile. Good luck.
As some of us have already told you, far from being "Republican Trolls," some of us have actually been third-party or independent candidates ourselves and have a long history of political activism. I ran for Congress as a Green Party candidate in 2002, and politically I'm a revolutionary socialist. I believe that capitalism needs to ultimately be overthrown, and that electoral support for third-party candidates is one of many tactics that are important for working toward that long-term goal.
We ARE having a discussion of tactics. Your side believes that it is useful to building a strong movement for change to support candidates who oppose us because they have a realistic chance of winning and aren't quite as bad as the other major party's candidates. Ours believes that that this is actually a HINDRANCE to building movements, because it inevitably leads to illusions in the "lesser evil" candidates and party (prominently on display in this article and elsewhere on CD), and it doesn't hold them accountable for their deeds through the electoral process.
Your side believes that it is at best useless to vote for third-party candidates, because they don't have a realistic chance of winning. Ours recognizes that at present they have no hope of winning, but believes that progressive people voting their conscience has a utility far beyond feeling good about ourselves. It lets the "lesser evil" party know that it can never take our votes for granted and and aims to slowly and steadily, year after year, build an independent electoral party that is not afraid to tell the truth about BOTH parties of corporate power. We see this as an ESSENTIAL component of building a real challenge to the power of our corporate rulers.
History speaks extensively to the issue of which of us is right. There is ample evidence from history (most recently in the collapse of the anti-war movement following its support for Democrats who mostly weren't on its side in the 2006 elections) for the proposition that political independence in both the electoral and nonelectoral arenas is vital and, conversely, that progressives' support for "lesser evils" that oppose their interests is extremely detrimental to their success.
Just try a little bit to imagine Obama as "Manchurian Candidate" for the New World Order.
No matter who wins this election we will have tons of work to do.
Finding agreement on a wide range of issues will be difficult.
The left is in shards, for a variety of reasons. I've been involved in groups long enough to have seen many kinds of ugly divisions tear progressives apart.
It doesn't help that we also have sophisticated political forces (and $$$ behind them) working overtime to exploit these inner divisions.
Forty years ago, we also didn't sit in our living rooms and typing away on blogs and bulletin boards, either, that's another big difference.
With this election, one thing that's happened in my town is black and white neighbors are looking at each other in a new way.
People are talking about racism. It's been taken out of the closet, as it were.
It's an OK topic, now.
Maybe the shock of what Palin has been doing is helping people see how imperative it is to address the underlying cause (racism) of some of our most complicated issues.
Racism is at the root of our massive prison industry, poverty (at least in many areas), the Katrina hurricane tragedy, immigration and the building of a militarily-patrolled fence along the southern U.S. border, and the list goes on.
One thing an Obama presidency will do (as he showed in his speech on race back in the spring) is that a new message will be sent throughout the U.S. (maybe the world) that open racism is no longer acceptable.
It is not (as some would like to characterize it) merely the "fact" that Obama's own heritage is mixed race, but that he UNDERSTANDS and is willing to speak in public (WHEN has a President done that?) about racism.
This country's racist past is so deep and so wide that any small beginning of unraveling this makes it more than worth it to vote for him.
Explaining racism, though, and it's affects strikes me a lot like trying to explain sexism (which I've had a lifetime of trying to do). It's invisible to them.
Often men (sometimes women, too) just don't "get it". It's like you've seen a Martian and are trying to describe that to someone.
But it's REAL (sexism, racism) and those are two of the issues that I KNOW will never be taken seriously by McCain and Palin. They have MORE than proven what they think. They're scaring the sh*t out of us with their overt white supremacy.
Some have said that the proven stategy of Nader's is to work to elect Republicans, to "make things worse" so that we will continue to build a progressive movement in reaction to that "worst".
For me, that is a very cruel strategy.
I'm ready to give Obama a try, his leadership on the issue of race is formidible.
This is the future!!
Toward the light, toward respect- it's a great beginning.
A beginning, not the whole answer.
Nothing is worth risking a McCain/Palin administration.
Nothing.
No matter how wonderful Ralph may have been in the past.
The time is NOW to vote for Obama.
Wake up - use your brain and start to think independently. Obama is nothing but the same old wine in a new bottle. The two party duopoly is the death sentence of our democracy. Vote for anyone but the Two Parties.
"Vote for anyone but the Two Parties."
And this gets us what...anyone? No, it still gets us one of the Two Parties.
The question facing us is which one can we work with?
"It is not true that it's one damn thing after another - it's one damn thing over and over." Edna St. Vincent Millay
"The question facing us is which one can we work with?"
Neither. Both elite parties are bought and paid for by the elites. The elites don't work WITH the people. The elites work ON the people. Vote third party. We gave the elite parties a chance to earn our votes and they failed.
"Why are you here? Do you not think that all of us are disappointed that Obama moved right after the primaries? So, what do we do now? Any ideas?"
I know!! Let's all follow your lead and surrender!!! Your example is the answer!! ha... what a joke.
By the way... good article to highlight the source of this kind of defeatism and how it is employed in an effort to undermine actual progressivism... and in the process, co-opt the goals of those seeking real change.
Even though it pretends otherwise, this is a test-tube propaganda effort with only one mission... destroy the left.
How? Make the center-right the "new left" in an attempt to drive American politics evermore rightward. Subvert real progressive efforts and slickly slap a new coat of paint on the spinning corporatist... make right-wing war-mongering Democrats and their "savior" appear to be salvation:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/30/us/politics/30message.html?ref=us
"... the first systematic, data-driven effort to mold the language of the left to fit the sensibilities of the center" (while simultaneously destroying any opposition from the left).
Good job lowkicker.
"You are dishonest.
In almost every post I call for us to work together on the left."
You do not, except as a fig leaf to cover the rather naked hectoring of those who do not wish to vote for your candidate.
Exactly. FWIW, "hectoring" popped into my head several days back, but I've been trying to keep my mouf shut. Thank you.
It is astounding that such language could be used concerning the brutal death of innocents.
Why do the people of Afghanistan become so expendable in the minds of Democrats? (and Repubs, too, I know). It's so sad!! It should be ENOUGH of a reason! There are actually hundreds of reasons to be against Obama.
Come on folks, this is a simple true or false test: Do you want McCain to be President? It is as simple as that.
When the house is on fire, you don't complain about the color of the carpet.
War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength.
Well said. Or the color of the firefighter.
Ridiculous.
"When the house is on fire, you don't complain about the color of the carpet."
When your house, job and future have been stolen by a corporatist "savior", you don't need to worry about the damned foreclosed house burning down... there are more important concerns... like finding an overpass with some available real estate underneath... and coming to terms with those who did this to you.
When the house is on fire, you don't complain about the color of the carpet.
____________________________
You might if it seems to be turning the color of ash.
Yeah vote for more war next tuesday, and then all you faux progressives can tell the future victims of American wars for global resource domination what an amazing thing it is that you voted in a right wing militarist who happened to have an African father.
Puke inducing hypocrisy from a nation sadly containing far too many consumptive idiots.
Not being a USAn I don't need absolution, I just have to listen to bullshit being expounded about a right wing militarist from a nation that clearly loves war.
A very long shot if you consider the rhetoric emanating from Obama's campaign, and if you consider the advisor's he has surrounded himself with.
Let use that analogy about a trapped room, and say the trap being set is war.
Can you tell me how voting for a someone who wants to perpetuate and expand that war helps anyone to have a chance of escaping the trap?
What a hoot.
You offered a facile analogy about being trapped, and then when that analogy is expanded to see how it works out, you get all personal and try to be a mind reader.
If you want to develop a viable third party alternative you activity work and VOTE for to achieve that end, you don't adopt the position of an apologist for a defunct two party system and accept the negativety of the lesser of two evils.
Start local, because that is where real change springs from.
As a friend said, "LET'S PARTY LIKE IT'S l984!!"
You are more interested in personal attack rather than reading what was actually written.
Yes. The Neocons and Neoliberals are joining forces, with the Neolibs taking the dominant role in calling the shots in the imminent and continuing WARS. There's a buzz in China right now about reports of the Rand Corporation lobbying the Pentagon for war against a MAJOR POWER, not a lesser power, in order to pull the MIC out of a collapsing world economy. There should be an article by Paul Joseph Watson (UK reporter for INFOWARS)out this afternoon on Infowars and Prison Planet. Right now, it's speculation, but as insane as it seems, not beyond the realm of possibility. It makes me think about the warnings/predictions of Joe Biden, Colin Powell, and elements in the Pentagon about severely unpopular decisions and actions with which Obama will have to deal early in his term. Who knows, could be the same old New World Order going completely psycho. Will Obama, or won't he????
Yeah, I think it does. Unless the US does something Nader advocates. That would be a product of your choice and thus make you responsible. Surely the ones who voted against Bush and haven't supported his actions can't be said to be responsible for those actions...................lizard
Would anyone care to imagine what would happen if McCain won? All indications tell us Obama is favored by Americans, American newspapers, several well known Republicans, and most of the rest of the world. I can't imagine what things would be like if McCain won. And I'm talking about the next few weeks after Nov 4th. Any takers?
One thing is certain, the rest of the world will be quietly trying to slip out of the room without Uncle Sam noticing. 1) A McCain victory will indicate that the electoral process is now hopelessly corrupt and will elect a Republican even if every poll says the Democrat is ahead 99% - 1%. 2) The USA will no longer be considered a serious nation but a pack of demented warmongers speaking in tongues and communing with rattlesnakes while anxiously waiting for the world to come to an end. Slowly, in a totally rational and diplomatic way, the other nations of the world will start severing their ties with us, where that's possible. If I were the more or less sane leader of a major nation, I'd deal with the United States as little as possible and just wait for us to finish throttling ourselves.
The corporate party affliation of the next president will make ZERO difference when USAn bombs continue to blow up and mutilate innocents around the globe.
But hey pat yourselves on the back, you have attempted to assuage some national shame concerning slavery and racism, lets just ignore the brutal violence your hubris causes in foreign fields shall we, it's all about making Americans feel good about themselves.
I didn't ask about the party affiliation. I asked what would happen if McCain won despite the proponderense of support for Obama, including worldwide. Now that you've had your Catharsis of hate (on this and other posts) take a drink of water, take a deep breath, and try to add something valuable to the conversation.
Different people would be murdered by McCain than Obama. Imagine: if Ralph Nader or Cynthia McKinney were President for the next four years! Every time I hear incrementalist rhetoric I am reminded of Nina Simone's "Mississippi Goddam"!
Why are you so angry? Your imperialist pro-war pro-nuclear pro-corporate candidate is winning, isn't he??
I've tried to imagine that, I really have, but what I keep seeing is a president without party backing who would accomplish absolutely nothing. It's a great fantasy, but that's all it is. You continue to attack what you see as the cult of personality around someone else while wallowing in the one around your guys. And your guys have never been tested, elected, or have governered - all they have is a cult of personality. Seems kind of hypocritical to me. Cynthia McKinney must have some congressional highlights, no?
Well done, a good dose of puerile smugness helps.
Ok let's entertain you a little more.
If the far right wins in America.
You may get some believers in shallow symbolic change getting all upset, some violently so, because the far right candidate beat the middling right candidate. You'll get the usual claims and counter claims of a rigged vote.
Still whatever the result, you'll get an American charade continuing to ignore the sadly real issue of American bombs and bullets murdering innocents around the globe.
That, in addition to the feeling of history at our (older) backs, are voting for Obama. (I already voted for Obama, absentee ballot.)
no-nothingism . . .
That's "know nothingism", an indispensible pole holding up the Republican Big Tent. The rest of us are definitely victims of " no nothingism" - no, I don't got nothing these days.
"One thing I hate about the net is it gives cowards the ability to act tough."
Well at least you can prove your own point by personal example... I will hand *that* to you... and you are good at it... almost genius.
Who says we have four more days?
I just wonder what the effect of Obama shaking hands with Bush and joking around with him will be.
This is a moment that not one of Obama's smiling and singing supporters has probably prepared for. But it will be nationally televised and projected into most homes. A smiling and congratulatory Bush, handing the torch of __________ (hope, love, peace, prosperity,) you fill the blank, on to Obama.
Well, I think it is the childish belief that one man can save the world that has prevailed and Obama should be the last
I for one will continue to withold my vote from any candidate that will not wage peace. If enough of us did this they would HAVE to change. But hey "culture of death" is the new "culture of life", (as long as you don't have to twist the knife personally, I guess).
I agree - it has broken my heart that peace activists think it's o.k. to vote for a pro-war candidate and party. It hurts. When I read these gloating articles, I just wind up so incredibly sad - how do we deprogram such well-meaning well-intentioned people??
Not by accusing, cursing and condemning them at every opportunity, that's for sure. After being exposed to the vitriol here it will be difficult for me to accept the word of any Naderite again, and I'm a progressive. Imagine what your anger would do to the average voter just beginning to realize the Republicans he's been voting for all his life are not quite on his side. Flaying him for his past votes will send him running back to the familiar stereotype, and we've all missed a chance to move the USA one person more to the left.
People don't move to the left by voting for a right-wing candidate.
No, of course not. We should always encourage the confused Republican voter to explore both arms of the PARTY, hang out with the Dems for awhile. Try 'em, you'll like 'em. They're not really any different from you. That would be good. It's not a good thing to bypass the Democratic Party. A person needs experience and a well-rounded education. I wouldn't want to scare anyone that badly--not like those nut-job 3rd party people on CD.
"...accusing, cursing and condemning...at every opportunity.....Vitriole..." PTUI!
You've made point. The rest have made point. It reminds me somewhat of Hermann Hesse talking about trying to dialogue with fellow members of the German intelligentsia who had jumped on the "New World Order Bandwagon" of their day (around the time of W.W.I.)--a tiring and somewhat embittering experience. Have a wonderful election, all! Got to attend to some other matters, temporarily. Then, I'M GONNA PARTY LIKE IT'S 1984!!
Good idea. I'll bring the dip if you've got the Chips. ; )
Yes, I agree.
It's going to be slow work to turn this ship around after what Bush has done.
Consider this, kids. Exxon Mobil reported record highest earnings ever for last quarter today. So, bottom line, while we were all paying up to $5 a gallon for gas, Exxon Mobil was laughing at us. McCain thinks this is great stuff. He wants to reduce taxes on Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big everything.
Obama says Big Oil doesn't need tax breaks after they have raped the American public. Instead he wants to lower taxes on middle class Americans and force Big Oil to give some of the money back to us that they stole.
I'm so glad Exxon's earnings report came out today. If anyone can look at that and then not vote for Obama, you're nuts.
Ooh! Ooh! I wanted to be the first one in to say it's all Obama's fault! Curse the luck!