Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Battle for Obama’s Economic Soul
The battle for Barack Obama's economic soul is on in earnest, and it has nothing to do with the "European socialism" that John McCain attempted to use as an epithet against him. The Republican quickly dropped that line of attack, perhaps because the European Union's brand of democratic socialism has proved more effective in regulating the rapacious financial markets at the heart of the economic meltdown. Besides, the socialist British Labor Party has been President Bush's most loyal supporter of the Iraq occupation that McCain has made the test of true patriotism.
It would be encouraging if the Democratic presidential candidate did indeed attempt to learn something from Europe's democratic, and barely socialist, governing left concerning the welfare of those who are not super-rich, i.e., how to provide quality health care and education for all -- but that is not what is happening. Instead, Obama has turned to the same American "free market" elite that views government as merely a corporate subsidiary. Even within that crowd, however, there are serious splits, and the more enlightened side seems to be winning.
Key among the good guys is former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, who consistently challenged the radical anti-deregulatory crusade of Alan Greenspan, his immediate successor at the Fed. Greenspan's all-too-successful effort to give the banking lobby everything it had ever dreamed of was abetted by two Clinton-era secretaries of the treasury, Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers. Unfortunately, the two, who should have mustered the grace to depart public life in deep contrition over their failed policies, are prominent in the Obama campaign.
Rubin, who pocketed tens of millions running Goldman Sachs before becoming treasury secretary, is the man who got President Clinton to back legislation by then-Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, to unleash banking greed on an unprecedented scale. What followed, thanks to a rare display of bipartisan teamwork, was a total dismantling of the regulatory regime that President Franklin D. Roosevelt had put in place during the New Deal, thus undermining the finest legacy of the Democratic Party. Under the guidance of Rubin and Summers, Clinton signed off on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, Gramm's two key pieces of legislation, during his final two years in the White House.
The first beneficiary of that legislation was Citigroup, which was allowed to merge with Travelers Insurance, where Rubin became a director after leaving the government. In his position on the executive committee of a floundering Citigroup, Rubin insisted as late as January of this year that a serious crisis was not forming. In a Jan. 31 article in Fortune headlined "Robert Rubin: What meltdown?" the subheading states: "In a talk on Wednesday [Jan. 30], the Citigroup director said the current financial upheaval is just cyclical. And none of the blame that there was to assign went to Wall Street." The writer of the article, Katie Benner, quoted Rubin as saying that the problems were "all part of a cycle of periodic excess leading to periodic disruption," neatly exonerating his own bank of any responsibility, even though Citigroup had already written down over $24 billion in bad mortgage losses.
At that time, Rubin was advising Hillary Rodham Clinton, while Obama, listening to Volcker, took the opposite tack, issuing a warning in a major address two months after Rubin's talk that the United States was experiencing the most profound economic crisis since the Great Depression. Obama specifically cited the legislation that Rubin had supported and cautioned, "Our free market was never meant to be a free license to take whatever you can get, however you can get it."
Although Rubin came over to the Obama campaign after Hillary Clinton's defeat in the primaries, it does seem that Volcker and legendary investor Warren Buffett, another fierce critic of Clinton-era deregulation, are holding the floor for the time being. Buffett has been increasingly visible in the Obama campaign. More than five years ago, Buffett charged that the new investment devices, the "hybrid instruments" and "credit swaps" with which taxpayers are now stuck, were "financial weapons of mass destruction."
Let's hope that a President Obama will keep Buffett and Volcker close. They are certainly not the European socialists conjured up in yet another mean-spirited and irrational outburst of the McCain campaign, and their vision for the country seems to extend beyond their own bank accounts.
- Posted in

31 Comments so far
Show All"..the socialist British Labor Party" What New labour socialist? hahahaha
Remember, this is By US standards.
Compared to the US, the Tories would be socialist. Look at you NHS, which even Thatcher didn't dare touch, as just one example.
Instead of listening to Billionare Buffet perhaps Obama should invite someone like economist Jeffrey Sachs as his Secretary of Treasury..(if Wall Street types are part of his administration progressives are screwed)...
A vote for O'Bama validates McKane's worst behaviors such as trying to inflame American hatreds of good things like "European socialism". A vote for O'Bama helps keep "American capitalism" in a morbid, undead state, to terrorize the American people nightly.
US elites depend on American nationalist pride of identity to buttress a vastly inferior ideology that died a miserable death way back in the 1970s after which they decided to ship US industry overseas where superior-performing ideologies prevail.
"European socialism" outperforms "American capitalism" which is why the supporters of "American capitalism" refuse to make public comparisons. "European socialism" has to be censored. O'Bama validates the game. Demok triangulation is the great enabler of all of the extreme right's worst behaviors. Suppressing American socialism is the worst behavior of all.
A third party vote is a vote for American socialism. It's about time the USA picked up on a good thing. Churchill said Americans always do the right thing after first exhausting all other possibilities.
What more evidence does Robert Sheer need? I have lost patience with him. Every time I read an article by him, he's lowered the bar even lower. It reminds me of religion or the justifications of an abused spouse - always waiting and hoping, trying to see the "bright side," but pretending to be discerning. Barack Obama is as sold out as the rest of them, Robert.
Obama's vote and role as major arm twister for the $800,000,000,000 financial industry bailout should have made it absolutely clear. Calls from the American people came in to their offices, 100 to 1 - against the bailout.
Vote Nader, 08 as if our country depended on it! Let them hear our collective voice at the ballot box. We've had enough of this empire!
.
We can beat the MSM by using the INTERNET...
Spread the word.Go to all the blogs.
Nader for President.
Champion of the people.
What say you America ?????
.
"Let's hope that a President Obama will keep Buffett and Volcker close"
Hilarious! Why doesn't Robert Sheer rename "Truthdig" to "Golddig"? He wants all the capital (human/natural resources) of Planet Earth piled on top of Warren Buffet's head, the pinnacle of the class hierarchy, for safe storage! I DON'T THINK SO!! Next idea? (keep rejecting them until he finally says socialism)
The problem is rooted in a sense of SCALE. For Paulson to say that AIG, some banks, etc are TOO BIG TO FAIL is key to the solution. Bernie Sanders responded that if they're too big to fail, they should not be allowed to be big in the first place. What we have here is a parasite economy based on extortion, an economy worshipping monopolies/cartels...the exact antithesis of what a real "free" market would be. If you are big enough to BUY THE COMPETITION, you stifle innovation and reward (i.e. obscene exec pay, golden parachutes) mediocrity and sustain unaccountability. If COMPETITION IS THE MOTOR of capitalism, then it needs to be maintained and protected; Teddy Roosevelt understood that quite well. If the ANTITRUST LAWS are not enforced, then our society is on the backward path to FEUDALISM.
In Capitalism are embedded the seeds of its own destruction.
Perhaps we are entering a new age in which it must reinvent itself. A shift from BIG to SMALL, from globalization to LOCALIZATION, from KILLING COMPETITION to COLLABORATING with it
is the new paradigm of a healthy economic system. It would offer all citizens a fair playing field and the opportunity to actively participate in it. It would honor a MERITOCRACY (not an olligarchy as we now have) and reward it amply and fairly. In the AGE OF THE NETWORK, this is not only possible but morally imperative. A CONSTELLATION OF SMALL, INTERCONNECTED ENTERPRISES would restore the well being of the citizen; call it a sort of INTERNAL FREE TRADE system. It would usher in the age of TRICKLE OUT WEALTH.
You've described the answer well. Economic stability is one of the many great benefits of localism. Grass roots political activism is much more effective when small communities have economic/political independence. The activism is needed to keep the wealth/power from concentrating. It's a never-ending threat.
"Too big to fail" = socialism for the rich and for the rich only.
WARman Buffet wants YOU to stand in line behind fifty million Americans to get your insurance and other stuff from HIM. You like a line so long? O'Bama is going to PUT YOU in that line. Vote third party for the short line.
Why bother with elections at all? We should just assign political offices through the rankings of the Fortune 500, forcing political service upon the wealthy and preventing them from hiring an alternate. Then the GOP could feel secure that there was no socialism while we sing them to sleep as they suck on their “free market” pacifier.
And how much bribe money has BO received from the "finance industry" again?
Yea, let's "hope" he doesn't do their bidding...
According to opensecrets.org, at last count Obama's received nearly $18 million from securities and investment firms, commercial banks and other "miscellaneous finance" entities.
I'm sure he knows who's buttering his bread. As someone else here already pointed out, if there ever was a battle for Barack's "economic soul," it was over long before he ever ran for President.
Of course Obama has no soul, economic or otherwise.
He's the #1 corporate money-raiser, has already indicated that NAFTA will remain as is, was immediately amenable to the first draft of of the Bush trillion-dollar Wall St criminal gift, and so on down the line. Bush's energy plan, Bush's CAFA limitations on tort, siding with the mining industry on reforming the 1872 Mining Act... you name it, if it screws the little guy, Obama's for it.
The "battle for Obama's economic soul" was fought and lost likely while he was still in college. He's a corporate tool and always has been, and anyone who ever thought otherwise is delusional.
These articles putting any "hope" into an Obama candidacy are just ludicrous. How anyone wastes one second of time on Obama or the Dems and calls themselves "progressive" is beyond me. Obama has never made a progressive peep.
Nader. Nader, Nader, Nader! If this website wants to be taken seriously as a "progresive" voice, it has to run at least 1/10th of its Obama-massaging print on Nader '08. Otherwise, what a fraud!
Let's hope that a President Obama will keep Buffett and Volcker close
----
LOL! Don't worry, he will keep 'em close --- along with other big time corporatists.
http://almusawwir.org/resistance/
An acid test:
If on 2/1/09 Nomi Prins isn't one of the president's top advisors, and Ben Bernanke hasn't been booted out of the US Federal Reserve, you can kiss off any potential for meaningful change from the next president.
I think Obama just wants to win the sheeple's election and not get killed.
Obama's soul?
The ensouled minority in the US Senate already voted against funding the genocidal occupation of Iraq and against the abrogation of the Fourth Amendment by warrantless wiretapping and against NAFTA-Peru and against offshore drilling and against the trillion-dollar give-away to the same speculators who broke the banks, and on the other side of all these issues...
There was Barack Obama, humping the public along with all the other soulless humps.
Jacob Freeze
"Let's hope that a President Obama will keep Buffett and Volcker close" And to them I hope he adds Reich and gets rid of Reubin.
He will get sound advice and more importantly realistic advice. Both these men are not there to profit themselves.
"They are certainly not the European socialists conjured up in yet another mean-spirited and irrational outburst of the McCain campaign"
Oh no! Not European socialism! I hate health care and vacations.
Obama has raised $600 million from 3 million campaign donors so far. SO WHAT if he accepted $18M from Wall Street? He doesn't need them! He doesn't have to return their phone calls!
After November 4th he's still gonna have more money than Uncle Scrooge. Barack Obama will be the most unencumbered President to serve since Andrew Jackson. The average of all his donation for the entire campaign has been $86.00!
He does accept large donation via his PACs, The Obama Victory Fund and the Campaign for Change. But of the $150M he raised in September, only $32M came from the OVF... and they don't accept funds from industry PACs or lobbyists.
Retirees and students are the two groups which gave the most contributions in September (THANK YOU Governor Palin!).
Governor Jerry Brown started this in 1992 with an 800 number and a pledge to accept no more than $100 from any donor. Howard Dean took the concept to the internet in 2004. Team Obama has perfected the game, and mastered it.
Small change is real change.
"The average of all his donation for the entire campaign has been $86.00!"
All of the major Democratic candidates are getting over half their fund raising money in checks of over $1000. (and yes, this includes Barrack Obama, who has made it seem that he has raised most of his money in $5 bills.)
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8/6/3218/79808
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/01/sweet_obama_secretive_about_fu.html#more
Obama has been misleading and basically a liar on this for the entire campaign. He presents the phony front of not wanting corporate money. While of course raking it in the back door.
Remember when he wouldn't take money from lobbyists? Well, apparently that didn't include individuals who worked for the big lobbying firms. And it of course didn't include money from the individuas who were execs in the industries represented by the lobbyists. It was just a Clinton-esqe charade. Obama raked in the big money while splitting hairs on the semantics of not taking money from lobbyists.
People who don't think Obama is just a servant of corporate money are deluding themselves.
PS ... 'average' can be very misleading.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
Key among the good guys is former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker...
-if these are the good guys then we are in deep shit!
Back in April Joe Costello wrote in this article how Carter's appointing Paul Volcker head of the Federal Reserve would change American politics for the next three decades:
"This new political regime's greatest accomplishment was actually something quite extraordinary, they basically removed economics, or at least any meaningful discussion of it, from politics. Various terms like "free markets" and "free trade" became mantras repeated without end and thus believed by most adherents to have a meaning negating any need for further debate. Economics became removed from political discussion to an extent unprecedented in American history."
In other words, with Volcker back, yeah, we'll be good for another three decades of deep shit.
"jjohnjj October 22nd, 2008 9:47 pm
Obama has raised $600 million from 3 million campaign donors so far. SO WHAT if he accepted $18M from Wall Street? He doesn't need them! He doesn't have to return their phone calls!"
THAT MEANS NOTHING; it does NOT say or prove who the real donators are. So people should not make naive assumptions; proof is what's needed. And he's most surely gotten a lot more than $18mn from Big Business people. Most U.S. voters couldn't donate $200 even if they'd like to.
With that said, Scheer's article is a little interesting, but the perspective it provides is very limited, too. I just made a post on another article at CD and of the same date as this one; this post for several links to articles that should be carefully read by everyone, really.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/10/22-4#comment-1061353
TOO MANY people are considering only Obama's national policy advisers; NOT the far more important foreign policy advisers he has on his team and whom he said will be forming his presidential administration team, if he's elected, which is a virtual certainty! McCain really has virtually NIL for chance of winning, as I've been believing for some time now and which I posted about here (CD) over the past few days, maybe on an article of Oct. 21st or 20th.
And this extreme shortcoming of the many "analysts" on Obama's national policy words is their very constant NEGLECT of his foreign policy advisers and extreme dangers.
The above post with links to several articles from various sources and posted at Uruknet give a strong sampling of the urgency for paying attention to the foreign policy aspect of Obama's team.
Not doing that is to again give the world all of the reason in the world to refer to the U.S. as "baby killers", etcetera; and that "Americans" again illustrate that they really care ONLY about themselves and their bank accounts, material comforts.
European socialism is better than what is found in the USA, BUT THAT'S NOTHING when we carefully consider that the European countries, key ones, are very criminal in the foreign policies and actions terms. They constitute the largest part of NATO and that's commanded by the USA; and this whole organization is nothing but a hellish beast doing whatever it wants to do whereever it wishes.
National is about self, which is akin to selfishness! Foreign is about international, which, in turn, means billions of other people; many peoples! I'll grant the latter the highest priority!
You try taking $18 million from the Wall Street mob, then later reneging on the deal, and see how insignificant they think $18 million is.
That's the difference. That money came with strings attached. The money from small donors came from dellusional people, and Obama promised them nothing and will deliver them nothing. The corporate money came in back rooms, and Obama will certainly have to follow through on his promises to them.
There was all this bull about Obama being assasinated earlier in the campaign when he needed some spin. But, if he takes hundreds of millions of corporate money (the $18 mil from Wall Street is only one categorty), and then suddenly reverses himself and doesn't follow through on the deals he's made, then that might get him killed. That's the real power in this country, and I doubt they'd take kindly to being conned out of a hundred million or so and then not getting what they paid for.
Of course, no chance of that happening. At no time in the Senate has Obama ever shown any sign of NOT doing what the money wanted him to do. Money calls, and Obama hits the floor as its obedient servant.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
What soul? Obama *has* none, he'll fight for Wall Street first, pure and simple. He's a Democrat.
Only 25% of his donations have been from small donors. No wonder he flew to Washington especially to vote for the bailout, the man only sees dollar signs in front of his eyes.
Wow, nice to know a couple of right-wingers like Buffett and Volker are the 'good guys' on the Obama team. Only if you put them next to the Wall Street scum I guess.
Notice how the one semi-decent voice from the Clinton years, Robert Reich, isn't even in the picture. And certainly no one else to the left of Volker ... who if I remember right was Ronald Reagan's pick to run the Fed.
There are economists and theorist to the left of Volker. Its very instructive that none apparently are allowed to talk to Obama. Instead, it looks like Reagonmics, version 2, is the 'change' that Obama will give us. Oh goody.
----------------------------
"To know, and not to do, is not to know"
www.samsonsworld.blogspot.com
Thought this Goof Ball (Robert Scheer) was locked up in the Loony Bin years ago. Here he is again, the Ramparts communist propaganda magazine editor. Does not Scheer realize he has terrible body odor? He has been fired by every magazine and newspaper he ever worked for. Maybe "Street Mime" would be a better career for this nutcase. Obama could be his manager.