Create Your Own Workplace
An agenda that puts people first: Jobs
Maria Rosales always dreamed of owning her own business and had the know-how to do it. She grew up helping her parents run a restaurant, market, and farm in Mexico, and later helped her sister with her work at a banana export business. But when Rosales immigrated to the United States, she found she lacked the formal education and capital to start her own business. So she took a job on a Silicon Valley electronics assembly line.
Life changed for Rosales years later when she learned about Women's Action to Gain Economic Security, or WAGES, a San Francisco Bay-area organization that helps low-income women start businesses. The staff of WAGES invited her to join four other women in starting a cooperative.
Under a cooperative business model, each participant is both a worker and an owner of the venture, sharing the costs and profits equally.
"Cooperatives give more people access to business ownership," says WAGES executive director Hilary Abell. And they provide jobs that put workers' well-being first.
That's more important than ever in today's sluggish economy, when big companies are downsizing and outsourcing jobs to lower-wage countries. Unemployment in the United States now stands at 9.9 percent if workers who have given up looking for jobs and the underemployed are included. Add in the U.S. prison population, and the rate is 11.3 percent.
For corporate employers, obligations to shareholders means a never-ending search for lower costs, and that often means employees are shunted aside.
But that can't happen at a cooperative, because the workers, managers, and shareholders are the same people. They don't need to make huge profits for shareholders to stay in business, and there's no pressure to keep wages low.
Co-ops also have the advantage of needing only modest amounts of capital to get started. "People can pool their skills and resources," says Abell.
From the beginning, Rosales and her coworkers made the decisions, including choosing to run a housecleaning service.
WAGES trained the women to work with safe and natural cleaning products like vinegar, baking soda, and vegetable-based soaps. The women, accustomed to using harsh chemicals, were skeptical at first. But they were won over when the products worked well without causing the rashes and headaches that had plagued them when they used chemical cleansers.
That was in 1999. Today Rosales works as a general manager for Emma's Eco-Clean, the company she started with the other women from WAGES. The increased demand for all things green helped Emma's expand to 25 worker-owners. Meanwhile, WAGES launched two other eco-cleaning businesses and is planning a fourth.
One of those companies, Natural Home Cleaning Professionals, announced a year-end profit of more than $90,000 last year. The worker-owners voted to take 70 percent of that amount in bonuses and put the rest into growing their business.
Sharing the Wealth While successful in some markets, the cooperative business model faces challenges. One is that co-ops are just catching on in the U.S., which means financing new projects is difficult, and guidance for young cooperatives is scarce. To help fill the void, WAGES provides advice to those trying to start a co-op. "We don't want other people to have to learn the hard way," Abell says.
WAGES also shares co-op know-how through local, regional, and national co-op networks including the United States Federation of Work Cooperatives, a grassroots organization founded in 2004.
Another challenge is that each co-op worker-owner assumes much more decision-making responsibility than an employee in a conventional business. They must be prepared to vote on everything from the annual budget and hourly rates to whether an under-performing member should be asked to leave.
"We are like a family," Rosales says, and that helps with decision making.
Also important are the goals co-op members share. These include earning better wages and benefits than are offered at other jobs available to these women. "I worked for 11 years, and the most I made per hour was $11," says Rosales. At Emma's, "everybody is making from $12 to $15 an hour."
The cooperative model has also payed off for Claudia Zamora, a worker-owner at Natural Home Cleaning. Like Rosales, Zamora emigrated from Mexico and worked in the cleaning and restaurant industries before joining the cooperative. She was scared at first-she had to contribute $400 to join, and had to go in with seven other women on a $14,000 loan. But the benefits were worth it. Zamora was able to purchase a home, and she can arrange her schedule around the needs of her two children, ages five and eight.
For Rosales, one of the biggest rewards is working in a job her family is proud of. Her oldest daughter, a 21-year-old college senior, talks about her mom to her friends. "She sends me e-mails, and says how much she admires me and how much she appreciates all the hard work I do," says Rosales.
Also important is the empowerment and business knowledge Rosales has gained. "I feel like I can do any type of business now with the experience I got here," she said.
As jobs in the corporate economy disappear overseas or fall victim to downsizing, workers may choose to create their own jobs through cooperatives that they can control.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
22 Comments so far
Show AllThis is how we must proceed in the future: grassroots redevelopment of our economic base. People running their own businesses, manufacturing locally, selling locally, being conscious of environmental issues: this is what we need to reverse decades of corporate hegemony, mass layoffs, job outsourcing, declining self-efficacy, and environmental destruction. If enough people would voluntarily pursue this approach and set a good example for others to follow, we can gradually and non-violently replace the existing government-corporate fascist structure with something friendlier and more down to earth.
Dave
http://daveeriqat.wordpress.com/
Progressive Newsflash: Neither banks nor corporations are necessary.
Coops are one of the keys. But the extreme right propaganda machine wants everyone to forget about coops, forget about heirloom seeds, forget about everything that keeps people INDEPENDENT and free in the "land of the free". You work on the corporate chain gang, courtesy of the Red White and Blue, or not at all.
Progressive Newsflash: Neither banks nor corporations are necessary.
Though those involved in the coop described above are to be commended, it's a long way from an eco-friendly home cleaning service to regaining the manufacturing activity that one expects to thrive within the US.
Well this was a hopeful article for a change. It's nice to see The American Dream being achieved for people without the huge sacrifices and the big risks. Most ordinary people who try to start their own businesses end up losing their shirts. They don't have the capital and resources and the safety cushions that the wealthy have. I'd work for Emma's Eco-Clean. At least I'd know that I'm not slaving away making someone else fat.
This is why I often enjoy reading the comments more than the actual articles, and even skip to them sometimes...
Siouxrose says-
"I remember thinking that when gay men entered the fashion world, the entire concept of the female BODY (in idealized version) came to resemble something like a tall basketball playing teenage boy with breasts... I call the model, "tits on a stick" and believe it should be a make-it-yourself popsicle, marketed to men getting off alcohol, to suck on during Superbowl and other foot ball games."
I've always wondered as a heterosexual male why I never got that excited about supermodels and such. Occasionally, I've put on "America's Next Top Model" for a few minutes just to see what the fuss was about. And I can honestly say that none of those women do anything for me. It just reinforced my view that ordinary women, the ones I come in contact with or see when I'm out and about are more attractive than the ones I see in magazines or on the screens big and small.
Also, whenever I have seen models in person, they were never all that interesting to look at. At my job, one of the companies whose products they sell has spokemodels (for power tools, no kidding). Once in a while, one of the models will come by along with sales reps to make a promotional appearance and sign autographs and pose for pictures. I see them in person, and they look like younge girls wearing too much makeup and with big hair. If they walked by me on the street, I wouldn't look twice.
With Pallin, I see a woman just trying to get by in Man's world. She traded on her looks in beauty pageants, and now she's trying to be all things to Middle America, despite the fact that few Middle Americans would be able to relate to her. She panders to good old boys by feigning their interests, yet wants housewives to like her also by being still being feminine and non-threatening. She'll help ya hunt, and then cook dinner without a complaint. One thing that worries me about a McCain/Pallin presidency is that if McCain goes down, you'd have Pallin running the show, and while she has been in positions of power, I still get the feeling that she's still pretty much used to deferring to men.
Little Brother and Frederick Johnson are examples of people who totally miss the point of a story.
What I like about this story is that:
these women are learning to cultivate relationships with the other co-owners as well as manage profit/loss statements and distribute profits.
these women are learning to have to make hard decisions towards those with whom they have developed a relationship such as having to ask sonmeone to leave when things are not working out.
these women have an organization available to help with guidance in helping them solve their business problems.
all owner-workers vote on all issues meaning that the majority buys in to all decisions.
Hugo Chavez has made the coop model a centerpiece of his economic empowerment of ordinary people in Venezuela and the movement there is having sinmialr successes.
Poet
It looks to me like Little Brother's opinion is close to / compatible with yours ???
Hugo is the threat of a good example that gives predatory capitalists diarrhea.
Did you even read my post? NO. Otherwise, you would have realized that I commend people like Maria Rosales who try to overcome the PRIVATIZATION of the lower/middle/working class. Yeah, it's tougher to achieve out here in South Carolina what's achievable in California but we ain't giving up.
Hell, Ralph Nader is the equivilant of Hugo Chavez which is why I'm batting for Nader at this point.
"Under a cooperative business model, each participant is both a worker and an owner of the venture, sharing the costs and profits equally."
"SHARING the costs and profits EQUALLY" are the operative words. Coops are neither predatory capitalism nor hegemonic communism, but a sustainable grassroots business model.
Too bad cooperativeness has been PRIVATIZED for decades by the Republicans and a great deal of the Democrats.
I remember thinking that when gay men entered the fashion world, the entire concept of the female BODY (in idealized version) came to resemble something like a tall basketball playing teenage boy with breasts... I call the model, "tits on a stick" and believe it should be a make-it-yourself popsicle, marketed to men getting off alcohol, to suck on during Superbowl and other foot ball games.
I mention this because I received a compelling email this morning from a woman who posts on CD who asked me if I didn't note in Sarah Palin a whole new distorted image of the feminine. Some CD readers may remember I offered the reserach of Jungian psychologist, Jean Shinoda Bolen who used various references to suggest different version of feminine and masculine prototypes. (As an astrologer, I related these to specific zodiac signs and came up with a fascinating new amalgam.) Based on this amalgam, the model of Athena, the Goddess who applauds war and warriors, denies her mother, and states that her origin derived from her father Zeus's head, tells it all. This is THE woman who thinks like a man, identifies with patriarchy and its guns n' god (Mars version) model. That this lady is also a mother is its own distortion... it's true that teens experiment with sex earlier these days due to the sexual bombardments from the music & movie industries, but her daughter clearly was rebelling against mom's controls. Sarah Palin is a hybrid of some really twisted yin and yang expressions. She's yang where it's wiser to be Yin and vice versa. Is there a cosmic chiropractor in the house?
I just want to make sure I'm following this... gay men created an ideal female based on fantasies about teenage boys (ok, I can see that) which actually has become nothing more than a phallus with tits (hmm, maybe). This phallus should be sold as a sugary treat for straight guys to suck on. (Whoa!)
"but her daughter clearly was rebelling against mom's controls."
I don't find that clear at all. Isn't it possible that her pill failed or she forgot to be careful in the heat of the moment or the rubber broke? If having sex at 17 is rebelling againsst your mother there is a whole lot of rebelling going on. I know at 17 I wasn't rebelling against my parents in having sex, it was just great.
Loved your "tits on a stick" concept. Twiggy has a lot to answer for.
I understood Siouxrose's comment. Palin's daughter is being raised in a highly controlled environment. You can't imagine there's free thought and speech in that household, can you? Palin also supports *abstinence ONLY* education - not just practice but education. How tragic. So the girl acts out - acts against the family mores ... there is the very slight possibility that she had no idea what was going only - only that it felt good - but my vote goes for 'stickin' it to mom and dad' while having it stuck to her.
Juliann
"You can't imagine there's free thought and speech in that household, can you?"
I can. Even the most far left or right extremist politically can be a Cuddly bear at home. I have no idea what these people are like, but I can't judge from political positions.
I see what you guys are saying, I still would bet it was a slip up. Or maybe the kids just want to get married and you are both right.
In any case it has nothing to do with politics as far as I am concerned.
Women such as Maria Rosales, Cindy Sheehan, Cynthia Mckinney, etc ... are the type of women that will find a place in my heart and my wife's as well. Women such as Palin and even Hillary are a FUCKING DISGRACE to women. Even to men who are sick and tired of being macho bullies at a time we're economically bleeding and possibly losing our family members to wars and piss poor healthcare, the last thing America needs are more corporatist puppets, even if they are minorities or women.
I am sick and tired of ordinary people ridiculing or even tearing apart each others' hard work and service. This is why we a are a FUCKING DYSFUNCTIONAL NATION OF PATHETIC LOSERS. We wouldn't be stuck with such shitty MISleadership from both parties otherwise !!
FrederickJohnson - Your argument is somewhere in there amidst foul language and hateful comments. Please try again and I MIGHT pay attn.
PS Hillary is NO disgrace to me. She is the person who should be president, with Bill on one side and Obama on the other.
But Hillary supported the war in Iraq and most of the "free" trade scams. If this is what you like, you might as well vote for Mccain or Obama and get it over with it.
I am shocked-- shocked!-- and dismayed that you could write such a thing!:
"Women such as Palin and even Hillary are a FUCKING DISGRACE to women."
First of all, just between you and me, I think it's against The Rules. And now that you've forced me to echo it, I'm going right down with you!
But more importantly, how dare you omit the name "Nancy Pelosi" from that sentence? That's the part that REALLY gets me.
I thought Nancy Pelosi is already getting replaced by Cindy Sheehan. Sorry about that dude, damn too many fucking names to name. In addition to Pelosi, let me add Liddy Dole, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Tammy Duckworth, Mary LandRUIN, etc ... Well, you know the list goes on. I'm not saying all women pols are bad. Unfortunately, like most male pols, a great deal of the female pols are selling out as well in both parties and the selling out of all pols needs to be fixed. Is that clear?
Very clear.
BTW, I was only kidding, but the little yellow winky-face emoticon is no longer available.
Another unfortunate casualty of the Reformed comments...
Ah, you nailed me. :)