Police Block Veterans’ Access to DNC in Largest Protest to Date
DENVER- A little more than an hour before Sen. Barack Obama made a surprise appearance at Pepsi Center to conclude the evening at the Democratic National Convention, his campaign had an exchange with Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW).
Approximately 100 IVAW members were determined to push Obama on his stance on troop withdrawal. Leading a grueling three-hour-plus long march of an estimated 7,000 demonstrators towards the Pepsi Center late in the afternoon, IVAW hoped to deliver a folded flag and a letter calling on Obama to endorse the three main goals of unity: immediate withdrawal of American troops, full veterans benefits, and reparations for the Iraqi people.
The march was met with a line of more than 100 Denver Police Department officers clad in riot gear and armed with batons and pepper ball guns at the intersection of Market and 17th Streets. The police refused to let IVAW or the thousands of antiwar demonstrators closer to the convention. After long moments of contention between the demonstration and the police, finally one IVAW representative, former U.S. Marine Liam Madden, was allowed to cross police lines to meet with representatives of the Obama campaign.
As Madden left on his mission, it seemed as if more than 50 IVAW members were prepared to engage in non-violent civil disobedience and likely arrest. Less than 10 minutes later, at approximately 7:40pm (CT), an announcement was made by IVAW to the crowd, indicating that Obama had endorsed their three points of unity, causing the crowd to uproar in applause.
Some veterans were visibly emotional by the end of the march. In a highly stirring and symbolic moment, members of IVAW gave a peace salute towards the direction of the Pepsi Center. There was then a moment of silence for casualties of the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.
"Sen. Obama, we won't forget this," said Jeff Engelhart, IVAW member who served in Baquba, Iraq, with the U.S. Army 1st Infantry Division, to the crowd via microphone and loud speakers. He went on to indicate that if Sen. Obama did not make good on his endorsement, more antiwar protests would come.
But there seemed to be some disconnect between the protesters and Madden's conversation with the Obama campaign.
IVAW's statement that the Obama campaign endorsed their points of unity could not be confirmed. The endorsement seems to be at odds with the Obama campaign's stated positions on troop withdrawal, which involve a gradual and phased withdrawal of combat troops, with a residual force to stay in Iraq for the time being.
Local news stations have not confirmed the claim that Obama endorsed the three points of unity. Instead, both the Rocky Mountain News and the Denver Post are reporting that a meeting has been planned between IVAW and Obama's liaison for veterans' affairs.
Members of IVAW expressed pessimism of the Democrats as an antiwar party, noting that although they were elected in 2006 with an antiwar message, they have continually funded the wars.
"I really don't feel [Obama] is the antiwar candidate," said U.S. Army Specialist Sean Valdez, a new member of IVAW who served two tours of duty in Iraq. "It's so hard. You hear what he says and you want to believe it, but how many times have we been disappointed before this?"
"We're here as veterans, as soldiers, as marines, here to demand that the Democratic Party uphold to the front that they have as an antiwar party, and actually make a stand, and bring our soldiers home now," said 31-year-old Adrienne Kinnie, a member of IVAW who served in the U.S. Army and Army Reserves from 1994 to 2004.
In a juxtaposition that is becoming familiar in Denver, two worlds seemly unconnected are living side-by-side, only streets apart - the polished Democratic showcase and the simultaneous protests in the parks and streets where the voices of ordinary people remain unheard by the Democratic dynasty.
While Sen. John Kerry addressed delegates about the Iraq War and veteran issues, outside the convention thousands of demonstrators were demanding that the Democrats take a firmer stance on ending the war and providing better treatment to U.S. military personnel and veterans. There was no mention of the large demonstration or the concerns of IVAW during the convention presentation inside Pepsi Center, although most of the speeches given throughout the night touched on the Iraq War and the military.
The Denver Police Department riot officers, looking as menacing as ever with their fingers on the triggers of their pepper ball guns, failed to corral the demonstrators into the so-called designed "free speech zone," located near 7th Street and Walnut Street, earlier in the afternoon when it left the Denver Coliseum after a Rage Against the Machine concert.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
13 Comments so far
Show AllThere were 7,000 demonstrators on the streets? And this didn't make the news? It says a lot about either how "edited" our "news" is; or the accuracy of this report. Which?
Tree Fitz at 08-28 at 6:58 pm
Well said, as Thomas More's comment made no sense at all. One would like to believe that even in George Bush's and/or Obama's America, the citizens of this country still have the right to protest against the policies of their government and the ideas that their leaders put forth.
Of course people have the right to protest. But they shouldn't lie about having 7000 people protesting, it simply leads people to disbelieve the truth when it is told.
I guess I need to make my comments in plain English, it was just my feeble attemopt at humor.
In any case the lies have to stop or we simply become the neocons, the same people that have been lying for 8 years.
Well, you still have the right to believe whatever you like. So far.
However, acting on that belief is a different question entirely.
With, one suspects, a totally different answer.
__________________
In a perfect world, it would matter what we the people think. In this one....
The Democratic Party have become the "Enablers". And to top it off, the protagonists did not get their wish (Rush (Dumbass) Limbaugh for one) for a violent confrontation.
The NWO Fascist Freakzoids need to keep pushing America to the breaking point. I for one, can not wait..... I got alot of rope
I am interested to read about the IVAW protest and especially interested in the confusing dissonance. Did Obama endorse their points or didn't he? This seems to be extremely important. And it is scary, to me, that we the people can't know for certain.
Stepping beyond the IVAW post, I am dismayed, frightened, really, at the way protestors are now cordoned off and prevented from protesting at the scene. My gosh, look at how our freedom of speech has been severely curtailed during this administration and look how seemingly happy the Democratic Party is to accept such restrictions? Is anyone else outraged that protestors are blocked from closer access?
And who and what are the other protests? I spend a large portion of my days reading news. I spend too much time online reading news. But it is hard to know what is going on in the protest zone in Denver. And it is sad and scary that we can't readily learn this things, that we don't seem to have much of a Third Estate anymore, a journalism branch of society that seeks to inform a democratic citizenry.
Tree Fitz
The vets need to lineup on the Beltway, fix bayonets and charge.
We are way past the time of saying "pretty please."
If only Obama had come about of his ivory tower and spoken to the demonstrators directly - letting them see his face, shake his hand. If only he would promise, that as president, he would withdraw our troops from Iraq and Afghanistan once and for all and ASAP, and never start any more new wars, and take the money away from the military and use it for desperately-needed social programs here at home. And that's just for starters.
But Obama never did come out and face the demonstrators. That speaks volumes for his intentions.
It is laudatory that the IVAW is urging Obama to withdraw all troops from Iraq post haste. But one wishes that the IVAW was just as concerned regarding the so-called good war in Afghanistan. Perhaps the IVAW should also have demanded that Obama condemn the United States for recently dropping 500 lb. bombs on Afghan civilians, killing 90 of them, 60 of whom were children. It would be extremely unlikely if the [alleged] agent of hope and change decided to state in his acceptance speech tonight that the unjustified bombing of those Afghani civilians has constituted a war crime against the United States under international law.
Give the IVAW a chance. Calling for simultaneous withdrawal from both theaters is likely more than twice as difficult as doing them serially. Maintaining 2 fronts is expensive, messy and usually leads to failure. Just ask Rumsfeld.
Focus on one theater. When that is successful, then they can focus on Afghanistan.
Quite true.
But....7000 protesters? My left toe.
what the heck does 'my left toe' mean? Are you voicing derision? skeptiism? And, if so, of what? Why do people bother to post crap like this. It degrades the subject matter of the thread, it does not add to the discourse. It is negative, enervating.
Are you saying you don't believe there were seven thousand protestors?
Gee you think it degrades the subject matter do you? OK, let me make it clear, there were unlikely 7000 protesters at the convention in toto and there certainly weren't 7,000 as is presented here.
And yes, spurious claims like this are very negative and do not add to our credibility in speaking about matters.
Clear enough now?