EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
Published on Thursday, December 15, 2011 by Ian MacKenzie
Naomi Klein - Interview with Occupy Vancouver
Shot by Ian MacKenzie ianmack.com
On Dec. 1, Naomi Klein joined "Occupy Condos: Take the Pantages!" to show support for affordable housing in the DTES.
After the march, members of Occupy Vancouver media team were able to sit down with Naomi and capture her thoughts on the Occupy Movement, the tar sands pipeline, and how to prepare for the largest economic shock yet.
Naomi Klein - interview with Occupy Vancouver from Ian MacKenzie on Vimeo.
Posted in #occupy
Comments are closed
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

22 Comments so far
Show AllI was teaching a HS honors class today and discussing the many similarities of the 30's Great Depression and today when the subject of "Hoovervilles" came up.
This made me wonder why the Occupy movement didn't call their Occupy encampments "Bushvilles" and/or "Obamavilles"?
It might have broadened the appeal to a wider range and volume of people to participate --- and mostly given the friggin corporatist media an "offer of a sound bite that they couldn't refuse" to popularize.
As I always tell students of history, it was George Santayana who said, "if we do not learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it."
And as we head toward the inexorable reality of Great Depression II, it might make sense to change the arc of history as our current presidential shill likes to claim, but never do.
Even a basic HS history review of Hoover's pitiful and stupid reaction/precipitation of GD I, exactly parallels Bush and Obama's same moves the 'second time around'.
The only difference seems to be the terminology used to fol the rubes, and, of course, the dollar amounts involved.
Best luck and love to Occupy Empire.
Liberty, democracy, justice, and equality
over
violent/Vichy
empire,
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
...the subject of "Hoovervilles" came up.
This made me wonder why the Occupy movement didn't call their Occupy encampments "Bushvilles" and/or "Obamavilles"?
That is an excellent point you make there. I just emailed the OWS main site with that recommendation.
You answered your question within your question.
Calling them "Bushvilles" or "Obamavilles" implies that the President is responsible for the economic devastation that capitalism inflicts. And this is exactly the meme that the right wing is frantically pushing, to divert people's attention from the men behind the curtain of the Great and Powerful Oz.
Puppidents come and go, but the wars, poverty and environmental destruction continues.
Focus on Wall Street!
backunivited, you have a point.
It's not just the puppet faux-emperor/presidents that are the proximate cause, but the disguised corporate/financial/militarist EMPIRE that has fully 'captured' and 'Occupies' our former country by hiding behind the facade of the empire's bought and owned TWO-Party 'Vichy' sham of faux-democratic and totally illegitimate government.
The Occupy movement has to make it clear that they are occupying the entire EMPIRE --- both the Bushvilles and the Obamavilles --- to clearly show that the EMPIRE is the central cancerous tumor which actually causes all the superficial 'symptom problems' like; increasing imperialist oil wars 'abroad', domestic spying and lying 'at home', Wall Street looting, destruction of our environment, massive income inequality, etc., etc.
So, backuninvited, thanks for reminding us that focusing on the causal cancer of EMPIRE is the first priority and pointing to the illegitimacy of the Empire's shills, Bush and Obama, is a secondary way of showing people with 'Bushvilles' and 'Obamavilles' that both of these treasonous pricks are just the names associated with the results of Empire's deceit and crimes.
Best,
Alan
One can learn from history, but if you can't or don't do something about it, you will do than and lose more than just repeating it.
We have gone from the Robber Barons of the Gilded Age
to the Robber Barons of the Goldman Age. Heckuva deal.
You might ad this Howard Zinn zinger into your 'quote repertoire' for the students as well:
"History is important. If you don't know history it is as if you were born yesterday";
it goes on further and concludes:
"And if you were born yesterday, anybody up there in a position of power can tell you anything, and you have no way of checking up on it.
You can't eat values. Shame and guilt and honor are not terms the rich understand. It's all about profits for them. If Occupy remains on the level of values and does not ramp up the economic pressure, it will fail. And Obama will grant permits for the pipeline as soon as Obama gets re-elected--no delusions please.
A systemic collapse of an economic system is not going to feed very many anyway and then people will have to look at their values in order to solve the problems we will all be facing. I believe she was very on point: that people fear change and that the only way we can overcome that in a healthy and safe way is by connecting to educate, inspire and energize each other for the extremely difficult tasks ahead. We are all part of one world, together.
Why can't I get past 2:15? Tried several times with Explorer and with Firefox. Someone playing games?
Naomi Kline is always a delight to hear from. She has first-hand experience of the South American 'consciencialização' - in Argentina and other places - each learner teaches another learner. 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed by 'Paolo Friere is a classic worth reading. the return of consciousness raising as a movement is just one of the gifts of Occupy. Its an important 'de-briefing' to really appreciate the diversity of experiences and schoolings that people are engaging and carrying forward.
I am reminded that the traditional nickname of the nations capital is 'old foggy bottom'. Karma beyond words... instead of the tomato that ate Philadelphia, we have the slimy dragging of the hydra headed swamp monster.
Seeds were harvested from herbs hung to dry. An abundance of hot peppers have been woven into a wreath of harvested morning glory vines with the dusky gray-green of artemesia and a few miniature wooden carved birds. Awaiting the winter solstice ...
Inadvertent duplication deleted.
What Naomi Klein is talking about is to some degree what Henry Wallace was talking about back in 1942 and 1943. He was talking about the need for a "people's century," a progressivs' big idea in his day, and he surely spoke for Franklin D Roosevelt. Wallace specifically talked about "American greed" and at the time "German will to power" saying both "must go." What he didn't talk about as far as I know was the environrment. But Earth Day wouldn't come until 1970. What Klein didn't tallk about here or maybe I missed it was the impact of a militarized economy which Wallace warned against along with all "American imperialism" condemniing it as going the way of the very enemy we were fighting against at the time.
Wallace would say of peace"It's like maintaining a garden in good order"-- surely a fitting metaphor. "Workiing for peace and the general welfare is the essence of true education and all true relgion" he would say being firmly of the Protestant social gospel and ecumenical mold.
Naomi Klein would surely agree with what Henry Wallace said about a miiitarized economy and she's on top of so much of what goes on with outstanding analysis of same as well as her activism.
It stopped at 3:39 on me and just as I was thinking the vimeo wouldn't go into a video dump and stop, but it sure did or it at least stopped. It will be very hard to convince me that someone or group (M$M) is doing this deliberately which is all too common now where people are not allowed to see, hear, read or say (commenting, which is disappearing or being deferred to facebook or twitter). Unconscionable, meaning psychotic.
I liked what she said at the end, the denial of the ruling elite (and right-wing think tanks) of global warming, their having no sense of a future, no concern for the destruction of the environment, a 'collective insanity' on the part of the ruling class. To me, this is one of the most puzzling problems, the idea that billionaires care about getting MORE STUFF rather than protecting the environment. How could they be so demonic?
You're right about those think tanks. I have for a long time thought them to be as insidious as the influence peddlers posing as lobbyists, major major treasonous bastards to this country. And it is the whole coterie of right wing think tanks and not just the 'global warming' ones. All of the neoconservative think tanks are set in one mind frame of deflecting, obfuscation, dodging and disruption to gain a step ahead of people who are aware and try to ameliorate their destructiveness if not down right shut them down. Those think tanks are the cesspools where the traitorous ideas, such as the 'project for the newt(he's one of the authors) american century' boil up into existence. Put the nail into the coffins of lobbyists and neoconservative think tanks and the path to a better world would become much easier.
Naomi Klein's visionary understanding really shines though in this excellent interview. Her "Shock Doctrine" book is perhaps the best characterization of our times, with a slow-burning argument that gets confirmed with each passing day.
I think she is dead on in saying during the interview that something new is happening within the movement that's attempting to take on neoliberalism. It's like an effort to fight a persistent cancer on the planet by undercutting it from the roots. The change that is happening perhaps will occur in a different way than has been contemplated in past movements, and it's really hard to foresee whether it will succeed or not.
I think this is the first step: a mass change in consciousness. That still leaves the economic machine intact, though. Maybe, despite the incredible violence of the shock machine, there is some level of persuasion that will break the machine in a quiet way. On a day-to-day basis, I meet people who just did not seem to care before, but now, with the OWS phenomenon, people whom I thought were indifferent seem excited. I'm hoping its not a short-term phase but the beginnings of an effort that will lead to systemic change.
Anyway, it could just be that I am hopelessly in love with Naomi. But it's equally true that Canadians think clearer than their neighbors down south. The United States could undergo profound cultural change, despite what looks like unfavorable odds and unfavorable conditions. If it happens before I'm dead, I will have died happy.
Naomi Klein ! I am so thankful there are people like her (you) out there ! What a blessing! What a treasure !
Just say it, Naomi, we all know you think it. Capitalism needs more than to be reigned in, it needs to be exterminated. Richard Perle, Advisor to the US Dept of Defense under George W Bush, and a one-man horror show against humanity, had this to say:
"Sometimes before you can bring about democratic change you have to remove the obstacles to democratic change."
I take that to mean removing the not just corrupt but fundamentally broken political paradigm of our governance which is bought and paid for under corporate-capitalist rule. Time is not on our side. We overthrow the state or die. Maybe that means putting forth and voting only for independent candidates from the communities which we collectively sponsor, and who will go forth and bring about radical change quickly. Maybe that means something else, something far more decisive.
We will suffer, no doubt, but we will survive and grow a much stronger democratic nation in the process. A nation with a democratic Constitution with fundamental safeguards in place to prevent such social crimes as the present ones foisted upon us all by monopolized wealth.
"a democratic Constitution"
Imagine that! Let's leave the faux democracy in the dust and get REAL!
I still can't get beyond 2 minutes 15 seconds of this interview before it stops - permanently
Edit ...
Update: ...
Works on another computer.