Haven't we heard all this before? And look what happened.
Unless he, or someone, will either challenge Obama in the primaries or, preferably, start a new alternative party - what is the point? It's all just hot air.
Posted by esabi
Jun 24 2011 - 6:58pm
it might work if the goals of the contract have more to do with issues and less to do with getting politicians elected / unelected.
Posted by Georgia
Jun 25 2011 - 3:52am
If you're in California, you have an alternative: check out the Peace and Freedom Party. http://peaceandfreedom.org/
Posted by PuffinThrush
Jun 25 2011 - 8:53am
If you're in California, you have at least two alternatives to the Republicans and Democrats. Check out the Green Party of California, the party of Peter Camejo.
Green Party of California
http://peaceandfreedom.org/
Peace and Freedom Party
http://www.cagreens.org/
- - - - -
Peter Miguel Camejo (December 31, 1939 – September 13, 2008) was an American author, activist and politician. In the 2004 United States presidential election, he was selected by independent candidate Ralph Nader as his vice-presidential running mate on a ticket which had the endorsement of the Reform Party.
Camejo was a three-time Green Party gubernatorial candidate most recently in 2006, when he received 2.3 percent of the vote. Camejo also ran in the 2003 California recall election finishing fourth in a field of 135 candidates (2.8%), and in 2002, finishing third with 5.3%. In the 1976 presidential election he was running for the Socialist Workers Party.
Wikipedia URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Camejo
Posted by Ameranglo
Jun 25 2011 - 10:32am
Unfortunately - very unfortunately - I'm in Oklahoma!
Posted by emperor_bob
Jun 26 2011 - 6:09am
Another party is just another problem. Political Parties usurp power that should be reserved for the people.
Obama has shown he doesn't really care about Progressives. We can meet and plan and call and email and vote and get him elected and he'll still be at best a Centrist who pays lip service to Progressives.
I'd rather spend my time and energy even in a failing effort to elect a true progressive which is what our country truly needs and power brokers will never allow.
Posted by danick
Jun 24 2011 - 5:46pm
Perhaps some have "heard all this before" but a lot of U.S. citizens haven't. If Van can be an effective messenger about the "Four Lies" and the social contract, more power to him. I would love to see even that much consciousness become part of the public conversation. I doubt the corporate media will give him much traction but wouldn't it be great if this video or others like it could go viral and We the People could start talking about real solutions instead of the tiny range of options that the media presents as the only possibilities.
Posted by corvo
Jun 24 2011 - 6:06pm
If only Van weren't trying to steer us toward a Party whose solutions are only marginally different from those of the Rethugs.
Van, honey, the Dims just aren't all that into you. Get a clue.
Posted by Ameranglo
Jun 24 2011 - 6:09pm
Didn't all of the USA hear it all before from the current president when in campaigning mode?
Posted by esabi
Jun 24 2011 - 6:56pm
Not in the same way. The USA heard Obama quoting MLK and they hoped and dreamed he would swoop down and save them, so they could be a part of the change without actually doing the work themselves.
At least in this VanJones iteration, people will have to come up with the ideas themselves and at least be involved in figuring out how to make it happen. Depending on the quality of ideas and level of commitment, it might be able to go somewhere (if Moveon doesn't edit the results too heavily)...
Posted by Ameranglo
Jun 24 2011 - 7:39pm
When I first read about this yesterday I had a surge of optimism - until I found a Rolling Stone interview with Jones
"But I will say this in case this is not clear: I do not think Barack Obama should be primaried. However, if QuestLove runs, I’d think about it. The Roots, man! The Roots!"
Which indicates, to me, that all he's doing is drumming up enthusiasm for Obama.
Posted by PuffinThrush
Jun 25 2011 - 9:35am
Ameranglo,
Thanks for the link to the Rolling Stone interview with Van Jones.
Sure, Van Jones calls out some of the lies about what is going on. But sheesh. Here is an excerpt from the Rolling Stone interview. Just more bait and switch hucksterism and propaganda.
Excerpt from "Van Jones on Rebuilding the American Dream", Rolling Stone, June 23, 2011:
But just to be clear: As much as Barack Obama inspired the movement, the movement inspired Barack Obama. The movement for hope and change in America predated Obama’s candidacy. Rebuild the Deam is a continuation of the movement that rose up in 2003 to oppose George Bush’s war. That whole movement poured into the John Kerry campaign and we came within 100,000 votes in Ohio of beating Bush. By 2006 we had a huge breakthrough – Nancy Pelosi in the Speaker’s chair a majority in the Senate. Then, in that environment that we created, a young senator Barack Obama saw that something powerful happening. He said, "If I work with these people, we can make history." The man met the movement met the moment and we were able to do something extraordinary. So this campaign is just a continuation of a long wave of the use of technology bringing people together in increasingly democratic and creative ways to solve the country’s problems. Movements ebb and flow, and this movement is about to flow again.
Obama was a bold candidate, but has been a timid leader. We have to do much better than Obama if we are truly going to transform our country.
Posted by Galenwainwright...
Jun 24 2011 - 6:22pm
Rebuild the dream?
How about wake up from the nightmare, shake off the decades of Rip vanWinkleism, and start behaving like adults to confront the dire consequences of resource depletion, environmental collapse and economic collapse.
'Dreaming' is how we got in this mess in the first place.
Posted by freethinker68
Jun 24 2011 - 7:35pm
I'm with you........PUKE on the nightmare that is falsely called the American Dream! Ask the generations of poor how they feel about the decades and decades of bullsh*t promises and the scraps via govt. cheese logs, welfare and Section 8 and crap schools and bars not books for THEIR kids. kill capitalism before it kills YOU! Ecotopia is waiting for us!! Socialism is the only way.
Posted by Georgia
Jun 25 2011 - 3:57am
And I'm with you. There isn't now, nor has there ever been, an American Dream. It's one of the US's greatest myths, perpetrated by capitalism. Socialism is the only way to free us from domination by the wealthy and their corporations.
Posted by PuffinThrush
Jun 25 2011 - 9:15am
Galenwainwright wrote:
Rebuild the dream?
How about wake up from the nightmare, shake off the decades of Rip vanWinkleism, and start behaving like adults to confront the dire consequences of resource depletion, environmental collapse and economic collapse.
'Dreaming' is how we got in this mess in the first place.
- - - -
I agree.
Posted by Progressive101
Jun 24 2011 - 7:36pm
What a joke of a video! Again, they are forming an organization without defined goals. You can't lead without a leader. One Nation and the Coffee Club went down the tubes partially for this reason. Moveon had goals but just dropped them after the Democrats got elected. The Rebuild the Dream organization is political marketing tool for the Democratic party.
Posted by Dominick J.
Jun 25 2011 - 2:10pm
You're suppose to be Progressive? Progressives are NOT defeatist! Of course the "Rebuild the Dream" is a marketing tool for the Democratic Party! BUT it's for ALL Americans Not just Democrats! You don't see Republicans trying to do this do you? They are tearing our way of living down and tearing it to shreds, and making a mockery of everything that this country has been built on over decades. Things that Republicans and Democrats have done to better our country. They are even trying to dismantle Our Constitution!! NOW we NEED to Rebuild the Dream and go Forward NOT backward, like the GOP is trying to do..
Posted by emperor_bob
Jun 26 2011 - 6:19am
Until and unless we change our campaign and election laws we will continue to get sub-par candidates to choose from. America isn't broke, but it is broken.
Posted by Galenwainwright...
Jun 24 2011 - 7:49pm
Old (slightly modified) saying: Neurotics build castles in the sky. Psychotics live in them. Psychologists (and ad men) collect the rent.
Posted by nkeegel
Jun 25 2011 - 1:30am
I'm surprised by the negative comments here. When I listened to his whole speech yesterday I was blown away and I'm now hosting a "Build Our American Dream" meeting. What's been missing is an organization like the Tea Party on the Right which has a platform and a plan to change this country without a charismatic leader. That is what we want to set up now. Will you join us?
Posted by Georgia
Jun 25 2011 - 4:01am
No, I'm afraid not. It's the left tea party instead of the right tea party.
Posted by betterdays
Jun 25 2011 - 3:12am
Sounds hopeful..
Posted by kennybro
Jun 25 2011 - 6:25am
Smooth talking Van Jones everybody's hero. No we are not broke.. close to bankrupcy both monetarily and spiritually. Look at what our public school system has become under unionism. Kids graduating without being able to read. Such fine organizations like the AFL-CIO, SEIU and Acorn all run by fat cats trying to lead the sheep to slaughter. It becomes easy to lead the sheep when they have no point of reference. The dumbing down of "America" has been most effective. This opens the door for individuals like Van Jones to appear like the Pied piper. Good luck America!
Posted by Progressive101
Jun 25 2011 - 12:52pm
Agree. I'll add, the "we are not broke" slogan is just a feel good slogan and Van Jones' simplification is dishonest. In the same way, the conservatives' statement that "we are broke" is a simplification and is dishonest. Fact is, scores of millions of Americans are not only broke, they will be overly-indebted for most of their remaining lives. As a whole, voting Americans, led by both Democrats and Republicans have led us here by voting for and passing legislation that reduces taxes, lowering social benefits (e.g., letting schools fail), and redistributing government funds to programs such as war that overly benefit the rich. This is the honesty that Van Jones fails to mention. As a country, sure, the US isn't broke, in the sense that if we liquidate US assets (e.g., selling national parks and resources) or transfer the wealth from the rich to government coffers, we could pay our debt. In that sense, Greece isn't broke either. But that isn't the point Van Jones is making. I will give credit to Van Jones for correctly pointing out that part of the solution is putting more tax burden on the rich, simply because that is where much of the wealth is concentrated in this country (other wealth is sitting in offshore corporate accounts); however, transferring some of that wealth won't cure our debt problems as long as Americans have the mentality to buy into needless wars and not fund their own children's schools.
Posted by wavygravylady
Jun 25 2011 - 6:32am
Part I.
I appreciate the headline name, "Rebuild the Dream." I think we need to rebuild the dream and I am glad that commondreams.org is focusing more on positive action rather than despair in this headline.
In the video, Van Jones said, "We are being lied to." I can sympathize with where I think he is coming from. I think he means well. But I think the phrase "we are being lied to" is a phrase that seems to arouse anger. I can understand why one might wish to feel anger. And I can understand that people seem to want to strike back at injustices.
On a spiritual level, I wish for anger to not be aroused, but instead, cooperation, healing, transcending labels and fixing the situations in this country and the world. I also think that it is appropriate to discuss things in a more complete manner and have sound "bits" rather than "bites."
I understand the challenges of communicating in a more complete manner though! So, I wish for Van Jones to be successful in engaging people to focus on dreaming, and I wish for these people to be able to transcend anger and feel compassion so that they can engage even more people and help heal our country and the world. I am also not sure that Jone's points are entirely accurate, but I know he has good intent.
It is understandable why many would perceive the words, "America is broke" as accurate considering the deficit and debt of the United States. On a spiritual and fundamentally practical level, though, the United States has the ability to heal its situation--I believe fairly quickly--by stopping funding of the military and military contractors and/or transforming the military and military contractors into agencies and businesses that implement sustainable infrastructure in an ethical manner inside the United States.
Also, were the United States government to make reparation payments to the countries of the world it has invaded, these countries could also develop sustainable infrastructures for themselves.
There are more complications to the phrase, "America is broke" when one considers the history of actions, debt and deficit in terms of parties that are in power in the legislative and executive branches of the U.S. Government, and the particular institutions and corporations and areas that the parties seem to want to invest in and/or fund. However, I am reasonably sure that most reading this particular page are aware of this history so I will not go into it now.
On a metaphorical level and practically implementable level, I love the phrase, "America is not broke." Jones goes on to point out that were the rich to pay a fair share of taxes, this would help the economy. I believe this to be true and good within a practical threshold of understanding.
The second "lie" Van Jones addressed is the sentence, "Asking the super-rich to pay taxes hurts America's economy." Based on the history of economics worldwide, I agree with Van Jones in that that sentence about the super-rich is not accurate. The disparity of wealth that the United States is experiencing has harmed the vast majority of people living in the United States, and has had a significant harmful impact on the people living in other countries as well. I ask for the extreme disparity to be removed. I also ask for free trade agreements between countries to be removed, and instead for fair trade to be implemented. But I ask that the fair trade is implemented in such a way that the biosphere can survive, heal and thrive--in other words, for sustainability....
Posted by wavygravylady
Jun 25 2011 - 6:33am
Part II.
"Hating on America's government - and wrecking America's infrastructure - is patriotic" is the third idea Van Jones calls a lie. I can understand where he is coming from. From a peace perspective, though, I have seen that criticizing the government and wishing for peace has been called "unpatriotic" and "hateful to the United States" as well. I do not believe that criticism of the government and wishing for peace are hateful or unpatriotic.
I do believe that wrecking infrastructure can be hateful, but also can clear the way for a new, sustainable infrastructure that we need. We need an infrastructure for public transportation that has a negligible impact on the environment. We need a new and/or revitalized infrastructure for affordable healthcare for all people. We need for the disparity of wealth between the CEOs of insurance companies and the people who need healthcare to be reduced.
I would prefer it were the health insurance companies disbanded, but with a transition plan for the people who are employed by the companies so that they can obtain more ethical, sustainable work. I want for the CEOs of all companies who are rich to just decide to opt out, retire at a reasonable income, and stop exploiting people. So basically, I want a graceful, gentle parachute for the CEOs so that they and their families are not frightened. Preferably Gaia would provide this naturally for these people so that it just happens without a hitch.
I wish Van Jones success in getting people to engage in rebuilding the American Dream in a sustainable manner and with the goal of long term sustainability, and I ask that this vision include kindness, forgiveness, and that rebuilding include sustainability in terms of wages, health, and especially the environment.
I have sympathy for many of the organizations that Van Jones mentions: AFL-CIO, SEIU, MoveOn.org, etc. I have volunteered for an effort that SEIU has helped with, and have contributed to moveon.org even though I'd seen moveon.org as being aligned with the Democratic Party. I have great sympathy for many who vote for the Democratic Party but I also have a lot of criticism for the corporate funding and militarism promoted by the Democratic Party. However, I realize that the heart of progressives is still represented in many ways within the Democratic Party, and that the heart of good people is also represented in the Republican Party albeit manifested in unfortunate ways within both. We must recognize common ground, and in a way that is beneficial to the health of most, if not all people and the environment!
On July 5th, Van Jones invites us to go to rebuildthedream.com and share ideas. I think this is good.
There is criticism based on the history of political campaigns and parties, and this is mentioned in the threads of comments below this video but I think we also have to recognize that opportunites are born in mixed circumstance, and that action and progress can transcend circumstance.
Spiritually I like the words, "Contract for the American Dream." I can see it as a way of making a covenant with a dream, a process similar to "making a covenant with God."
I would like us to transcend "they" and "our" in the phrases "their turn" and "our turn" that Van Jones says. I would like "them" to be "us" and "us" to be "them." I know this is so in so many ways. "We're going to rebuild the movement that stands for liberty and justice for all," Van Roy says at the end, and I think the "all" part if this is good and the intent is good. I'd also like for us to consider mercy. :)
So this is my long, yet brief analysis of this video!
Posted by Dominick J.
Jun 25 2011 - 1:57pm
You have to instill a reason. People respond better when they have a GOOD amount of anger to get on the ball and start responding. Van isn't instilling Hate he's instilling anger, an awakeining in those people so they will want to stand up and fight for what's right. He's also doing it in a calm manner NOT yelling and screaming and wringing his hands. His demore is calm his words are right on! The rest of your post is Great and is JUST what Van was saying.
Posted by guernica
Jun 25 2011 - 7:36am
rebuild a dream? a dream? rebuild? this is madness. and again more emotional-manipulative politics...."changs"
Posted by iowapinko
Jun 25 2011 - 7:49am
Joe Hill had the best response to this form of mindless, brand-name politics:
"Pie in the sky when you die;
It's a lie!
Van Jones' well-funded trail does not lead to a new direction. It is a cul-de-sac.
Posted by SeriousCitizen
Jun 25 2011 - 10:52am
Why would we want more Dreams? How about reality and rule-of-law for a change, instead of ideology and unpunished crimes in high places? Or, how about life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, for a change, instead of war and the preumption that citizens and their incomes are resources for the state to exploit for private corruption and geopolitical games?
Posted by kayla
Jun 25 2011 - 3:15pm
OK, dreams are just fine, BUT WHERE IS THE ACTION PLAN?
We are sick of voting for democrats that betray the people, we are up to here with impotent petitions, calls and letters, marches and rallies!
We must take to the streets by the millions, and not leave till we are satisfied:
till our troops come home, till the billioniares are taxed big time, till coal and nukes are closed forever, till we have health care and real justice for ALL.
A call is out now for all of us - especially we who have never protested before to come to DC and occupy Freedom Plaza till our demands are met. Go to http://october2011.org/ to get involved. If you really can't go yourself, help financially and otherwise those who will be going.
Posted by ezeflyer
Jun 25 2011 - 3:20pm
Conservatives may be dumb-asses, but at least they get together and get (evil) things done while progressives fight among themselves over how to do (good) things.
34 Comments so far
Show AllHaven't we heard all this before? And look what happened.
Unless he, or someone, will either challenge Obama in the primaries or, preferably, start a new alternative party - what is the point? It's all just hot air.
it might work if the goals of the contract have more to do with issues and less to do with getting politicians elected / unelected.
If you're in California, you have an alternative: check out the Peace and Freedom Party. http://peaceandfreedom.org/
If you're in California, you have at least two alternatives to the Republicans and Democrats. Check out the Green Party of California, the party of Peter Camejo.
Green Party of California
http://peaceandfreedom.org/
Peace and Freedom Party
http://www.cagreens.org/
- - - - -
Peter Miguel Camejo (December 31, 1939 – September 13, 2008) was an American author, activist and politician. In the 2004 United States presidential election, he was selected by independent candidate Ralph Nader as his vice-presidential running mate on a ticket which had the endorsement of the Reform Party.
Camejo was a three-time Green Party gubernatorial candidate most recently in 2006, when he received 2.3 percent of the vote. Camejo also ran in the 2003 California recall election finishing fourth in a field of 135 candidates (2.8%), and in 2002, finishing third with 5.3%. In the 1976 presidential election he was running for the Socialist Workers Party.
Wikipedia URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Camejo
Unfortunately - very unfortunately - I'm in Oklahoma!
Another party is just another problem. Political Parties usurp power that should be reserved for the people.
Obama has shown he doesn't really care about Progressives. We can meet and plan and call and email and vote and get him elected and he'll still be at best a Centrist who pays lip service to Progressives.
I'd rather spend my time and energy even in a failing effort to elect a true progressive which is what our country truly needs and power brokers will never allow.
Perhaps some have "heard all this before" but a lot of U.S. citizens haven't. If Van can be an effective messenger about the "Four Lies" and the social contract, more power to him. I would love to see even that much consciousness become part of the public conversation. I doubt the corporate media will give him much traction but wouldn't it be great if this video or others like it could go viral and We the People could start talking about real solutions instead of the tiny range of options that the media presents as the only possibilities.
If only Van weren't trying to steer us toward a Party whose solutions are only marginally different from those of the Rethugs.
Van, honey, the Dims just aren't all that into you. Get a clue.
Didn't all of the USA hear it all before from the current president when in campaigning mode?
Not in the same way. The USA heard Obama quoting MLK and they hoped and dreamed he would swoop down and save them, so they could be a part of the change without actually doing the work themselves.
At least in this VanJones iteration, people will have to come up with the ideas themselves and at least be involved in figuring out how to make it happen. Depending on the quality of ideas and level of commitment, it might be able to go somewhere (if Moveon doesn't edit the results too heavily)...
When I first read about this yesterday I had a surge of optimism - until I found a Rolling Stone interview with Jones
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/van-jones-on-rebuilding-the-american-dream-20110623
At the end of that he said
"But I will say this in case this is not clear: I do not think Barack Obama should be primaried. However, if QuestLove runs, I’d think about it. The Roots, man! The Roots!"
Which indicates, to me, that all he's doing is drumming up enthusiasm for Obama.
Ameranglo,
Thanks for the link to the Rolling Stone interview with Van Jones.
Sure, Van Jones calls out some of the lies about what is going on. But sheesh. Here is an excerpt from the Rolling Stone interview. Just more bait and switch hucksterism and propaganda.
Excerpt from "Van Jones on Rebuilding the American Dream", Rolling Stone, June 23, 2011:
But just to be clear: As much as Barack Obama inspired the movement, the movement inspired Barack Obama. The movement for hope and change in America predated Obama’s candidacy. Rebuild the Deam is a continuation of the movement that rose up in 2003 to oppose George Bush’s war. That whole movement poured into the John Kerry campaign and we came within 100,000 votes in Ohio of beating Bush. By 2006 we had a huge breakthrough – Nancy Pelosi in the Speaker’s chair a majority in the Senate. Then, in that environment that we created, a young senator Barack Obama saw that something powerful happening. He said, "If I work with these people, we can make history." The man met the movement met the moment and we were able to do something extraordinary. So this campaign is just a continuation of a long wave of the use of technology bringing people together in increasingly democratic and creative ways to solve the country’s problems. Movements ebb and flow, and this movement is about to flow again.
URL: www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/van-jones-on-rebuilding-the-american-dream-20110623
Obama was a bold candidate, but has been a timid leader. We have to do much better than Obama if we are truly going to transform our country.
Rebuild the dream?
How about wake up from the nightmare, shake off the decades of Rip vanWinkleism, and start behaving like adults to confront the dire consequences of resource depletion, environmental collapse and economic collapse.
'Dreaming' is how we got in this mess in the first place.
I'm with you........PUKE on the nightmare that is falsely called the American Dream! Ask the generations of poor how they feel about the decades and decades of bullsh*t promises and the scraps via govt. cheese logs, welfare and Section 8 and crap schools and bars not books for THEIR kids. kill capitalism before it kills YOU! Ecotopia is waiting for us!! Socialism is the only way.
And I'm with you. There isn't now, nor has there ever been, an American Dream. It's one of the US's greatest myths, perpetrated by capitalism. Socialism is the only way to free us from domination by the wealthy and their corporations.
Galenwainwright wrote:
Rebuild the dream?
How about wake up from the nightmare, shake off the decades of Rip vanWinkleism, and start behaving like adults to confront the dire consequences of resource depletion, environmental collapse and economic collapse.
'Dreaming' is how we got in this mess in the first place.
- - - -
I agree.
What a joke of a video! Again, they are forming an organization without defined goals. You can't lead without a leader. One Nation and the Coffee Club went down the tubes partially for this reason. Moveon had goals but just dropped them after the Democrats got elected. The Rebuild the Dream organization is political marketing tool for the Democratic party.
You're suppose to be Progressive? Progressives are NOT defeatist! Of course the "Rebuild the Dream" is a marketing tool for the Democratic Party! BUT it's for ALL Americans Not just Democrats! You don't see Republicans trying to do this do you? They are tearing our way of living down and tearing it to shreds, and making a mockery of everything that this country has been built on over decades. Things that Republicans and Democrats have done to better our country. They are even trying to dismantle Our Constitution!! NOW we NEED to Rebuild the Dream and go Forward NOT backward, like the GOP is trying to do..
Until and unless we change our campaign and election laws we will continue to get sub-par candidates to choose from. America isn't broke, but it is broken.
Old (slightly modified) saying: Neurotics build castles in the sky. Psychotics live in them. Psychologists (and ad men) collect the rent.
I'm surprised by the negative comments here. When I listened to his whole speech yesterday I was blown away and I'm now hosting a "Build Our American Dream" meeting. What's been missing is an organization like the Tea Party on the Right which has a platform and a plan to change this country without a charismatic leader. That is what we want to set up now. Will you join us?
No, I'm afraid not. It's the left tea party instead of the right tea party.
Sounds hopeful..
Smooth talking Van Jones everybody's hero. No we are not broke.. close to bankrupcy both monetarily and spiritually. Look at what our public school system has become under unionism. Kids graduating without being able to read. Such fine organizations like the AFL-CIO, SEIU and Acorn all run by fat cats trying to lead the sheep to slaughter. It becomes easy to lead the sheep when they have no point of reference. The dumbing down of "America" has been most effective. This opens the door for individuals like Van Jones to appear like the Pied piper. Good luck America!
Agree. I'll add, the "we are not broke" slogan is just a feel good slogan and Van Jones' simplification is dishonest. In the same way, the conservatives' statement that "we are broke" is a simplification and is dishonest. Fact is, scores of millions of Americans are not only broke, they will be overly-indebted for most of their remaining lives. As a whole, voting Americans, led by both Democrats and Republicans have led us here by voting for and passing legislation that reduces taxes, lowering social benefits (e.g., letting schools fail), and redistributing government funds to programs such as war that overly benefit the rich. This is the honesty that Van Jones fails to mention. As a country, sure, the US isn't broke, in the sense that if we liquidate US assets (e.g., selling national parks and resources) or transfer the wealth from the rich to government coffers, we could pay our debt. In that sense, Greece isn't broke either. But that isn't the point Van Jones is making. I will give credit to Van Jones for correctly pointing out that part of the solution is putting more tax burden on the rich, simply because that is where much of the wealth is concentrated in this country (other wealth is sitting in offshore corporate accounts); however, transferring some of that wealth won't cure our debt problems as long as Americans have the mentality to buy into needless wars and not fund their own children's schools.
Part I.
I appreciate the headline name, "Rebuild the Dream." I think we need to rebuild the dream and I am glad that commondreams.org is focusing more on positive action rather than despair in this headline.
In the video, Van Jones said, "We are being lied to." I can sympathize with where I think he is coming from. I think he means well. But I think the phrase "we are being lied to" is a phrase that seems to arouse anger. I can understand why one might wish to feel anger. And I can understand that people seem to want to strike back at injustices.
On a spiritual level, I wish for anger to not be aroused, but instead, cooperation, healing, transcending labels and fixing the situations in this country and the world. I also think that it is appropriate to discuss things in a more complete manner and have sound "bits" rather than "bites."
I understand the challenges of communicating in a more complete manner though! So, I wish for Van Jones to be successful in engaging people to focus on dreaming, and I wish for these people to be able to transcend anger and feel compassion so that they can engage even more people and help heal our country and the world. I am also not sure that Jone's points are entirely accurate, but I know he has good intent.
It is understandable why many would perceive the words, "America is broke" as accurate considering the deficit and debt of the United States. On a spiritual and fundamentally practical level, though, the United States has the ability to heal its situation--I believe fairly quickly--by stopping funding of the military and military contractors and/or transforming the military and military contractors into agencies and businesses that implement sustainable infrastructure in an ethical manner inside the United States.
Also, were the United States government to make reparation payments to the countries of the world it has invaded, these countries could also develop sustainable infrastructures for themselves.
There are more complications to the phrase, "America is broke" when one considers the history of actions, debt and deficit in terms of parties that are in power in the legislative and executive branches of the U.S. Government, and the particular institutions and corporations and areas that the parties seem to want to invest in and/or fund. However, I am reasonably sure that most reading this particular page are aware of this history so I will not go into it now.
On a metaphorical level and practically implementable level, I love the phrase, "America is not broke." Jones goes on to point out that were the rich to pay a fair share of taxes, this would help the economy. I believe this to be true and good within a practical threshold of understanding.
The second "lie" Van Jones addressed is the sentence, "Asking the super-rich to pay taxes hurts America's economy." Based on the history of economics worldwide, I agree with Van Jones in that that sentence about the super-rich is not accurate. The disparity of wealth that the United States is experiencing has harmed the vast majority of people living in the United States, and has had a significant harmful impact on the people living in other countries as well. I ask for the extreme disparity to be removed. I also ask for free trade agreements between countries to be removed, and instead for fair trade to be implemented. But I ask that the fair trade is implemented in such a way that the biosphere can survive, heal and thrive--in other words, for sustainability....
Part II.
"Hating on America's government - and wrecking America's infrastructure - is patriotic" is the third idea Van Jones calls a lie. I can understand where he is coming from. From a peace perspective, though, I have seen that criticizing the government and wishing for peace has been called "unpatriotic" and "hateful to the United States" as well. I do not believe that criticism of the government and wishing for peace are hateful or unpatriotic.
I do believe that wrecking infrastructure can be hateful, but also can clear the way for a new, sustainable infrastructure that we need. We need an infrastructure for public transportation that has a negligible impact on the environment. We need a new and/or revitalized infrastructure for affordable healthcare for all people. We need for the disparity of wealth between the CEOs of insurance companies and the people who need healthcare to be reduced.
I would prefer it were the health insurance companies disbanded, but with a transition plan for the people who are employed by the companies so that they can obtain more ethical, sustainable work. I want for the CEOs of all companies who are rich to just decide to opt out, retire at a reasonable income, and stop exploiting people. So basically, I want a graceful, gentle parachute for the CEOs so that they and their families are not frightened. Preferably Gaia would provide this naturally for these people so that it just happens without a hitch.
I wish Van Jones success in getting people to engage in rebuilding the American Dream in a sustainable manner and with the goal of long term sustainability, and I ask that this vision include kindness, forgiveness, and that rebuilding include sustainability in terms of wages, health, and especially the environment.
I have sympathy for many of the organizations that Van Jones mentions: AFL-CIO, SEIU, MoveOn.org, etc. I have volunteered for an effort that SEIU has helped with, and have contributed to moveon.org even though I'd seen moveon.org as being aligned with the Democratic Party. I have great sympathy for many who vote for the Democratic Party but I also have a lot of criticism for the corporate funding and militarism promoted by the Democratic Party. However, I realize that the heart of progressives is still represented in many ways within the Democratic Party, and that the heart of good people is also represented in the Republican Party albeit manifested in unfortunate ways within both. We must recognize common ground, and in a way that is beneficial to the health of most, if not all people and the environment!
On July 5th, Van Jones invites us to go to rebuildthedream.com and share ideas. I think this is good.
There is criticism based on the history of political campaigns and parties, and this is mentioned in the threads of comments below this video but I think we also have to recognize that opportunites are born in mixed circumstance, and that action and progress can transcend circumstance.
Spiritually I like the words, "Contract for the American Dream." I can see it as a way of making a covenant with a dream, a process similar to "making a covenant with God."
I would like us to transcend "they" and "our" in the phrases "their turn" and "our turn" that Van Jones says. I would like "them" to be "us" and "us" to be "them." I know this is so in so many ways. "We're going to rebuild the movement that stands for liberty and justice for all," Van Roy says at the end, and I think the "all" part if this is good and the intent is good. I'd also like for us to consider mercy. :)
So this is my long, yet brief analysis of this video!
You have to instill a reason. People respond better when they have a GOOD amount of anger to get on the ball and start responding. Van isn't instilling Hate he's instilling anger, an awakeining in those people so they will want to stand up and fight for what's right. He's also doing it in a calm manner NOT yelling and screaming and wringing his hands. His demore is calm his words are right on! The rest of your post is Great and is JUST what Van was saying.
rebuild a dream? a dream? rebuild? this is madness. and again more emotional-manipulative politics...."changs"
Joe Hill had the best response to this form of mindless, brand-name politics:
"Pie in the sky when you die;
It's a lie!
Van Jones' well-funded trail does not lead to a new direction. It is a cul-de-sac.
Why would we want more Dreams? How about reality and rule-of-law for a change, instead of ideology and unpunished crimes in high places? Or, how about life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, for a change, instead of war and the preumption that citizens and their incomes are resources for the state to exploit for private corruption and geopolitical games?
OK, dreams are just fine, BUT WHERE IS THE ACTION PLAN?
We are sick of voting for democrats that betray the people, we are up to here with impotent petitions, calls and letters, marches and rallies!
We must take to the streets by the millions, and not leave till we are satisfied:
till our troops come home, till the billioniares are taxed big time, till coal and nukes are closed forever, till we have health care and real justice for ALL.
A call is out now for all of us - especially we who have never protested before to come to DC and occupy Freedom Plaza till our demands are met. Go to http://october2011.org/ to get involved. If you really can't go yourself, help financially and otherwise those who will be going.
Conservatives may be dumb-asses, but at least they get together and get (evil) things done while progressives fight among themselves over how to do (good) things.