<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.commondreams.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>election reform</title>
 <link>http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/election-reform</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Can We Get Some Small-d Democracy?</title>
 <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/11/03-8</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;author-name&quot;&gt;by Katrina vanden Heuvel&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I have long advocated for a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061120/kvh&quot;&gt;strong pro-democracy agenda&lt;/a&gt; to repair and strengthen our &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut/274167&quot;&gt;broken electoral system&lt;/a&gt;.  The needs are many--from creating an Election Day holiday, to requiring &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut/307798&quot;&gt;voting machines&lt;/a&gt; that produce a voter-verified paper trail, to re-enfranchising former
felons who have served their sentences, to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut/233515&quot;&gt;public campaign financing&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/11/03-8&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/11/03-8#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/election-reform">election reform</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:00:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">49015 at http://www.commondreams.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tightening the Corporate Grip: The Stakes at the Supreme Court</title>
 <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/09/09-11</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;author-name&quot;&gt;by Robert Weissman&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can things get still worse in Washington?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes, they can. And they will, if the Supreme Court decides for corporations and against real human beings and their democracy in a case the Court will be hearing today, &lt;i&gt;Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/09/09-11&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/09/09-11#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/corporate-personhood">corporate personhood</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/election-reform">election reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/supreme-court">supreme court</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:23:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">46792 at http://www.commondreams.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Health Care Tyranny by 13 Obstructionists</title>
 <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/07/31-8</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;author-name&quot;&gt;by David Sirota&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt; For those still clinging to quaint
notions of the American ideal, these have been a faith-shaking 10
years. Just as evolutionary science once got in the way of
creationists’ catechism, so has politics now undermined patriots’ naive
belief that the United States is a functioning democracy. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/07/31-8&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/07/31-8#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/democracy">democracy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/election-reform">election reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/healthcare">healthcare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/taxonomy/term/8">Politics</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:18:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">45354 at http://www.commondreams.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Supreme Court Pulls Teeth From the Voting Rights Act</title>
 <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/06/22-11</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;author-name&quot;&gt;by John Nichols&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Once an election is done, it is hard to undo.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
That&#039;s true in Iran, and it&#039;s also true in the United States.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is why it is important to get the rules by which elections are held right before elections are held.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For this reason, one of the essential components of the Voting Rights
Act -- arguably its most powerful tool for combating discrimination and
disenfranchisement -- has long been a requirement that officials get
approval from the Department of Justice before they change the way in
which elections are conducted.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/06/22-11&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/06/22-11#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/election-reform">election reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/supreme-court">supreme court</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/voting">voting</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:17:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43706 at http://www.commondreams.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Election Reform: Follow the Money</title>
 <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/22-4</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;author-name&quot;&gt;by Hank Kalet&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;As an elected official, I think I
am the only person I know of who is supposed to take large amounts of
money from private individuals who very much want me to do a certain
thing and then act as if they haven&#039;t given it to me, to ignore the
money. I&#039;m supposed to be a perfect ingrate and that&#039;s hard to do,
given human nature.&amp;quot; Barney Frank, D-Mass. During a 2006 interview with
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.etopiamedia.net/empnn/pages/apt/apt47-5551212.html&quot;&gt;Etopia Media&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/22-4&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/22-4#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/campaign-finance">campaign finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/election-reform">election reform</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:04:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">41143 at http://www.commondreams.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Broken Elections</title>
 <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/07-4</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;author-name&quot;&gt;by Blair Bobier&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;On Tuesday, Los Angeles reached a new, all-time low for voter turnout in a mayoral election.  Contrary to the claim in a L.A. Times editorial that the abysmally low voter turnout was not &amp;quot;bottom scraping,&amp;quot; the thirteen percent turnout was in fact as bottom of the barrel as it gets.  Sure, it could get lower-but it hasn&#039;t before.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Bottom scraping&amp;quot; or not, thirteen percent voter turnout for a mayoral election is hardly cause for civic celebration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/07-4&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/07-4#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/election-reform">election reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/instant-runoff-voting">instant runoff voting</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:53:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">39178 at http://www.commondreams.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&#039;Patriot Dollars&#039; to Reform Politics</title>
 <link>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/01/05-8</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;author-name&quot;&gt;by Pamela L. Finmark and William D. Chalmers&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;We raised money -- $100 million over the last 17 years -- for candidates and ballot initiatives. Known as &amp;quot;fortune tellers,&amp;quot; we &amp;quot;delivered&amp;quot; big bags of &amp;quot;doughnuts&amp;quot; (campaign contributions) to our clients -- sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars a day. And as reformed sinners, we are here to tell you that the current system is not just broken, it is irrevocably broken.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/01/05-8&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/01/05-8#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.commondreams.org/category/broad-topics/election-reform">election reform</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:20:11 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36056 at http://www.commondreams.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
