Share | CommonDreams.org

From this page you can share Crime, Punishment and ExxonMobil to a social bookmarking site or email a link to the page.

Social Web	E-mail
Twitter StumbleUpon Facebook Delicious Digg Newsvine Google Yahoo Technorati	Your Email: * Your Name: * Send To: * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following: Crime, Punishment and ExxonMobil Message Subject: (Your Name) has forwarded an article to you from CommonDreams.org: Crime, Punishment and ExxonMobil Message Body: (Your Name) forwarded this article to you from CommonDreams.org. Sign up here if you would like to receive daily news from CommonDreams.org. Your Personal Message: *
Crime, Punishment and ExxonMobil Last month witnessed the extraordinary contrast of two perspectives on crime, punishment and ExxonMobil. Just two days after leading climate change scientist James Hansen told the U.S. Congress that he believed ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel company CEOs "should be tried for high crimes against humanity and nature" for their role in delaying a serious global response to climate change, the U.S. Supreme Court decreed that a $2.5 billion punitive judgment against Exxon for the Valdez oil spill disaster denied the company the "sense of fairness" to which it is entitled.

Social Web

E-mail

Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati

Crime, Punishment and ExxonMobil

Last month witnessed the extraordinary contrast of two perspectives on crime, punishment and ExxonMobil.

Just two days after leading climate change scientist James Hansen told the U.S. Congress that he believed ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel company CEOs "should be tried for high crimes against humanity and nature" for their role in delaying a serious global response to climate change, the U.S. Supreme Court decreed that a $2.5 billion punitive judgment against Exxon for the Valdez oil spill disaster denied the company the "sense of fairness" to which it is entitled.