Home

Share

From this page you can share FTC on Net Neutrality: Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence to a social bookmarking site or email a link to the page.
Social WebE-mail
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FTC on Net Neutrality: Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence
(Your Name) has forwarded an article to you from CommonDreams.org: FTC on Net Neutrality: Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence

(Your Name) forwarded this article to you from CommonDreams.org.

Sign up here if you would like to receive daily news from CommonDreams.org.

FTC on Net Neutrality: Absence of Evidence Is Not Evidence of Absence

The Chair of the Federal Trade Commission, Deborah Platt Majoras, speaks in riddles about net neutrality the way Donald Rumsfeld spoke about the Iraq War. (See "The Communicators", C-SPAN, July 12; FTC Report on Net Neutrality, June 27)

Her message is to stay the course on regulation, which means no enforcement of net neutrality. Repeatedly citing "unintended consequences of regulation", Chairman Majoras claims in effect, that in regard to the intended regulation that brought us the internet, the absence of harm (then) is not evidence of absence of harm in the future.