Share | CommonDreams.org

From this page you can share Bush Pushes Iraq Oil Law for ExxonMobil to a social bookmarking site or email a link to the page.

Social Web	E-mail
Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Newsvine Facebook Google Yahoo Technorati	Your Email: * Your Name: * Send To: * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following: Bush Pushes Iraq Oil Law for ExxonMobil Message Subject: (Your Name) has forwarded an article to you from CommonDreams.org: Bush Pushes Iraq Oil Law for ExxonMobil Message Body: (Your Name) forwarded this article to you from CommonDreams.org. Sign up here if you would like to receive daily news from CommonDreams.org. Your Personal Message: * CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Math Question: * 5 + 10 = Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Bush Pushes Iraq Oil Law for ExxonMobil by Matthew Rothschild With Iraq going to hell, and the al-Maliki government failing to meet one benchmark after another, Bush is getting desperate. On Sunday, he sent Admiral Fallon, the chief U.S. commander in the Mideast, to lean on Prime Minister al-Maliki. On Tuesday, John Negroponte, former U.S. ambassador to Iraq and the UN, flew to Baghdad to lean on al-Maliki. And what were they leaning on him for, above all? Passage of the new oil bill, which would turn over Iraqi's liquid treasure to foreign corporations like ExxonMobil. This is the paramount concern of the Bush Administration. It is being sold to the American people as a way to equalize revenues to various segments of Iraqi society. But the true reason for it is to line the pockets of U.S. oil executives. "The law would transform Iraq's oil industry from a nationalized model closed to American oil companies except for limited (although highly lucrative) marketing contracts into a commercial industry, all-but-privatized, that is fully open to all international oil companies," Antonia Juhasz, author of "The Bush Agenda," wrote in an op-ed for The New York Times on March 13. "The Iraq National Oil Company would have exclusive control of just 17 of Iraq's 80 known oil fields, leaving two-thirds of known—and all of its as yet undiscovered—fields open to foreign control," Juhasz wrote. "The foreign companies would not have to invest their earnings in the Iraqi economy, partner with Iraqi companies, hire Iraqi workers or share new technologies. . . The international oil companies could also be offered some of the most corporate-friendly contracts in the world." Not surprisingly, the Iraqi people don't want their oil privatized. They've been resisting this move in parliament, and in the streets. Iraq's oil unions have been leading this resistance movement, holding demonstrations and waging strikes, as recently as June 4 in Basra. So bothered by this is the Bush Administration that it ordered U.S. fighter jets to circle over and buzz the demonstrators, according to labor journalist David Bacon. Bush is at least consistent, though. He's still working for the oil industry, and he's anti-union here, and he's anti-union there. Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine. © 2007 The Progressive

Social Web

E-mail

Bush Pushes Iraq Oil Law for ExxonMobil

by Matthew Rothschild

With Iraq going to hell, and the al-Maliki government failing to meet one benchmark after another, Bush is getting desperate.

On Sunday, he sent Admiral Fallon, the chief U.S. commander in the Mideast, to lean on Prime Minister al-Maliki.

On Tuesday, John Negroponte, former U.S. ambassador to Iraq and the UN, flew to Baghdad to lean on al-Maliki.

And what were they leaning on him for, above all?

Passage of the new oil bill, which would turn over Iraqi's liquid treasure to foreign corporations like ExxonMobil.

This is the paramount concern of the Bush Administration.

It is being sold to the American people as a way to equalize revenues to various segments of Iraqi society.

But the true reason for it is to line the pockets of U.S. oil executives.

"The law would transform Iraq's oil industry from a nationalized model closed to American oil companies except for limited (although highly lucrative) marketing contracts into a commercial industry, all-but-privatized, that is fully open to all international oil companies," Antonia Juhasz, author of "The Bush Agenda," wrote in an op-ed for The New York Times on March 13.

"The Iraq National Oil Company would have exclusive control of just 17 of Iraq's 80 known oil fields, leaving two-thirds of known—and all of its as yet undiscovered—fields open to foreign control," Juhasz wrote. "The foreign companies would not have to invest their earnings in the Iraqi economy, partner with Iraqi companies, hire Iraqi workers or share new technologies. . . The international oil companies could also be offered some of the most corporate-friendly contracts in the world."

Not surprisingly, the Iraqi people don't want their oil privatized. They've been resisting this move in parliament, and in the streets.

Iraq's oil unions have been leading this resistance movement, holding demonstrations and waging strikes, as recently as June 4 in Basra.

So bothered by this is the Bush Administration that it ordered U.S. fighter jets to circle over and buzz the demonstrators, according to labor journalist David Bacon.

Bush is at least consistent, though.

He's still working for the oil industry, and he's anti-union here, and he's anti-union there.
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
© 2007 The Progressive