I just returned from a research trip to Norway where the people I
interviewed often brought up the topic of our new President. The
first was Kristin Clemet, the director of a conservative think tank.
"This spring on a delegation to Washington I was struck again," she
said, "by how different the political spectrum is in Norway from your
country. Here, Obama would be on the right wing."
I checked her view with others -- academics, politicians, activists all
over the Norwegian spectrum -- and all but one agreed. In Norwegian
terms, our President's positions are very conservative.
When Norway hit a major financial crisis in the early '90s (from a
real estate bubble and speculating banks), the Norwegians decided
against bail-outs. Three of the biggest banks were simply taken by
the government, their senior management fired, their stockholders sent
packing. The government nursed the seized banks back to health over
time while the economy made a quick recovery. The other troubled banks
were left to declare bankruptcy or find new capital.
Norway's action sent a clear message to the banks: mismanagement and
greed don't pay. The result is that today its own financial sector is
clean and only needs to deal with the impact of other countries'
disasters. Norway's strategy was very far from Obama's bank-friendly
game plan.
When Norwegian oil was discovered, the country decided not to risk
putting their new treasure in private ownership. Norwegians were
therefore able to lead the world in environmental responsibility and
to avoid boom/bust impact on their seacoast cities. Most important,
Norway has been stashing the oil profits in a public, socially
responsible "Pension Fund" that will support the Norwegians' famously
high living standard for many generations to come.
Half a century ago Norway already had a universal health care system
that is simplicity itself. There's a single payer (the government)
and minimum red tape, something like Medicare but for everyone and
better. The entire political spectrum supports this. By contrast,
Obama says he backs the failed U.S. private insurance scheme and his
team is wobbling on his own modest proposal to add a public option.
So I would have to say to thoughtful Republicans: even if you don't
like the Nordic blend of capitalism and socialism, with its virtual
abolition of poverty, free university education, and enlightened
environmentalism, you're only confusing the issue when you try to
label the President with the "S"-word. You may think his policies are
wrong, but in Norway even conservatives would say the Democrats and
Obama don't go nearly far enough.
George Lakey, formerly Eugene M. Lang Visiting Professor for Issues in
Social Change at Swarthmore College, is now directing a research
project there. Author of seven books, he founded Training for Change.
Glakey1@swarthmore.edu .