|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysts
Scrutinize NATO Bombing
|
|
|
WASHINGTON
- March 31 -
- ROBERT HAYDEN, www.post-gazette.com/forum/19990328edhayden8.asp
Director of the Center for Russian and East European Studies at the
University of Pittsburgh, Hayden has been deeply involved in attempts to mediate
the crisis in Kosovo, bringing together political leaders from all sides and
regularly visiting the region. One of the Albanian party leaders he worked with
was reported by NATO to have been executed by Serbian forces. Hayden said today:
"This mission, supposedly designed to prevent a massive humanitarian
catastrophe, has instead produced it. We have now shown that NATO is 'credible'
for doing something incredibly irresponsible. Apparently 'winning it' means
destroying the Balkans to save NATO for its upcoming 50th birthday.... Having
provoked the catastrophe with bombing, NATO's 'remedy' is more bombing. The army
headquarters in central Belgrade that NATO is considering targeting is
surrounded by apartment buildings. Civilian casualties here could not be
considered 'collateral damage,' particularly since the 'command and control'
functions are no longer being carried out from those headquarters."
- JACQUELINE CABASSO, wslf@earthlink.net, www.napf.org/abolition2000
Executive director of the Western States Legal Foundation, Cabasso said:
"The situation in Kosovo is ominous with respect to prospects for nuclear
disarmament. The U.S.-led NATO bombing is opposed by Russia, China, India and
Indonesia; three are nuclear powers, making up almost half the world's
population. There are reports that India is considering a possible alliance with
China and Russia in response. Russia has terminated its Y2K compliance program
with the U.S., and Ukraine is reportedly contemplating reversal of its
non-nuclear status. This first NATO military action since its recent expansion
up to Russia's border comes on the eve of NATO's 50th anniversary summit in
Washington. Centrally provocative to Russia is that NATO acts under the U.S.
'nuclear umbrella' including threatened first use of nuclear weapons. There's
also the recent Senate vote to go forward with national missile defense, which
threatens to abrogate the ABM treaty. All of these developments have made the
Russians resistant to ratifying the START II arms reduction treaty. In addition,
the U.S. has committed $60 billion to rebuild its nuclear weapons research,
development and production infrastructure, and the Secretary of Energy has
announced that production of tritium -- radioactive hydrogen used to boost the
destructive power of atomic bombs -- will be resumed. We seem to be heading
straight backwards into the Cold War."
- JULIANNE SMITH, jsmith@basicint.org, www.basicint.org
An expert on NATO, Smith
is a senior analyst at the European Security desk at BASIC (British American
Security Information Council). Smith said: "Bombing is not a preventive
tool, it is a consequence of not having any preventive tools. It's clear that
the NATO bombings are not saving lives, instead they are contributing to the
escalation of the conflict."
###
|
|
|
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.
The
press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by
one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community.
If
you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information,
please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)
Making News?
E-mail us your news release! news@newscenter.org
© Copyrighted 1997-2000
All Rights Reserved. Common Dreams. www.commondreams.org
|
|