|
Breaking News
from America's Progressive Community...
Latest
Releases
January
1999
archives/1998
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
Making news?
E-mail us!
editor@newscenter.org
NewsCenter
is a news service - providing breaking news and views for
progressive-thinking Americans.
The press releases posted here
have been provided to NewsCenter
by the one of the many progressive organizations we have selected to
participate. If you would like more information about this press
release, you should contact the organization directly. |
|
|
|
|
| WASHINGTON
- January 20 - Some researchers said Wednesday that President Clinton's
proposal to provide a tax credit for parents who stay home to care for their children is based on a double standard. The
specialists contended that Clinton's new plan is at odds with his welfare reform policy.
Among those available for interviews:
MIMI ABRAMOVITZ, iabramov@shiva.hunter.cuny.edu
A professor of social policy at the School of Social Work at Hunter College, Abramovitz said that "the $250 tax credit
proposed by the president for stay-at-home parents -- mostly mothers -- usefully recognizes the value of women's work in the
home as does the popular income-tax deduction for the care of dependents.... This thinking stands in sharp contrast to the lack
of support for parenting found in the administration's welfare reform policy." Abramovitz added: "The early research, tracking women forced
off the welfare rolls, finds most of them deeply anxious about what is happening to their kids while they are away from home. As
one woman on welfare said, `Poor kids need their moms too.' The proposed child tax credit for stay-at-home mothers is only one of
many ways that U.S. social policies reveal a double standard for women based on their marital status and income level. But it is
one of the most blatant and hypocritical -- given the bipartisan insistence that women on welfare `work first' regardless of their
own or their family's needs." The author of books titled "Regulating the Lives of Women"
and "Under Attack, Fighting Back: Women and Welfare in the United States," Abramovitz said Wednesday: "Why not give poor women on
welfare the same consideration and the same choices that we give to other women -- often with more resources -- who want or need
to stay home with their kids?"
ANN WITHORN, withorn@umbsky.cc.umb.edu
Withorn, professor of social policy at the University of Massachusetts in Boston, commented that Clinton delivered his
State of the Union speech "in utter denial of the disappeared Americans: the 50 percent of recipients who have left the welfare
rolls but not found jobs; the single mothers who still need assistance taking care of their families and now with welfare's
virtual end are tempted to return to batterers; the welfare moms being denied the same chance to attend college he pledges to
guarantee others; the increasing numbers of people who are homeless and hungry. They weren't in his `strong Union.'"
Withorn added that Clinton "wants to pretend that his policies have not created an even larger group of people who are
denied access to the national community of which he is so proud." Co-editor of "For Crying Out Loud: Women's Poverty in the U.S.,"
Withorn criticized Clinton's policies the day after his speech: "The federal government that he proclaims as `a progressive
instrument of the common good' has made things worse for millions of poor Americans."
###
|