NewsWire


, 2000

Latest news from America's Progressive Community

Search | Sign Up | Privacy
  NewsCenter > NewsWire > For Immediate Release     

 

     
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JUNE 17, 1998
11:05 AM
CONTACT:  Human Rights Watch
In Rome, Richard Dicker -- mobile phone (0335)-345-629 home phone 584-6224
Reed Brody -- mobile phone (0348)-334-9973
Human Rights Watch Disapointed In U.S. Position On International Court
 

ROME - June 17 - Human Rights Watch today expressed disappointment in the speech of U.N. ambassador Bill Richardson at the conference to establish an International Criminal Court (ICC).

In a speech to more than 150 delegates meeting in Rome, Richardson made no reference to the most contentious and important issue to be decided at the conference: the question of "state consent," or whether individual governments will have to give their permission  before an investigation can go forward. Unlike previous U.S. statements, which reserved Washington's position on state consent, Richardson's made no mention of it whatsoever.

"It's a shame that Washington continues to leave open the possibility that any tyrant can block his own prosecution," said Richard Dicker, who leads the ICC campaign for Human Rights Watch, an international monitoring organization based in New York. "It's incredible that at this late date, the US has not announced its position. That makes the work of this conference more difficult."

The proposed ICC would have the power to investigate and prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.

In his speech, Richardson also argued that an independent prosecutor, who could begin investigations on his or her own initiative, would "overload the limits of the Court's design, leading to greater confusion and controversy."

Human Rights Watch believes an independent prosecutor is essential to the proper functioning of the court. "A lot of crimes will go unpunished if the prosecutor is limited to what the Security Council refers to her, and to complaints from member states." said Dicker. "If that's the case, this court won't be able to dispense real justice. States are notoriously reluctant to register complaints against other states."

Dicker strongly took issue with Richardson's statement that "the court cannot be the creation of only a single group of nations."

Richardson was evidently referring to the "like-minded group" of more than 50 nations, who seek to establish an ICC with strong and   independent powers. "A coalition with members from South Korea to South Africa, from Senegal to Germany, from Canada to Malawi, can hardly be called a single bloc," said Dicker. "This is a coalition with the broadest imaginable scope."

Dicker also noted that Richardson did not insist that the United Nations Security Council permanent members have a veto over the   court's docket. "We can live with the U.S. position on that,"  said Dicker.

The ICC conference will run until July 17 and is expected to produce a treaty to establish the ICC.

###

 
Common Dreams NewsCenter is a non-profit news service
providing breaking news and views for the Progressive Community.

The press release posted here has been provided to Common Dreams NewsWire by one of the many progressive organizations who make up America's Progressive Community. If you wish to comment on this press release or would like more information, please contact the organization directly.
*all times Eastern US (GMT-5:00)

Making News?
E-mail us your news release! news@newscenter.org

Tell Us What You Think: editor@newscenter.org

Copyrighted 1997-2000 All Rights Reserved. Common Dreams. www.commondreams.org